View Poll Results: Which of these Oscars should've been Meryl Streep's?

Voters
72. You may not vote on this poll
  • 2010-Julia & Julia (S. Bullock, The Blind Side)

    29 40.28%
  • 2009-Doubt (K. Winslet, The Reader)

    5 6.94%
  • 2003-(supporting)-Adaptation (C. Zeta-Jones, Chicago)

    14 19.44%
  • 1999-One True Thing (G. Paltrow, Shakespeare in Love) (also nom: C. Blanchett, Elizabeth)

    8 11.11%
  • 1991-Postcards from the Edge (K. Bates, Misery)

    1 1.39%
  • 1988-Ironweed (Cher, Moonstruck)

    3 4.17%
  • 1986-Out of Africa (G. Page, The Trip to Bountiful)

    20 27.78%
  • 1984-Silkwood (S. MacLaine, Terms of Endearment)

    5 6.94%
  • 1982-French Lt's Woman (K. Hepburn, On Golden Pond) (also nom: M. Mason, Only When I Laugh)

    10 13.89%
  • 1979-(supporting)-The Deer Hunter (M. Smith, California Suite)

    5 6.94%
  • Other (please comment) (see list below)

    6 8.33%
  • Never! Each winner, or someone else, deserved her win over Meryl

    6 8.33%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 65
  1. #21
    Corgi Wrangler
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Not Wearing Enough Sparkles
    Posts
    6,344
    vCash
    510
    Rep Power
    2366
    Quote Originally Posted by Beefcake View Post
    Reminder, Streep's wins were:
    ** 1980: (Supporting) Kramer V Kramer
    ** 1983: Sophie's Choice
    Yes, it's been 19 damned years since America's greatest actress has won an Oscar!
    .
    No, hon, it's been TWENTY-NINE years.

  2. #22

    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    24,303
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    45242
    I picked several, and some that were not listed(*).

    Out of Africa- could be my most favorite Meryl movie
    Adaptation (definitely wuzrobbed)
    A cry in the dark*
    Silkwood
    One true thing (it was a pity that Paltrow won it)
    The devil wears prada *
    Julie and Julia (Meryl was the only one that kept me awake in parts of the movie; the rest put me to sleep)

    I did not see Postcards from the edge and Ironweed.

    I was surprised that she was not even nominated for the Hillary Clinton-like role (played by Angela Lansbury in the past): I am forgetting the movie title- need help.

    No complaints about Winslett's win over Doubt, although Streep was good enough to win the SAG for that role.

    No complaints about Music of the heart not winning. The movie was a box office failure.

  3. #23
    Corgi Wrangler
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Not Wearing Enough Sparkles
    Posts
    6,344
    vCash
    510
    Rep Power
    2366
    Quote Originally Posted by Vash01 View Post

    I was surprised that she was not even nominated for the Hillary Clinton-like role (played by Angela Lansbury in the past): I am forgetting the movie title- need help.

    The Manchurian Candidate?

  4. #24

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Quadland
    Posts
    6,163
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    1604
    She was great in The Manchurian Candidate. A lot of her losses are for excellent performances but I don't think she really deserved to win for a lot of the losses over other losers. Like Glenn Close for Dangerous Liaisons or Elizabeth Shue or Sharon Stone in 1995.

  5. #25
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Diagonally parked in a parallel universe.
    Posts
    4,422
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Vash01 View Post
    I was surprised that she was not even nominated for the Hillary Clinton-like role (played by Angela Lansbury in the past): I am forgetting the movie title- need help.
    The Manchurian Candidate? I don't remember much about the 2004 version of the film, but I honestly forgot that Streep was even in it. So again, if the film is not terribly well received, its actors are less likely are going to be nominated. But maybe others liked it more. I thought it paled by comparison to the Sinatra version.

    Frankly I'm surprised Streep was nominated for One True Thing -- not because she was anything less than her usual wonderful self, but I thought the movie was cookie-cutter and instantly forgettable. (That might have had something to do with a certain Ms. Zellwegger of course ...) I'm not normally a big Paltrow fan, but I did think she was great in SiL, and that movie at the time was more of an "Oscar" movie. So I'm not crying foul on that one.

  6. #26

    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    24,303
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    45242
    Quote Originally Posted by danceronice View Post
    The Manchurian Candidate?
    That's the one. Since I had not seen the old version with Lansbury, I thought it was a good movie, though not great. I thought Streep was great in it, so it came as a shock that she was not even nominated.

  7. #27

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Quadland
    Posts
    6,163
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    1604
    I think her nomination for One True Thing made more sense than her nomination for Music of the Heart! Streep + Cancer was a good shot with the academy- and the move was seen as much better than Sarandon's Stepmom which may have helped Streep in a way.

  8. #28
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    California
    Posts
    11,774
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by danceronice View Post
    No, hon, it's been TWENTY-NINE years.
    Math is hard.

  9. #29
    Blergh
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    I Want to Go to There
    Posts
    9,328
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    17286
    I'm torn between Streep in Julie and Julia and Streep in Adaptation.

    Her performance in Adaptation was one of the best performances of the 2000s and I absolutely loved the film. That said, CZJ was wonderful in Chicago even if it wasn't up to Streep's standards (though I would have given the Oscar to Emily Mortimer in Lovely and Amazing had she been nominated).

    My vote for Julie and Julia was due to it being a pretty ho-hum year with Bullock winning for a performance that was far from impressive and not even nomination-worthy. Talk about lack of subtlety, depth, and simple-mindedness. I'm talking both of Bullock's performance and that hack of a film. I think it's one of those things that even the Bullock knew she didn't deserve which would explain her whole demeanor that night (well I'm sure it was really the fact that her husband was cheating on her and knowing the story was going to break out the next day).
    "Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility." - Ambrose Bierce

  10. #30
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    U.S.A.
    Posts
    8,087
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Has anyone lost more times than Meryl?

  11. #31

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    3,233
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    2507
    Quote Originally Posted by Allskate View Post
    Has anyone lost more times than Meryl?

    I don't know if she lost more than Meryl, but I believe Deborah Kerr holds the record for woman with most nominations and NO win. (Man who holds that record is Richard Burton IIRC.)

    PS I'd give it to MS for Julie and Julia; I thought she was phenomenal in that.

  12. #32
    Watch me move
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Gwyneth Paltrow Fan Club headquarters
    Posts
    16,755
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I don't think Gwyneth Paltrow should have won for Shakespeare in Love, but I don't think Streep should have won that year either. I think Streep has won when she has been truly phenomenal, and in other years she seems to have been nominated just because she is Streep.
    Who wants to watch rich people eat pizza? They must have loved that in Bangladesh. - Randy Newman on the 2014 Oscars broadcast

  13. #33

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Age
    47
    Posts
    17,726
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    15832
    Without commenting on what Meryl should have won, I just want to say what a wonderful actress she is.

    In Australia we were very impressed with Meryl's Aussie accent in Evil Angels (or Cry in the Dark as it was publicised in the US). It is a really hard accent for anyone not Australian to get. The only ones who I think have done it well were Meryl and Robert Downey Jnr.
    When you are up to your arse in alligators it is difficult to remember you were only meant to be draining the swamp.

  14. #34
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    9,762
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by caseyedwards View Post
    She was great in The Manchurian Candidate. A lot of her losses are for excellent performances but I don't think she really deserved to win for a lot of the losses over other losers. Like Glenn Close for Dangerous Liaisons or Elizabeth Shue or Sharon Stone in 1995.
    Close was so good in Liaisons. One of my favorite films ... well, except for John Malkovich. Who won the Oscar that year?

  15. #35

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Quadland
    Posts
    6,163
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    1604
    Quote Originally Posted by orbitz View Post
    Close was so good in Liaisons. One of my favorite films ... well, except for John Malkovich. Who won the Oscar that year?
    It was Jodie Foster for the Accused. There was also Streep, Sigourney Weaver-Gorillas in the Mist, Melanie Griffith-Working Girl and Close.

  16. #36
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    3,403
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Not sure if this applies, but interestingly, I could have totally seen a 2002 combo Streep nomination for "Adaptation" supporting and "The Hours" lead, but I guess they figured to push their efforts towards "Adaptation" supporting and give the supporting nod for "The Hours" to Julianne Moore and the lead to Nicole Kidman instead...

  17. #37

    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Age
    34
    Posts
    12,717
    vCash
    2634
    Rep Power
    30447
    Quote Originally Posted by Seerek View Post
    Not sure if this applies, but interestingly, I could have totally seen a 2002 combo Streep nomination for "Adaptation" supporting and "The Hours" lead, but I guess they figured to push their efforts towards "Adaptation" supporting and give the supporting nod for "The Hours" to Julianne Moore and the lead to Nicole Kidman instead...
    I agree. Streep's performance in The Hours certainly deserved a nomination that year, whereas Kidman's did not. Julianne Moore was robbed of the win in lead actress that year for Far From Heaven.
    Logic is in the eye of the logician --Gloria Steinem

  18. #38

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Top Secret FSU Witness Protection Location
    Age
    31
    Posts
    20,620
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    15753
    Kidman won because of a damn fake nose. Seriously, I am convinced that she won because she "transformed" into Virginia Wolfe except that the majority of the transformation was a prosthetic nose. Streep was amazing in her scenes, especially with her ex who was dying of AIDS. The Hours is my favorite movie of all time, I have seen it countless times. People think it is horribly boring (and I actually see why they would think so) but it just pulls me in, the dialogue is just perfect.
    -Brian
    "Michelle would never be caught with sausage grease staining her Vera Wang." - rfisher

  19. #39
    snarking for AZE
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    vera ellen's turtleneck museum
    Posts
    29,828
    vCash
    2068
    Rep Power
    22411
    Quote Originally Posted by BigB08822 View Post
    Kidman won because of a damn fake nose. .
    i thought she won because tom cruise left her

    which seems like enough of a prize on its own
    I feel like I'm in a dream. But it can't be a dream because there are no boy dancers!

  20. #40

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Top Secret FSU Witness Protection Location
    Age
    31
    Posts
    20,620
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    15753
    Quote Originally Posted by my little pony View Post
    i thought she won because tom cruise left her

    which seems like enough of a prize on its own
    -Brian
    "Michelle would never be caught with sausage grease staining her Vera Wang." - rfisher

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •