I thought at first you had posted this article link in jest because it was clearly too absurd to be taken seriously. I didn't realize you actually found some truth in it.
You shouldn't believe everything you read, honey.
I think it's painfully obvious that the writer of this rubbish likes to over-exaggerate in order to create kontroversy.
Amerikans
![]()
![]()
Incidental contact on both occasions. Players attempting to play the ball and one of them came out of it somewhat worse for wear. It happens to players on both teams and is accepted as such. Soccer is not necessarily "dirty", but it is a rough, demanding, physical contact sport. A perfect example of that occurred in extra time when Tancredi, I've heard she's nicknamed "Tank", flattened one of the USA players while tackling the ball from her. There was hard contact, but no whistle, no foul. Play went on because it was an accepted as part of the game by both teams (BTW, the USA & Canada are considered to be 2 of the more physical teams in the women's game, if not the 2 most physical).
The beef against the non-call on Tankredi was she did something was a deliberate attempt to injure an opponent. It is at the same level as the nice young "Lady" from Colombia that was running down the field with Abby Wambach, turned and punched Abby in the face. The ref in that game missed it & play continued. After the game the event was reviewed and the Colombian player, essentially, was banned from the tournament. BTW, IMO, Ms Tankredi's yellow card for insulting the ref also could very well have been a red. As yet, nothing has happened to Ms Tankredi. We'll see if anything ever does.
Sad that such an epic game has degenerated into finger-pointing and name calling. Especially since the finger pointing and name calling are not directed where they should be; not at the players on the other team, but at the officiating. I don't know who assigned this woman to the game, be it the IOC or FIFA. It is now obvious that she had no clue how competitive and aggressive these 2 teams are. Especially towards each other. She was in way over her head from the opening whistle.
NJL
ETA: I don't remember seeing the T-Shirts during the medal ceremony. They wore their team warm ups. As did all 3 teams. Canada's red being the most memorable. The T-Shirts were handed out and worn by some just after the game's ending & well before the medal ceremony. For some reason I thought of this thread and PeterG having apoplexy when I got a good look at them. I'm not offended. Just discouraged. These are at the same level as the "gold" jersey they wore at one WWC. They finished 3rd. The jerseys were then ridiculed as the "bronze" jersey. It seems that some lessons never sink in.....![]()
Last edited by NeilJLeonard; 08-10-2012 at 10:02 AM.
I missed the ceremony, so that is good to hear. The T-shirts were a dumb idea, but at least they weren't on the podium.
I don't follow women's soccer very closely, but from what I've read, both the US and Canadian teams are known for being highly physical, in contrast to the Japanese women who I guess are considered more of technicians. So it seems silly for either the US or the Canadian team (or their fans) toover the physical nature of the game.
As for "ugly," I'm finding the attempts by some to discredit the US women's soccer gold medal to be. Sour grapes can be ugly, particularly when people refuse to get over it.
Creating drama!
I misunderstood your post then, I thought we were talking about poor sportsmanship, in addition to being articulate. Lipinski was notorious (as was her mother) for beingwith her expletives! And Sasha had a few iffy moments too.
Allskate beat me to it, but you interpreted the article. You gave it an "ugly" twist.
podium photo
No t-shirts on the podium
"Me, cutie/chicken, the egg cup, I am the hammer of my spoon!"--Jen_Faith translation
I have no problem with the shirts. They won 3 consecutive golds- that is greatness. If they lost, Nike would have eaten the cost of the shirts, or donated them (for pretty much every major sporting event they print up shirts proclaiming both teams the winner- the loser's shirts get recycled or donated to charities that usually send them to Africa.)
I just watched the podium ceremony. If they are wearing them, you can't see them. They look great in their track suits- and look awesome belting out the Star Spangled Banner.
If they had worn them for the medal ceremony, they would have looked extremely tacky (who does a medal ceremony in a t-shirt?), but what they did do, put them on after the game, and then dress appropriately on the podium, I see no problem.
I guess I don't see the need to be humble- as long as you show good sportsmanship (not sure that exists in soccer though- cannot believe that one girl stomping on someone else's face!) I mean Bolt is off proclaiming he is the greatest athlete to ever exist, Lolo Jones is tweeting how awesome her legs look in photos, I'm thinking a certain level of arrogance just exists in elite sports. You have to have pride in your performance to make it to the top. But you also need to be polite and shake your opponents hand.
Can the USA adopt Bolt? I find his unfiltered arrogance hysterical. Reminiscent of a young Cassius clay.
What I find interesting is that the American women's soccer team is derided for wearing T-shirts proclaiming their greatness and yet a Jamaican male sprinter's proclamation that he is a living legend is lauded.
That is what Tom Hammond (I think) said last night at the end of NBC's coverage.
But then he also said that Ashton Eaton is the world's best athlete. Bolt annoyed me in 2008 (celebrating before even crossing the line) but somehow I find himnow. His showboating is genuinely funny and he does seem respectful of other athletes. I did read that he is in a feud with Carl Lewis - what is that all about?
Creating drama!
^ doping. Lewis is pro drug testing. Bolt is pissed the legend is raining on his parade. Blah blah blah
Come on, you can do it
Yes because it no longer affects him. He admits he failed drug tests that should have kept him out of Seoul but because it was uttered after the three year period he keeps his medals and titles AND perhaps worst of all is some people clearly still think he's some great sporting legend. As a side note I think it's since come to light pretty much the whole final group of the 100m in Seoul were juiced. That whole Balco affair in the early 2000´s is one of the largest contributing factors to my total lack of interest in anything to do with track these days.
They must have since changed the three year rule because just today some American Cyclist was stripped of his 2004 Athens gold medal for admitting a year ago on 60 minutes he was doped to his eyeballs
http://www.ctvolympics.ca/cycling/ne...2004-gold.html
Come on, you can do it
There's physical, and then there's excessive. IMO, a couple of players from both teams exhibited the behaviour that would be characterized by the latter adjective and these players should have been given automatic reds. I am referring to stamps on Carli Lloyd and Christine Sinclair. Neither were incidental contact--they weren't clean tackles or even careless or reckless play. IMO, they were deliberate, excessive, and could have resulted in injury. Unfortunately, players will sometimes try to injure star players (well, usually strikers) from the opposing team, so the ref has to be very vigilant. I think both Lloyd and Sinclair have a right to be upset.
I hate this kind kind of play, and hope to see it disappear from the game. But I don't blame the teams in this case, as I didn't see a lot of players doing it. These are the actions of only a couple of players who should be disciplined.
OTOH, I love Japan's technical style of play. They have a really beautiful way of moving the ball around and are creative in finding space. I really enjoy watching them and I hope the game moves in this direction.
Last edited by Bournekraatzfan; 08-10-2012 at 07:08 PM.