Page 6 of 16 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 120 of 313
  1. #101
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    452
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by dinakt View Post
    You refer to the necessity of building back the adrenaline. However, excessive adrenaline- a very frequent occurence under pressure- is just as detrimental as not having enough, so it purely depends on an individual. Somebody who is flooded with adrenaline and cannot think straight, or hyperventilates, would greatly benefit from a 3-minute- break. It varies too much from person to person to be taken into consideration ( as a person who has excessive adrenaline under pressure and have been learning to deal with it all my life, I know what I am talking about).
    And skaters start from different elements in practice all the time, and talk about necessity of building up the endurance to get through the whole program.
    I am not for draconian rules, but certainly for a deduction, and perhaps a stricter time limit.
    You have a point. I must say though that I don't know anyone who would rather have a breather in the middle of a performance rather than continue even if that means discomfort or even pain, unless it becomes impossible to continue without risking injury/ aggravating an already existing injury (well, I think most sports require you to learn to push through various levels of discomfort and even pain, anyway, if only to complete training sessions). Then again I don't know anyone who has struggled with adrenaline levels the way you describe. Sure, I've known situations when I have been hyperventilating/ where I have pretty much lost coherent thought-process (a risk in endurance running), but I can't say I've experienced that chronically so I can't judge and take your point onboard

    And like you, I'm not against deductions per se but against the "well, you really have to stop? Too bad, the door is there" stance

  2. #102

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,341
    vCash
    532
    Rep Power
    8773
    Quote Originally Posted by rayhaneh View Post
    You have a point. I must say though that I don't know anyone who would rather have a breather in the middle of a performance ....
    Don't you? Even if you were so desperate that you would be willing to do anything to win, you made a mistake and you knew that if you stop, have a break and restart, you will be able to repeat the element that you did not start correctly and give up on? I know quite a few people who would do it. After all, under the current rules it is not against the rules and it is not negatively marked, so it actually pays off. It is a strategy.

  3. #103
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    452
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by hanca View Post
    Don't you? Even if you were so desperate that you would be willing to do anything to win, you made a mistake and you knew that if you stop, have a break and restart, you will be able to repeat the element that you did not start correctly and give up on? I know quite a few people who would do it. After all, under the current rules it is not against the rules and it is not negatively marked, so it actually pays off. It is a strategy.
    I was exclusively addressing the principle of "taking a breather". The ability to repeat an aborted element is another, seperate issue which, as I was saying in my one before last post in this thread, needs to be addressed

  4. #104

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Age
    52
    Posts
    10,242
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    10899
    I'd like to see a decision tree for the referee something like this:

    Should I stop the program when I see or hear something going wrong?
    -Is the skater in imminent danger of injury (e.g., dragging pants strap, detritus on ice) or exacerbating an already-evident injury? STOP
    -If the skater continues skating under the current conditions (e.g., bleeding, shedding costume parts, on the verge of vomiting) will it present a hazard to the next skater and require a delay to clean up the ice, perhaps including a resurface? STOP
    -Is the problem something from an outside source that will prevent the skater from completing the program at all or from being judged fairly (e.g., music failure, lighting failure, fire alarm) STOP

    Otherwise, allow the skater to continue or to stop on their own initiative.

    If the skater stops on his/her own initiative, should s/he be allowed to restart?*

    -Can the problem be fixed within the time limit (2 or 3 minutes?) ALLOW RESTART from the point of interruption*
    -Will it delay the competition by more than the allowed time to solve a problem that affects only this skater? DISQUALIFY
    -Will the whole competition for all remaining skaters be delayed until the problem is solved?
    ALLOW RESTART from beginning of program or from point of interruption, depending skater's preference, on how far into the program the problem occurred, and/or length of delay (rules to specify when each apply); NEW WARMUP for all skaters including the one whose program was interrupted if it's been more than X minutes since the original warmup ended

    *The point of interruption could be when the skater stopped skating, when the music stopped, or when the referee noticed a hazard and blew the whistle. If more than one of these things happened, use the first one?

    If the referee stops the program OR the skater stops on his/her own initiative and then resumes, should there be an official deduction from the segment score?

    -Was the source of the problem within the skater's sphere of responsibility? (skater's body, skates and clothing, music media supplied by skater) YES DEDUCTION

    The reason this deduction should be small is to encourage skaters to stop if there's a problem that poses immediate danger that can be quickly fixed.

    -Was the source of the problem within the sphere of responsibility of the venue, competition organizers, and/or the world outside the venue? NO DEDUCTION

    Because the source of a music problem can be ambiguous, if it's not clear where the problem lies the skater should get benefit of the doubt. I think we can rest assured that no one is going to intentionally submit a bad CD in hopes of getting a rest in the middle of a program.

    My recommendation is to have a small mandatory deduction (1.0) from the segment score taken by the referee IF a program is stopped either by the skater or by the ref because of a problem in the skater's sphere of responsibility. I don't want to say "fault" because sometimes it's just bad luck. I think we would have to include falls or injury during a program tripping over a rut in the ice caused by previous skaters skating -- that's part of the intrinsic variability of the the competition surface in this sport, and skaters should be used to dealing with chopped-up ice although it's not ideal. More seriously unsafe ice conditions caused by compressor failures, etc., would come under the category of problems in the venue sphere of responsibility that will take more than 3 minutes to solve.

    It might also make sense to write rules recommending specific PCS reductions to the judges, to be applied in addition to the 1.0 deduction from the segment score, IF the referee has determined that the stop was due to a reason within the skater's sphere or responsibility.

    There could also be separate but related recommended PCS reductions for breaks in the program in which the skater stops performing and then resumes while the music continues playing and the program is finished within the time limit of the music but with an interruption of several seconds in the middle.

    Or if the program is stopped so close to the end that the partial program could be officially scored without restarting to perform the final movements after the last element or without a skater who is injured and unable to continue within 3 minutes had stopped so close enough to the end that they prefer to be scored on what they did than to be withdrawn.

  5. #105
    Rooting for the Underdogs
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Politicking for P&B and V&M
    Posts
    1,630
    vCash
    887
    Rep Power
    0
    I'm probably going to regret this, but I'm truly curious about something. There have been rules in place for decades now allowing--even requiring-- skaters to stop their programs for various reasons. For crying out loud, G/G at the 1987 European Championships? They didn't stop their program and got disqualified for it, leading to some outrage over their disqualification. In the past, skaters have been applauded for being brave and continuing on to finish their programs. Why all of the outrage now all of a sudden when there have been various stops over the years? Is it because it was the particular team (V/M) who stopped? My suspicion is that most people would be singing a different tune if D/W or any other team or skater had stopped.

  6. #106

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    4,378
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by gkelly View Post
    I'd like to see a decision tree for the referee something like this...
    That's pretty much what I'd like to see. Only presented in a much more organized and articulate way

  7. #107

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,341
    vCash
    532
    Rep Power
    8773
    I don't think there is ever problem with music at Europeans/4CC/Worlds competition that can possibly be skater's fault. The music is collected from the skaters well in advance and then played at the official practices. I think they have practice about twice a day for a few days before their competition, so if the music would work every day at the official practices, then suddenly stopped working during the competition, there is no way that it could be the skater's fault. It would be the music system at the rink.

    Saying that, on some small competition where they don't have official practice with program run throughs, fault with music could be the skaters fault because the CD could be faulty.

  8. #108
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,008
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Zemgirl View Post
    That's pretty much what I'd like to see. Only presented in a much more organized and articulate way
    But by the time they work their way through a detailed decision tree, even more time will have lapsed....

  9. #109

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    NC, USA
    Posts
    16,287
    vCash
    450
    Rep Power
    5510
    Quote Originally Posted by aka_gerbil View Post
    I'm probably going to regret this, but I'm truly curious about something. There have been rules in place for decades now allowing--even requiring-- skaters to stop their programs for various reasons. For crying out loud, G/G at the 1987 European Championships? They didn't stop their program and got disqualified for it, leading to some outrage over their disqualification. In the past, skaters have been applauded for being brave and continuing on to finish their programs. Why all of the outrage now all of a sudden when there have been various stops over the years? Is it because it was the particular team (V/M) who stopped? My suspicion is that most people would be singing a different tune if D/W or any other team or skater had stopped.
    No and no. V/M aren't the only team that has stopped mid-FD. And this thread only appeared after a third team stopped mid FD this season. I don't think this discussion has anything to do with who the skaters are.

  10. #110

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Fending off those velocity raptors inside the LHC...with a crossbow
    Posts
    2,383
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    530
    Quote Originally Posted by aka_gerbil View Post
    I'm probably going to regret this, but I'm truly curious about something. There have been rules in place for decades now allowing--even requiring-- skaters to stop their programs for various reasons. For crying out loud, G/G at the 1987 European Championships? They didn't stop their program and got disqualified for it, leading to some outrage over their disqualification. In the past, skaters have been applauded for being brave and continuing on to finish their programs. Why all of the outrage now all of a sudden when there have been various stops over the years? Is it because it was the particular team (V/M) who stopped? My suspicion is that most people would be singing a different tune if D/W or any other team or skater had stopped.
    This thread was started after Papadakis/Cizeron stopped at Jr. Worlds. Everything doesn't revolve around V/M.

  11. #111

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,341
    vCash
    532
    Rep Power
    8773
    Quote Originally Posted by shan View Post
    No and no. V/M aren't the only team that has stopped mid-FD. And this thread only appeared after a third team stopped mid FD this season. I don't think this discussion has anything to do with who the skaters are.
    Exactly. The discussion is because it is becoming a trend now. After a long time not having any incidents like that (I don't count Zhangs because everyone could see the problem there) we suddenly have three incidents in ice dance during one season. And in all three incidents there is nothing clearly visible (not bleeding hand from cutting it by the blade by Duhamel, not a huge fall on quad throw jump). While no one is directly saying that the skaters were not injured, the posters here want to know why suddenly there is such an increase of these incidents in major international competitions. And whether this is fair towards other competitors or not. And whether potentially there is a room for abuse...

    It has nothing to do about who the skaters were. Besides, it is not the fault of the skaters, it is the system that allows it.

  12. #112
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Riga, Latvia
    Posts
    1,224
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Spun Silver View Post
    But by the time they work their way through a detailed decision tree, even more time will have lapsed....
    Do technical specialists and judges read through all the rules while judging a performance? Obviously no - they have to read the rules beforehand. It would be the same with the rules for interruptions in programs.

  13. #113
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    2,401
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by hanca View Post
    No, but what about gymnasts? They also work very hard for a few minutes programs and they don't have second chances. Is gymnastics 'safer' than figure skating? Aren't injuries common in gymnastics? Does anyone take 3 minutes off in the middle of their bar routine and then finish without having any deductions?
    I don't know---I'm not familiar with gymnastics rules. And I was agreeing with a poster who supports a deduction if the skater has to stop.

  14. #114

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,341
    vCash
    532
    Rep Power
    8773
    Quote Originally Posted by lauravvv View Post
    Do technical specialists and judges read through all the rules while judging a performance? Obviously no - they have to read the rules beforehand. It would be the same with the rules for interruptions in programs.
    I would hope that they have to KNOW the rules, as opposed to just read it beforehand!

  15. #115

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    3,467
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    1553
    Quote Originally Posted by hanca View Post
    No, but what about gymnasts? They also work very hard for a few minutes programs and they don't have second chances. Is gymnastics 'safer' than figure skating? Aren't injuries common in gymnastics? Does anyone take 3 minutes off in the middle of their bar routine and then finish without having any deductions?
    Sports can't be judged on the same level because they are so different. Missing a grip of the bar and falling or falling off a beam is far more prevalent in each competition than a skater stopping program. If a gymnast falls off the beam or bars, they do not ask them to leave the competition they are given a deduction just like skaters get when they fall and get to finish the routine if they can. The ISU must not see it being such a big deal and I doubt skaters will keep doing it to be dishonest. I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt.

  16. #116

    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    peregrinating
    Posts
    4,942
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    14926
    But you still have a set amount of time to get back on the apparatus and finish the routine after you fall off. I think it's 30 seconds, but could be wrong about that. 2 minutes is significantly longer.

  17. #117
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Does it matter?
    Posts
    1,115
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I don't quite understand the comparison with other sports, it's like comparing apples and oranges. Each sport has its own rules which are specifically developed for that particular sport.

    As far as the technical specialists and judges reading or knowing the rules, I'm guessing no one can serve as a technical caller or a judge until they've passed some tests and aren't they also testing the candidate's knowledge of the rules in force?

  18. #118
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Riga, Latvia
    Posts
    1,224
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by hanca View Post
    I would hope that they have to KNOW the rules, as opposed to just read it beforehand!
    That is what I meant - I just didn't formulate it in a precise manner. I should have used the word "know" instead of "read". But that would involve reading them, would it not ?

  19. #119

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Top Secret FSU Witness Protection Location
    Age
    31
    Posts
    20,620
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    15753
    Comparing other sports is indeed apples and oranges, for the most part. This is especially true when you compare to team sports. In a team sport EVERYONE benefits from a break. Both teams in football, for example, get to take a breather, get something to drink, talk to their coaches, etc. They both have the same amount of time. This just isn't true in a sport like figure skating. The only skater who gets to take advantage of stopping is the skater who stops. There MUST be a penalty and IMO it should be a point PLUS mandatory PCS deductions of some sort. 1 point is not enough, IMO. The only time I would let it go is it there was a problem completely out of the skaters control. A muscle cramp is not a good enough excuse. These are elite athletes, they should be prepared to compete at the highest level without cramping. If they can't do that then too bad. Take the deduction or withdraw.
    -Brian
    "Michelle would never be caught with sausage grease staining her Vera Wang." - rfisher

  20. #120
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    1,249
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Even if you were so desperate that you would be willing to do anything to win, you made a mistake and you knew that if you stop, have a break and restart, you will be able to repeat the element that you did not start correctly and give up on?
    Under the present rule, skaters are not allowed to repeat any portion of the program already skated. Elements were repeated back when the rule called for a total restart, but now the skaters are supposed to pick up at the point of the interruption. I think folks are confused on this point because of the recent V-M incident when the official allowed then to go well back into their music to do the lift they had skated through. The officials probably erred in that case. (The BBC commentator thought so, anyway.)

    And in answer to the folks who can't believe skaters would stop as a strategy choice even when they could have continued, yes it has happened (Bernadis telling Abitbol to stay down after a fall on a throw jump being one example).

    I would agree with not punishing skaters for things entirely outside their control, like problems with lighting or the sound system. Still, Rodnina-Zaitsev might argue otherwise:
    http://youtu.be/o7BLMcR2KmU?t=44s

Page 6 of 16 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •