Based on how everyone else skated, they didn't need a perfect outing to win. Rotating one of the 3toes in either the short and the long & doing their SBS 2axel seq (which is a fairly consistent element for them) would have been enough to make up the 11 pts difference between 3rd and first.
I know Amanda's SBS jumping has always been questionable, but this Nationals was particularly bad. I hope she focuses on the postives from their career as she moves on from competitive skating.
I did think these two would stay together until they both retired. I wish them a lot of luck on their future endeavours though; the few brief times I've spoken with either of them they have seemed like really nice people.
(((Camp Peterson))) They've lost both their top two teams over the last two seasons.
HeatherC, can we turn you into a Donlan/Speroff groupie?![]()
My Life Would Suck Without FS-You
Their late career rise was an inspiring success story. Sad they couldnt cap it off with a U.S title this year as they were fully capable of. I am very surprised Mark is continuing. It would have seemed like a fitting time to retire together, and I cant see him being successful with a new partner at this stage of his career, especialy with the limited number of quality U.S pairs partners.
Deleted
Last edited by carriemarie; 04-13-2012 at 02:28 AM.
I wouldn't say that, but if you are pretty much just sticking with it to win the National title and you fall short, it gets harder to keep going. Being overly results-oriented usually doesn't work out. And staying in it just to win the National title usually puts enough pressure on you to ensure that you won't win the National title.![]()
I loved them. Beautiful couple. I will miss them so very much.
How about Cassie Andrews for Mark? Admittedly, I don't know the age span between the 2 of them, but she is petite (isn't she?)
ETA - she's 5'2" and 18 yrs old. I guess that's old enough.
I'm going to miss Mark and Amanda. I totally enjoyed their skating. I wish them both the very best.
Angie
Some cause happiness wherever they go; others whenever they go. - Oscar Wilde
deleted
Last edited by carriemarie; 04-15-2012 at 12:52 PM.
yep that's it... two Olympic and World Coaches haven't told Caydee to "point your toes" - let's send her a collective email!
I was referring to her turnout issues mainly- imo what make Caydee consistent on throws and jumping is her turned in hips, unfortunately it affects her lift positions in a negative way. She and John are what they are...but they seem to be consistent in their elements - if they can make slight improvements in COP and continue to put out clean performances (POTO and all), I feel they can crawl up a few spots in the World ranking.
Turned in hips doesn't make Caydee keep her shoulders up at her ears when she skates, either.
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe.
Thank you so much for the links to the pictures...and the commentary. I have been wondering what people did not like about Caydee's positions. Now I see it!
I am surprised that her upper body isn't held in a better position, because it seems to my limited brain, that one would use the same set of muscles to land a throw jump that would use in the lift.
DH - and that's just my opinion
Aaaannnnyway- good luck to Amanda and Mark: you will be missed!
Pilates for core strength and ballet for paying attention to the posture and lines?
Just a wild guess.
Well, training time is very limited. You have to allocate your resources wisely as there is never enough time to work on everything and one's body can only handle a certain amount of training as well (assuming you have enough money to really train as much as you'd like which probably hardly ever happens in the first place).
We can bitch about skaters' postures all we want but if skaters will still get high GOE/PCS even with bad lines/carriage (and Denney/Coughlin did this season if they landed their stuff), what incentive do the skaters have to work on it? None.
It's much wiser to use that time and energy on stuff that actually counts, like technical elements.