Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    3,485
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0

    Proper puctuation question

    Would you type the following phrase as either:

    non-co-owner occupants

    OR

    non co-owner occupants

    Normally, if I'm typing a word beginning with non, I would use the hyphen afterwards, such as "non-profit". I wouldn't type "non profit".

    Thanks much.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Age
    52
    Posts
    10,245
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    10899
    I wouldn't leave a space. Prefixes like non- and co- are parts of the whole word, not separate words.

    Close up non to the following word in most cases, but if your style requires a hyphen rather than closing up co- to owner to avoid confusion with the double o, then hyphenate the other prefix as well, as in your first example.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    10,586
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    17593
    Quote Originally Posted by Cupid View Post
    Would you type the following phrase as either:

    non-co-owner occupants

    OR

    non co-owner occupants

    Normally, if I'm typing a word beginning with non, I would use the hyphen afterwards, such as "non-profit". I wouldn't type "non profit".

    Thanks much.
    I'd type it as "nonprofit" -- no hyphen and no space.

    As for your original question, I'd use non co-owner occupants.

  4. #4
    Uncle Dick's Beyotch!
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    3,343
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    1851
    Quote Originally Posted by Cupid View Post
    Would you type the following phrase as either:

    non-co-owner occupants

    OR

    non co-owner occupants

    Normally, if I'm typing a word beginning with non, I would use the hyphen afterwards, such as "non-profit". I wouldn't type "non profit".

    Thanks much.
    My insticts say "non co-owner occupants" is correct.

    How about just writing the phrase "Non-Occupant Co-Owners" ? It solves the question of how to spell it and flows a little better IMO.

  5. #5
    Watch me move
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Gwyneth Paltrow Fan Club headquarters
    Posts
    16,761
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Are you talking about people who live in the suite or wherever, but who aren't co-owners of the suite?
    I would write it as "non-co-owner occupants", since all three modifiers apply to the occupants. But if it's acceptable for whatever you're writing this for, why not "non-owner occupants", unless the co-ownership is an important part.
    Who wants to watch rich people eat pizza? They must have loved that in Bangladesh. - Randy Newman on the 2014 Oscars broadcast

  6. #6

    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    10,586
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    17593
    Quote Originally Posted by Bostonfan View Post
    My insticts say "non co-owner occupants" is correct.

    How about just writing the phrase "Non-Occupant Co-Owners" ? It solves the question of how to spell it and flows a little better IMO.
    Non-occupant co-owners doesn't have the same meaning as non co-owner occupants. The former are not occupants, the latter are.

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    3,485
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Yes, I'm talking about condo co-owners (that's generally what they are called) who don't actually live in the unit but are renting/leasing it out to another person.

    I've decided to type it as "non co-owner occupant." Non-co-owner occupant just looks wrong.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    New England, USA
    Posts
    5,788
    vCash
    470
    Rep Power
    3403
    Is there a prior distinction between owners and co-owners? If not, just write non-owner occupants. If you need the distinction, try non-owner/co-owner occupants/
    AceOn6, the golf loving skating fan

  9. #9

    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    10,586
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    17593
    Quote Originally Posted by Cupid View Post
    Yes, I'm talking about condo co-owners (that's generally what they are called) who don't actually live in the unit but are renting/leasing it out to another person.

    I've decided to type it as "non co-owner occupant." Non-co-owner occupant just looks wrong.
    It seems that I have misunderstood what you meant by "non co-owner occupant" because "non co-owner" is the modifier of "occupant" as you have written it. Bostonfan's "non-occupant co-owner" actually seems to be what you are meaning to say, if you are referring to the co-owners and not the occupants (those leasing the condo).

  10. #10
    Beach Bum
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Maryland burbs and shore
    Posts
    12,988
    vCash
    583
    Rep Power
    5666
    I am not sure what you are writing, but can you get around the issue by using a sentence like: the co-owners of the unit do not occupy the unit.

    Or if you are talking about the occupants: the occupants of the unit do not own the unit.
    I think I will have a snack and take a nap before I eat and go to sleep.

  11. #11

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Age
    38
    Posts
    17,218
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I'd say "non-co-owner," because "non" isn't a word by itself. (At least not in English.) It's a prefix.
    Charter member of the "We Always Believed in Ashley" Club and the "We Believe in Ricky" Club

  12. #12
    Bountifully Enmeshed
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    At the Christmas Bizarre
    Posts
    37,709
    vCash
    250
    Rep Power
    16217
    Quote Originally Posted by Wyliefan View Post
    I'd say "non-co-owner," because "non" isn't a word by itself. (At least not in English.) It's a prefix.
    This is one where you really need an office style guide to know what would be considered "correct," but this is what I would go with.

    The only other option is to eliminate the hyphens and make it all one word, which is the modern preference, but the resulting word is very hard to read.
    Trolling dates all the way back to 397 B.C. - People began following Plato around and would make fart noises after everything he said.

  13. #13

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Driving the Han Yan Fan Van
    Posts
    8,837
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    "renters"?

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    3,485
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by LilJen View Post
    "renters"?
    I am going to try using "renter occupants," but if that is not acceptable, then maybe I'll just use the "non-co-owner occupants" because like someone said above, "non" is not a word on its own.

    Thank you, everyone!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •