Page 28 of 52 FirstFirst ... 18262728293038 ... LastLast
Results 541 to 560 of 1024
  1. #541
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    California Dreaming....
    Posts
    1,209
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0

    Exclamation

    I, too, think this series is spiraling downward into more or less a soap opera atmosphere and has lost a lot of the subtle writing that made it so very interesting last year. That said, I still love it!!!!!!

    Yes, Sir Robert better keep his eyes off that new maid (!) sadly I do think something will "develop" there.

    Mary and Matthew are boring together. Each of them needs somebody with fire in their personality to allow their own, reserved (and in Mary's case, spoiled) personalities to become more interesting.

    The issue of how Patrick knew Gordon is very unclear - I was thinking that they met during the war.....something about Princess Patricia's brigade????? What was it? Can't remember now. I don't think we've seen the last of this character.

    Hey, don't count Edith out yet in the romance department - I think she'll end up with the happiest match of all the girls.

    The actress who played Vera Bates is in the Titanic special coming up this Spring. Since I completely hated the Cameron "Titanic" movie, I'm hoping for something better with this effort.

    DA is going to take the characters through WW2 and then end so there is plenty of time left for answers to our current questions and for more questions to arise.

  2. #542
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    PNdub
    Posts
    1,770
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I seem to remember "Patrick" saying that he knew a Peter Gordon in school. So maybe that is the connection? I settled on that explanation and I am surprised to find so many people speculating about the connection so maybe I heard wrong.

    Peaches, Vera Bates is played by Maria Doyle Kennedy who was Catharine of Aragon in The Tudors. Maybe she will go for the Trifecta and play an estranged first wife in the Titanic production.

  3. #543
    Corgi Wrangler
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Not Wearing Enough Sparkles
    Posts
    6,456
    vCash
    510
    Rep Power
    5546
    Quote Originally Posted by Peaches LaTour View Post
    The issue of how Patrick knew Gordon is very unclear - I was thinking that they met during the war.....something about Princess Patricia's brigade????? What was it? Can't remember now. I don't think we've seen the last of this character.
    Since the Titanic went down in 1912, even if they met in the war, that would still mean Patrick didn't die when they claimed. I HOPE we haven't seen the end. (Then again that makeup job has to SUCK for that actor...)


    The actress who played Vera Bates is in the Titanic special coming up this Spring. Since I completely hated the Cameron "Titanic" movie, I'm hoping for something better with this effort.
    Do NOT get me started on Cameron. I am coming to tolerate the plot, and even appreciate Leo DiCaprio's performance more than I used to (he actually does some very good work, more than the script really deserves) but the treatment of Titanic's officers and crew just sets off my berserk button like you would not believe. (In as much as it is possible to be a fangirl of someone who is 1. a real person and not a fictional character and 2. has been dead since 1952, I'm a huge Lightoller fangirl.) I can got for hours on the subject. In fact I had to promise my boss I will stick to my lecture topic (local survivors) and NOT turn it into "101 Things James Cameron Got Wrong."

    Maria Kennedy appears to be playing a fictional character (the name doesn't appear on survivor or victim lists) so hey, maybe this time she plays a wronged first wife, only for variety she teams up with the mistress and they throw her ex-husband out of a lifeboat.

  4. #544
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    California Dreaming....
    Posts
    1,209
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0

    Exclamation

    Quote Originally Posted by danceronice View Post
    Since the Titanic went down in 1912, even if they met in the war, that would still mean Patrick didn't die when they claimed. I HOPE we haven't seen the end. (Then again that makeup job has to SUCK for that actor...)

    Do NOT get me started on Cameron. I am coming to tolerate the plot, and even appreciate Leo DiCaprio's performance more than I used to (he actually does some very good work, more than the script really deserves) but the treatment of Titanic's officers and crew just sets off my berserk button like you would not believe. (In as much as it is possible to be a fangirl of someone who is 1. a real person and not a fictional character and 2. has been dead since 1952, I'm a huge Lightoller fangirl.) I can got for hours on the subject. In fact I had to promise my boss I will stick to my lecture topic (local survivors) and NOT turn it into "101 Things James Cameron Got Wrong."

    Maria Kennedy appears to be playing a fictional character (the name doesn't appear on survivor or victim lists) so hey, maybe this time she plays a wronged first wife, only for variety she teams up with the mistress and they throw her ex-husband out of a lifeboat.
    No, don't get me started on the zillion things wrong that Cameron brought to his film, "Titanic"........

    I saw a photo of Maria Kennedy, in character, for the upcoming special about the Titanic. There was no information about her role in the show.

  5. #545
    Corgi Wrangler
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Not Wearing Enough Sparkles
    Posts
    6,456
    vCash
    510
    Rep Power
    5546
    Quote Originally Posted by Peaches LaTour View Post
    No, don't get me started on the zillion things wrong that Cameron brought to his film, "Titanic"........

    I saw a photo of Maria Kennedy, in character, for the upcoming special about the Titanic. There was no information about her role in the show.
    It's on IMBD, with "Muriel Batley" as the character's name. That name isn't on any passenger or crew list to which I have easy access at the moment, though of course those aren't all 100% accurrate, but it's easier to deal with fictional people.

    And sounds like we could form a support group. I'm just telling myself, if JF is running this show, he will NOT do half the things that Cameron did. (Though I'm dreading the no-thanks-to-Cameron now-inevitable question of an officer suicide...) He has not disappointed yet. Then the evil little voice says "there's always a first time."

  6. #546
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    700
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    So...Peaches and Dancer...I take it you're not going to see the new 3D version of Cameron's Titanic then..

  7. #547
    Official FSU Alte Kacher
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Looking through my D7100 viewfinder
    Posts
    12,073
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    20374
    Quote Originally Posted by znachki View Post
    So...Peaches and Dancer...I take it you're not going to see the new 3D version of Cameron's Titanic then..
    I can do peaches and dancer one better, I’ve never seen Cameron’s Titanic, nor do I intend to.
    "Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity”– MLK

  8. #548
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    700
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Reuven View Post
    I can do peaches and dancer one better, I’ve never seen Cameron’s Titanic, nor do I intend to.
    I did see it once. Last Cameron movie I've ever seen.

    I remember at the time, that there was a lot of to-do about the fact that it had cost so much money, and "Hollywood" had the knives out. Until the general agreement was that you could see every dollar spent up there on the screen. And it was purty. Which is what my 14 yr old (at the time) nephew said about Avatar. The movie was stupid - but it sure was purty.

    Back on topic though,
    Peaches - I agree that the quality has gone down a bit. However, like a lot of these shows, they make a good contained story with no expectation of being renewd. Then, they do and I'm sure there can be a bunch - "Oh, Sh!t! Now what do we do?"

  9. #549
    Corgi Wrangler
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Not Wearing Enough Sparkles
    Posts
    6,456
    vCash
    510
    Rep Power
    5546
    Quote Originally Posted by znachki View Post
    So...Peaches and Dancer...I take it you're not going to see the new 3D version of Cameron's Titanic then..
    Well, not least because IMAX and 3-D make me queasy....not going to see The Phantom Menace in 3D, either, and I saw that..um...many times.

    I don't despise every single thing about the movie--yes, the plot is simplistic bordering on stupid, and whenever we're dealing with the ships' officers, Ismay, Andrews, the real passenger characters, the rest of the H&W guarantee group who don't exist because the ENTIRE SECOND CLASS doesn't exist (despite "second class male" being the single worst thing you could be if you want to get off the Titanic alive)....I turn into Madeline Khan in "Clue"--"Flames...flames, on the sides of my face..." But the ship is pretty and the dresses are pretty.

    But I have CONFIDENCE in Fellowes! Oooh...do you think he'll sneak in a throwaway of Patrick and their other cousin (Patrick's father?) who died? As a little nod to Downton fans?

  10. #550
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,125
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    That would be cool.
    I Did love the movie because as a Titanic fanatic, I just loved seeing a copy of the ship and seeing some of the real people and history.
    I pretty much ignored the plot.
    On tv it was a big yawn, but, on the big screen, it was breathtaking.

  11. #551

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    The Top of Utah!!
    Age
    55
    Posts
    7,547
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    19192
    Quote Originally Posted by Peaches LaTour View Post
    I, too, think this series is spiraling downward into more or less a soap opera atmosphere and has lost a lot of the subtle writing that made it so very interesting last year. That said, I still love it!!!!!!

    Yes, Sir Robert better keep his eyes off that new maid (!) sadly I do think something will "develop" there.
    Maybe he will get her pregnant, she will have a son, and that will solve the problem of who will inherit Downton Abbey!
    Nubka - Unpaid Slave Laborer...

  12. #552
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Ravenclaw Common Room
    Posts
    2,005
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    No, because she wouldn't be married to Lord Grantham, so the bastard son still wouldn't inherit.

  13. #553

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    7,398
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    4361
    Quote Originally Posted by centerstage01 View Post
    No, because she wouldn't be married to Lord Grantham, so the bastard son still wouldn't inherit.
    Could a son inherit if Lord Grantham divorced his wife and remarried before the birth? IIRC, Henry VIII married Anne Boleyn when she was already pregnant with Elizabeth; would the rule be different for the non-royal nobility?

  14. #554
    Corgi Wrangler
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Not Wearing Enough Sparkles
    Posts
    6,456
    vCash
    510
    Rep Power
    5546
    Quote Originally Posted by attyfan View Post
    Could a son inherit if Lord Grantham divorced his wife and remarried before the birth? IIRC, Henry VIII married Anne Boleyn when she was already pregnant with Elizabeth; would the rule be different for the non-royal nobility?
    I think LEGALLY, that would qualify, but socially they might as well move to Australia at that point. Anyone with a clue and an ability to do basic arithmetic would know what was going on.

  15. #555
    Quadless
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Celebrating the power of Pooh
    Posts
    15,037
    vCash
    325
    Rep Power
    43699
    I have a different take on Lord Grantham's camaraderie with the new maid, which is that it's just another signal of how barriers are breaking down as a result of the war. Sybil is about to run off with the chauffeur. Edith had her barnyard tryst with the farmer. Mary is about to marry a crass nouveau riche commoner. And Lord Grantham is letting down his guard with the help. I really don't think there's more to it than that.
    "I miss footwork that has any kind of a discernible pattern. The goal of a step sequence should not be for a skater to show the same ice coverage as a Zamboni and take about as much time as an ice resurface. " ~ Zemgirl, reflecting on a pre-IJS straight line sequence

  16. #556

    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    4,733
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    14921
    I just want to say - I am so happy to read other folks dislike of Cameron's Titanic. I enjoy lots of movies, classics, foreign, indy, comedy, drama, along with well made and some guilty pleasure ones. Over the years I have hated listening to folks that hardly see any movies go on and on about how Camerons' Titanic is the best movie evahhh. I just want to gag.

  17. #557
    Quadless
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Celebrating the power of Pooh
    Posts
    15,037
    vCash
    325
    Rep Power
    43699
    Small favor to request - might those interested in discussing all things Titanic please consider starting a separate thread to leave this one for Downton Abbey?
    "I miss footwork that has any kind of a discernible pattern. The goal of a step sequence should not be for a skater to show the same ice coverage as a Zamboni and take about as much time as an ice resurface. " ~ Zemgirl, reflecting on a pre-IJS straight line sequence

  18. #558
    snarking for AZE
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    katbert greenhouse
    Posts
    30,171
    vCash
    2068
    Rep Power
    50062
    Quote Originally Posted by BittyBug View Post
    I have a different take on Lord Grantham's camaraderie with the new maid, which is that it's just another signal of how barriers are breaking down as a result of the war. Sybil is about to run off with the chauffeur. Edith had her barnyard tryst with the farmer. Mary is about to marry a crass nouveau riche commoner. And Lord Grantham is letting down his guard with the help. I really don't think there's more to it than that.
    that's how i took it. i thought he was trying to be nice because the is a veteran and knows her alleged husband is a soldier who died in action, leaving her in a difficult position.
    I feel like I'm in a dream. But it can't be a dream because there are no boy dancers!

  19. #559
    Corgi Wrangler
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Not Wearing Enough Sparkles
    Posts
    6,456
    vCash
    510
    Rep Power
    5546
    Quote Originally Posted by BittyBug View Post
    I have a different take on Lord Grantham's camaraderie with the new maid, which is that it's just another signal of how barriers are breaking down as a result of the war. Sybil is about to run off with the chauffeur. Edith had her barnyard tryst with the farmer. Mary is about to marry a crass nouveau riche commoner. And Lord Grantham is letting down his guard with the help. I really don't think there's more to it than that.
    Stay away from wikipedia. That's all I'm saying.

    smurfy--part of my dislike probably started as hype aversion, but really--I saw it in the theaters on a date, and by the time she was on the back of the boat the first time people in the audience were snickering and going "Jump, jump!"

  20. #560
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    877
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BittyBug View Post
    I have a different take on Lord Grantham's camaraderie with the new maid, which is that it's just another signal of how barriers are breaking down as a result of the war. Sybil is about to run off with the chauffeur. Edith had her barnyard tryst with the farmer. Mary is about to marry a crass nouveau riche commoner. And Lord Grantham is letting down his guard with the help. I really don't think there's more to it than that.
    But I thought there were a couple of other hints that something might be brewing between Lord Grantham and the maid. In one scene, Lady Cora was hurrying around doing her thing, and he complained about having to take his lunch, or some meal, alone. She replied that she just had too much to do and that in so many words he could handle being by himself for once. He wouldn't be the first man to have a pity party about not getting enough attention.
    Seems like there was another thinly veiled hint in the most recent episode, but I can't remember what it was. I hope I'm wrong and nothing comes of this. Though it would be interesting to see how the Dowager Countess handled it. She would surely know.

Page 28 of 52 FirstFirst ... 18262728293038 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •