Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Kanada
    Age
    34
    Posts
    2,056
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0

    Talking 5 logical fallacies that make you wrong more than you think

    Highly applicable for an internet discussion forum.

    http://www.cracked.com/article_19468...you-think.html

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Zombieland
    Age
    45
    Posts
    2,153
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    8136
    That was a fun read. I don't have any of those problems, of course ... everyone really is out to get me.
    "Liking this sport is ridiculous, so you’re a little different for liking it, she explained. But you’re allowed to like what you like." - Robert Samuels

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Age
    53
    Posts
    10,467
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    21424
    So far I've just read the first two pages, between working.

    No matter what side you're on, you've played that game, and all it does is give you an excuse to ignore everything the other person says. You're dismissing their points as lies, they're doing the same to you, so why are you even having the conversation? Because you like making everyone else at the dinner table feel tense and awkward?
    I tend to operate on the assume that people mean what they say and are trying to act as best they can according to what they know and believe, which may not be the same as me.

    Obviously I know there are exceptions, but it's not my default assumption.

    Thus, for example, my tendency to approach analysis of skating scoring in terms of trying to understand what the officials may have been thinking according to the rules.

    Whereas many fans tend to assume that all officials are guilty of wrongdoing, one way or another, and will look for evidence of cheating, bias, or incompetence first before considering that there might have been a good reason for the scores given.

    Since we have different approaches to interpreting the officials motivations, when debating with each other about the results we also end up questioning each other.

    But I still think that fans who look for bad judging aren't lying . . . I think they're hypothesizing scenarios that make sense to them within their worldview. I do think they're often incapable of recognizing good judging because they're not looking for it and not interested in finding it.

    Either admit that maybe this person honestly thinks what they're saying is true, or just talk about sports.
    'Cause we all know how conflict-free sports discussions always are. Especially in figure skating.

  4. #4
    Internet Beyotch
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    NorCal
    Posts
    15,830
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    24455
    Quote Originally Posted by gkelly View Post
    So far I've just read the first two pages, between working.
    Cracked articles only ever have 2 pages.

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Calgary
    Age
    46
    Posts
    8,732
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    That was really entertaining.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    I Want to Go to There
    Posts
    9,852
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    40880
    Loved the article.
    "Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility." - Ambrose Bierce

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •