Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 97
  1. #41
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    773
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by neptune View Post
    True, but I see Michelle Kwan in kind of the same way--one of the best competitors ever, but not necessarily one of the best skaters ever. Michelle did a lot of things well, but not that much spectacularly IMO. Of course, she didn't have a lot of competitors who could be called "best ever" either. But I would rate early Chen Lu, for instance, as a better skater overall, even if she wasn't quite as steely a competitor as Michelle.
    I'm confused 'cos unless you're just comparing artistry which is subjective, if you're talking just about who excelled at individual technical elements then actually chen lu had even weaker individual elements than michelle such as her spins and spirals (and that's considering that spins are michelle's weakest element).

    for me michelle had among the best spirals and footwork sequences in the history of the sport and that's just speaking for individual technical elements. her edges were also top notch.
    I also happen to think her artistry is pretty much the best but that's of course subjective. I will agree with those who say her choreography became extremely watered down later on in her career as opposed to the mid-section during the late 90's where every program was intricate and complex, filled to the brim with nuances, even the exhibitions.

    @ judgejudy, I can't speak for all of irina's footwork but I distinctly remember her 05 worlds footwork to be a big flaw on an otherwise amazing program (yes the historic one where she won and made a big comeback). it was just so awkward. I can't recall anyone's footwork getting the same kind of response michelle's did consistently throughout her career. most people remember how she always had a climactic footwork sequence that had the crowd going crazy during the latter part of her career but even earlier than that during her rachmaninoff 1998 or dream of desdemona 1997 programs she had very nuanced and fast circular footwork that distinguished her from most of the rest of her competition.

    kind of off topic, but most graceful skater evarrrr
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqVXK8xdpV0
    Last edited by iarispiralllyof; 07-29-2010 at 09:06 PM.

  2. #42
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    773
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    And about the argument that certain skaters such as Cohen rarely competed at their "best" - I just don't buy that.

    It's not because I'm arguing that someone who competes better (has steel nerves) is better than someone who has more potential but always makes mistakes .. I just personally think there is obviously a technical issue that is also part of the problem when someone falters as often as cohen does.

    people chalk it up simply to lack of confidence or nervousness but again something like nerves is immeasurable and only speculative, how can you refute the argument that the rare time she skated clean was simply a fluke and not the other way around that instead she rarely performed "at her best".

    maybe people are explaining it through nerves because the rare time she does skate clean she has for the most part solid technique on most of her jumps, but being able to consistently have a solid thought process and mental/physical preparation during the millisecond before a jump is as much a part of the technical process of jumping as something like "nerves". I know my thoughts are probably sounding jumbled right now but basically I'm saying that yes nerves may have been a problem but I find people who fall as constantly as sasha do also have a major inherent technical flaw in their jumps, it's not just all "nerves".

    all of those factors that are important (speed going into and out of the jump, height, posture and position, correct landing and takeoff and way more) of which the slightest mis-preparation could cause a two-foot, stumble, shaky or wobbly landing or at worst a fall are not simply ruined just by "nerves" or "missed potential". there's a lot of sheer technical skill in consistently landing jumps with all of those factors considered. maybe she simply didn't have the capacity to consistently complete perfect programs because she simply couldn't handle too much technical content packed within a competitive long program (all of those factors to consider during the millisecond of preparation before a jump). like a bubble filled up with too much air, even if she managed a clean jump she'd find something else to falter on because her concentration and body could not take anymore. and besides her falls even when she landed the jumps it was often so abrupt and hard landings, not smooth and filled with ease like many of kwan's
    Last edited by iarispiralllyof; 07-29-2010 at 09:07 PM.

  3. #43
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    with my Sestra Helena plotting how to ravish Hot Paul and delicious Cal
    Age
    36
    Posts
    3,256
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by miki88 View Post
    I think Mao will be remembered as the one who spearheaded the renaissance of Japanese skating. Although there have been many great Japanese skaters prior to her arrival, she's really the one that has got the most attention since Midori.
    Yes, I think the timing of Mao's rise on the senior scene and the Japanese interest accompanied with that is also in large part due to Shizuka Arakawa's win in Torino as the only 2006 Olympic medal for Japan, and ladies' figure skating GOLD, the glamour event of the Winter Games, at that! Also, Miki Ando's victory at the following year's Worlds in 2007 in her home country brough further attention to the sport of figure skating in Japan. Asada, like Kwan following the Harding/Kerrigan saga in the USA, greatly benefited and reaped the rewards from the timing of her ascent when the attention of her nation was focused on her sport.

  4. #44

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Skateland
    Posts
    7,841
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    As far as basic skating skills are concerned - smoothness of edges and such - it's between Lynn, Hamill and Sato. Whose DVDs delight us with the basics? Those three are absolutely "it," as far as I'm concerned. Even 'The Kween' settles for the next tier, e.g., spotty laybacks, not the most elegant upper-body carriage,etc. Lynn, Hamill & Sato were (are) like textbooks of skating, even though they have only two World titles among them and no Oly title. [Sarah Hughes has an Oly title...so does that make Sarah a greater skater than Lynn, Hamill and Sato? (chuckle) You answer, please.]

  5. #45

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Some place competitive and athletic, but ultimately more like an audition than anything else.
    Posts
    7,786
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    19516
    Among Lynn, Hamill and Sato, Lynn stands apart.

  6. #46
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Dashing Between Bennetton and Krispy Kreme
    Posts
    2,451
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Frau Muller View Post
    Lynn, Hamill & Sato were (are) like textbooks of skating, even though they have only two World titles among them and no Oly title. [Sarah Hughes has an Oly title...so does that make Sarah a greater skater than Lynn, Hamill and Sato? (chuckle) You answer, please.]
    Hamill was the Olympic Champion in 1976.

  7. #47
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    There's one near you!!! :)
    Posts
    3,952
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by iarispiralllyof
    I'm confused 'cos unless you're just comparing artistry which is subjective, if you're talking just about who excelled at individual technical elements then actually chen lu had even weaker individual elements than michelle such as her spins and spirals (and that's considering that spins are michelle's weakest element).
    That may be true concerning the spins and spirals, but I thought Chen's jumps were better, with more height and spring. Didn't she also skate faster than Michelle?

    I will agree with those who say her choreography became extremely watered down later on in her career as opposed to the mid-section during the late 90's where every program was intricate and complex, filled to the brim with nuances, even the exhibitions.
    When she had the choreography, Michelle was definitely top-notch with connecting moves.

  8. #48
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,981
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by neptune View Post
    That may be true concerning the spins and spirals, but I thought Chen's jumps were better, with more height and spring. Didn't she also skate faster than Michelle?


    Yes, Lulu definitely had more height and spring on her jumps than Michelle ever did. She also did skate faster. Artistically, I would put Lulu eons over Michelle as well... Spins... Well, Michelle has a slight edge as she is not that great a spinner...

    Spirals, no debate on that one.

  9. #49
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    There's one near you!!! :)
    Posts
    3,952
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by miki88
    Michelle's influence is inevitably tied to Lynn's since that was her idol.
    Wait a minute--I thought Tonya was Michelle's idol? Well, I guess that was before her coach made an edit.

  10. #50
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    3,377
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Tonya was an idol from the triple axle perspective. And not a bad idol to have, regardless of the scandal. Her 3 axle was really great (when she hit it). Better than Ito's IMO even though Ito was more consistent with it.

    I believe Kwan was heavily influenced by Lori Nichols when it came to drawing inspiration from J. Lynn's skating.
    Last edited by Bostonfan; 07-30-2010 at 06:25 PM.

  11. #51
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    2,050
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by judgejudy27 View Post
    One cant really compare the technical content of someone in her prime in the early and mid 80s to someone in her prime in the late 90s and early 2000s. That said I wholeheartedly agree that I find Kwan a much superior skater to Witt inspite of the OGMs. Many people at the time said Witt was never even the best skater of her own era, just the best competitor. People like Thomas and Kadavy to me overall look like much better skaters, yet Witt still found a way to rise up and beat ever their best at the 87 Worlds. Witt is probably the greatest competitor in womens skating history, and that is how she carved out her own place in skating history with less than the best technique or style in pretty much everything she did.
    I even found Manley a better SKATER than Witt, but not as good a competitor.

  12. #52
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,829
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by neptune View Post
    Wait a minute--I thought Tonya was Michelle's idol? Well, I guess that was before her coach made an edit.
    I am pretty sure she came to the decision that Tonya was no longer her idol on her own, LOL...especially being so close to the attack at 13 year old. It was probably very scary for her.

  13. #53

    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    4,316
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Why does it matter so much who the greatest ever skater much, really? Skaters can be great because of so many things: technical talent, artistic talent, the number of championships they've won, the fact that they made their mark in certain aspects of skating, the fact they were influential by doing certain things, or the fact that they became famous outside of skating etc etc etc. Why obsess with naming ONE particular skater to be the greatest ever? Some may think Sonja Henie was the greatest ever because she was first in so many things and became hugely popular, but do I really give a damn about her actual skating? Not really. It really comes down to who you love the most and who brings the most emotions out of you as a fan.

  14. #54
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    514
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by olympic View Post
    Yes. Don't get me wrong. Yu Na is top-notch and deserved her wins. She is technically brilliant. But stuff of legends is usually something that will stand out decades to come. Off the top of my head, people may be discussing 'that ballerina like lady who still did a 3x in the SP and 2 3x's in the LP in Vancouver' more so than 'that gal from Korea who did everything perfectly, but I can't recall what exactly she did. She just won.'
    Off the top of my head, people may be discussing 'that beautiful lady who did the greatest performance in Olympic history' more so than 'that gal from Japan who did 3As, but I can't recall what exactly she did. She won silver'

    I don't think Mao is at the same line with YuNa yet for "the greatest ever". She doesn't have the big title and her 3A is not the WOW-quality of Ito and Harding. Her 3 3A in Vancouver will remain in the history book. But, I am not sure if people will ever remember it. The FS performance wasn't very impressive, with flaws.

    YuNa will be remebered as the skater who helped to put CoP on firm ground. She will be remembered as the skater who combined athleticism and artistry into one. Her 3-3 will be remembered as one of the most impressive in the ladies history. Most of all, she will be remembered by her beautiful programs and performances.

    But, I am not claiming YuNs is the greatest ever. I don't think it is possible to choose one skater as the greatest ever.
    Last edited by lakewood; 07-31-2010 at 09:45 AM.

  15. #55
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Age
    23
    Posts
    13,208
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    The wow factor of Mao's triple axel is definitely not the same as one of Ito's or Harding's, however she is attempting and sometimes completing (stingy callers aside) 3 triple axels in competition. That alone means she is making a mark of some sort, when it took almost 20 years for anyone to start doing them again period.

  16. #56
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    23
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I frankly don't get the fuss about Mao Asada being the first woman to have landed three 3A in a competition (including Olympics) and twice in a program. If you ask me, being the first to have landed a particular jump or a combination is indeed a significant achievement (e.g. Dick Button, Carol Heiss, Kurt Browning, Midori Ito, Elvis Stojko, Evgeni Plushenko), but landing it multiple times in a competition or a program is not a breakthrough technical advancement-rather a result of better stamina and consistency. Do any of you happen to know who was the first man to have two 3A in a program? The first person to have done so in Olympics? The first woman to have landed two 2A in a program? The first woman to have landed two 3Lo? You may or may not know the answer (I only know that the answer to the first question is Brian Orser, 1987 Worlds, according to commentary preserved on Youtube), but that kind of achievement is hardly what makes or breaks the legacy of a skater in history. It is fun fact to have on Trivia Night, but not something to talk over and over for years; if an authoritative biography of a skater with such achievemnt was to be written, I won't be surprised if the significance of that fact receives a one-line treatment.

    The lesson from history is that achievement like doing a particular jump twice pales into insignificance when you discuss a great skater's career. I do not know what Mao Asada will be remembered for 20 years' time in terms of objective achievement (so far the most successful Japanese person in World Championships?), but I'm quite convinced being the first woman to have two 3A in a program and three in a competition will be nothing but a footnote. In any case, the accolade for three 3A in a program should take the fact of unlevel playing field into account-I doubt that Midori Ito was even allowed to do 3A in SP in her days.

    So please talk about Mao Asada's objective technical achievements-or anyone else's-by any means, but can we kind of tone down on hype about two 3A in a program, etc?
    Last edited by sydneyphoenix; 08-01-2010 at 08:36 AM.

  17. #57
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    806
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by lakewood View Post
    I don't think Mao is at the same line with YuNa yet for "the greatest ever". She doesn't have the big title and her 3A is not the WOW-quality of Ito and Harding. Her 3 3A in Vancouver will remain in the history book. But, I am not sure if people will ever remember it. The FS performance wasn't very impressive, with flaws.

    From post-Olympic reactions, a lot of people thought it was a pretty amazing feat. However, I sure hope Mao will be remembered for more than just her triple axels.

  18. #58
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    23
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I don't think it will be given prominence in figure history in a few decades, just as we don't discuss the fact and circumstance of Brian Orser becoming the first man to land two triple axels. Don't feel it's a huge feat worthy of remembrance, but each to his/her own. Mao Asada will certainly be remembered-she is possibly the most successful Japanese ladies figure skater, depending on how you rate Shizuka Arakawa with OGM given her World Title came in 6.0 era-but not for three 3A in Vancouver.

  19. #59
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    806
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by sydneyphoenix View Post
    I don't think it will be given prominence in figure history in a few decades, just as we don't discuss the fact and circumstance of Brian Orser becoming the first man to land two triple axels. Don't feel it's a huge feat worthy of remembrance, but each to his/her own. Mao Asada will certainly be remembered-she is possibly the most successful Japanese ladies figure skater, depending on how you rate Shizuka Arakawa with OGM given her World Title came in 6.0 era-but not for three 3A in Vancouver.
    I understand what you mean but I think it's the fact that the sighting of a triple axel is very rare in ladies FS skating that they hold more significance. Based on her competitive track, Mao should be the most successful Japanese figure skater. She has one more world medal than Midori. Shizuka got the OGM but her career was really a hit or miss. I think in a few decades, Mao could equal Midori's influence in Japanese skaters. Many of them including rising star Kanako already see her as their idol.

  20. #60
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    12,332
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I think it is impossible to pick a greatest ever in Figure Skating.
    Because the sport has changed so much, from figures to figure jumping. Plus, there is a big part of artistry, hard to judge.

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •