Doesn't Joubert re-use his programs........a lot.?.......
Doesn't Joubert re-use his programs........a lot.?.......
Addicted to FSU
Petrenko was on the third year of his LP when he won Olympic Gold...
He has repeated some programs, though never two in the same season that I'm aware of. Also, Joubert does sometimes have two new programs - more often, I think, than Chan. Brezina tends to recycle programs too, I think he recently said he can't afford to have two new programs choreographed each season. But while Chan has had a lot of expenses, I doubt that's the reason he's chosen to repeat programs.
All that said, I don't mind skaters repeating programs, if said programs are good - especially if there are extenuating circumstances, such as an injury wiping out part of someone's season. I do think repeating both programs is going too far, though.
Those were 6.0 days and corruptions and all.
I'm sure judges have their faves. Chan's not the only one. But he's the only one some people keep accusing when there's really baseless.I do think Chan is the best among the men generally. But he is not the best natural jumper. And while I think most of his wins have been justified, I also think he has the judges' favour. Favour isn't necessarily misplaced and can be seen as no more than a fair acknowledgment. But it does benefit some skaters while others really have to fight for recognition among the judges.
Or because Fernandez had a better skate. If Chan had made another jump, and Fernandez had fallen another jump, the result could have been different.And he lost to Fernadez because he lost so many points on the jumps. There was just no way for the judges to gift him the win.
There are many guys can beat Chan when they have a great skate and Chan has a bad skate. But if all have a bad skate, Chan has the advantage because of his difficult programs and other factors.It wouldn't surprise me at all if Hanyu beat Chan at some point this season. He, too, has the judges favour IMO
Gachinski won because Ando made a stupid mistake.
I do believe the judges value SS more than other elements, and it's rightfully so! Many like to say "sure, Chan has great SS, I will give him that, but that's only one of 5 PCS etc" True to that it's one of five PCS. However, without great SS, you can't really have great TR and CH, and to the extend, PE. And SS contributes to speed, edges, intricacy of the blade, the flow etc. It's not easy to have them all. One may have the speed, but not the edge. SS affects how the whole program will be skated. So it's not just one of the 5 PCS.Since COP was introduced, I think SS (and on a more intangible note, confidence) has become the most important characteristic judges look for in a skater. You have Ando and Joubert consistently scoring high despite nil CH and TR, and then there's Kim's decisive advantage over Asada in the 2010 season.
I'm not a skater myself, so I have no idea which move is difficult or easy. I just listen to Kwong, Wilson and Browning talking about Chan's skate which is great. Browning points out Chan's movement after the 3Lutz, something that I'll never have spotted since it was just a second or so.
http://www.cbc.ca/sports/figureskati...es-doubts.html
It's a Chan lovefest among those 3, so just skip to 3:50-5:00 for Browning's take on Chan's skate, and 6:00-7:00 on Wilson's take. It also touches on why Chan has so much difficulty on the 3Axel. To me that's Chan's weakness, not his artistry which many people like to think so.
Last edited by jettasian; 11-15-2012 at 06:49 AM.