View Poll Results: Best and worst career out of Chan, Lambiel, Joubert, Lysacek, Tak

Voters
207. You may not vote on this poll
  • Chan best career, Lysacek worst

    29 14.01%
  • Chan best career, Joubert worst

    32 15.46%
  • Chan best career, Takahashi worst

    7 3.38%
  • Lambiel best career, Lysacek worst

    31 14.98%
  • Lambiel best career, Joubert worst

    12 5.80%
  • Lambiel best career, Takahashi worst

    4 1.93%
  • Takahashi best career, Lysacek worst

    32 15.46%
  • Takahashi best career, Joubert worst

    5 2.42%
  • Lysacek best career, Takahashi or Lambiel worst

    8 3.86%
  • Lysacek best career, Joubert worst

    31 14.98%
  • Joubert best career, Takahashi or Lambiel worst

    2 0.97%
  • Joubert best career, Lysacek worst

    14 6.76%
Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast
Results 81 to 100 of 122
  1. #81
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    582
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by shine View Post
    But he had an amazing qualifying and electrifying SP. Yes, that was during the days when skaters still to skate 2 LPs in a championship, which makes the competition even tougher IMO.
    Yeah, and it was really not common to see skaters actually win worlds with brilliant performances in all 3 phases of competition.

  2. #82

    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    4,317
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Lambiel came pretty close in 2006. I know he wasn't completely clean in the SP, but I loved that program and performance.

  3. #83
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    582
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Not all the QR performances on readily available on youtube, but I think Yagudin in 2002 and Plushenko in 2001 (maybe 2003 also) were probably the cleanest all-around worlds performances I remember that included 3 phases. (probably why they're not in this poll lol)

  4. #84

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    4,758
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by moviechicko_o View Post
    Yeah, and it was really not common to see skaters actually win worlds with brilliant performances in all 3 phases of competition.
    Quote Originally Posted by shine View Post
    Lambiel came pretty close in 2006. I know he wasn't completely clean in the SP, but I loved that program and performance.
    Without his QR advantage, Lambiel would have won silver at 2006 Worlds.

    I think all five men have done a lot in their careers but in different ways, and there's no point in comparing Lambiel's artistic achievements, Chan's technical mastery, Joubert's consistent podium finishes at major events, Lycasek winning everything there is to win and Dai's all-around wizardry and impact in Japan. Certainly I'm not going to call any of them the worst. Not even Lysacek

  5. #85
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    56
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Zemgirl View Post
    Without his QR advantage, Lambiel would have won silver at 2006 Worlds.
    Only due to a bogus < on Lambiel's triple axel, and outrageous PCS. Joubert with equal PCS to Lambiel, yeah right.

  6. #86

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    4,758
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by beyoncerocks View Post
    Only due to a bogus < on Lambiel's triple axel, and outrageous PCS. Joubert with equal PCS to Lambiel, yeah right.
    Perhaps you can point it out in the protocols? Because tech panels weren't really picky when it came to technical issues back then.

    Joubert skated well in 2006, and PCS tended to be lower in the first years of the IJS, with less differentiation between top skaters. Anyway, the point isn't whether the scoring was correct, only that the QR ended up being the difference.

  7. #87
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    56
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Well thank god it did since Joubert winning over Lambiel how he skated would have been another scandal for the sport. Here are the protocals and as you can see the downgrade:

    http://www.isuresults.com/results/wc..._FS_scores.pdf

    Which was never justified or even possible:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F893u_lTNVw

  8. #88

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    4,758
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Joubert skated well. Lambiel skated well. Neither of them winning would have been a scandal by any stretch of the imagination. And is there really any need to rehash 2006 Worlds, of all things?

    Given that tech panels were not as strict back in 2006, I'll assume that the replays they saw supported a downgrade.

  9. #89

    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    4,317
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Zemgirl View Post
    Without his QR advantage, Lambiel would have won silver at 2006 Worlds.
    I'm not sure what you are trying to say? Without the QR, SP or LP advantage, many skaters would not have won gold in various competitions.

    I thought the tech panels were pretty harsh about downgrades back then? Weren't people always complaining about how triples got downgraded AND would receive negative GOEs as badly done doubles? Lambiel's axel in the LP looked clean to me (less than 45 degree underroated).
    Last edited by shine; 03-11-2014 at 09:20 PM.

  10. #90
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    692
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Zemgirl View Post
    And is there really any need to rehash 2006 Worlds, of all things?
    You are the one who brought up the 2006 worlds and Lambiel supposably being lucky to win a title the whole world thinks he clearly won.

  11. #91

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    4,758
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I don't recall a lot of downgrades back in the early years of the IJS, but it was so long ago, who knows

    Quote Originally Posted by KimGOAT View Post
    You are the one who brought up the 2006 worlds and Lambiel supposably being lucky to win a title the whole world thinks he clearly won.
    No, I did not bring that up. I responded to a post suggesting that Lambiel in 2006 was the closest to having brilliant in all three parts of a three-stage competition by noting that it was a bit more complicated than that. This does not imply that he should not have won, or that the QR should not have been counted, etc. etc. The rules back then called for three segments, Lambiel was the best over three segments. But he was not the best in each of the three segments, which kind of runs counter to the original point I was responding to.

  12. #92

    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    4,317
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Ah, but I was responding to moviechick's post: "Yeah, and it was really not common to see skaters actually win worlds with brilliant performances in all 3 phases of competition."

    She didn't say winning with "the best" performances in all 3 phases or being 1st in all 3, but "brilliant performances", which I thought Stephane did.

  13. #93

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    4,758
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by shine View Post
    Ah, but I was respondign to moviechicko's post: "Yeah, and it was really not common to see skaters actually win worlds with brilliant performances in all 3 phases of competition."

    She didn't say winning with "the best" performances in all 3 phases or being 1st in all 3, but "brilliant performances", which I thought Stephane did.
    I know, but I felt it was debatable. The actual result I have no problem with. Personally I liked his 2007 programs better, but obviously he didn't perform them as well as he could have in Tokyo.

    Anyway, I'm glad that both Lambiel and Joubert won world titles. I think that's a fair reflection of their careers and what they did in skating.

  14. #94
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    101
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I can't really bring myself to vote for any of these men as having the worst career, but I'm actually surprised at how many chose Evan as having the worst. He's my least favorite skater of the lot, but to me he's had the most satisfying career. He's basically won everything there was to win and probably has no regrets, unlike some of these other guys on the list - that's gotta count for something.

    Plus, he's the only one in this poll who will (for now anyway) go down in history as OGM. The Olympics may be overrated, but I'll bet good money Chan would be willing to trade at least 2 of his World titles for that OGM (perhaps the two he won controversially?) - like it or not, it IS the ultimate, most coveted prize for most skaters, and I for one do value it over a couple (even a few) world titles (PS. I think Aliona Savchenko agrees with me on that one).

  15. #95
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    692
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I dont think Evan is completely satisfied with his career. If he did he wouldnt have tried so hard to come back, even against the odds. If anything Lambiel, Takahashi, Chan, and Joubert all seem more satisfied as they are all retiring on their own terms, and dont seem desperate to have something more to prove. Evan seemed too desperate to carry out an ultimately no hoper comeback for me to believe he is so satisfied with his career as you believe.

    There are some people (not most but a few) who think Michelle Kwan still had a better career than Yu Na Kim despite that Kim trumps her not only at the Olympics but everywhere but one event (Worlds). Well if that is the case then pretty much everyone should think Evan who is trumped by all these guys everywhere but the Olympics (again one event, even if the biggest) hasnt had a better career than any of them.

    I dont think Chan would trade his 2 of his world titles for the Olympic Gold. Maybe if they were spread out more, but as it is winning 3 World titles in a row followed by an Olympic silver is a bigger legacy than winning say the 2011 worlds and 2014 Olympics would ever be. It is a sign of true dominance, something none of these others ever enjoyed. He won almost everything there was to win this quad and will go down as the dominant skater of the quad, despite "only" the Olympic silver. Evan will not go down as the dominant skater of the 2007-2010 quad. That already shows Chan has clearly had the better career, and probably the best of all these guys, like him or not. Lambiel and Takahashi also werent the dominant skater of any quad, but they were alteast big forces over two different quads while you only think of Evan as even a force in the post Turin quad, despite his out of nowhere bronze at the bizarre 2005 worlds.

  16. #96
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    582
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Satisfaction could be more monetary related though not necessarily career. We all know figure skating is at an ebb in the US and for an American male skater, it's not as easy to just retire comfortably as it used to be. Certainly not the way skaters in Europe and Asia can these days.

  17. #97
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    with my Sestra Helena plotting how to ravish Hot Paul and delicious Cal
    Age
    36
    Posts
    3,259
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Meteorlight View Post
    I can't really bring myself to vote for any of these men as having the worst career, but I'm actually surprised at how many chose Evan as having the worst.
    Yes, it is pretty shocking that the poll reflects that Lysacek had a "poorer" career than Joubert. Brian is clearly getting longevity and hottie votes. The porny appreciating public has spoken.

  18. #98
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Age
    23
    Posts
    13,257
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    It seems most think Lysacek or Joubert had the poorest career. I am surprised more dont think Takahashi had the worst. In terms of just results it would probably be him. He has an Olympic medal but it is only a bronze. Joubert has so many World medals and European medals. I think you could argue any of those three as having the least excellent (I prefer that term, poor is ridiculous for any of them) career of these five, but my choice would probably be Takahashi as the least excellent, moreso than Lysacek or Joubert.

  19. #99
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    4,890
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I went with Evan best, as he's the only one who got the ogm, plus a world title and is somewhat lucky to have both being not the most naturally talented skater.

    I picked Brian for worst as he has no oly medals at all, only one wc and really stagnated toward the end, perhaps just staying in too long. He also seemed the most "just a jumper" out of this bunch.

    I'd put Patrick in second as he has an oly silver and 3 WC titles plus all that talent. Dai comes in 3rd as he has less hardware than chan, better artistry IMHO, but also had a bit of that Joubert "stayed beyond his prime" vibe going.

  20. #100
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    473
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    In terms of 'Career', the ranking is Chan, Lysacek, Lambiel, Takahashi, and Joubert. In terms of delivery (actual performances, skating level, and should-be titles rather than official titles), Lysacek and Takahashi should swap spots.

Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •