The first step is break the connection between olys and skating.
The first step is break the connection between olys and skating.
yes people do underestimate the athletic capabilities of figure skaters, but this thread is about making the sport more popular. and I repeat, having a separate dry technical competition comparing elements hardly makes for compelling tv. since when did skateboarding or snowboarding get top 10 tv ratings (outside of olympics for snowboarding). I think the perceived disrespect or underestimation of figure skating is a totally different issue altogether. I realize there are a minority of people and skaters who despise the artistic, musical aspects of figure skating and it wouldn't hurt to create a separate competition based on just judging technical elements, but to claim that that's the savior of figure skating's popularity is a stretch imo
gymnastics is actually more respected as a sport than figure skating is. maybe it's because they do have separate competitions to judge specific elements. but I'm not so sure that's increased their popularity. in figure skating skaters are just taking individual elements and (ideally) seamlessly incorporating them into a whole program which actually is even harder. the artistic mark actually has a lot to do with the technical mark as an artistic skater often makes technical feats look simple and flow easily with the rest of the elements. if anything I think the general audience just doesn't understand enough about what makes a good skater and what specific elements are looked at, rather they often just assume who does the prettiest program is the best. I've even read comments on other sports' forums from men who don't watch skating at all who think that whoever has the best costume has a much higher chance of winning the gold -------__________--------
most people I know even if they find figure skating cheezy or lame, still respect the skaters as athletes. the ones who don't are meathead losers anyway, why r ppl so eager to pander to them?
this is all extremely similar to an article I once read which called for getting rid of costumes and music in figure skating.
there's a line imo between just garnering more (very deserved) respect for figure skaters as athletes, and broadening skating so that it appeals more to those who only prefer the technical aspects, vs just pandering to some kind of societal construct regarding masculinity.
Last edited by iarispiralllyof; 07-05-2010 at 12:02 AM.
It goes without saying that athletic integrity should be there though I doubt we have the integrity there 100% (I guess it is a matter of definition and opinion). There is a gap between popular aesthetics (music, dance, attire/costumes, etc.) and the status quo of figure skating. Somebody should be able to figure out how to creatively apply the popular aesthetics to figure skating if the priority is to be popular.
Actually I made a mistake. It was 1992, not 1976, that the U.S. ladies' champion last won the Olympics.
Kimmie was World champion first, then U.S. champion in 2007. The less than stellar performances at 2007 Nationals has led to speculation that the USFSA wanted Kimmie to defend her World title as U.S. champion, and shaved a few points here and there. ( Of course, this is just speculation. )
If true, I don't know why the USFSA thinks ISU judges care about a National championship. Evan was not National champ when he won Worlds, nor when he won the Olympics. Neither Tara nor Sarah were National champ when they won their Olympic titles.
Back on topic; I think the next time a U.S. lady wins Nationals, then Worlds or Olympics, this will be an excellent start to making the sport more popular again. As to why casual U.S. fans are primarily interested in the ladies; let's save that discussion for another thread.
This topic again, well...money for one and another big scandal might do the trick.
Without fear you cannot find courage
I think that TV inaccessibility is a huge problem. I know that this means there must be the perceived public interest in order to get the sponsors on board, but it just becomes like a vicious circle. No TV sponsorship/no interest.
Just take SOI in the US, for example. At the height of the skating popularity, All of the SOI program was shown on TV, and at a popular viewing time. Sometimes it would even be repeated several times on cable. Now they show, what, about 45 minutes, and most of it is in documentary form of past programs? And stuck in a weird time slot, with absolutely No hype.
Granted, SOI is about professional skating, not the ISU competitions. But really, the general public doesn't know the difference. They just need to have skating be more in-your-face, if you will, and this will generate more interest.
Yes, often figure skating is preceived as "unfair" and I think that is the big issue that alienates the most casual spectators, (myself included). I was recently rewatched the Ladies Skating from the 2006 Olympic Games and, (in the short program), Dick Button just hammered one skater even going so far as to comment that it would be "...more helpful if she went to the rink and not only trained, but thought about it a little bit, too." (Then added that he hoped he wasn't being "unkind.") Mind you this skater landed 3lutz-2toe (which Dick commented that she telegraphed.) She also landed 3flip. (Which Peggy admitted was NOT 2 footed when she saw the slow-mo clip after the preformance.) This skater did not fall. She did not trip. I guess her greatest "flaw" was skating competitively for 12 years and having the gall to attend 4 Olympics. Point in fact: She was old. (And in their opinion, she had not "improved.") http://<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/c9Jyl6dXaiM&hl=en_US&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/c9Jyl6dXaiM&hl=en_US&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>if anything I think the general audience just doesn't understand enough about what makes a good skater and what specific elements are looked at, rather they often just assume who does the prettiest program is the best.
... Now, on to Sasha in the long program.... http://<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Kh3iW4I39DI&hl=en_US&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Kh3iW4I39DI&hl=en_US&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>
Fell out of both opening jumps (flip and lutz), but (to her credit) did not give up on the program, (respect her for it), and did a highly artistic verson of Romeo and Juliet. Dick Button chirpped that he would gladly "take the 2 mistakes" in return for the beautiful artistry..... Right there. THIS is what we don't "understand" (or I would argue some of us understand, but don't agree with.) This is why the audience gets turned off. In a sporting event, there really should not be much (if any) "artistic component." That is more appropriate to a dancing event than to a sporting event. Yes, sure, deep edges and all that..... But why is this aspect of the sport given more credit than being able to actually stand up on your feet? Because 90+ years ago people started out doing circles on a patch of ice? Well, those people could do nice circles, but they certainly couldn't stand up after completing 3 rotations in the air. I mean, we do triples and quads now. Things change. You want a sport with circles on ice. Add it. Put patch back in. Lots and lots of pretty edges and no spectators (except other patch skaters. Fact is no one else will watch it because it is boring.) That is the "problem" with figure skating. It makes no sense to the audience. In fact, sometimes it makes the audience angry because it can be preceived as unfair, (and in my opinion, this is a just perception.) The audience becomes disgusted and turns off the sport.
A technical event would make a lot more sense to a lot of spectators..... And seem less "unfair" ..... At least to those of us who don't know what we are looking at. (Which, I would argue, is the majority of your spectators.)
Last edited by Firefly123; 07-05-2010 at 06:17 PM. Reason: Added last sentence
Is that why figure skating garners the highest ratings of any Winter Olympic sport in the U.S.?
Yes, figure skating needs to do something in order to have sustainable popularity in the years between the Olympics, but the problem with figure skating is that it's not what you call an inclusive sport. It's incredibly expensive to keep up with, and not every area of the U.S. has an ice rink available. I think those factors actually hinder skating's popularity much more so than any perceived notion that it's unfair or biased or doesn't take the athletic aspects seriously enough.
When I watched this past Olympics with a bunch of casual Olympics viewers, their no. 1 complaint was that the skaters didn't seem to interpret the music anymore and they were just doing a bunch of moves. They wanted to go back to the 6.0 system, not because they thought the system was better, but because they simply enjoyed watching the routines under 6.0 more and they liked being able to follow how the scoring system works. I'm not saying we need to revert back to 6.0, but somebody somewhere has to better explain the scoring system and the networks and even the ISU needs to make the scoring a lot more transparent so people know exactly how a skater scored that way.
Honestly, Firefly123, if people took your suggestions and only had competitions with jumps and spins and nothing else, then you'd really see figure skating lose any sort of fan base. BTW, they dropped figures already so I don't know what you're complaining about. Of course they still expect skaters to have some sort of MITF and moves in-between the elements, which isn't very convenient for your adult skating career.
"Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility." - Ambrose Bierce
If fans would buy tickets to skating events in their areas & fill the arenas once again it might begin to generate interest in the sport. Money always talks!
1. This isn't about me (so I would thank you not to go there).Honestly, Firefly123, if people took your suggestions and only had competitions with jumps and spins and nothing else, then you'd really see figure skating lose any sort of fan base. BTW, they dropped figures already so I don't know what you're complaining about. Of course they still expect skaters to have some sort of MITF and moves in-between the elements, which isn't very convenient for your adult skating career.
2. My point is that the artistic elements of this so called "sport" make it more of an "art" (like dance) and that is what (understandably) turns a lot of spectators off of it. (Especially when it is included in the Olympics. In fact, after the recent Olympics there were many threads on skating AND non-skating boards questioning whether or not it should even BE considered a sport.)
3. This "artistic element" (or MITF or whatever you want to term it) confuses many spectators who preceive the scoring system as unfair because of it.
4. And, honestly, for those of you would think so highly of the artistic side, I'm not sure why you even want to be considered athletes. Seriously, isn't it an insult to you? Most ballerinas would be highly insulted if you called them "great athletes." They consider themselves "artists" not athletes even though we all understand what they do takes an incredible amount of atheletic ability. Not sure why skaters even want to be considered both when dancers seem insulted by the comparison.
That is my point. This is what confuses the spectators. They see a skater fall and then see them get higher points than someone who stands up. This makes no sense to most spectators and they preceive it to be unfair. Then they get angry. Then they tune out.I always assumed that the point of being somewhat lenient where falls were concerned was to keep from discouraging skaters from trying more difficult jumps.
What makes you think that dancers don't consider themselves to be athletes?
After the Nancy/Tonya years, the USA seemed to lose any sense of direction. It just seemed to want to keep the numbers up and the money rolling in. It has lost any sense of identity. I think that it is fine to become less elite, but not when that means giving up most of what the sport was all about. It was really pathetic a few years ago when we copied the format of a very low class show like American Idol. Could anything have been more cheesey that that panel pretending to be like the Idol udges? I had to stop going to Stars on Ice a few years ago after two years of having to leave the show in literal physical pain because the music was so bad. The comments I heard from others leaving the shows echoed my experience. The touring shows have alienated their core audience but have not yet found a new core audience.
Have known several ballerinas over the years. Granted, this may only apply to the dancers I know/knew.... But, as far as I can tell, most are not interested in being considered athletes or getting ballet included in the Olympics as a sport. Most consider themselves artists. Like I said, this is based primarily upon my own experience.What makes you think that dancers don't consider themselves to be athletes?