View Poll Results: Is it time to get rid of COP/IJS?

Voters
201. You may not vote on this poll
  • No

    136 67.66%
  • Yes - bring back the 6.0 system (either as was or with improvements)

    36 17.91%
  • Yes - but replace it with a completely new marking system (i.e. not the 6.0 system)

    29 14.43%
Page 3 of 13 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 250
  1. #41
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Dashing Between Bennetton and Krispy Kreme
    Posts
    2,424
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I read somewhere and it was an article directly related to skating competition attendance and ratings (apart from a lack of coverage), that numbers were down because of the vast array of entertainment choices available now versus a decade ago.

  2. #42
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Dashing Between Bennetton and Krispy Kreme
    Posts
    2,424
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Though CoP is a big improvement over the 6.0 system, for the average fan, it is still too complicated.

    At least with 6.0, though it was a puzzle as to why skaters were given the marks they got, there was a mark for technical merit (what they did) artistic impression (how they did it), and a ceiling as well. Yes, the placements determined the winners ultimately, but it just looked neater.

    With CoP, there is a technical element score, but 5 elements that make up the program component score. Especially when there is crossover between skating skills, transitions, performance, choreography and interpretation, why not just have one mark instead.

  3. #43

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    4,366
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Aussie Willy View Post
    I am judging with Sissy Krick this week at an adult event here in Melbourne. Met her the other night at a seminar she did for us. She is a very passionate and knowlegable woman and it is lovely of her to come and do our event.
    That is nice of her, definitely. My post came across like some sort of corruption allegation, didn't it? I meant just that is was a rather strange call to have S/P ahead of B/S in the SP.


    Quote Originally Posted by bruno6 View Post
    I think the problem is with the judges, not the system. What's mind boggling to me is why coaches are now teck controllers. That is bias in it's purest form. And should be illegal. They are judging skaters. Grand prix events should not allow coaches who have
    Teams in the grand prix judge their rival skaters. This is a joke. Save the system out the
    Judges...
    Quote Originally Posted by Aussie Willy View Post
    Knowing a few Technical Specialist, including those who have done international events, the last thing they are looking at when doing their job is the skater themselves. They are focussing so much on the elements and levels that who the is skater is irrelevant. It is actually the most unemotional and detached aspect of how skaters are evaluated and personality is taken right out of the equation. Sit on a technical panel doing data entry or video replay and you will see how it works. Plus there are 3 people sitting in that seat, not one.
    I imagine tech callers are dedicated and try to be impartial at all times. That having been said - it does look bad, even if nobody's doing anything wrong, because it creates an appearance of possible impropriety, something skating doesn't need.

  4. #44

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Age
    47
    Posts
    17,724
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    15381
    Quote Originally Posted by Zemgirl View Post
    That is nice of her, definitely. My post came across like some sort of corruption allegation, didn't it? I meant just that is was a rather strange call to have S/P ahead of B/S in the SP.
    I didn't read it that way at all.

    BTW I judged with Sissy today. She is a very natural and down to earth person. Even when I was having major problems with the computers she just went with the flow. Absolutely dedicated and passionate about skating.

    Quote Originally Posted by Zemgirl View Post
    I imagine tech callers are dedicated and try to be impartial at all times. That having been said - it does look bad, even if nobody's doing anything wrong, because it creates an appearance of possible impropriety, something skating doesn't need.
    But the problem in skating is that most judges, skaters and coaches know each other anyway. It is such a small community, even worldwide, that those perceptions are unavoidable.
    When you are up to your arse in alligators it is difficult to remember you were only meant to be draining the swamp.

  5. #45
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    104
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I will disagree with you there.. I to know
    Many tek controllers and while some are on the
    Up and up, others become tek controllers to
    Corrupt! I think Peter Kriek who should run for Isu head
    Replacing the ass.... Who is there now. He really cares about
    The skaters and hates this corruption . Thank god he I's there
    And has to ok Tek panel. He try's to balance out the
    Bullshit. But Alla is head of tek committee .

  6. #46
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    104
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I am writing this quickly while at work...
    But in the by laws judges can not be coaches
    What kind of con job is that.. Isn't tek controllers
    Judges???

  7. #47
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    346
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bruno6 View Post
    I think the problem is with the judges, not the system. What's mind boggling to me is why coaches are now teck controllers. That is bias in it's purest form. And should be illegal. They are judging skaters. Grand prix events should not allow coaches who have
    Teams in the grand prix judge their rival skaters. This is a joke. Save the system out the
    Judges...
    Wow, I didn't know that coaches are allowed to be technical controllers!
    I am so tired of this continuous unfair judging that goes on and on. Just a couple of hours ago I read this interview with Pechalat/Bourzat and their opinions about what happened in the Euros: http://absoluteskating.com/index.php...echalatbourzat

    The skaters feel as bad about the judging as does the audience. Who benefits from this system?

  8. #48
    Beach Bum
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Maryland burbs and shore
    Posts
    12,986
    vCash
    583
    Rep Power
    5666
    Quote Originally Posted by Rochelle View Post
    Fast forward to today... and do many of you really feel that there are far less creative, artistic performances out there now compared to, say, 1994-2002
    Absolutely. I have a hard time remembering skater's programs under COP because they all look so the same. I can clearly remember specific choreography and visual moments from pre-COP programs like Chen Lu's Rach, Klimova and Pomonorenko's A Man and a Woman, Michelle Kwan's Rach SP and several LPs, T/D's bolero and paso, etc.

    The lack of uniqueness is even more apparently outside of the medal contenders. There are a lot of top 10 skaters who do generic programs with jumps with hippy hoppy double loops tacked on, wobbly spins, slow sloppy footwork, long footwork sections of swinging around on one foot which must wear the skater out. Whereas you used to get some truly interesting and entertaining programs outside of the perennial World medal contenders (like Kristina Czako, Stephanie Rosenthal in the US to name a couple).

    However, I do want to point out that most of the skaters on the 2006 and 2010 Olympic podiums were skaters that are thought of as artistic/complete packages. Mao was trying to rely on the 3Axel, but she still is an artistic skater. Slute may have been a power skater but she had become a complete artistic skater. You can argue about Lysacek and Plush all you want, but that was not in the same vein of the athlete vs. the artist competitions like Elvis vs. Kurt/Ilia/Urmanov or Midori vs Kristi or Tonia vs. Kristi or Nancy.

    The place I think it has really started hurting the most is pairs. Pairs now is full of truly ugly struggling arm wrestling lifts. It wasn't quite as bad during early COP. There are only a couple of pairs ladies with the line to make those lifts look decent and a couple of men who can keep up the speed during them.

    I don't like the short dance, but dance is where I still see truly memorable choreography in COP, perhaps due to the skill level of the dancers.
    I think I will have a snack and take a nap before I eat and go to sleep.

  9. #49
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    104
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I think everyone should drop a email to the
    ISU to ask congress to change this immediately or
    You will see in the next few years even more
    Corruption then before. Tek specialist can make or
    Break a teams scores! No coaches should be allowed to
    Judge period!!

  10. #50
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    474
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    A. being on the tech panel is not judging. I see no reason why coaches who don't have skaters in that event shouldn't be on a panel. There is zero evidence of any bias on the tech panels, and their job is very black and white, there is no opinion in it.

    B. You only remember the specific choreography pre-COP because it was so rare

  11. #51
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    16,821
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I don't think CoP is necessarily worse, but it is no improvement. There is still bias, it is just harder to see. Because of anonymity and because the marks are totals and not broken down (unless you know t look at protocols). The programs have lost something. It is sad that there are those who do not appreciate the athleticism needed to execute an artistic program. Why is doing a bunch of elements, often beyond your ability, considered more difficult than combining grace, musicality, and artistry with strong elements? People see CoP for exactly what it is, smoke and mirrors. The ISU created it to persuade the public that they were sound something about biased judging. They changed the math. But, they never addressed the real problem, a sport so steeped in opinion and bias, that no new system could fix it. SLC Olympics did a lot of damage to the sport. The sport thought it could just carry on, pretend to police itself, and keep the fans (AKA revenue). People are not that naive, they wanted to see real changes, like sanction unfair judging. The 6.0 system was not a prize winning system, but CoP is no better. It was never the system, it was the implementation of the system. And that has not changed one bit.

  12. #52
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    104
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Being on the tek panel is not judging?? You must be joking. Then how do you account
    For the marks the skaters receive ? If you think that is not judging you are not being
    Real. Tek panel give levels they are judging levels from what their opinion I's.
    Yes they have 3 that must agree and if one judges thinks they called a wrong level they
    Call for a review. But if you have to cozy judges they can over rule the third call.
    So yes this is most definatly judging and affecting the skaters marks. Geat Real!!!

  13. #53
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    346
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by johndockley92 View Post
    A. being on the tech panel is not judging. I see no reason why coaches who don't have skaters in that event shouldn't be on a panel. There is zero evidence of any bias on the tech panels, and their job is very black and white, there is no opinion in it.
    Technical panel played a huge role in Euros short dance and also for example didn't call Chan's fall in 4CC.

  14. #54
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    104
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I don't know no evidence of bias... Do you sit in round table disscussions of judges
    When they are talking....the evidence is quite clear from the history of this sport .
    To think it does not show up on tek panels is to be very naive.

  15. #55
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,051
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Really don't think the system of judging is the main problem.

    The relationships between coaches and judges are so incestuous it's sickening. Coaches and judges and skaters traveling together to international events, for example, with coaches continuously sucking up to the judges who will be judging their skaters.... Calling judges under the guise of asking advise about their skater, all the while just kissing up.....constantly trying to curry favor for their skater...

    How can any one system even begin to fix this type of mess?
    Last edited by demetriosj; 02-16-2012 at 08:12 PM. Reason: correct grammar

  16. #56
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    16,821
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by demetriosj View Post
    Really don't think the system of judging is the main problem.

    The relationships between coaches and judges is so incestuous it's sickening. Coaches and judges and skaters traveling together to international events, for example, with coaches continuously sucking up to the judges who will be judging their skaters.... Calling judges under the guise of asking advise about their skater, all the while just kissing up.....constantly trying to curry favor for their skater...

    How can any one system even begin to fix this type of mess?
    It can't. Add in that judges go to the official practices and then have meetings where they discuss those practices, and you have no way to fix it. Why are the judges allowed to go to the official practices? Why are the judges allowed to "make their deals" in the judges rooms at events?

  17. #57

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Quadland
    Posts
    6,157
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    1604
    Two hands down on a quad toe better always be worth more than a clean triple Flip!!! You are talking about a quad toe! It just goes back to an interview with Jeff Buttle I saw when he was asked "so what's a quad all about?" You can pull back on technical difficulty to plese the ignorant. If you want to ban quads that could be done but don't make it was before where an URed quad toe was worth 1 point and no one did them barely anymore and you then had complaints about technical regression! Four revolutions beats three! Always should be the case.

  18. #58

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Deep in a Dream
    Posts
    7,455
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    7091
    Were you responding to something other than the voices in your head?
    My job requires me to be a juggler, but that does not mean that I enjoy working with clowns.

  19. #59

    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    In Canuck Land, hey!
    Age
    56
    Posts
    3,781
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by IceIceBaby View Post
    Technical panel played a huge role in Euros short dance and also for example didn't call Chan's fall in 4CC.
    Chan didn't fall in 4CC this year, he had hands down. Since it wasn't a fall, the deduction for it shows up in PCS as opposed to a deduction from his total. He didn't splat or zambonie the ice. If you want to see an actual FALL, check out Dai's quad attempt.

    Patrick's short and he was clean in the free.

    Dai's quad attempt

    Maybe some people should read what was actually written by those who were there or who watched.
    Crazy about sports!

  20. #60
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    346
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by professordeb View Post
    Chan didn't fall in 4CC this year, he had hands down. Since it wasn't a fall, the deduction for it shows up in PCS as opposed to a deduction from his total. He didn't splat or zambonie the ice. If you want to see an actual FALL, check out Dai's quad attempt.
    But his body weight was on his hands = fall! That's what the rules say!

Page 3 of 13 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •