Rob

Beach Bum
Messages
15,234
You and I were posting at the same time. That's my interpretation as well. I'm pretty sure that Skate Canada will win an appeal based upon the TE document itself.

ETA - It honestly blows my mind that reporters and fans are able to figure this out but the ISU can't. Just another example, as @tony mentioned earlier today, of the ISU and federation officials literally not knowing what their own documents and regulations say. Two years. Two years now for them to review all of the relevant documents and regulations and have the correct scenarios laid out, ready to go for whenever CAS made their ruling. SMDH.
That interpretation is what I pieced together yesterday, and when combined with the doping rules, I think it says they don't DQ the other team members (unless they have positive tests), but they should reassign the points. I do read statutes for a living, and I cannot believe they didn't get legal advice on this given the media attention. What a crock of an organization.
 

overedge

Mayor of Carrot City
Messages
35,920
That interpretation is what I pieced together yesterday, and when combined with the doping rules, I think it says they don't DQ the other team members (unless they have positive tests), but they should reassign the points. I do read statutes for a living, and I cannot believe they didn't get legal advice on this given the media attention. What a crock of an organization.
Which is what you get when people rise to positions of power because they are good at politicks. Not because they're qualified to manage an organization.
 

Dobre

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,216
I'm still of the opinion that the Russian team should have been disqualified for cheating. Not moved down. Rescoring an event could--in the future--create all kinds of chaos. That was one of the problems with the old ordinals system. One athlete's results could switch the results of two other athletes, etc. (And, as some people have pointed out, that can't be done fairly because some teams don't qualify for the second portion of the event. Likewise, athletes are selected based on a certain strategy and those strategies could be different if a particular team or athlete wasn't a threat). Much more straightforward to say that cheating is illegal, and sorry but that means you shouldn't put cheaters on your team. If you do, you're out.

It seems the IOC and ISU still haven't learned their lesson. If you don't hold Russia accountable for their actions, they will continue to cheat. And we will be back here again the next time someone gets their drug-regimen wrong. (Because what does Russia lose from this, really? They risked putting Valieva on the team because they wanted gold and only gold. So the lesson is that their risk was minimal. They get another color of medal anyway:p).

As for the ban, Russia needs to get the blank out of Ukraine and report all the mandatory drug data that has previously been demanded. Then and only then, the discussion about having Russia return to competition should begin.
 

PRlady

Cowardly admin
Staff member
Messages
46,215
No, thanks, no need for a new thread. Some posters already started to belittle Hanyu's achievements and make fun of fanyus so the replies to them should be in this thread, not somewhere else. Everything would be easier if Hanyu wasn't living rent free in some posters' minds. ;)
Ok, official request to take this topic elsewhere. Start a new thread if you want, but one side comment about Nathan and fanyus doesn’t justify derailing this thread.
 

Dobre

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,216
I mean, say that one day the Russian drug program gets fully exposed as happened with East Germany. Does the ISU really want to go back and rescore every Olympic team event? I'm thinking the answer should be an obvious no. A straightforward disqualification makes a lot more sense in the long run.
 

skatingguy

decently
Messages
18,627
I mean, say that one day the Russian drug program gets fully exposed as happened with East Germany. Does the ISU really want to go back and rescore every Olympic team event? I'm thinking the answer should be an obvious no. A straightforward disqualification makes a lot more sense in the long run.
There's an 8-year statute of limitations on drug cases. After that period of time it would be very difficult to redistribute medals, and any attempt to do so would probably be overturned at CAS, and the Swiss Federal Tribunal.
 

Karen-W

How long do we have to wait for GP assignments?
Messages
36,689
This article has some quotes from Nathan, Maddie and Zach and Maddie Chock

Zach wants it in Paris too!!!

There are no details yet from the International Olympic Committee on when or where the medals ceremony for the team event will take place, but the U.S. team is hoping to have it at the Paris Games this summer. “I think that being on an actual Olympic podium is necessary,” says Donohue. “The amount of people in any country that start skating, and then make it to the Olympics, much less medal, is so small that it would be belittling to host it somewhere else. It wouldn’t be the same thing.”
 

Judy

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,582
Canada’s overall point total remained at 53 while the Russians’ tally dropped from 74 to 54 — enough for the bronze medals for everyone on the team except the disqualified Valieva.

One point.
 

leilaofpaper

Well-Known Member
Messages
731
With the way her politics have been trending, Jamie might show up to advocate for the Russian team at this point.

Canada’s overall point total remained at 53 while the Russians’ tally dropped from 74 to 54 — enough for the bronze medals for everyone on the team except the disqualified Valieva.

One point.
As many other have pointed out, if you recalculate the womens score Canada ends up with 55 points, and so wins bronze.
 

Karina1974

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,305

ilovesalchows

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,395
Russia should be DQ completely. Doesn’t matter if they would have put in Trusova or whomever instead. The elephant in the room is that the entire team was likely getting the same “supplements” due to the systemic doping. If a player on a soccer team has a positive test do you just discount their goals?

I agree, medal ceremony in Paris this summer. Preferably on one of the days I am there. ;)

I have a son the same age as Valieva. Makes me want to puke, what they did to her.
 

Wyliefan

Ubering juniors against my will
Messages
44,168
Russia should be DQ completely. Doesn’t matter if they would have put in Trusova or whomever instead. The elephant in the room is that the entire team was likely getting the same “supplements” due to the systemic doping. If a player on a soccer team has a positive test do you just discount their goals?
But you can't base a ruling on "likely," even if it's VERY likely. The fact remains that the rest of the team tested negative.
 

Allskate

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,813
Christine Brennan's latest article:


This is good. She succinctly lays out all the we have hashed out here today.

Actually, she doesn't lay it all out.

She does mention Rule 353(4)(a) of the ISU’s technical rules and quotes the language: “Disqualified competitors will lose their placements and be officially noted in the intermediate and final results as disqualified (DSQ). Competitors having finished the competition and who initially placed lower than the disqualified competitor(s) will move up accordingly in their placement(s).”

But, she says there are "questions still unanswered about whether this rule applies only to men’s and women’s singles, pairs and ice dance — figure skating’s four traditional disciplines — or also to the team competition, which is a relatively new event."

And then she says this:
U.S. Anti-Doping Agency CEO Travis Tygart told USA TODAY Sports Tuesday in a text message: “The Team Event is made up of all the disciplines and there is no specific Team Event rule on this issue that we are aware of, so the discipline rule should apply.”

There's something missing and something incorrect. As discussed here earlier today, there is an ISU document that lays out provisions for determining placements for the team event. This is separate from and in addition to the anti-doping rules for individual and team events. (It is the team anti-doping provision that doesn't address the placement, not the team event judging document.) Some people may have missed it because it is called "QUALIFICATION SYSTEM FOR XXIV OLYMPIC WINTER GAMES, BEIJING 2022." However, it definitely includes rules for determining results and explicitly says in section 4 of the Annex that Rule 353 applies to the team event.


Anyone with a Twitter/X account want to message Christine Brennan and Travis Tygart? And maybe Skate Canada?
 

coppertop1

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,968
So, what are they going to say from the media ceremony? Just have gold and silver? Russia is banned, they won't be at Worlds and the bronze is still being contested. What a mess. Had they done the right thing and Canada good the bronze, this would be avoided
 

Judy

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,582
So how long does it take for appeals to be resolved?

I posted the above link to Christine’s twitter re the rule.
 
Last edited:

Judy

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,582
So with Russia Canada appealing then technically they can’t award medals yet? Russia wouldn’t win the gold … but it would cause a potentially 1 year delay? Wtf does it take a freaking year.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top
Do Not Sell My Personal Information