There are plenty of female clothing options that are neither masculine/gender neutral nor overly sexualized.
Even if the clothes themselves are neutral -- say khaki slacks and t-shirt -- the shape of the wearer's body will usually make the sex of the wearer apparent. If the clothes are cut to fit, the shape of the body will be clearer. Of course, different individuals have different body shapes that may exaggerate or minimize typical sex characteristics.
If women should wear miniskirts and plunging necklines, does equality dictate that men should wear codpieces?
Fair enough.
There are some professions in which that kind of clothing is appropriate or even typical, even some in which sexual objectification of the male body is the main point.
But business executive is not one of them.
Of course I did once observe Scott Hamilton taking a business meeting dressed in tights and t-shirt.
On site at a pro competition right after practice.
Unless you're Sharon Stone. (Ok, she wore a dress but the skirt was short).
This is simply not true. Business dress allows women to wear skirts, dresses or pants, however a jacket is required in all cases. I know of few secretaries who wear pencil skirts. It's the lawyers who wear skirts, especially if they're going to Court, where a black skirt is required (along with black barrister's robes).
My former boss, a senior partner in one of the big Bay Street firms, told me that when she was first called to the Bar, she made her own suits because there was little available for business women at that time. Today, there is a wide range of feminine suits available either with pants or skirts. You can even buy stylish and attractive jackets on their own. And my former boss no longer makes her own suits.
It is also possible to dress stylishly without "gender objectification" becoming an issue, and without looking like a dowdy grandmother either. The media may make it appear to be an either/or situation but that's far from true.
Free Amodio.
Lawyers in Canada have to wear robes to court but not in the US. We had ourselves here in SF a very tiffed ADA once also former SF First Lady Kim Guilefoyle. She won the infamous dog mauling case. She now has a job on TV.
"Nature is a damp, inconvenient sort of place where birds and animals wander about uncooked."
from Speedy Death
Well, when I was in Jr. High, we weren't allowed to wear pants to school. During the winter when it was very cold, we could wear them to school but had to take them off once we got there. It was considered very revolutionary when, during my last year in the school district, they changed the rule to allow women to wear pants.
But my kids' experience is a lot like yours. My son wears pink a lot including a fedora with pink pin stripes that he wears any time he has to wear a suit. He's quite proud of that hat and, if anyone gives him a hard time, he tells them pink is a very manly color. My daughter asked for permission to go on a date with a girl a few months ago as well. (I told her that our dating rules hadn't changed -- no solo dates until she's 16 -- no matter what gender her date was.)
Breasts and buttocks have been sexualized in our culture. Definitely showing cleavage is considered dressing in a sexy manner. So is wearing a short skirt that barely covers the buttocks and/or crotch.
Every time you say something stupid on the internet, Tim Berners-Lee punches a kitten.
On the cover of our local newspaper, there is a story entitled "Students given Cinderella-style grad". The accompanying picture shows four young women in their grad dresses in front of a horse-drawn carriage which is a large white metal-framed, pumpkin-shaped carriage.
I find it interesting that in 2011, we still have females who want to be "princesses" whereas I never see anything similar about males wanting to be "princes".
I'm off to the Patrick Chan threads...where you can watch a molehill become a mountain in seconds!!!
And the women wonder why they never found their Prince Charming...lol
-Brian
"Michelle would never be caught with sausage grease staining her Vera Wang." - rfisher
This, exactly. I think many women are so used to dressing a certain way, and many of us enjoy it, that we don't think of where it originated. I don't wear high-cut tops often-- they look horrible on me. Same for long skirts (if I wear a skirt). I wear what I like, and what looks good. However, I can't pretend it has nothing to do with sexism, or isn't based on what men like to see. A lot of "sexy" styles for women are, even if it's a style that many women like.
I'm not sure what should be done about it, though.
Do you remember this?
Exception that proves the rule?During the summer of 2001, he proposed to her during a specially planned evening with a Cinderella theme, including a scroll inviting her to the "royal ball" and a gift of a crystal glass slipper. This engagement theme provided motivation for his free skate this year, which is skated to music from the ballet "Cinderella."
I'm off to the Patrick Chan threads...where you can watch a molehill become a mountain in seconds!!!