Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Walking to Work
    Posts
    25,657
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    17666

    Another 7.2 - 7.8 Quake; This Time in Indonesia

    This is getting creepy....

    Some reports say 7.2, others anywhere up to 7.8.

  2. #2
    Banned Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    IN RETARDED PETLAND!!!
    Posts
    1,173
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Rock and Roll! Boy, the world is changing more than we expect, isn't it!
    Without fear you cannot find courage

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Walking to Work
    Posts
    25,657
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    17666
    Quote Originally Posted by MOIJTO View Post
    Rock and Roll! Boy, the world is changing more than we expect, isn't it!
    If that uber-stoopid flick "2012" turned out to me right....

    But the "Ring of Fire" has been rather active in the past couple of months, on our continent, South America's west coast and in Asia.

  4. #4
    Corgi Wrangler
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Not Wearing Enough Sparkles
    Posts
    6,344
    vCash
    510
    Rep Power
    2366
    Earthquakes happen. We're only in trouble if one of the supervolcanoes decides to go....

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Calgary
    Age
    46
    Posts
    8,732
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by danceronice View Post
    Earthquakes happen. We're only in trouble if one of the supervolcanoes decides to go....

    Well, Yellowstone is overdue.

    I watched a program the other night on Discovery Channel. They said that we are due for a HUGE earthquake alone the Cascade region (which is up the US coastline through B.C. and Alaska)

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Walking to Work
    Posts
    25,657
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    17666
    Quote Originally Posted by missflick View Post
    Well, Yellowstone is overdue.

    I watched a program the other night on Discovery Channel. They said that we are due for a HUGE earthquake alone the Cascade region (which is up the US coastline through B.C. and Alaska)


    I saw a special on the Yellowstone caldera thingie - they said if it blows, it would be as bad as a nuclear blast, if not worse. And the ash/debris cloud out blot out the sun in many places of the world. The US would take decades to recover from it. Not something one enjoys thinking about.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    I'm turning what????
    Age
    43
    Posts
    9,296
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    328
    People are panicking about the quakes, but we really are not having an unusual year. On average, the US Geological Survey records 50 earthquakes per day. The NEIC detects 12,000 to 14,000 earthquakes per year. (That number goes up as we increase our ability to monitor activity, identify faults, and install more monitoring devices around the world.) According to the USGS, per year, we should annually expect 18 major earthquakes in the range of 7.0-7.9 and one larger above 8.0. In 1970 and 1971, we had 20 and 19 major earthquakes, respectively.

    Last year, we had 16 quakes between 7.0 and 7.9, and 1 above 8.0. So far this year, through 1/4 of the year, we have had 4 and 1 (that might not include today's). In 2007, there were 4 quakes over 8.0 and 14 between 7.0 and 7.9. In two weeks of August that year, there was a 7.2 in Vanuatu, a 7.5 in Java, Indonesia, and an 8.0 in Peru (along with a host of under 7.0 quakes). In September that year, there was a 7.2 in the Santa Cruz Islands, 8.5, 7.9 and 7.0 quakes in Indonesia, a 7.5 in Japan, and a 7.4 in New Zealand.

    I think the news media is a large reason for why people are so anxious about earthquakes. The Indonesia quake yesterday would have barely merited mention in most years, because it does not appear to have caused any major injuries or significant damage.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    The Top of Utah!!
    Age
    55
    Posts
    7,349
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    2814
    Quote Originally Posted by Rex View Post


    I saw a special on the Yellowstone caldera thingie - they said if it blows, it would be as bad as a nuclear blast, if not worse. And the ash/debris cloud out blot out the sun in many places of the world. The US would take decades to recover from it. Not something one enjoys thinking about.
    At least there wouldn't be radioactive fallout...
    Nubka - Unpaid Slave Laborer...

  9. #9
    Corgi Wrangler
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Not Wearing Enough Sparkles
    Posts
    6,344
    vCash
    510
    Rep Power
    2366
    Well, it's not really overdue in geologic terms. Could be next year, could be in a thousand years. The 'due date' window is on a rather big scale.

    And yeah, it would actually be MUCH worse than an average nuclear blast. One nuclear bomb--well, sucks to be you if you're in range, but long-range, long-term, there are worse things. A tactical nuke is even in some circumstances less devastating than a 'conventional' weapon like a bunker buster. The entire PLANET would be in trouble for decades from a supervolcano. To even approach that level of devastation would require a couple MAJOR nuclear nations setting off the majority of their warheads, and even then you don't have the pyroclast and the neverending ash cloud, and the erruption could keep going for weeks or months...

    Yeah, it would suck.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    future ex-angelino
    Posts
    778
    vCash
    500
    Rep Power
    185
    People are panicking about the quakes, but we really are not having an unusual year.
    oh, fine. go and inject rationality into it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •