Page 7 of 13 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 140 of 249
  1. #121
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    In the middle of a hair war with Alena Leonova.
    Posts
    2,554
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by jlai View Post
    My favorite P&P sequel is still Pemberley Shades
    THE SHADES OF PEMBERLEY ARE THUS POLLUTED!

    I'm so glad there are so many others here who've watched the BBC version over and over.

    I'm one of those people who get ultra-frustrated at moronic characters in fiction, even though it's fiction. I could not stand the BBC Mrs. Bennett, or Mr. Collins, but I understand that they're just ridiculous.

    But I must say, to this day, I randomly spit out scenes from this version. Mary singing her song at the party. Lizzie singing that Henry Purcell song. "A friend in need is a friend in deed!" "Ooh, the soldiers!"

    I only saw the 2005 movie in the theaters and did not like it.

    The other monstrous BBC mini-series that's ultra frustrating but addictive is Bleak House. I'm starting Little Dorritt from the library this week. I absolutely loved the recent BBC version of Emma.

  2. #122

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Two places! Atlanta suburbs and in the North Georgia Mountains
    Posts
    3,814
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    2089
    Add me to the list of those who can't get enough of the 1995 BBC version! It was as close to perfection for me as I could get. I study the Regency (on a hobbiest level) because of my lifelong interest in some characters of history...and this version seemed to me to be the closest in feel, and let's face it-Firth IS DARCY. That pitiful boy in the 2005 version wasn't man enough. Sorry. I did like Rintoul though. And Kera Knightly was just dreadful IMHO. She's just too contemporary, and she's always Kera Knightly. I'm Kera! Watch me emote!

    If you want a feel for the Regency period, here is a delightful, witty, naughty and very intelligent site. Might skew often a bit early for P&P, but it covers items into the early 19th century as well. I particularly love the "Tart of the Week" section!

    http://georgianaduchessofdevonshire.blogspot.com/

    I also loved Thompson's S&S and watch it often. I love the score. I love kate Winslet in it-I thought she got it right. And I don't blame her for loving Willoughby. Some Austen scholar friends of mine in Australia have suggested that Willoughby was inspired by one of my favorite historical figures, Banastre Tarleton. During the period from about 1785-1800, Tarleton had a long affair with actress and early feminist writer Mary Robinson, who was about the essence of "Sensibility." He dumped her for a rich 23 year old whome he married and lived happily ever after with, the dog. Not a perfect fit, but the story was very much a part of the times and highly publicized. You might also remember Tarleton from the dreadfully historically incorrect "The Patriot" (the bad dude Tavington-great job but nothing like the real person) and Cirian Hinds in the recent movie about Wilberforce (Can't remember the name-didn't see it.) But from what I've read, it was also another totally incorrect portrayal of a delightful Regency rake. I love Hinds though! Loved him as Julius Caesar!

  3. #123
    Cruder than you thought
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    All choked up
    Posts
    19,294
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    37244
    Quote Originally Posted by vesperholly View Post

    BBC's Tom Jones from the late 90s is a personal favorite. It was serialized on A&E when my family was on vacation in Florida and we watched it every night.
    I loved this! I only ever saw it the once, I should look for it.
    Disclaimer: The post contained herein represents the opinions of a fan and may or may not bear any relation to reality.

  4. #124

    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Getting drunk with Athos
    Posts
    5,004
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    33078
    Quote Originally Posted by vesperholly View Post
    I never really liked the Paltrow Emma. Though the BBC Emma's Harriet is a total ripoff of the 1996 actress.
    I never watched her much with Northam and Ewan McGregor on the screen. I suppose having a main character that's easy to tune out is not exacty the mark of a stellar performance, but at least she didn't annoy me as much as usual .

    And, Toni Collette is brilliant in pretty much anything she does, including Harriet, so they can go ahead and plagiarize her interpretation. I thought it worked well with their new adaptation.

  5. #125
    Port de bras!!!
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Ravenclaw
    Posts
    30,105
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    33052
    Here's some (unwelcome to me) news about Keira Knightly--she will be playing Anna Karenina. I just don't see her having

    (a) the depth of acting talent to do the role justice
    (b) looking and acting appropriate not only for a different period but also a very different country.

    She is just not well-suited for period films, yet she insists on making them.
    "Nature is a damp, inconvenient sort of place where birds and animals wander about uncooked."

    from Speedy Death

  6. #126
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    4,747
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by IceAlisa View Post
    Here's some (unwelcome to me) news about Keira Knightly--she will be playing Anna Karenina. I just don't see her having

    (a) the depth of acting talent to do the role justice
    (b) looking and acting appropriate not only for a different period but also a very different country.

    She is just not well-suited for period films, yet she insists on making them.


    As someone basically put it upthread...See Keira Emote.

    So many good actresses. Why would they cast her?

  7. #127
    Port de bras!!!
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Ravenclaw
    Posts
    30,105
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    33052
    Quote Originally Posted by PDilemma View Post


    As someone basically put it upthread...See Keira Emote.

    So many good actresses. Why would they cast her?
    I know. Ridiculous. May be Baz Luhrmann is directing it once he is done mauling The Great Gatsby.
    "Nature is a damp, inconvenient sort of place where birds and animals wander about uncooked."

    from Speedy Death

  8. #128
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Diagonally parked in a parallel universe.
    Posts
    4,771
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by IceAlisa View Post
    Here's some (unwelcome to me) news about Keira Knightly--she will be playing Anna Karenina. I just don't see her having

    (a) the depth of acting talent to do the role justice
    (b) looking and acting appropriate not only for a different period but also a very different country.

    She is just not well-suited for period films, yet she insists on making them.
    Oh dear, that is bad news. And a big fat Though of course the reason why they cast her is obvious -- they think she's a draw. Probably won't draw me though!

    To be fair, when the part is in her wheelhouse, Keira can do a decent job. I quite liked her in Bend it Like Beckham, Love Actually, and even Never Let Me Go. But I just saw A Dangerous Method, and she was truly awful -- really ruined an otherwise good film.

    Quote Originally Posted by vesperholly View Post
    BBC's Tom Jones from the late 90s is a personal favorite.
    Ooh, yes, a much happier topic! I loved that production too. It really captured the rustic, bucolic, bawdy feel of the book perfectly.

  9. #129
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    700
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Sasha'sSpins View Post
    OT but has anyone read any books based on Jane Austen's novels?
    I did read "Mr. Darcy Takes a Wife" by Linda Berdoll
    http://www.amazon.com/Mr-Darcy-Takes...7966740&sr=1-1 It was originally a sef-published book and is the "racy" continuation of what happens after the wedding. Meh.

    One that I actually thought was interesing was Darcy's Story by Janet Aylmer.
    http://www.amazon.com/Darcys-Story-J...7966878&sr=1-1
    She basically gives you Darcy's half of the equation, with more backstory regarding Georgiana and Wickham and such.

  10. #130
    Title-less
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    8,764
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    6417
    I thought Darcy's story was bleh. Some nice moments though.

    ETA: Death comes to Pemberley started off all right. A bit wild towards the end
    Last edited by jlai; 05-25-2012 at 08:39 PM.

  11. #131
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Diagonally parked in a parallel universe.
    Posts
    4,771
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Don't bother with Death Comes to Pemberley by P.D. James. Although I did like a few of the life-at-Pemberley bits, it fails as a mystery (surprising, given the author), and the whole last act is exposition-overload and WTF-where-did-that-come-from moments.

  12. #132

    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Jersey, Channel Islands
    Age
    34
    Posts
    9,137
    vCash
    925
    Rep Power
    1377
    Regarding the Sense & Sensibility film & Elinor's age, I am not sure if it is true but Wikipedia says this:

    Thompson's hope was that Doran would cast Natasha and Joely Richardson, the daughters of Vanessa Redgrave, as Elinor and Marianne Dashwood. However, Lee wanted Thompson herself to play Elinor, to which the actress replied that at age 35, she was too old for the 19-year-old character. Lee then suggested Elinor's age be changed to 27, which would also have had the effect of making the reality of spinsterhood easier for modern audiences to understand
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sense_a...sibility_(film)

    I lurve that movie despite the age thing, I think Thompson does a fabulous job, better than Kate Winslet. There is one scene though, where they have a picnic and I always thought Elinor had a better chemistry with Willoughby than Marianne, and then they did end up getting married IRL.

    I saw some of the BBC version, & thought it was ok...love the girl who played Margaret (who was also Posy Fossil in the BBC's Ballet Shoes) and thought she was the best thing about it - but I also love the girl who played Margaret in the film too, so overall I prefer the film.

    LOVE Hugh Lawrie's grumpy character, like an English old fashioned House.
    “What’s on the revengenda this evening?” – Nolan Ross

  13. #133

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Age
    33
    Posts
    4,866
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    4947
    Quote Originally Posted by LilJen View Post
    Okay, to stir the pot: Who else was REALLY annoyed by the 1999 film adaptation of Mansfield Park? They made Fanny into this confident person who was secretly a writer. And who DID get engaged to the cad/scumbag and even KISSED him! Instead of the shy, self-effacing character with enough intelligence to see that Henry Crawford is a louse--y'know, how the character was actually written by Austen. I got the idea that the movie writer didn't like Mansfield Park or the character of Fanny and just wrote the film she wanted to write instead of actually adapting the book.
    You're more likely to stir the pot by suggesting you liked the 1999 Mansfield Park I don't know off too many serious Austen fans who enjoy this version, although there is a minority who do. I seem to have some kind of either amnesia or masochism when it comes to this movie, as I watch it anytime it's on TV, each time expecting to like it better and I never do. I really should learn my lesson and quit wasting my time! But I'm one of the few who really likes book-Fanny and admires her steadfast morality, so there is no way that I would be happy with a character as vastly different as movie-Fanny. I'm still waiting for a good adaptation of Mansfield Park, as the recent one with Billie Piper is also terrible.

    Back on the original topic, I don't know how much I'll add to the discussion that hasn't been already said, but I prefer the 1995 version overall - more faithful to the book, Colin Firth is my definitive Mr. Darcy, slightly preferred Ehle's portrayal of Elizabeth, and on the minor characters, this version had a wittier Mr. Bennet, a Caroline Bingley with a permanent bitchface, a smarter Mr. Bingley, and a meeker Georgiana Darcy. I didn't find Ehle smug at all, just confident and a little bit mischievous in a playful way. I can see why people find Mrs. Bennet and Mr. Collins a bit cartoonish, but that didn't really bother me, as they're written as cartoonish in the book. Oh, and I liked this Charlotte Lucas better - more practical and sensible, whereas the 2005 Charlotte came across as a bit pathetic. Wickham is much more charming than Rupert Friend's portrayal (although the actor who plays Wickham is much less physically attractive than Friend).

    I did like the 2005 version, particularly the scenery and soundtrack, and feel like it captured the mood and feel of the book reasonably well given its 2 hour running time. I thought Keira Knightly did a surprisingly good job, although didn't live up to Ehle's performance earlier. Jane Bennet was the one major improvement in casting from the 2005 version, as it was hard to see why 1995 Jane was the "great beauty" of the neighbourhood. I don't have major complaints about most of the cast, but I wouldn't consider them standout performances. The two that I had the biggest issues with were McFadyen's Darcy and Georgiana Darcy, who was way too confident.

    On some of the other adaptations that have been mentioned here, I love the Ang Lee/Emma Thompson Sense & Sensibility, even though it is probably one of the least faithful adaptations of Austen's books. Thompson mentions in the commentary that by the time she was through with the screenplay, she realized how few of Austen's lines she had left and treasured/protected what was left. But it gets the overall feel right in spite of that...it probably helps that I think it's the only Austen adaptation I saw before reading the book, so I didn't have any preconceived notions of what it should be. The 2007 version is also terrific, though, much more faithful to the book, and it's kind of nice to be able to watch them both. The 2007 version when I want the book brought to life and the Emma Thompson one when I just want to watch a good story with good acting.

    Lurve the Amanda Root Persuasion, tough call as to whether that or 1995 P&P is my all time favourite Austen adaptation. The newer Persuasion is a big disappointment in comparison, although is probably OK on its own merits. And agree with the generally consensus that the Kate Beckinsale Emma is the best one of that novel, although I hadn't seen all of the Romola Garai version yet. And it's been a while since I saw the Carey Mulligan Northanger Abbey, but I remember liking it well enough, even though it was being trashed by a lot of the rabid Austenites.

  14. #134
    Resident Rude Brazilian
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    In a million depressions over the end of the World Cup
    Posts
    3,229
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    15463
    My favourite quote from 1995 P&P.

    "Her teeth are tolerable, I suppose."

    Is there a Caroline Bingley day? There should be one.
    Dá-lhe, Isadora!!
    Lead me not into temptation. I can find it, and eat it, all by myself.

  15. #135
    Port de bras!!!
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Ravenclaw
    Posts
    30,105
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    33052
    We have a poster with a user name "Caroline Bingley".
    "Nature is a damp, inconvenient sort of place where birds and animals wander about uncooked."

    from Speedy Death

  16. #136

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Age
    38
    Posts
    17,615
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Artemis@BC View Post
    Don't bother with Death Comes to Pemberley by P.D. James. Although I did like a few of the life-at-Pemberley bits, it fails as a mystery (surprising, given the author), and the whole last act is exposition-overload and WTF-where-did-that-come-from moments.
    I liked it. It had some flaws, but I thought it captured the original tone and characters rather nicely.
    Charter member of the "We Always Believed in Ashley" Club and the "We Believe in Ricky" Club
    Old, lonely, pathos-hungry, and extremely gullible

  17. #137
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    279
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I soooooo love the 1995 BBC-Version of P&P. I don´t know how often I watched it and right now I wish I would have the time to watch it again! I LOVE Colin Firth as Mr. Darcy and also Jennifer Ehle as Elizabeth. I think all characters were casted perfect - or at least I like all of them. I tried to watch the 2005 version but I have to admit I didn´t finished the movie because all felt so wrong for me I wasn´t able to watch it to the end. I like both S&S versions, and usually I prefer the BBC-version. And maybe you can help me: I´m searching for the music of the first dance from Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy. I bought the soundtrack but there´s only a tiny little piece of it on it. It´s also at the beginning of "Emma" with Gwyneth Paltrow. Emma and Mr. Knightley also dance to it in that movie. Does anybody know how this dance and the music is called? I would like to have it sooo much but can´t find it. Thanks for your help!
    PS.Sorry for my bad English. Today I have the feeling I make tons of mistakes...

  18. #138
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Posts
    9,948
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by IceAlisa View Post
    Here's some (unwelcome to me) news about Keira Knightly--she will be playing Anna Karenina. I just don't see her having

    (a) the depth of acting talent to do the role justice
    (b) looking and acting appropriate not only for a different period but also a very different country.

    She is just not well-suited for period films, yet she insists on making them.
    ITA with you. She has a very beautiful and expressive face and loads of natural talent IMO, but watching her act together with trained actors, one feels that the three years spent at drama school usually aren't wasted. She especially lacks voice control and range of movement, her posture is horrific and she does not have any sense of acting according to the period.

  19. #139

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    North Dakota
    Age
    33
    Posts
    3,126
    vCash
    480
    Rep Power
    35
    Quote Originally Posted by Laney View Post
    And maybe you can help me: I´m searching for the music of the first dance from Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy. I bought the soundtrack but there´s only a tiny little piece of it on it. It´s also at the beginning of "Emma" with Gwyneth Paltrow. Emma and Mr. Knightley also dance to it in that movie. Does anybody know how this dance and the music is called? I would like to have it sooo much but can´t find it. Thanks for your help!
    From what I have gathered, it's called "Mr. Beveridge's Maggot"... but I don't know if that refers to the dance, the song, or both. If you search for it on YouTube, there are a few videos of it, and all the dances are the same with the same music.

  20. #140

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    North Dakota
    Age
    33
    Posts
    3,126
    vCash
    480
    Rep Power
    35
    Quote Originally Posted by znachki View Post
    I did read "Mr. Darcy Takes a Wife" by Linda Berdoll
    http://www.amazon.com/Mr-Darcy-Takes...7966740&sr=1-1 It was originally a sef-published book and is the "racy" continuation of what happens after the wedding. Meh.
    I have this one, as well as the follow-up "Darcy & Elizabeth". Um... not really believable as a continuation of Pride & Prejudice, but they're entertaining (and pretty racy) if you separate them as stand-alone books. They read more like a romance novel... which I suppose they are if you think about it.

    I've also read the trilogy by Pamela Aidan which was done from Mr. Darcy's point of view. They were okay. But the thing I liked most about them was that when the author described what people were wearing, if possible, she described the outfit based off of the 1995 BBC mini-series. So it kind of brought it more to life.

Page 7 of 13 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •