I know art is important and a huge part of any country's culture. But $106.5 million for a painting, even a Picasso, just blows my mind.
http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/20...ef=global-home
I know art is important and a huge part of any country's culture. But $106.5 million for a painting, even a Picasso, just blows my mind.
http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/20...ef=global-home
"Heaven has no rage like love to hatred turned / Nor hell a fury like a woman scorned."
That boggles my mind. It must be worth that to somebody but not to me! I would only pay money for it to turn around and sell it for a profit later. LOL! I don't value art like that.
-Brian
"Michelle would never be caught with sausage grease staining her Vera Wang." - rfisher
I just hope it doesn't sit in some billionaire's living room where people can't see it.
^^ This is what I don't understand about mega-rich people who buy art. What good does it do just sitting in a warehouse? Okay, its like ""your money" and "you bought it" blah blah blah ... but can't you loan some pieces to libraries, hospitals, schools, even lobby's of businesses, etc., so other people can, you know .... SEE them?
![]()
Sometimes it's an insurance issue....the piece is worth so much that no one will insure it for public exhibition. Allegedly there are some very high-profile museums (in North America, at least) who have security systems, guards, etc. but who don't actually have insurance on their collections, because if they did it would cost so much they couldn't afford to operate the museum itself.
But more commonly, a lot of people with mega $$$ buy the art just as an investment, and don't want to risk losing it by displaying it. They don't care about what the art looks like, or whether people would enjoy seeing it...they just want to hang onto it until they can flip it to another buyer for a higher price. To them it's no different from owning stocks, or real estate, or any other commodity that might appreciate in value.