Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 22
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Canada baby!
    Age
    38
    Posts
    7,591
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    3318

    Phantom- Love Never Dies

    I just happened to discover Andrew Lloyd Webber released it well over a year ago and that Ramin Karimloo is playing him at the Adelphi Theatre in London. I have listened to some of the tracks and have to say I quite enjoy "Till I Hear You Sing", "Beneath A Moonless Sky", "Beauty Underneath" and "Love Never Dies". I liked the songs enought to order the CD online.

    Has anyone seen the show? What did you think of it?

    It also premieres in Melbourne soon (or has already?). DYING for it to come to Toronto so I can see it. I have read that Ramin will portray the Phantom here but I guess that will happen once he is finished at Adelphi.
    ~I am convinced that life is 10% what happens to me and 90% how I react to it.~ (Charles R. Swindoll)

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Top Secret FSU Witness Protection Location
    Age
    31
    Posts
    20,719
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    34207
    I think I remember people not liking it, at all...
    -Brian
    "Michelle would never be caught with sausage grease staining her Vera Wang." - rfisher

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Age
    25
    Posts
    9,108
    vCash
    1529
    Rep Power
    0
    It got absolutely atrocious reviews.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Canada baby!
    Age
    38
    Posts
    7,591
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    3318
    I never listen to reviews especially when I have already listened to the music and enjoy it so much.

    I was just wondering if anyone actually saw it and what they thought of it.

    It was to only play a year and they extended it for another 6 months to Sept./11 where they are moving it to another theatre in London. I am hoping it is at that point that Ramin comes to Toronto. I would love to see it for my bday.
    ~I am convinced that life is 10% what happens to me and 90% how I react to it.~ (Charles R. Swindoll)

  5. #5
    Corgi Wrangler
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Not Wearing Enough Sparkles
    Posts
    6,456
    vCash
    510
    Rep Power
    5546
    The reviews were SO AWFUL it immediately went into MAJOR rewrites and they dumped a lot of the music. It's (very loosely) based on an old treatment by Frederick Forsythe (no seriously) that became "The Phantom of Manhattan", which was a stupid book when it was a book, and doesn't sound like it improved much with rewrites. The Phan reaction from those who've seen it seems to be it's basically a love letter for Christine/Phantom 'shippers, a take that to Christine/Raoul and Phantom/Meg shippers, and it works only if you buy total character derailment for everyone who appears from the original show/book. The big "reveal"/plot point (which anyone can see coming a hundred miles off) only works if you basically accept Christine's an even bigger ditz than the first one implies AND the Phantom's an even bigger jerk than you think (but you also have to be willing to let it slide), plus Raoul's a total jerk, and Meg....

    There are ways all of that could work. From the sound of things, they don't. Painfully.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Canada baby!
    Age
    38
    Posts
    7,591
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    3318
    The Phantom of Manhattan started as a collaboration between Forsythe but Webber didn`t agree with many of the concepts and didn`t think it would take to the stage very well. Forsythe published his work regardless and Webber went on to rework many aspects but the basic design of Coney Island remained but Meg and mom were the `villians`.

    I don`t think it is that out of touch with the original in that Christine loved aspects of the Phantom but loved the safety and security of Raoul. Also, I read an interview with Webber who stated he wanted this to be a stand alone work... that connects with the original.

    Still gonna see it and looking forward to it.

    Also, Being the huge Phantom fan I am, the original lyrics to `The Phantom of the Opera`were changed drastically as well. The 1st verse in particular had a huge overhaul from the original lyrics written by Steve Hartley by Charles Hart. Andrew Lloyd Webber has notoriously done that with many of his musicals.
    Last edited by Twilight1; 04-05-2011 at 03:16 PM.
    ~I am convinced that life is 10% what happens to me and 90% how I react to it.~ (Charles R. Swindoll)

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    170
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    42
    I saw it in London about a year ago (before the rewrites). The score is lovely, the performances were quite good (I saw an understudy for the Phantom, unfortunately), the set/costumes/effects were suitably spectacular. The book was awful. It felt like fan fiction written by a 13 year old. The characters only loosely resembled the characters from the original story, and I hated, hated, hated the removal of any autonomy for Christine at all (I know she's not a paragon of feminist thinking in the original, but at least she gets to make her own choice at the end of the first one).

    I did enjoy it, and it made me quite sentimental for the original, and it was a fun evening in the theatre. But the book was awful, and frustrating.

  8. #8
    Corgi Wrangler
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Not Wearing Enough Sparkles
    Posts
    6,456
    vCash
    510
    Rep Power
    5546
    See, my problem is in the stage version

    Spoiler

    All of which kinda negates the ending of the first play, AND makes Christine look like an indecisive ditz, and makes the Phantom look like a complete jerk again, totally wiping out what character development he had. (Never mind a classic 'you fail biology forever' moment as

    Spoiler

    )

    It's less that it's a stupid plot as it's an UNNECESSARILY stupid plot. The book was bad enough, the musical took the basic premise and went TOTALLY crazy (note, however, while IIRC the trigger 'man' is different the end result is the same.) It only functions if you accept every returning character underwent a radical personality shift, lost any sort development from the previous play, and learned absolutely nothing. Given the Leroux is in the public domain, there are a million sequels out there--they didn't have to go with such a weak idea to start with.

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    2,404
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I did break down and see it in London after it reopened post-rewrites. It was crap and I'm still mourning the money spent to see that piece of crap. I'm not sure how else to describe something that bordered on bad fan fiction.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Age
    35
    Posts
    12,720
    vCash
    2634
    Rep Power
    40013
    I'm one of the few people that never liked Phantom of the Opera in the first place, so I never cared about Love Never Dies, but I've heard that it's a disaster, and not of the interesting kind.

    In fact, I can't think of a Lloyd Weber musical I liked. Joseph is pretty good, but I'm just not a fan of his work in general.
    Last edited by Allen; 04-05-2011 at 11:55 PM.
    Logic is in the eye of the logician --Gloria Steinem

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    2,404
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Allen View Post
    I'm one of the few people they never liked Phantom of the Opera in the first place, so I never cared about Love Never Dies, but I've heard that it's a disaster, and not of the interesting kind.

    In fact, I can't think of a Lloyd Weber musical I liked. Joseph is pretty good, but I'm just not a fan of his work in general.
    To be honest I'm not that much of a fan of his work. It is just isn't my cup of tea. Phantom is better than say Cats, but that doesn't say much. I did appreciate some of the music from Phantom. I can't say as much for Love Never Dies.

    I'm a fan of musical theater, but that piece of garbage makes me have second thoughts about that statement.

  12. #12

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Age
    38
    Posts
    17,618
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by danceronice View Post
    it works only if you buy total character derailment for everyone who appears from the original show/book.
    That's what drives me bonkers about the whole trainwreck. The guy wrote a sequel that basically undoes everything he did in the first one, wrecks the characters, and negates the original's ending. Who does that to his own work??
    Charter member of the "We Always Believed in Ashley" Club and the "We Believe in Ricky" Club
    Old, lonely, pathos-hungry, and extremely gullible

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    5,541
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ArtisticFan View Post
    To be honest I'm not that much of a fan of his work. It is just isn't my cup of tea. Phantom is better than say Cats, but that doesn't say much. I did appreciate some of the music from Phantom. I can't say as much for Love Never Dies.

    I'm a fan of musical theater, but that piece of garbage makes me have second thoughts about that statement.
    I agree. I think most of ALW's music is too bombastic and he always pairs himself with some of the worst lyricists around. I enjoy plenty of other music theater composers, but I think Andrew Lloyd Webber's one of the worst.

  14. #14

    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    In and around.
    Posts
    10,628
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    3495
    Isn't there an urban legend that ALW's cat deleted his work halfway through? Insinuating SOME form of fate was trying to save us from it...

    I have no doubt the music is lovely, performances strong, etc. etc. etc. I admit I haven't seen it, but I've read what happens. The comparison to fan fiction seems bang on, and that's sad. I was a huge fan of everything Phantom-- even the hit and miss 2004 movie.

    I have to laugh because I would have LOVED a sequel back when I first saw it... at age 12/13.

  15. #15
    Corgi Wrangler
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Not Wearing Enough Sparkles
    Posts
    6,456
    vCash
    510
    Rep Power
    5546
    Quote Originally Posted by Wyliefan View Post
    That's what drives me bonkers about the whole trainwreck. The guy wrote a sequel that basically undoes everything he did in the first one, wrecks the characters, and negates the original's ending. Who does that to his own work??
    Well, the first one took some liberties, but more or less stuck halfway close to the original novel ('sexing up' the Phantom's makeup, mostly because they discovered Michael Crawford couldn't sing through a full-face prosthetic.) This one--the book Forsyth ended up writing wasn't that great, and it's like ALW took the worst aspects from it and used those. There are LOTS of sequels, and as the original's in the public domain no one's stopping ALW from writing something totally new, and THIS is what he thought was the best option?

    It's have sooner seen them adapt one of the crossovers involving that OTHER public-domain character, Sherlock Holmes ("The Canary Trainer" and "The Angel of the Opera". I can't remember which was readable and which was just bad, but either one was better than "The Phantom of Manhattan.")

  16. #16
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    139
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I saw it, I liked it (mostly because Ramin was so very good) but the ending is awful, and drags on forever. After Christine sings her big number there must be twenty minutes until the curtain falls and there is not another song in that time. Very odd.

  17. #17
    gold dust woman
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Olympia, WA
    Age
    35
    Posts
    4,056
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Andora View Post
    Isn't there an urban legend that ALW's cat deleted his work halfway through? Insinuating SOME form of fate was trying to save us from it...
    Not an urban legend!

    The Daily Mail announced in May 2007 that the sequel would be delayed, because Lloyd Webber's six-month-old kitten Otto, a rare-breed Turkish Van, climbed onto Lloyd Webber's Clavinova digital piano and managed to delete the entire score. Lloyd Webber was unable to recover any of it from the instrument, but was eventually able to reconstruct the score.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love_Ne...%29#Background

  18. #18

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Two places! Atlanta suburbs and in the North Georgia Mountains
    Posts
    3,820
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    2089
    I always hated the book because Christine is just a dumb little twit. I liked many of the songs in the first musical, and I enjoyed the movie until I fell asleep.

    Put me down as one who thinks Le Miz is infinitely better as art. Phantom has its moments. But it's a surface/glossy/shallow bauble.

    I love ALW's Requiem though.

  19. #19

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Top Secret FSU Witness Protection Location
    Age
    31
    Posts
    20,719
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    34207
    I can't get over the fact that his cat deleted everything. I don't think I would have it in me to start over. Is his cat still alive? lol
    -Brian
    "Michelle would never be caught with sausage grease staining her Vera Wang." - rfisher

  20. #20
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    2,404
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BigB08822 View Post
    I can't get over the fact that his cat deleted everything. I don't think I would have it in me to start over. Is his cat still alive? lol
    The cat deserves an award.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •