Page 12 of 51 FirstFirst ... 2101112131422 ... LastLast
Results 221 to 240 of 1012
  1. #221
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    456
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I am in no way endorsing the crazy blog...but, like a bad gossip magazine, i do read it every now and again... and I have to say the Meryl/Charlie and Tessa/Scott comparisons are actually pretty interesting on there right now. Not sure what has made him or her change her tune against the wild personal speculations, but I liked the past few posts about twizzles!

  2. #222

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    8,563
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by HSGP21 View Post
    I am in no way endorsing the crazy blog...but, like a bad gossip magazine, i do read it every now and again... and I have to say the Meryl/Charlie and Tessa/Scott comparisons are actually pretty interesting on there right now. Not sure what has made him or her change her tune against the wild personal speculations, but I liked the past few posts about twizzles!
    Really? Maybe she need to send this to ISU.

  3. #223

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,852
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Golightly View Post
    Like I said, I'm all for it. If only for the debate possibilities! How to go about it, though?
    I sort of have an idea with others. Will PM you later.

  4. #224
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    The airport
    Posts
    1,240
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I have never visited the famous blog, but could you share with us what was said about the twizzles? I am curious.

  5. #225
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    1,124
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Golightly View Post
    I have never visited the famous blog, but could you share with us what was said about the twizzles? I am curious.
    They have a bunch of gifs up from the last few seasons comparing the twizzles of D&W and V&M. What you see is basically what many of us here have been seeing. They do the same thing with little variation program after program, year after year whereas V&M change it up and add you can see how they change the twizzle element to compliment their theme and choreography, not just repeat the same element. It's actually quite interesting to watch to be honest. It would be interesting to see similar done with all the other elements and quite the eye opener for those who haven't figured this out on their own.

    I think this is a big part of the reason behind the frustration we saw V&M go through last season. They know what they are doing, what they are trying, and it just simply isn't being rewarded or appreciated by the judges. The ISU really needs to address this. We've already lost the CD's but the current trend to reward what D&W do over V&M will ruin this discipline.

  6. #226
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Age
    47
    Posts
    8,165
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Golightly View Post
    Carmen, I do not disagree. I think you misunderstood what I meant. I am not happy about the way the season went, I think V-M deserved better. They had outstanding material that, for some reason, was never truly embraced by the judges. On that I agree with you completely.

    Now, that is one thing. My personal enjoyment of both programs is another. My happiness has nothing to do with their results, I am not asking anyone to feel happy because they lost. I am saying that I am glad that they decided to be ambitious and I am thankful to them for giving us these two incredible programs this season because I, as a fan of the sport, can appreciate what they tried to and, yes, succeeded to do.
    ......
    Golightly, thanks for that post and for clarifying (also another thank you to walei).

    It's true that despite the fact that things didn't end the way we would have wished (they way they arguably should have) I am glad that we were given V&M/Jennifer Swan's version of Carmen. True that when the dust clears, this program could/should be their signature program. I do feel that having been able to bring their Carmen into the competitive arena was important. V&M were getting criticized for always doing the lush, romantic themed dances. With Carmen, Tessa and Scott proved they were capable of taking it to another level. They did that in the past with the Pink Floyd FD and this year they built on that and then some.

    I am understanding the sentiment behind the being happy to have seen the Carmen FD a little bit better now. Thank you guys for that.

    I have to admit that I'm just so undone by the issues V&M are having that at times, I haven't been able to properly separate the two things (judging issues vs personal enjoyment). ITA that I never would have imagined that a team like V&M would have been so easy to railroad and for the ISU/USFS to make it seem as if this is a team who can barely keep up with D&W and are beginning to fall behind.

    Even with B&A in the past while I still feel that they (Tanith) were a bit underrated. B&A IMO were never as horrible as people made them to be. However, I do acknowledge that they did leave an opening or two for people to find fault and mark them down.

    With V&M as others have stated, this is a team who seemed to have all their bases covered; no opeinings there or at least not many that were glaring. The Carmen FD was just the icing on top of the cake that made them into a complete package. It's unreal that people can watch them skate especially without the mistakes and see faults everywhere.

    Like gerbil, I'm not convinced that it's all innocent; a case of the ISU simply being in one of those periods in which they want something different than what they had been emphasizing as good skating/icedancing pre-Vancouver. I feel that there are politics at work here as well.

    Quote Originally Posted by Golightly View Post

    ......Of course it is unfair that two mistakes on the short dance saw them more than three points behind. That was not necessary and the fact that most of the gap came from GOE and PCS is even more infuriating, I understand that. Of course it is not fair that, again, the subjective marks were the difference in the free dance.

    It is not that V-M’s programs need to be polished since the very beginning, they never are! And, hey, that’s logical: they like to work their programs because most of their material is new. My problem is that the biggest effort isn’t being rewarded. Let me explain: anyone who competes at a high level is a hard worker, but not all hard workers make the same effort, correct? Now, Carmen and The Waltz Goes On were VERY difficult programs structurally speaking. If you create a program from scratch with new lifts and steps, that is going to take a while to perfect. Both programs were pretty much set by Nationals. The USFSA gave monster scores to D-W; Skate Canada asked V-M to work on a few things. Did that send a message? I wonder. But what happened next makes me think V-M were on track to win, they had a marvelous first skate a 4CC. They had momentum there, beating D-W in the short dance and then Tessa’s injury happened. That, I think, gave the judges the perfect out. Looking back, maybe Pani was right and they shouldn’t have made that trip, maybe they should’ve stayed home. I don’t know. My point is that momentum was lost after Four Continents. I, naively perhaps, thought the judges weren’t going to let that affect their perception of their programs at Worlds, but it did and that is unacceptable. I can’t, for the life of me, find a 3.25-point between the Waltz Goes On and Giselle. Not when D-W didn’t even level 4 the entire thing. It was, indeed, a cleaner skate, but it was not perfect. V-M’s skate wasn’t as terrible as the numbers imply. So, you see, there are little details that do not quite add up because most fall on the subjective marks.

    ....But not even that disappointment will make me think that their efforts were pointless or aimless. I got those programs. And, sure, I am a nobody in the figure skating world, my opinion doesn’t really change anything, but still, I truly did appreciate the programs and I am happy they took those risks.
    Excellent post.

    The reason you can't find a 3.25 point different between Giselle and V&M's Waltz was because IMHO there wasn't one. Don't get me wrong, just like the SD at the GPF last season I had no issue with D&W winning the SD. My issue was the huge point spread that basically cost V&M the chance to try and fairly win the FD and the title overall. IIRC, the change to CoP was supposed to do away with those types of situations. That a team ends up out of contention after the first portion of the competition. In the other disciplines in the past we've even seen skaters make up huge point totals but not in icedance. I think that the structure of Carmen is such that with the performance V&M had Saturday they could have made up those 3.25 points in levels and GOE points but that just doesn't happen in this discipline. But with the D&W vs V&M "rivalry" we've seen that pattern established before. When D&W win the SD it's almost always by such a large margin that the competition has effectively end before the FD has even taken place. When V&M have come ahead in the SD it's usually by a much smaller margin. It's as if the judges are leaving the door open, making sure that D&W have the opening they need should they skate well. And for D&W, it seems skating well means no major falls or issues with lifts but they are allowed numerious bobbles. Those get ignored.

  7. #227
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    424
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Can I just remind people in light of the usual B&K bashing that what they experienced competitively was unprecedented harassment from some members of the figure skating community - it wasn't just the whispers of 'leg line', 'speed', or whatever else was the popular critique of the day, it was the crazy Aunt crashing the press conference, the obnoxious official forcing them to jump the boards just to compete and the arrogant official arranging for them to finish back in the CDs and then smugly telling all and sundry about it so it would reach their ear. Of course SC supported them publicly - why would they not? Of course Canadians supported them - why would they not? That constant belittling undermined their confidence in competition, it undermined trust in the judging system, but most of all it diminished figure skating in the sporting world. Maybe if the ISU had tried to root out the bad apples then, it wouldn't have blown up in their face in 2002. And it was a judge that cheated, not S&P. People will always have their personal preferences, but all that stuff that went on meant B&K never really got to compete on a level playing field or show us if they indeed could have won some of those big competitions. So if SC or fans don't appear to be providing the kind of support to V&M that B&K got, well I'm sure they learned that it would only make things worse. And I worry for V&M because of the fact that they consistently aren't getting the GOE marks, and I can see on the various boards that there's a concerted effort to diminish their skating after every competition, such as the constant 'he messed up his twizzle' or 'she nearly took Scott out with her twizzle'. Those appear to me to be staged remarks to define the narrative before the discussion has even begun. And the promotion of D&W's skills as perfect, flawless even when it isn't and the sky high marks. I particularly don't like that some of it's coming from the USFSA. IMO the dangerous politicking is on the rise again.

  8. #228
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    34
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Just my opinion here - I don't think the USFSA is as politicking as much for Meryl and Charlie as much as you all are making it out to me - the promotion, the interviews, etc.

    Over the course of this season in particular, I think they have been promoting Ashley Wagner and Gracie Gold A TON more in fact. USFSA has been looking for that ladies star that they've been lacking since the days of Michelle Kwan and Sasha Cohen and are desperately promoting both of them, since the ladies are the discipline is the "glamour" discipline and bring in the ratings. From the coverage of US Nationals, Gracie got the big NBC fluff piece and Ashley got the largest picture on the promotional poster. D/W would've been dropped like hot cakes if Ashley or Gracie medalled this year at Worlds and no doubt Ashley and Gracie are going promoted a lot more than D/W going into Sochi.

  9. #229
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    822
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Subway View Post
    What you've just said struck me. I'd like to comment.

    That's a list of very different skaters. Some are more deserving of "fight" than others. To come at the situation with a list as if we're always screwed and here's the list is something that can be used against you or anyone who has that feeling.

    For instance. Elvis Stoiko is a multiple world champion, right? He could jump. He was slow, and he couldn't spin to save his life. His big calling card was he had a very macho, masculine style that was popular. It positioned him against Mr. Puffy Shirt Alexei Urmanov who represented a lot of what makes people uncomfortable with men figure skating - silly looking moves, puffy shirts, trilly music. Yet Urmanov was a more complete skater than Stoiko and he had the jumps. He's not as crowd pleasing, but that's a style issue.

    The Stoiko versus "Someone Else" debate was often about what Stoiko represented, even more than the skating. But if he were Russian it would be a Plushenko thing "He can only jump."

    Sale & Pelletier I was not a fan. The original result in 2002 was correct. To me Bereshznaya and Sikhuerlidze have more in common with Virtue Moir than Sale & Pelletier, especially in how 2002 was handled and the media manipulated.

    I would never fight for Bourne & Kratz. Virtue Moir - every day and twice on Sundays. Very different teams. One is in a different league than the other, and a different league than everyone skating today. That wasn't the case with Bourne & Kratz. They deserved to be in the mix and they were, and they have a World title. Did they deserve more?

    Long story short. Defend figure skating, not figure skaters or "our figure skaters." Fans of Virtue and Moir are fans of the best ice dancers in the world today. They don't belong on a list of skaters who may or may not have deserved to do better. At least not that list.

    I don't think I'm being clear but it's more than fandom. It's important to make distinctions and focus on why Virtue and Moir deserve our support and deserve a loud defense. It's because they are the best skaters. That's what we're defending when we defend them.
    For the record I wasn't implying that all these skaters deserved defending and I certainly haven't defended them all. I just know the media has gone to bat for them (with the exception of maybe Jeff, and not so much Patrick but time will tell) and I know what the perception is out there of some, that Canada seems to 'complain' a lot and it pains me that we may have to go through this again, even though as you say for V/M I'd do it all day every day. That's why I was hoping some 'outsiders' would jump on board. As I said in V/M case I never thought it would ever come to this, and no they don't belong on some list I was just using it as how it may be perceived by some 'here we go again Canada?' They are to damn brilliant and shouldn't need defending, look at them judges! It certainly is more than fandom, it's defending what's good for this sport. Sorry if I didn't make that clear and I hope I am now.

  10. #230

    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    In Canuck Land, hey!
    Age
    56
    Posts
    3,781
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by skatingfan12 View Post
    Just my opinion here - I don't think the USFSA is as politicking as much for Meryl and Charlie as much as you all are making it out to me - the promotion, the interviews, etc.

    Over the course of this season in particular, I think they have been promoting Ashley Wagner and Gracie Gold A TON more in fact. USFSA has been looking for that ladies star that they've been lacking since the days of Michelle Kwan and Sasha Cohen and are desperately promoting both of them, since the ladies are the discipline is the "glamour" discipline and bring in the ratings. From the coverage of US Nationals, Gracie got the big NBC fluff piece and Ashley got the largest picture on the promotional poster. D/W would've been dropped like hot cakes if Ashley or Gracie medalled this year at Worlds and no doubt Ashley and Gracie are going promoted a lot more than D/W going into Sochi.
    Actually, I think this past season, the US DID politic a great deal, especially compared to other years, for D/W because they were likely their only real shot at a medal. And most of the comments coming from that PR animal were rather sly ones. None of this pointing a finger and coming right out and saying what you mean -- like Pasha with B/K for instance. No, it was what I would call "side-ways" talking. It's a term I used with some of my family when they want something but instead of coming right out and saying what they mean, they just sorta hint and I'm supposed to pick up on it. Fortunately for me, I've gotten used to their "short-handed" talk. To me, this is precisely what took place -- hints and innuendo.

    For instance, D/W would never say something like "we wuz robbed, we're the rightful winners". Instead they come up with "we had many fans come up and tell us that they felt we were the winners". One tells you like it is, the other insinuates. And it was that way for most of the season. Tessa had to stop with a cramp at 4CC, as well all know. So when asked how she is, she replies that she's fine, it was just a cramp, something temporary, likely caused by over training. A straightforward answer! How was all that interpreted by US media and the uber D/W fans around here?

    We know the answer to that question don't we -- hey Davey boy? The insinuations that they stopped:
    1) they needed a rest so they could then beat D/W. Puhlease!
    2) there was no injury, they just wanted a break
    3) looks mighty suspicious that they needed a break yet AGAIN; didn't that happen before when they were afraid of losing to D/W.

    Then, even after Tessa tells us that she's OK, more speculation that
    1) it was faked all along
    2) it was more than just a cramp and she's still not recovered.

    What is the response from the D/W camp and their media coverage -- we're healthy and we've never felt better and our training is going extremely well (or words to that effect), we're ready for Worlds. Oh yeah, I forgot about the we have a newfoundconnection and it shows in our skating and off the ice too. Hmmm, yeah, whatever.

    And then what really got my eyes rolling -- the article in a fricking CANADIAN local paper about Meryl's Canadian family and her ties to the local area (aka near London, but actually closer to where I live). I couldn't believe my eyes. A full page about Meryl and her Canadian ties. Give.me.a.break. Yeah, there were a number of articles in the same rag about V/M but was there any articles about anyone else who apparently has "family" ties that are Canadian. NOPE. Were there any articles solely about the main rival of one of our gold medal contenders who were from another country -- like something about Dai or Fernandez or Hanyu compared to Chan. NOPE. So why the hell was there one about D/W? If that isn't a form of politicking, then I'd sincerely like to know what is.

    Like it said, very little was said directly from the inner circles but there sure was a lot of lip flapping going on by the U.S. media.
    Crazy about sports!

  11. #231
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    42
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by HSGP21 View Post
    I am in no way endorsing the crazy blog...but, like a bad gossip magazine, i do read it every now and again... and I have to say the Meryl/Charlie and Tessa/Scott comparisons are actually pretty interesting on there right now. Not sure what has made him or her change her tune against the wild personal speculations, but I liked the past few posts about twizzles!
    I don't think he/she has changed his/her tune on the "personal" stuff and there will be lots more to come on that, I am sure. However, he/she clearly knows ice-dance. Please don't hate me for saying this but he/she is doing a comparison including gifs of the 2 teams and he/she is bang on. In the comments section there is a lot of opinion and analysis of all aspects of ice-dance and it is all accurate. I hate the premise of that blog but I too go there to snoop. I hope you guys don't kick me out......

  12. #232
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    287
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by professordeb View Post
    Actually, I think this past season, the US DID politic a great deal, especially compared to other years, for D/W because they were likely their only real shot at a medal. And most of the comments coming from that PR animal were rather sly ones. None of this pointing a finger and coming right out and saying what you mean -- like Pasha with B/K for instance. No, it was what I would call "side-ways" talking. It's a term I used with some of my family when they want something but instead of coming right out and saying what they mean, they just sorta hint and I'm supposed to pick up on it. Fortunately for me, I've gotten used to their "short-handed" talk. To me, this is precisely what took place -- hints and innuendo.

    For instance, D/W would never say something like "we wuz robbed, we're the rightful winners". Instead they come up with "we had many fans come up and tell us that they felt we were the winners". One tells you like it is, the other insinuates. And it was that way for most of the season. Tessa had to stop with a cramp at 4CC, as well all know. So when asked how she is, she replies that she's fine, it was just a cramp, something temporary, likely caused by over training. A straightforward answer! How was all that interpreted by US media and the uber D/W fans around here?

    We know the answer to that question don't we -- hey Davey boy? The insinuations that they stopped:
    1) they needed a rest so they could then beat D/W. Puhlease!
    2) there was no injury, they just wanted a break
    3) looks mighty suspicious that they needed a break yet AGAIN; didn't that happen before when they were afraid of losing to D/W.

    Then, even after Tessa tells us that she's OK, more speculation that
    1) it was faked all along
    2) it was more than just a cramp and she's still not recovered.

    What is the response from the D/W camp and their media coverage -- we're healthy and we've never felt better and our training is going extremely well (or words to that effect), we're ready for Worlds. Oh yeah, I forgot about the we have a newfoundconnection and it shows in our skating and off the ice too. Hmmm, yeah, whatever.

    And then what really got my eyes rolling -- the article in a fricking CANADIAN local paper about Meryl's Canadian family and her ties to the local area (aka near London, but actually closer to where I live). I couldn't believe my eyes. A full page about Meryl and her Canadian ties. Give.me.a.break. Yeah, there were a number of articles in the same rag about V/M but was there any articles about anyone else who apparently has "family" ties that are Canadian. NOPE. Were there any articles solely about the main rival of one of our gold medal contenders who were from another country -- like something about Dai or Fernandez or Hanyu compared to Chan. NOPE. So why the hell was there one about D/W? If that isn't a form of politicking, then I'd sincerely like to know what is.

    Like it said, very little was said directly from the inner circles but there sure was a lot of lip flapping going on by the U.S. media.
    But some of it was direct, wasn't it?
    Wasn't there an article about the lack of connection between V&M and something about them not having the best lines?

  13. #233

    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    In Canuck Land, hey!
    Age
    56
    Posts
    3,781
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ddtpdx View Post
    But some of it was direct, wasn't it?
    Wasn't there an article about the lack of connection between V&M and something about them not having the best lines?
    You know what, there might have been but there was just so much of it out there that I wouldn't want to say yes and then have some D/W uber come in here, read it and then go post in the D/W thread that not only are we wrong about the USFSA politicking for D/W, but we're actually wrong about anything we say negative about them. We're just a bunch of whiners, busily wringing our hands over the fact that our team lost - to a better one. HA!
    Crazy about sports!

  14. #234
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    34
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by professordeb View Post
    Actually, I think this past season, the US DID politic a great deal, especially compared to other years, for D/W because they were likely their only real shot at a medal. And most of the comments coming from that PR animal were rather sly ones. None of this pointing a finger and coming right out and saying what you mean -- like Pasha with B/K for instance. No, it was what I would call "side-ways" talking. It's a term I used with some of my family when they want something but instead of coming right out and saying what they mean, they just sorta hint and I'm supposed to pick up on it. Fortunately for me, I've gotten used to their "short-handed" talk. To me, this is precisely what took place -- hints and innuendo.

    For instance, D/W would never say something like "we wuz robbed, we're the rightful winners". Instead they come up with "we had many fans come up and tell us that they felt we were the winners". One tells you like it is, the other insinuates. And it was that way for most of the season. Tessa had to stop with a cramp at 4CC, as well all know. So when asked how she is, she replies that she's fine, it was just a cramp, something temporary, likely caused by over training. A straightforward answer! How was all that interpreted by US media and the uber D/W fans around here?

    We know the answer to that question don't we -- hey Davey boy? The insinuations that they stopped:
    1) they needed a rest so they could then beat D/W. Puhlease!
    2) there was no injury, they just wanted a break
    3) looks mighty suspicious that they needed a break yet AGAIN; didn't that happen before when they were afraid of losing to D/W.

    Then, even after Tessa tells us that she's OK, more speculation that
    1) it was faked all along
    2) it was more than just a cramp and she's still not recovered.

    What is the response from the D/W camp and their media coverage -- we're healthy and we've never felt better and our training is going extremely well (or words to that effect), we're ready for Worlds. Oh yeah, I forgot about the we have a newfoundconnection and it shows in our skating and off the ice too. Hmmm, yeah, whatever.

    And then what really got my eyes rolling -- the article in a fricking CANADIAN local paper about Meryl's Canadian family and her ties to the local area (aka near London, but actually closer to where I live). I couldn't believe my eyes. A full page about Meryl and her Canadian ties. Give.me.a.break. Yeah, there were a number of articles in the same rag about V/M but was there any articles about anyone else who apparently has "family" ties that are Canadian. NOPE. Were there any articles solely about the main rival of one of our gold medal contenders who were from another country -- like something about Dai or Fernandez or Hanyu compared to Chan. NOPE. So why the hell was there one about D/W? If that isn't a form of politicking, then I'd sincerely like to know what is.

    Like it said, very little was said directly from the inner circles but there sure was a lot of lip flapping going on by the U.S. media.

    I think what you are saying about what USFSA does and does not say is being blown way out of proportion. All of the comments said about negative comments Tessa's leg cramp were from fans with an opinion, not from sports journalists. Dave ISN'T a member of the US media or journalist - he's simply a fan with a figure skating blog who can speculate or say whatever he wants. None of the US media even discuss figure skating with the exception of Phil Hersh, who if you read his tweets or articles about skating, know that he could care less about D/W, because the US wants a female star so he's promotes Gracie Gold quite a bit and brings up every negative about all the other ladies or men.

    D/W are extremely-media trained, almost to the point where I expect stock answers from them and comments from them are the same all the time. That answer D/W gave at their pre-Worlds interview - "We're healthy and strong. We're training extremely hard and it's going well. We're ready to give it our all," is practically the same answer they've given at every pre-Worlds interview since they've come through the senior ranks. If you were to go back to those articles, I think you'll see that's been the case. I don't see how that's backhanded comments towards Tessa and Scott, unless someone really, really wants to stretch beyond their wildest imaginations.

  15. #235
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    449
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ddtpdx View Post
    But some of it was direct, wasn't it?
    Wasn't there an article about the lack of connection between V&M and something about them not having the best lines?
    It was this article from the USFSA's Icenetwork.com.

  16. #236
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,332
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    So many great discussions you guys

    I just want to chime in on the reusing old element discussion. If V/M can handle it I definitely wish they still up their ante and churn out new elements and new lifts for next year. Then oone of two things may happen:

    1) D/W still use more or less the same elements for what now, six years in a row? This is great weapon for politiking (we just gotta find a way to convince the frustrating SC to step it up). There have already been many opinions that Notre Dame is basically PotO. If supposedly they want to keep this #newfoundconnection would it translate well into other musical themes? If they skate again to a powerful music full of O faces and fake angst would the judges be finally bored with them? Perhaps.

    2) D/W also bring new elements, and then we can see how well they adjust to their training and programs. V/M and D/W would be more on equal grounds in terms of preparedness and will really test D/W in a situation that I will bank on V/M any day of the week even with the apparent judging bias. Which also brings out my speculation that why they changed from La Strada to DF and supposedly Sinatra to Notre Dame...

    On the other hand both V/M and D/W both recycle elements, which I would hate to see because, well this is going to sound really bad but with all due respect to D/W, I don't want V/M stoop to D/W's level as elite ice dance competitors. And this would give even more power for more politking and hearsay against V/M.

    "Hey look Tessa is probably still in pain and couldn't train as much so they have to reuse elements"
    "ANOTHER romantic sappy program from V/M? One trick pony"

    You get the jist.

    I think a ballet would be the perfect choice for V/M next year, playing up Tessa's dancing strength and the Olympics being in Russia.

  17. #237
    Banned Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    forever wishing i had access to the crack TAT smoked when she said D/W should've won 2012 worlds ;)
    Posts
    420
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by aka_gerbil View Post
    ITA Cherub. I would add, like a lot of things, D/W's crispness is partly illusion. The fact that they don't hold their lines and moves or use much in the way of sustained movements, it makes them look more crisp, but what V/M are doing is actually harder. I think, for the record, that once V/M learn their new moves, their execution is just as crisp. Besides, there's more to exectuion than crispness. There is cleanliness as well, and V/M are far, far cleaner in their execution.

    And, yes, the fact that many of D/W's elements are so old, the fact that they have fewer transitions, and that their program construction is odd (e.g., three lifts in a row at the end) makes things a lot easier on them.



    I also agree with wanting them to have something that's just theirs. There is Mahler, but a lot of people also associate that with G/G since Katia did the piece after Sergei's death. Like you, I also don't care if it's romantic or what genre it's from.
    d/w werent crisp at all in their sd. the judges were very generous to give them a lvl 3 instead of a level 2 because their first pattern looked like shit.
    in addition their programs are so cookie cutter.

    Quote Originally Posted by pani View Post
    What do you think about Anna Karenina?
    music from the movie's ost?

    While I disagree that D&W's FD's are masterpieces and that they deserved to win Worlds last season, their fans say otherwise. And while I don't read the D&W thread, I've seen comments in other threads. Those fans were livid and spoke up. They weren't happy just to have witnessed what they thought were great programs and the medals didn't matter. The same for the other teams who people have perceived as ripped off. W&P last season had a FD that really touched people and while those folks enjoyed that FD, again they spoke out against what they felt was an unfair placement at Worlds. Only V&M and their fans seem to be forced to throw in the towel in a way and say placements don't matter as long as we get to see them skate.
    idk about you but i'm making sure im bring vocal

    Quote Originally Posted by volunteer View Post
    You're funny . . . but you forgot about developping a newfoundconnection.
    they try too hard when it comes to trying to connect with eachother
    for example: http://24.media.tumblr.com/31b6874f9...v07ko3_500.gif

    Quote Originally Posted by Golightly View Post
    But I would like to see these things discussed on the media. No one debates about figure skating anymore these days and when they do it is about: "OMG, Voir are so perfect, they're, like, so boring. And Tessa is, like, heavy while Merlie are, like, so exciting and OMG, their hair is SO pretty! And Patrick Chan fell again and he WON, thank god Canada didn't cheat in dance too."
    oh god LMAO i just say a post on tumblr that said almost the exact thing you said.
    like if they think v/m arent exciting or too slow, maybe they should be watching speed skating instead of ice dance

    Quote Originally Posted by aka_gerbil View Post



    Forget the Virtue "French Family." The now have a "Russian Family." Pani, you can loan them some relatives for this correct?


    Absolutely. I've talked about reasons to change coaches already today, but you bring up an excellent point that D/W are copying so much that have made V/M so sucessful. Seriously, D/W just say they have the same thing that V/M do and then suddenly, they have that trait too, even if it's not evident in their skating. V/M are not benefitting AT ALL from D/W seeing every move they make. No, D/W can't do what V/M can on ice, but they're still controlling the rhetoric in the press and part of it is coming from the fact that they (D/W) always know what's up with V/M. One example: There are rumors floating around that Tessa's been dealing with an ankle injury. In their pre-worlds press conference, D/W made it a talking point about how healthy they are. D/W do not need to be privy to that sort of information that they can feed to the press and their fed for purposes of politicking against V/M. If V/M are having injury issues, confidence issues, come up with something new that's really cool, choose to emphasize this, that, or the other, or whatever else is going on, D/W do not need to know it. If they know it, it just gets used against V/M. Not cool
    wow talk about taking advantage of V/M'S injury and adding salt to the wound
    what shit 'friends' d/w are to v/m

    Quote Originally Posted by skatingfan12 View Post

    D/W are extremely-media trained, almost to the point where I expect stock answers from them and comments from them are the same all the time. That answer D/W gave at their pre-Worlds interview - "We're healthy and strong. We're training extremely hard and it's going well. We're ready to give it our all," is practically the same answer they've given at every pre-Worlds interview since they've come through the senior ranks. If you were to go back to those articles, I think you'll see that's been the case. I don't see how that's backhanded comments towards Tessa and Scott, unless someone really, really wants to stretch beyond their wildest imaginations.
    i think it is
    its just said in a really subtle way

  18. #238
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,749
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by manhn View Post
    When people say Mahler, what other skaters would people be thinking about?

    Or Funny Face? Heh.

    I'm pretty confident that Marina will choose a classical piece that is romantic, but probably not as ethereal as Mahler.
    Or their Latin FD music which was stolen by like 10 teams the next season lol

  19. #239
    Banned Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    forever wishing i had access to the crack TAT smoked when she said D/W should've won 2012 worlds ;)
    Posts
    420
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Macassar88 View Post
    Or their Latin FD music which was stolen by like 10 teams the next season lol
    dont forget the twizzles!

    how unfortunate

  20. #240
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    The airport
    Posts
    1,240
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Oh, I remember the twizzles! Didn't two teams try to do the circular twizzles too?

    Speaking of elements I wish they recycled, those twizzles are perhaps top of my list together with the serpentine lift on Pink Floyd.

Page 12 of 51 FirstFirst ... 2101112131422 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •