Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 116
  1. #21
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    “It is far more important to have a good judge than a possible conflict of interest." - Ottavio Cinquanta
    Posts
    1,583
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I remember seeing a fluff piece where Natalia talked about how she "lost some kilos... about 4 kilos." I believe this was during 1994 Olys.

  2. #22
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Ubering Max Aaron, Bobrova/Soloviev,Sotnikova, Gordi Pots!!!
    Age
    29
    Posts
    571
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    ^ Yes, this one. She didn't cry in it but they showed a clip where she broke down while sitting next to Dmitriev. She talks about losing weight and cutting her hair.

  3. #23
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    129
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Thanks everyone for the info. Wow I got more than I thought I would asking this, I never knew about the one-sided romance stuff, etc. Regardless, they were beautiful skating together anbd it's too bad they couldn't have stayed together as a pair.

  4. #24

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Age
    47
    Posts
    17,726
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    15381
    Quote Originally Posted by Jemestone View Post
    ^ Yes, this one. She didn't cry in it but they showed a clip where she broke down while sitting next to Dmitriev. She talks about losing weight and cutting her hair.
    OMG the bit at the end where he is throwing his baby around!

    Here is one of their professional performances

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-40q...eature=related
    Last edited by Aussie Willy; 08-02-2012 at 01:57 PM.
    When you are up to your arse in alligators it is difficult to remember you were only meant to be draining the swamp.

  5. #25
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    “It is far more important to have a good judge than a possible conflict of interest." - Ottavio Cinquanta
    Posts
    1,583
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Their pair spin was really innovative. They seemed to be more spunky than the typical "classical" Russian pair.

  6. #26
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    822
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Holy crap I never knew all this. I only ever saw them perform once in the 94 Olys and loved them thought they should've won, still do, but I had no idea about all this it's and a kinda

  7. #27

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Age
    47
    Posts
    17,726
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    15381
    Here is their FS from 94 Olympics. I would call this program a masterpiece.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNDqZuQVcQg
    When you are up to your arse in alligators it is difficult to remember you were only meant to be draining the swamp.

  8. #28
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    6,264
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I remember quite the brouhaha over this comment from Moskvina about Natalia's weight:

    Pairs Skating Can Lead to Double the Trouble
    "She was a cloud," lamented their coach, Tamara Moskvina. "A heavy cloud."

  9. #29
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    “It is far more important to have a good judge than a possible conflict of interest." - Ottavio Cinquanta
    Posts
    1,583
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I remember thinking that M&D were so much more exciting to watch than G&G. It seemed G&G won due to being the favorites.

    After re-watching the programs, I just don't know. M&D had a lot more elements in the program. G&G's looked sparse/boring. But it may be because G&G made the difficult look so easy.

  10. #30

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Age
    47
    Posts
    17,726
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    15381
    Quote Originally Posted by leafygreens View Post
    I remember thinking that M&D were so much more exciting to watch than G&G. It seemed G&G won due to being the favorites.

    After re-watching the programs, I just don't know. M&D had a lot more elements in the program. G&G's looked sparse/boring. But it may be because G&G made the difficult look so easy.
    I rewatched both of them and whilst there were mistakes, G&G had a clarity of line and ease of movement that is quite special. And whilst you can't hear it, apparently the one thing they had above the other skaters was their quietness on the ice. I also felt they had a better connection to the music. As the commentator said on the clip I saw, it was as if Beethoven had written that music for them. I don't think I got quite the same connection with M&D.
    When you are up to your arse in alligators it is difficult to remember you were only meant to be draining the swamp.

  11. #31
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    404
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Aussie Willy View Post
    I rewatched both of them and whilst there were mistakes, G&G had a clarity of line and ease of movement that is quite special. And whilst you can't hear it, apparently the one thing they had above the other skaters was their quietness on the ice. I also felt they had a better connection to the music. As the commentator said on the clip I saw, it was as if Beethoven had written that music for them. I don't think I got quite the same connection with M&D.
    YMMV. the olympics was the weakest performance of that moonlight sonata program. i don't think G&G made everything look easy--when you stumble, you aren't making it look easy. under 6.0 judging they made more than 1 mistake. M&D were not *so* inferior to them that they should have had a 2 stumbles cushion. the judges judged the practices and pre-awarded the gold to G&G. yes, i am still peeved about the 94 olympics

    i'm glad that natalia landed on her feet and i still root for her students today... unless they are wearing oven-mitts

  12. #32
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    6,264
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I preferred M&D by a mile, but I really have to stand up for the difficulty and seamless of G&G lifts.

    I've seen some more exciting lifts since then, but I don't think I've seen a higher quality set of lifts performed in a LP since that performance. The one lift were they are in one hand position and she's actually rotating her body around in the air... I don't think I've seen that since.

  13. #33

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    near Chicago
    Posts
    2,028
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by canbelto View Post
    Whatever it is, I freaking loved them. Omg. Still one of the most inventive, charismatic pairs of all time. And I loved the death glares Natasha gave Artur when he made a mistake. They were awesome.
    ITA!! They were mesmerizing. There hasn't been a pairs team since them that I love as much as I loved them.

  14. #34
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    9,759
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    M&D skated with passion in LilliHamer; The ending with Artur leaping with abandon into the air and then Natalia skating right into his open arms was thrilling; One of the best endings to a pairs' LP. Ever.

    G&G probably had better flow and better quality throws, but they made obvious mistakes in both the SP and LP. Moonlight was also a rather traditional LP that we've seen from other pairs before. The one thing I did love about the Moonlight choreography was when Sergei and Katia's arms weaved over and under each other but never touched. That was a brilliant moment from Marina.

  15. #35

    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    24,275
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    43732
    Quote Originally Posted by Aussie Willy View Post
    I rewatched both of them and whilst there were mistakes, G&G had a clarity of line and ease of movement that is quite special. And whilst you can't hear it, apparently the one thing they had above the other skaters was their quietness on the ice. I also felt they had a better connection to the music. As the commentator said on the clip I saw, it was as if Beethoven had written that music for them. I don't think I got quite the same connection with M&D.
    I have watched that competition over and over again and I still cannot decide which pair was better. I go back and forth on the win. They really were apples and oranges. However, M&D skated two solid performances, and G&G's mistake in SP and minor mistakes in the LP were totally ignored by the judges. G&G's LP performance got a 6.0 for artistic marks, but M&D were equally deserving of a 6.0, which was not given to them.

    Argument could be made in G&G's favor because of their stronger basic skating skills but M&D were no slouches either. They skated with great passion between them, with the same level of difficulty as G&G (actually their lifts were more challenging, and they did sbs 3t vs. G&G's sbs 2A- just minor things), and their 94 Oly LP performance is one of the best ever. It was good enough to win the gold. That is why the 8-1 (only the Belarus judge placed M&D higher) judging decision in G&G's favor bothered me. They had already decided who would win the gold.

    I always loved M&D's creative choreography. IMO they really changed pairs skating from doing standard pairs moves. Before them, Valova-Vasiliev had some creative moves too, but the beauty of M&D's Lieberstaum was incomparable to anyone before them. They had a great impact on the sport.

    Going back to the original question- why did they split up- there could have been a combination of reasons, but IMO the deciding factor was that Natalia was burned out after competing in two Olympics, but Artur wanted to go on to 1998. She was not feeling too motivated after their 1992 OGM, and many Olympic champions don't feel motivated enough to continue after an OGM, so who can blame her? Regardless, I was very disappointed that they suddenly broke up. They had not had a lot of success as pros between 92 and 94, but after the 94 Olympics they seemed to be really good and on way to becoming even greater.

    When Artur looked for another partner, he looked for a smaller partner, since he had that choice. Natalia was big for a pairs skater, but Artur was very strong, so I don't think it was an issue when they were skating together. I don't buy that romance/broken heart story either. I liked Kazakova & Dmitriev, but never as much as Mishkutenok-Dmitriev. There was a charm about them that very few teams have.

    Even with two mistakes, M&D's Liebestraum is one of the greatest performances in pairs skating.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-lIi...eature=related

    I love this exhibition by M&D:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...NC_zfEPIw&NR=1

    Here is another exhibition- I had completely forgotten this one. They were so creative and exciting to watch!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZQC34u4AfQ
    Last edited by Vash01; 08-11-2012 at 08:57 AM.

  16. #36

    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    24,275
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    43732
    Quote Originally Posted by skfan View Post
    YMMV. the olympics was the weakest performance of that moonlight sonata program. i don't think G&G made everything look easy--when you stumble, you aren't making it look easy. under 6.0 judging they made more than 1 mistake. M&D were not *so* inferior to them that they should have had a 2 stumbles cushion. the judges judged the practices and pre-awarded the gold to G&G. yes, i am still peeved about the 94 olympics

    i'm glad that natalia landed on her feet and i still root for her students today... unless they are wearing oven-mitts
    You are right. G&G did not make everything look easy. Katia landed forward on the throw 2A. Sergei's minor mistakes (losing unison on the 2f and singling the 2S) were ignored by the judges. The loss of unison on the sbs camel spins in the SP was also ignored, in a way (their tech marks were slightly low, but the artistic marks put them ahead). Basically they had the gold unless she had fallen on a throw. M&D were undermarked in both SP and LP (particularly in the LP- leaving plenty of room for G&G). Since I loved both pairs, I was not as upset as some others about the final results, but it greatly bothered me to see M&D get such low marks after two perfect performances.

    Who are Natalia's students? Do they compete at the international level?

  17. #37
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    6,264
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    G&G probably had better flow and better quality throws, but they made obvious mistakes in both the SP
    I thought they were clean in the sp?
    You are right. G&G did not make everything look easy. Katia landed forward on the throw 2A. Sergei's minor mistakes (losing unison on the 2f and singling the 2S) were ignored by the judges. The loss of unison on the sbs camel spins in the SP was also ignored, in a way (their tech marks were slightly low, but the artistic marks put them ahead).
    G&G were such a textbook pair that, without those small miscues, I could have easily seen them getting a row of 6.0's for both marks, so an argument could be made that they were actually marked down.

    Again I think people are undervaluing G&G having three incredibly difficult and perfectly executed lifts to only two for M&D, neither of which came close to the difficulty that G&G had. M&D's one arm overhead lift only goes to one arm for about one second. The second lift never goes to one arm, and all the difficulty comes in the dismount.

    Again, I prefer M&D by a mile, but I understand the judging.

  18. #38
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    50
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I love this, one of their last :
    http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x5f...?search_algo=2.

    One of the commentators mentions the importance of ballet training for MD and other Russian pairs.

  19. #39
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    577
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Artistically, I also found M/D much more interesting than G/G. There was a great beauty to G/G's Moonlight Sonata program but it also bored me to a certain extent. The problem with M/D was with some of their basics. Their stroking was much noisier than G/G who you can barely hear when they skate by whereas with M/D, you can really hear them digging and scratching into the ice. Artur always traveled on the side by side spins, Natalia almost always two footed her double axel, and their lifts were much simpler. G/G skated a nervous and flawed performance but their basics were so much better than M/D. It's to my understanding that this was the difference between the Moscow and St. Petersburg camp (technical perfection vs. artistic perfection).

  20. #40
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    404
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Vash01 View Post
    You are right. G&G did not make everything look easy. Katia landed forward on the throw 2A. Sergei's minor mistakes (losing unison on the 2f and singling the 2S) were ignored by the judges. The loss of unison on the sbs camel spins in the SP was also ignored, in a way (their tech marks were slightly low, but the artistic marks put them ahead). Basically they had the gold unless she had fallen on a throw. M&D were undermarked in both SP and LP (particularly in the LP- leaving plenty of room for G&G). Since I loved both pairs, I was not as upset as some others about the final results, but it greatly bothered me to see M&D get such low marks after two perfect performances.

    Who are Natalia's students? Do they compete at the international level?
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natalia_Mishkutenok
    wiki says: One of her students is the U.S. men's 2009 novice silver medalist Stevan Evans. don't know if this is out of date

    this icenetwork article is quite old.
    http://web.icenetwork.com/news/artic...&vkey=ice_news

    i believe there was a more recent ice network article as well, where she was asked why all the russian pairs had problems at 2012 worlds--that article mentions her more recent students. Sylvia would know best who her current students are. i know she definitely coached angela maxwell in the past.


    re: G&G and M&D in '94, if lifts and unison were all that counted, and skaters should not be penalized for mess ups on individual jumps, then donlan & speroff should have been U.S. champs several times over. skaters have to perform ALL the elements in the program. it all depends on how you weigh the elements, and the overall impact. for me the first mistake by G&G already shattered the mood, which even when successfully achieved doesn't give me the palpable thrill of M&D. YMMV
    Last edited by skfan; 08-11-2012 at 07:14 PM.

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •