I think I have my own understanding of when young skaters and their coaches move up to the next level. But I'm wondering what the range of thought is on this.
For example, one general "rule" or common practice is that once a kid has a single axel (more or less), they star Pre-Pre. (Well, you can't skate No Test with and axel, and I'm sure some skaters might "sandbag" for whatever reason. Still....)
And I know there are move-ups more or less built in (age limits and not skating below a certain free skate test level.)
But Pre-Juv and Juvenile (other than scoring) seem a bit gray. And then Juvenile and Intermediate (beyond age requirements) have some cross-over.
So, for instance, is it always best to be placing well as a Juvenile before moving up to Intermediate? Or is that difference not as great as, say, between Int and Novice? Is there a better level to repeat a year or two, or is there an advantage to getting two years Novice experience instead of two years Intermediate?
I know there are a lot of factors. Just like to hear other people's thoughts on this.


Reply With Quote

Enjoying the moment is so important and that is hard to do if a skater is not in the right category.. Especially in their early to mid teens when many girls will quit skating. I truly believe there is a place for all skaters and as parents we should look at the emotional needs of the skater and for coaches they should look at the ability and potential of the skater and be realistic of the skaters chances in that division. A decent coach will be honest with you and say where a skater has the potential to place.. I also think it helps with goal setting if you focus on the goals and not the winning.. that way even if a child is middle of the pack or even last - if they can accomplish mini goals it can still give them some level of accomplishment.

