I have no clue. Slutskaya was clearly the favorite of the judges with her incredibly inflated scores throughout the season. But judges seemed to mark her down at the Olympics. So, I'm lost.
With everyone at her best, I would have been with : Arakawa, Slutskaya, Cohen.
"If I agree well it's just to appease you 'cause I don't remember what were fighting for..." - Sarah McLachlan
Last edited by museksk8r; 05-21-2010 at 10:30 PM.
Asada actuaully was a combined 5-1 vs Cohen, Arakawa, and Slutskaya that year. A perfect 3-0 vs Arakawa, 1-0 vs Cohen, and 1-1 vs Slutskaya. Not that it neccessarily means too much and certainly doesnt mean she was ever a shoo in or anything but interesting nonetheless.
I think a perfect Cohen would have gotten the gold. The judges had been salivating to give her gold her entire career, she just never delivered. Then I guess Irina with the silver, Shizuka with bronze. Asada would have gotten the "wait your turn" treatment and finished fourth or so.
"Marge, if you're going to get mad at me every time I do something stupid, then I guess I'm just going to have to stop doing stupid things!" - Homer Simpson in the Mr. Plow episode
Since Miki is included in this discussion, despite the technicality that was pointed out, and we're going by the scenario that everyone hits their planned programs, wouldn't Miki place higher? She was aiming for a quad. Her PCS would certainly hold her back but I would think that Miki would place a bit higher than where she's is currently (looking at various lists). I suppose her quad could balance out the low PCS so her ranking might be about correct from what most of you have said.
Miki was planning a quad? This is news to me. The last quad I even saw her try was at a cheesefest in 2004 and it was horribly cheated, basically 3.25 rotations.
My opinion- Cohen would have the highest PCS, but Arakawa would have won in TES and enough to win gold overall.
Frankly I’m confused as to why so many people chose Slutskaya. For me, the most telling sign that she would not win if the ladies skated clean was the fact that Sasha hung onto 1st place (rightfully so) after the SP despite having –GOE on 2 jump elements (flutz and axel). Her PCS was almost a full point ahead of Slutskaya/Arakawa, and the scores were only factored at 0.8!
(btw judgejudy, correct me if i'm wrong, but Arakawa only planned one 3-3 in the LP- the sal+toe, since she wasn’t doing the 3lz+3loop combo anymore during her full run-thrus). Regarding TES, I think Arakawa would have been 1st, Slutskaya 2nd. Arakawa was the only lady to gain level 4’s on spins and 3’s on footwork, had a slightly higher base value, but most of all the GOE’s and the quality of her jumps were far ahead of Slutskaya. Slutskaya’s landings carried no speed, were not of high quality, but the judges seemed to love big/high jumps anyways so they would probably give her higher GOE’s than Cohen. Cohen would have probably been 3rd on TES with no 3+3.
PCS- Cohen would have won on that, for sure. Now, others may disagree with me on this, but I think Arakawa would have gotten slightly higher PCS than Slutskaya, even if reputation helped Slutskaya. Arakawa tends to show her beautiful qualities better in the LP than in the SP, so it is not surprising that Slutskaya slightly got higher PCS in the SP. Slutskaya is more of a powerful, quick skater, and her SP showcased her strengths more than the LP did. After the SP Arakawa was almost tied with Slute on PCS so the judges obvi liked her. But I think Slutskaya knew she was in trouble because the SP was where she could have made a big lead for herself but didn't. A clean Sasha (or Michelle) would almost always beat Slutskaya in PCS. Oh, and i didn't include Kwan b/c we never saw her compete that season. Charlie cyr mentioned she did her homework on levels etc but...so did Slutskaya and Cohen, who lost levels in the spins and footwork. So who knows.
But... i'm torn on Arakawa and Cohen in the LP! I guess the question is would Sasha garner enough PCS to beat Arakawa's TES.
IMO the results would be:
1. Arakawa (71 if she did 3+3 in SP+ 135 in LP)
2. Cohen (66+134-135?)
3. Slutskaya (66+130)
4. Asada (64+125)
5. Kostner (66+120ish)
Last edited by Fallcolor; 05-22-2010 at 04:38 AM.
sorry i cannot agree! In 05 she only got -GOE on (f)lutz, 3flip that she stumbled on and 3+3seq on a step out, so it's understandable. When her jumps were clean she never got -GOE's.
In Torino, i actually thought that other than the first 3 LP jumps, the rest of her jumps were the best quality ones she's ever done. It didn't have the usual fragile shaky edge landing we usually see from her. In fact at the olympics imo her GOE's were somewhat undermarked. The 3+3seq was 2 footed at the end, but a -1.14 is a bit harsh, no? when compared to Slutskaya's -.29 for a 2footed 3flip. Sasha's 3f+2t was beautiful, even if it was tiny, but got no GOE.
"At there best" . . . since Asada had beaten Cohen and Slutskaya earlier in the season, I think she would have won.
4. Cohen (assuming her best means only one screw up)
A triple flutz for Sasha is a clean triple lutz for her. She isnt capable of doing it as anything other than a flutz, she never once has in competition atleast. And she usually got -GOE on it even landing it cleanly once the judges began scoring it correctly (she was lucky she didnt compete now as it would be scored far worse today). So to count that as a "mistake" in any form for her makes no sense.
Even with her shaky double axel (and Sasha even at her best is good for atleast one of those) it was still the best short program performance she ever did according to most. That was Sasha at her best, and she still probably wouldnt have even won the short if she didnt skate last considering she won it by only 0.03 as it was.
I also think the judges scored Sasha's jump GOE correctly in Turin. Most of them should be 0s IMHO. Sasha's strength is everything outside the jumps and her medicore basic skating. Her jumps are small and quite ordinary in everyway with sometimes bad takeoff technique even when she does make them. In 2004 she was getting outrageous GOE on her jumps (far higher than say then nobody Arakawa in the same events) so it was nice to see them scored correctly in her final 2 injury marred seasons (apart from blip of a comeback).
Well, if we are going by the way they were skating currently at that time, I would say the top 4 would have been Irina, Shiz, Mao, Sasha.The best Irina ever skated was 2005 worlds LP. if she had skated like that she would have won. Shizuka would have been a close second, even if she had done a 3/3, I just do not see how the judges would deny Irina the gold with that type of skate. I think Mao would have taken the bronze with a clean skate. Sasha's very best has always included some type of error. She has never skated an error free program so I cannot put her at the top because her best was never good enough, sadly. I don't know where to fit Kimmie in here. She skated amazing at worlds. I guess I would put her ahead of Sasha because technically it was better than anything Sasha was capeable of. maybe I would even put her third. I have no idea how to rank Michelle. Based on the previous season, and how she skated at that cheesefest, she would really not be in the mix due to her hip injury. But we really truly do not know.
If everyone was clean, by looking at the SP scores i would think that panel of judges would award the gold to Sasha Cohen, silver to Mao, Bronze to Arakawa or Slutskaya. I think Shiz would be favored for bronze medal considering how she almost outscored Ira with a slighly flawed combination jump. Yuna would have rounded of top 5.
But, as we all know, Sasha could never deliver two back to back clean performance at a competition, hence Mao would have taken the gold ahead Shiz and Ira. i do think scores would have been so tight that Yuna would have had a realistic chance for gold, after all Yuna did finish ahead of Mao later that year at the world Juniors and successfully did a 3+3 in both her programs.
I'm not sure even how to consider what Sasha's best might have been given that she never, ever delivered a clean short and a clean long in a senior competition -- at least not once that I remember. Do you hypothesize that this might be that one time when everything works (It's a Miracle!) or are we talking "skates her best" given a more likely jump scenario?
I mean, using the "skates her best" theory I'd guess any number of skaters could have won in 2006. I just don't think you can completely get away from competition psyche -- some skaters are (and were, then) much better competitors than others. Czisny is a beautiful skater on so many levels, but she has big nerve problems and is not a good competitor. Do you set up the hypothetical competition as if those nerves weren't an issue and Czisny magically lands every jump along with delivering her wow spins? (And I know Czisny wasn't at the Olympics in 2006, but she's the best example that comes right to mind.)
Maybe it would make more sense to consider what if each skater in the event had skated her SP as well as she'd skated her SP at any of the GP or Euro/4CC events that season, and the same for the LP. Then you'd at least be in the realm of the reasonably possible.
Last edited by barbk; 05-22-2010 at 06:00 PM.
For all the contenders who were actually there, I think we have to take the results that they actually had...Sasha with 2 falls, Shizuka with only 5 triples & no 3/3, & Irina with a completely lackluster LP. There is no reason to believe they could have done anything other than what they did. Same with Fumie, Miki, et all.
We can only speculate about what Mao, Yuna, & Michelle would have done. In my dream scenerio Michelle is healthy with 3 & 4 levels on everything & her 3T/3T successful. So the result is
No way do the judges let either of the 14yr olds win.