Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 5678 LastLast
Results 121 to 140 of 149
  1. #121

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    NC, USA
    Posts
    16,284
    vCash
    450
    Rep Power
    5352
    Quote Originally Posted by skfan View Post
    no more blade grabbing, period. blade grabbing is fugly on death spirals and butt ugly on 95% of single skaters who drop their legs rather than extend the leg towards the hand that grabs the blades. most can't do a blade grab spin half as beautiful as rory flack's anyway. and maybe without blade grabs there would be an end to the epidemic of gloves.
    Can we limit pairs to 1 lift that includes a blade grab?

  2. #122
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    404
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by shan View Post
    Can we limit pairs to 1 lift that includes a blade grab?
    i wish it were up to me in my dream world LOL i personally don't find blade grabs in lifts attractive for pairs or dance couples.

    a skater can angle his or her arm AS IF he/she were going to grab the blade but refrain from actually grabbing--then the wrist/ hand/arm achieves a more aesthetic line/position. i've seen this with several skaters that either go to grab blade and 'missed' or intentionally struck such a (finger perilous) pose.


    in general i prefer moves performed without 'assistance'--blade grabs are a form of assistance, as are spirals with the leg being held up by the arm. bielmanns and other blade grab spins, including usually hideous I spins, are rarely performed well enough to be more beautiful than eyesore IMO.

    if one had the strength and flexibility, one can achieve the grace of a blade grab position without actually grabbing the blade, no?

    still, it takes all opinions to make a world--while i'm celebrating the decreased number of dog-at-hydrant crotch-flashing ladies spirals others are campaigning for a return of the spiral in short programs. i would be ok with spirals briefly held (minimum time: 2 sec, maximum time: not so long that it jars with the music) and no assistance from grabbing the leg --but i'm happy for the demise of the _old rules_.

  3. #123

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,520
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    3645
    Quote Originally Posted by Marco View Post
    Judges should be encouraged to ... vary PCS components
    Have you read the criteria under each PCS? It would be a semantic feat to distinguish meaningful differences betrween the criteria under CH, IN, & PE. Even the criteria under SS overlaps slightly with the others. We need to rewrite the criteria.
    Last edited by TheIronLady; 07-19-2011 at 08:52 AM.

  4. #124

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Age
    52
    Posts
    10,242
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    10899
    Quote Originally Posted by TheIronLady View Post
    Have you read the criteria under each PCS? It would be a semantic feat to distinguish meaningful differences betrween the criteria under CH, IN, & PE. Even the criteria under SS overlaps slightly with the others. We need to rewrite the criteria.
    So what would be some good changes in the way they're written?

  5. #125

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    4,761
    vCash
    289
    Rep Power
    15381
    Quote Originally Posted by Marco View Post
    Get rid of axel requirement in the sp, the 3 required jumps should be: combo, steps into toe jump, and steps into edge jump
    Why do you want to get rid of the axel?

    I think the "double axel" option should be got rid of in the men's SP, the required element should be a triple. We are long past the days of double axels being the norm.

    Besides, if you made the rule an edge jump, most skaters would do an axel anyway, because it's worth more points!

  6. #126

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Walking to Work
    Posts
    25,656
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    17666
    Quote Originally Posted by leafygreens View Post
    Or Nessun Dorma?
    . ANYTHING that the judges feel has been overused.

  7. #127
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Miami, FL, USA
    Posts
    6,771
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I love the idea of a 2 pt. bonus for combos [but keep the limitations in place, so skaters don't go crazy with it]. This should be goal #1 for the ISU. CoP is supposed to reward jumps with difficult entries. Then, what is a more difficult entry to a jump than another jump???

    Also love the idea of giving point values to walleys, toe walleys, and inside axels to allow skaters a greater variety of jumps to choose from.

  8. #128

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Age
    52
    Posts
    10,242
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    10899
    Quote Originally Posted by misskarne View Post
    I think the "double axel" option should be got rid of in the men's SP, the required element should be a triple. We are long past the days of double axels being the norm.
    You do realize that there are senior men who cannot do all the triples, the triple axel being the most likely one missing, right? Check out some senior B events and lower groups at championships.

    And that occasionally even an otherwise medalworthy skater with top-quality skating and all the other triples plus a quadruple jump has a particular problem with the triple axel, whether rooted in technique, injury, or mental block about the forward takeoff.

    Triple axel may be the norm at level expected on the Grand Prix or Worlds top 24, but there are sometimes exceptions at that level, and the same rules also need to apply to all senior-level competitions, which includes every man who is good enough to represent his country internationally and is older than 19.

  9. #129

    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Staring at the ocean, anywhere anytime
    Posts
    9,667
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    4440
    For quite a while, Patrick Chan's 3A was iffy. Should he have been prohibited from senior competition by that?

    Doesn't seem right.

  10. #130
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,754
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by misskarne View Post
    Why do you want to get rid of the axel?

    I think the "double axel" option should be got rid of in the men's SP, the required element should be a triple. We are long past the days of double axels being the norm.

    Besides, if you made the rule an edge jump, most skaters would do an axel anyway, because it's worth more points!
    I agree that the men should have to do a triple axel.
    But for the edge jump, I think they would probably do a salchow or loop if they didn't need to do an axel as both of those give you more points.

  11. #131

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,971
    vCash
    1271
    Rep Power
    5546
    Quote Originally Posted by DORISPULASKI View Post
    For quite a while, Patrick Chan's 3A was iffy. Should he have been prohibited from senior competition by that?

    Doesn't seem right.
    Adam Rippon as well.

  12. #132

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Age
    28
    Posts
    11,834
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by aliceanne View Post
    Adam Rippon as well.
    Let's not forgot Joubert splatting a double axel of all things as well. He'd long been an established senior at that point.

  13. #133

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Age
    52
    Posts
    10,242
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    10899
    Anyone can splat on any jump at any time if one little thing goes wrong with technique, concentration, ice surface, etc.

    But sometimes a skater consistently never masters a certain jump, or has it for a while and then loses consistency to the point that they choose not to include that jump in their programs.

    I'm thinking more of Stephane Lambiel often opting to do double instead of triple axels a couple years ago, while still including quads.

  14. #134

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,520
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    3645
    Quote Originally Posted by Rex View Post
    . ANYTHING that the judges feel has been overused.
    Maybe orchestration should be banned. All programs must be performed to a single instrument.

  15. #135

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,971
    vCash
    1271
    Rep Power
    5546
    Quote Originally Posted by TheIronLady View Post
    Maybe orchestration should be banned. All programs must be performed to a single instrument.
    Maybe they should have to accompany themselves with said instrument while they skate

  16. #136
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    the Rainbow State
    Age
    32
    Posts
    2,338
    vCash
    730
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by TheIronLady View Post
    Maybe orchestration should be banned. All programs must be performed to a single instrument.
    Years of horrible tinkly piano music, screechy Vitamin String Quartet, or Apocalyptica overuse

  17. #137
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    1,249
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I think I like most of the suggestions made so far. I think I would add -

    Get rid of the eligibility rules and rules designed to restrict a skater's activities/choices in order to force them into ISU events. We can call this the Kwan/Rochette/Plushenko rule (or rather, non-rule).

    There should be some kind of bonus to reward skaters who do 6 different triples (less the 3A for the ladies). I don't know whether it could be done as simple add on bonus points or by constraining the jumps schedule in some way. For example, perhaps the rule could say no triple/quad jump entrance can be repeated until the skater has done either a double or triple using all 6 different jump entrances. This has the bonus effect of pushing the repeated jumps to later in the program. It always bugs me when we see skaters do the same jump again 20 seconds later.

    End anonymous judging


    It would be a semantic feat to distinguish meaningful differences between the criteria under CH, IN, & PE.
    I think they need to dump the separate choreo component mark. If the skaters all did their own choreo then this mark could perhaps be defended, but I find it whacked that there is a separate mark for choreography when the credit for the choreo mainly belongs to someone other than the skater. Why should the skater get sporting credit for hiring a good choreographer? What's next, a separate mark for costumes to reward the designer's work? It is supposed to be a sport and the results should be based only on the athlete's efforts. The skater should still get rewarded for execution and interpretation of the choreo, but there are already marks for that.

    Treat multi-rotation walleys and toe walleys as distinct jumps and award them their own base value.
    Not a plan. They stopped treating these differently because it is often difficult, in real time, to distinguish them. We don't need more elements with footnotes from the callers for things that are invisible to the audience, and we really don't need programs with 4 jumps that all look like a triple toe loop. (And you know there would be some opting to repeat the 3 toe and the 3 toe walley.)

    I would institute a rule that there must be one "classic" move per long program, no levels, just GOE points.
    One of the sad things about COP is the disappearance of things like spirals by men and cool jumps you list. So, of course, I like this suggestion too for senior skaters: "Jumps of 1 revolution, except in combinations, are considered nonlisted jumps. No points and they don't take up a jump slot." I think I would remove "except in combinations, though. (In other words, a single jump as an entrance to a triple jump is just a difficult entrance and does not turn it into a combination.)

    Revising the step sequence rule (levels), so that they don't have to last forever (and at the speed of a tortoise with a bad foot) and do not have to use every turn ever invented. I preferred the pre-COP step sequences.
    This. The sad thing is they did kind of do this by assigning no level to the second fw seqence for the men, and still most of them were ugly. I guess it will take a while to get footwork un-COP-ified. I also like the suggestion of adding a time limit for completing the step sequence. I timed someone last year at using a full 45 seconds to go from one end of the ice to the other. They also need to insist that SL footwork stay in a reasonably strait line, constantly progressing - no stopping to dance in place and no meandering from side to side.

    Once you compete at a senior ISU international event (GP, ISU champs, whatever), you cannot then compete at a junior ISU international event (JGP, Junior Worlds).
    ITA.

    What if in the FS, they did 8 jumps and 6 spins/footwork/spirals
    That basically is the pre-quad free skate program standard for men. Personally I like the idea of no more than 8 big jumps. A quad should replace its counterpart triple jump, not be done in addition to the triple.

    I would like to alter the current rule regarding only repeating two triples to allow 3T to be a 'third' repeated triple provided that they are only included as the second half of a 3+3 combination (or 2A+3),... This would allow more 3+3 combinations.
    Do not like this one. If skaters want to do 3 triple-triple combinations, they should have to do the 3 loop. (It is possible. Browning did 3A-3T, 3F-3T, 3S-3Lp once to win one of his World titles (90? 91, maybe?)

    My rule is that skaters get a 50 point bonus for actually skating to the music instead of over it.
    In theory, at least one of the PCS marks is supposed to take this into account, but the judges don't seem to use it. IMO if a skater uses one of those bland style music choices that function as little more than background music for their skate, it should be impossible to get anything higher than about 6 for Interpretation because there isn't much there to interpret.

    Keeping skaters from using the same music over and over. I would not allow them to use the previous season's programs.
    Wow, Viktor P would have been in serious trouble if that one had been around 1990-92. I think that one would get too tricky to enforce, with skaters pretending the music is different by adding different cuts or using different recordings.

    I think I'd propose instead that each spring, the ISU publish a list of music that is prohibited for the coming year. Carmen would, of course, top this list at first, but they could also use the list preemptivelty. For 2011-2012, for example, I would have included Swan Lake/Black Swan because you know we will be heartily sick of that by December at the latest.

    While we're on the music police theme, I'd change the no lyrics rule to no vocals. We have had enough debates over mumbling/chanting/dead languages and more than enough wailing sopranos.

  18. #138

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Walking to Work
    Posts
    25,656
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    17666
    Quote Originally Posted by TheIronLady View Post
    Maybe orchestration should be banned. All programs must be performed to a single instrument.
    Or better yet, LIVE music!!!

  19. #139
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    11,069
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Susan M View Post
    I think they need to dump the separate choreo component mark. If the skaters all did their own choreo then this mark could perhaps be defended, but I find it whacked that there is a separate mark for choreography when the credit for the choreo mainly belongs to someone other than the skater. Why should the skater get sporting credit for hiring a good choreographer? What's next, a separate mark for costumes to reward the designer's work? It is supposed to be a sport and the results should be based only on the athlete's efforts. The skater should still get rewarded for execution and interpretation of the choreo, but there are already marks for that.
    Well, I actually think the skater should be rewarded for executing such choreography (and executing it well i.e. to the music, beat, mood, expression etc). A simple slip may ruin the effect of an entire segment (Nagasu missing the layback to the drum beat last season and Asada's waxel at 2008 Worlds etc).

    I think the 5 components are very clearly defined and differentiated. There are bound to be some common features but overall each category rewards something a little different. Using a spread eagle as an example:

    SS rewards the speed and edge quality displayed while the skater does a spread eagle;

    TR rewards how the spread eagle is incorporated into the program (in between other elements or movements);

    PE rewards the body positioning and expressiveness while doing the spread eagle;

    CH rewards how the spread eagle is timed to the music, the effect created by the spread eagle, and also the placement of the spread eagle on the ice compared to the rest of the program;

    IN rewards how "into the music" or "into character" the skater is while doing the spread eagle.

  20. #140

    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    "Winterpeg"
    Posts
    4,794
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Keeping skaters from using the same music over and over. I would not allow them to use the previous season's programs.
    Quote Originally Posted by Susan M View Post
    Wow, Viktor P would have been in serious trouble if that one had been around 1990-92. I think that one would get too tricky to enforce, with skaters pretending the music is different by adding different cuts or using different recordings.
    Oh my, you hit the memory button for me there. I remember at least one year that the Grand Prix Final had a requirement for two different free programs from the skaters. The particular memory is of Ina and Zimmerman performing 99% identical program to a different orchestration of the same music and calling that a "different program". I am still shaking my head at how Moskvina got away with that one.

Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 5678 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •