Results 1 to 16 of 16
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    The Top of Utah!!
    Age
    55
    Posts
    7,351
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    2814

    Question Thrill Seekers...

    Ok., adventure lovers, if you had to choose one, would you rather:

    A. Climb Mount Everest

    B. Go down to the Titanic in one of those tiny submarines

    I'm terrified of heights, so I guess I'd go to the Titanic (I'd need some mega-valium to get me through it, though!)

    My hubby said he would take Mount Everest -
    Nubka - Unpaid Slave Laborer...

  2. #2
    Duck Hunter
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    7,062
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    I would totally go down to the Titanic (how tiny are we talkin'?)

    Wouldn't do Everest because I'm nowhere near in shape

  3. #3
    Corgi Wrangler
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Not Wearing Enough Sparkles
    Posts
    6,345
    vCash
    510
    Rep Power
    2366
    I realize I'm statistically FAR more likely to survive the sub, but being claustrophobic and having seen a movie depict an explorer sub imploding, (thank you for that among your many other sucks, 'Raise The Titanic') I'm not sure Everest wouldn't be more tempting. The view would definitely be better.

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Cali baby
    Posts
    1,797
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Titanic! That would be one of my life's dreams come true.

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Main floor
    Posts
    2,428
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0

    Lust is the disease and she is the cure

    Isn't there an option for climbing Sly Stallone's ex? Gal is tall! http://images.starpulse.com/pictures...AYL-004049.jpg

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    The Top of Utah!!
    Age
    55
    Posts
    7,351
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    2814
    Bump! Come on, everybody...
    Nubka - Unpaid Slave Laborer...

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Age
    28
    Posts
    2,827
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Titanic. Water soothes my fears. That other thread with the video of that crazy hike didn't freak me out too badly because most of the heights were over water, which for some reason I find less frightening.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Enjoying purple crocuses.
    Posts
    4,632
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    33925
    Quote Originally Posted by KikiSashaFan View Post
    Titanic. Water soothes my fears. That other thread with the video of that crazy hike didn't freak me out too badly because most of the heights were over water, which for some reason I find less frightening.
    Possibly because if you fall into water you can live - if you fall into the ground, you won't?

    I like to breath - which you can't do easily climbing Everest, but have no desire to travel underwater. Is there a flying option?

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    The Top of Utah!!
    Age
    55
    Posts
    7,351
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    2814
    Quote Originally Posted by KatieC View Post
    Possibly because if you fall into water you can live - if you fall into the ground, you won't?

    I like to breath - which you can't do easily climbing Everest, but have no desire to travel underwater. Is there a flying option?
    Good question! Would you be be up for a trip to the Moon? I would never do that - waaaaaaay to chicken!
    Nubka - Unpaid Slave Laborer...

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Enjoying purple crocuses.
    Posts
    4,632
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    33925
    Quote Originally Posted by nubka View Post
    Good question! Would you be be up for a trip to the Moon? I would never do that - waaaaaaay to chicken!
    Yeah, that one I would probably do!

  11. #11
    Demon Barber
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    17 Cherry Tree Lane
    Posts
    3,148
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Assuming I actually had skills and climbing Mt Everest wasn't completely stupid (as it would be for me now, a nonclimber with no experience, etc), I would absolutely climb Mt. Everest. Sitting in a sub, while cool, is just too passive.

  12. #12
    Thunder & Lightning!!!
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    A tiny corner of my own mind!
    Age
    54
    Posts
    4,380
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    19484
    Go down to the Titanic

    I am so drawn to the water, it would be a dream come true!
    Peace & Love, Gypsy
    Even a man who is pure in heart and says his prayers by night, may become a wolf when the wolfbane blooms and the autumn moon is bright.


  13. #13

    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    9,492
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    1231
    Going down to the Titanic sounds like a “thrill” but it’s actually a “torture” and an expensive “torture”.

    The wreck is 12,620 ft under water. The vessels which can reach the wreck are military submarines or MIR Russian high-tech small sub (for explorations).

    US and other western military subs are not for “private rent”. Old Russian military full-size subs are for rent, but they want $250,000 USD + expenses, etc…..

    MIR is cheaper, but it is a small “egg-like” structure, where you sit in a small cabin with knees up to your shoulders and can’t stand up once you get in.

    It takes min. 30 minutes for departure preps (while you’re already sitting), and 2 hrs. 40 minutes to reach the wreck, if there are no currents or other shifts. Same time on the way up. So you spend 6-7 hours crouched up, and you don’t get to see much of the “wreck” except the “outline far in the distance”. MIR is light compared to submarines, and will not drift close to the wreck in order not to be tangled into the wreck by the current and get stuck. All you see, with full projectors on, is dark carcass of “something”.

    Everest is not much better, especially if one smokes or has blood pressure issues. But at least you're not "crouched up", although there are plenty other discomforts.

    If people want high altitude thrills - go up Angel Falls on DC-3, or land on top of the Auyantepui Mesa in a helicopter.
    http://www.worldart.com.au/images/an...aphy-natu1.jpg
    http://www.romartraveler.com/ROMAR07...TA-Arekuna.gif

    Or Victoria Falls
    http://takeoffafrica.com/upload/557/vic_falls.jpg

    If you want to "submerge", go "Underwater Cave Diving" in Mexico, in the under-water cave labyrinth Sistema Nohoch Nah Chich.
    http://gallery.cavedivinggirl.com/Underwater

  14. #14

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    The Top of Utah!!
    Age
    55
    Posts
    7,351
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    2814
    [QUOTE=Tinami Amori;2757144]Going down to the Titanic sounds like a “thrill” but it’s actually a “torture” and an expensive “torture”.

    The wreck is 12,620 ft under water. The vessels which can reach the wreck are military submarines or MIR Russian high-tech small sub (for explorations).

    US and other western military subs are not for “private rent”. Old Russian military full-size subs are for rent, but they want $250,000 USD + expenses, etc…..

    MIR is cheaper, but it is a small “egg-like” structure, where you sit in a small cabin with knees up to your shoulders and can’t stand up once you get in.

    It takes min. 30 minutes for departure preps (while you’re already sitting), and 2 hrs. 40 minutes to reach the wreck, if there are no currents or other shifts. Same time on the way up. So you spend 6-7 hours crouched up, and you don’t get to see much of the “wreck” except the “outline far in the distance”. MIR is light compared to submarines, and will not drift close to the wreck in order not to be tangled into the wreck by the current and get stuck. All you see, with full projectors on, is dark carcass of “something”.

    Everest is not much better, especially if one smokes or has blood pressure issues. But at least you're not "crouched up", although there are plenty other discomforts.

    Debbie Downer!

    I'll bet you take lollipops away from little kids, too...
    Nubka - Unpaid Slave Laborer...

  15. #15

    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    10,586
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    17593
    I'm not a thrill-seeker at all, but if forced to make a choice, I think that I would choose Everest over the Titanic. I love the water (and have been scuba diving in the Bahamas), but I wouldn't want to have more than two miles of the stuff over my head -- thinking of the pressure and the darkness and the cold Atlantic going to see the remains of what was the tomb for so many is unnerving. Whereas I understand that freezing to death can be like going to sleep -- and if I didn't die, the view WOULD be ever so much better. But I guess I'd really choose neither.

  16. #16
    Corgi Wrangler
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Not Wearing Enough Sparkles
    Posts
    6,345
    vCash
    510
    Rep Power
    2366
    Yeah, again, the movie "Raise the Titanic" pretty much killed the idea of tourism dives for me. It includes a graphic depiction of a mini-sub imploding. That would be a horrible, horrible way to die.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •