Marijuana THC blood levels were the subject of extensive debate in Colorado this legislative season with a proposed bill that set a standard for impairment. From what I read of the testimony and debate, there just isn't much good evidence about what level of blood THC impairs driving (and presumably, judgment) and the bill died. Given that testimony, I'm not sure that Martin's autopsy showing low levels of THC in his blood means a whole lot.
I was one. And incidentally, since you are questioning me: I was followed once by a threatening individual when I was 16. Guess what I did?
Some expert or other said that the amount found in his blood would not have affected his behavior. It's a non-factor and is irrelevant.
"Nature is a damp, inconvenient sort of place where birds and animals wander about uncooked."
from Speedy Death
I have known a boatload of potheads & I have never heard of anyone having a bad trip on marijuana. I've known people to totally zone out or get the munchies but I've never seen anyone have a personality change or become belligerent. And if the medical examiner says that the amt found would not have had any bearing on Martin's behavior then that sounds reasonable to me.
I'm not sure that GZ's injuries actually happened during the fracas with Martin. Someone in his family may have beat him up to make him look more convincing. Or maybe one of the police on the scene was a friend. All I know is everything that happened after the shot smells like a coverup to me.
And not one has ever mentioned marijuana-induced paranoia? Again, not that it was a factor in this case as mentioned, but really?
Yes, munches and zoning out are common but a paranoid state isn't that rare either.
"Nature is a damp, inconvenient sort of place where birds and animals wander about uncooked."
from Speedy Death
"Nature is a damp, inconvenient sort of place where birds and animals wander about uncooked."
from Speedy Death
"Nature is a damp, inconvenient sort of place where birds and animals wander about uncooked."
from Speedy Death
Since you changed your quote, I'll answer you again, you mentioned you were in a similar situation, not me.
Trayvon was stalked and then confronted by someone, there was a scuffle and then he was shot. I doubt a 5 year old would call 911, I probably wouldn't be able to get my phone out of my purse. No two situations are the same as I've said before.
"Nature is a damp, inconvenient sort of place where birds and animals wander about uncooked."
from Speedy Death
"Nature is a damp, inconvenient sort of place where birds and animals wander about uncooked."
from Speedy Death
Also, teenagers - especially minorities do not immediately call the police.
This is what the autopsy report states: "The wound is consistent with a wound of entrance of intermediate range."
Gunshot wounds are typically classified as contact wounds, near-contact wounds, intermediate wounds, and distant wounds. Intermediate means being or occurring at the middle place, stage, or degree between extremes...which does support Trayvon standing. Trayvon being shot while on top of Zimmerman banging his head in the ground would have resulted in a contact or near-contact wound.
And again, the autopsy report says that witnesses saw Trayvon fall to the ground after being shot. One doesn't fall to the ground if already on the ground in a struggle.
So were you confronted and beat up by a 28 year old? If that's not too personal, since you did say you were in a similar situation as Trayvon and did have the fore site call 911 at 16.
And no, the major difference is between how most 17 year olds react and 28 year olds. The outcome may have been very different if Zimmerman had confronted Trayvon's father and not the son. Maybe the exact same thing would have happened. Maybe it would have ended in a shouting match.