Why Is U.S. Skating No Longer Dominant?

Discussion in 'The Trash Can' started by missing, Mar 24, 2012.

  1. missing

    missing Well-Known Member

    1,639
    520
    113
    I emailed a friend of mine to tell her I'd be devoting much of the week to watching Worlds online, and this was her response:

    Why do you think US skaters are headed down the slope instead of up? Too few skating rinks turning out too few skaters, or is it just not the thing to do anymore?

    I don't know the answer, and I don't particularly trust my theories, so I figured I'd ask here. And then I'll know what to tell my friend!:)
     
  2. Jarrett

    Jarrett Well-Known Member

    1,692
    179
    63
    Clearly Michelle Kwan skated too long and didn't let others have a chance.
     
    kwanette and (deleted member) like this.
  3. gkelly

    gkelly Well-Known Member

    10,822
    2,417
    113
    My simplistic answer is that there are more skaters turning out more skaters all over the world, more countries in the mix, so just being one of the best from one of the countries in contention is less likely to mean being one of the best in the world when there are more countries out there that have skaters good enough to contend.

    Within the US, I'd say that the "problem" is also with larger rather than smaller numbers of skaters. The peak participation in the US may have been about 10 years ago, but it's still higher now than it was 20+ years ago (figures era). However, because there are so many good skaters, it's hard for any single good skater to dominate and build the confidence and reputation that a skater with the same talent level could do in a smaller field.

    E.g., if any two or three of Czisny, Flatt, Nagasu, Wagner, Zawadzki, and Zhang could have gone to Worlds 5 times in the past 5 years, as might be the case if only two or three of the above existed (and there weren't firm age limits), they would probably be perceived as more dominant than that group as a whole.

    Too many good skaters makes it harder for any one of them to rise to the level of greatness.

    Anyway, that's my theory and I'm sticking to it. :)
     
  4. Aussie Willy

    Aussie Willy Well-Known Member

    18,142
    2,174
    113
    Japan. And Purple.

    But whilst singles is probably not the absolute top, the US have never been stronger in dance at this point in time.
     
  5. missing

    missing Well-Known Member

    1,639
    520
    113
    The funny thing is that's one of my theories I don't quite trust. The theory goes if there's a single dominant skater (Kwan in the U.S., Plushenko in Russia), there's a bottleneck effect, which discourages younger skaters.

    But I'd need a lot more instances to see if there's any merit to my theory.
     
  6. jlai

    jlai Title-less

    9,101
    636
    113
    When you say US skating is no longer dominant, you mean mainly ladies and perhaps the men? For ice dance is stronger than ever and pairs is...as always. :)

    Ladies: In the past you had girls who are tough with good basics and reliable jumps. The program is built so that every O cycle you have girls grooming to be the next big thing while skating under the shadow of an elite competitor. In 2008, that system was totally disrupted when Meissner suffered from a premature downturn in her skating career, and promising girls were prematurely put under the spotlight before they were really ready. Those girls ended up being rather inconsistent, and since then US has been in an neverending loop of digging itself out of that situation and (eta) getting back to the usual O cycle.

    Add to that two problems: US had relied somewhat on pre-puberty girls who could do senior events and who mastered triples somewhat incorrectly (flutz/ur) before they hit puberty (Lipinski, Hughes). After the age loop closed and ISU started going after UR jumps, it is taking time for US to train girls to peak later, learn good jump techniques and not follow the Hughes/Lipinski model.

    The current American system works well when the usual O cycle is happening (a strong reliable top girl with a couple of upcomers in the shadows), but with a current crop of inconsistent girls, you have no assurance that their skating well today means skating well two three months from now. I believe until the normal O cycle returns, you should send girls who are skating well now to competitions, not girls who skated well months ago at US nationals or some other event. (That on top of US nationals not always being judged the way an ISU one would...but that for another time)

    To send girls skating well at the time to internationals, means: having a JGP monitoring event in the summer, and stronger pre-world monitoring (e.g. the Flatt situation last world).

    Right now, most things are decided based on US nationals results -- a once a year event. So there's only one window per year to get good assignments. There're girls who have to wait a long queue to get to a JGP event. With GPs harder to get, more girls will also get stuck at JGP. there should be spots set aside for JGP or even senior events (like the Skate America host spot) so skaters skating great can cut through the long line and not wait for US nationals to turn their luck around. And by the time they get their turn, surprise, their peak may have passed. :(

    I also think teaching girls stronger basics also helps, for world champs like Mao and Miki also have very good skating techniques.
     
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2012
    Habs and (deleted member) like this.
  7. Turbo-Mom

    Turbo-Mom Member

    52
    17
    8
    One of the reasons is because the entertainment dollar in the United States and Canada can only be divided so many ways. In United States, you have many available spectator dollars and available leisure time being split between many available entertainments options. Leisure recreation, camping and hunting, travel, ocean cruises, sports like professional, college, high school, and little league women's and men's football, arena ball, baseball, basketball, hockey, soccer, golf, softball, tennis, swimming, track & field and etc, plus Broadway, Hollywood, Local Theatre, Movies, HBO, Comcast, and so on. Figure Skating appeals to a select audience. Appreciative of Athleticism, culturally literate, and educated. In US it follows advertising dollars pretty closely.
    Just my thoughts
    I love watching so I'm prejudice
     
  8. dinakt

    dinakt Well-Known Member

    3,903
    821
    113
    The popularity of skating in the US is down. But not its prominence as a skating country. The question is relevant only if one considers Ladies only. US has a current OGM in Men, current Gold and Bronze in Dance, and a very recent GPF Gold medalist in Ladies. As for next generation- all disciplines look VERY promising. I don't know if US was much more dominant before, unless you only consider great Ladies champions.
     
    gkelly and (deleted member) like this.
  9. bardtoob

    bardtoob Well-Known Member

    8,229
    1,287
    113
    Obviously because Sasha Cohen did not wack Sarah Hughes :p
     
  10. Sassafras

    Sassafras Well-Known Member

    1,518
    179
    63
    :duh:
     
  11. Vash01

    Vash01 Fan of Julia, Elena, Anna, Liza, and Vera

    26,863
    4,052
    113
    US ladies and men (singles) used to be dominant, and pairs & ice dance did not. Now we have ice dance as dominant, and the ladies & men are not. Pairs are low as before, in terms of success. Japan has enjoyed dominance in ladies and to some extent men (if you take out the Chan factor). Russia is showing signs of dominating in the ladies field over the next cycle.

    By the same token, Russia is no longer dominant in pairs and ice dance, the way it once was. It is doing poorly in mens, after about 12 years of dominance (relatively short period). Now pairs dominance is in China; ice dance in USA & Canada.

    The point I am trying to make is - these things go in cycles. The USA enjoyed a very long period of dominance in two disciplines. Next it was Japan's turn, and now it seems like Russia may be taking over.

    I think USA is still doing well in men and ladies but no longer dominating because other countries have made improvements in that regard. By the same token, USA has made strides in ice dance, and is now dominating the past powers. I just see this as a natural development, and not necessarily a huge regress.
     
    gkelly and (deleted member) like this.
  12. DarrellH

    DarrellH New Member

    4,763
    375
    0
    There is too much pressure to find the next Kwan.
     
  13. officialcoach

    officialcoach New Member

    54
    14
    0
    I feel that skating in the US has become less dominate due to the societal changes and structural changes in the US.
    Since figures has left our training and MOVES IN THE FIELD has been adopted, parents pressure teachers to pass these test because they don't matter or a waste of money and time. Learn them, pass them and forget perfect them!!This attitude bleeds over to all training. The judges pass them with NO consistantcy and at standards that would have our past great coaches and judges rolling over in their graves!!!
    In most levels coaches are not organizing the skaters carreer but there unknowledgeable parents who read statements by other unknowledgeable people try to decide carreer choices.
    Students don't accept the process of development and want quick fixes...ie Caroline Zhang's jumps. Rather than take an extra year to fix her misaligned basics the pressure to get her to the top to young most likely will keep her from being a champion, which she could have been!
    In general the respect for the process has changed, along with the changing idea that " if my child is not a champion by 12 we should stop the dream of greatness(Olympic dream)".
    I believe people don't understand the commitment that High Performance takes and screw themselves and our whole skating system.
     
  14. berthesghost

    berthesghost Well-Known Member

    4,891
    585
    113
    I agree that this is just about the ladies, as usual, but in reality, it's the pairs that have drastically plummeted. It was only 10 years ago that they were still regularly winning world medals. Now theyre so inferior, it's a nail bitter to see if we can even get two pairs in the top 10, with the end result usually disappointment. Plus they swap partners quicker than a 70s key party, so it's hard to build a fan base when every year is a complete new set of different couples.

    With the men and ladies, I think this is a combination of panic, Internet angst, and forgetfulness. Some of the sports icons were in fact huge head cases back in their day. People forget just how frustrating it was to follow hamil and Lynn back in the 70s. So. It may seem terrible to follow Abbott and ripping and czisny hoping they will come thru, as all have world podium potential, but the pre Kwan days were also nail biters. Had fsu existed back during 73 worlds, Lynn would have been regularly trashed. But now she's such an icon, it's almost become sacrilege to suggest she wasn't gods gift to usfs.
     
  15. Johnny_Fever

    Johnny_Fever Well-Known Member

    1,117
    36
    48
    It requires more work to reach your full potential in figure skating than in any other sport. Other countries have better work ethics than the US.
     
  16. os168

    os168 Active Member

    871
    138
    43
    It is about the money and personal commitment which does not gel well in a capitalist driven society like the USA. Fast easy money, little work effort.

    There's only so much you can do for the 'love of the sport' and the 'joy of competing' when it is my observation US fans does't seem to seem treat its own champions or team members with respect and support that they deserve when they failed to bring home the gold.

    Britain has always love and support its own athletes regardless of gold medals (although certainly we'd love them more if they manage to medal), and that bring a great deal of good will and encouragement to the skaters and team mentality.

    Japan, China seems to have this, Europe seems to have this. US according to reading these boards seems to like to blast its own when they fail to deliver a medal, particularly the ladies. Given these are young athletes who has endured and sacrificed a great deal to compete in this highly volatile and unpredictable sport, maybe a change of attitude is in order to incubate and nourish its own talents rather than demand so much of them ready made to take the metal from the reigning champs. Okay this might have been an exaggeration, but it is certainly a trend on these boards, which often are a polorised extreme view of real life opinions.

    No one is born a champion in this sport, it requires a great deal of work and dedication, and certainly encouragement and understanding not to always have to live up to be the best. Whatever that means... it is a sport where the best may not always win, and being lucky, having the right momentum and having the political pull may just be as important as your artistry/sporting credentials.

    (Oh yeah and they have been spoilt for too long by purple)
     
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2012
  17. jlai

    jlai Title-less

    9,101
    636
    113
    Unlike US, Canada seems to be doing very well in two disciplines now. And Britain hasn't done well in some time. China so far has done well in one discipline. I don't see how fan board support correlates with success of a skating program

    Anyway, I seem to recall British fans get really mad at their soccer stars when they don't deliver. :)

    But Hamil and Lynn brought home medals, while the ladies field haven't brought home any world medals in 5 years which is an anomaly for the US. The ladies field is really a drought. That said, yes, the pairs haven't done better

    Anyway, I think US female skaters need to improve their basics through moves of the field or figures or something. Even our top jumpers don't have edges like top girls from Japan.
     
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2012
  18. os168

    os168 Active Member

    871
    138
    43
    Sorry i edited my post... I mean US only, and more specifically the ladies. Respect, good support and realistic expectations imo adds alot to how athletes can perform and develop. And instead of going for the big jumps/instant glory at young age, they can learn to focus on the basics which is something apparently Russian, Chinese, Japanese skaters are focusing more on according to the interviews I have read.

    These soccer/football players are over paid cry babies, so are the fans!

    So yeah of course people are mad when they turns out over pampered useless gits fans paid a great deal to support! Skaters on the other hand are the extreme opposite end of the spectrum. It is a sport with literally no money and a great deal of dedication, risks and commitment, so they are quite different and the audience would respect that, like how they respect Marathon racers, Rowers, Rock climbers, or any endurance sport that requires the stiff upper lip.

    Yeah I don't watch football, but I love tennis, track and field, and we have excellent young athletes leading to the Summer Olympics, just wait!!!
     
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2012
  19. jlai

    jlai Title-less

    9,101
    636
    113
    Call me a skeptic, but I highly doubt fan criticisms drive or doom the success of the ladies program in the US. Back in the Kwan/Lipinski days, fans bickered like they do today. That has been a constant regardless of # of world medals, perhaps you just see more complaints now that internet exists. :)
     
  20. Kasey

    Kasey Loving on babies!

    12,311
    5,537
    113
    I suppose the idea that everything in the world is cyclical is irrelevant...
     
  21. love_skate2011

    love_skate2011 Well-Known Member

    1,628
    135
    63
    the spread of wealth in each disciplines to other countries
    and the shift of FS popularity to Asia
     
  22. briancoogaert

    briancoogaert Well-Known Member

    12,550
    1,334
    113
    Because Asia has worked a lot to be better !
     
  23. zippy

    zippy Active Member

    575
    99
    28
    Actually I think it might be the opposite effect - that if a single dominant skater is out there, it raises everyone's game as they try to knock that skater off their pedestal. Maybe this is a factor in several intense in-country rivalries, such as Kwan/Lipinski and Yagudin/Plushenko (maybe even Nastia and Shawn in gymnastics). Kwan was out there throwing down 7-triple skates for so long, it pushed a lot of younger skaters to master their competitive abilities too. There was that period with the 'baby ballerinas' - NNN, Cohen, Stellato, Hughes, etc. - lots of talent. Since Kwan left it's felt like a bit of a vacuum; of course this coincided with COP so maybe it just took some time for the US girls to adjust and Kwan has nothing to do with it (but doesn't Kwan always have something to do with it? :confused:)
     
  24. missing

    missing Well-Known Member

    1,639
    520
    113
    The problem with your theory is that when Lipinski retired, no one beat Kwan nationally (although Cohen and Hughes did defeat her internationally), and when Yagudin retired, no one beat Plushenko nationally. The rivalries were great but short lived, leaving one true champion and a lot of wannabes, which could lead to a weaker field.
     
  25. Jammers

    Jammers Well-Known Member

    4,082
    421
    83
    The US was due for a slump in Ladies skating. Think about it since the early 1950's the US Ladies were the best almost every year or in the hunt. The only think that stopped a possible 54 year streak of medals at the Winter Olympics was the plane crash of 1961. Even then it was only 4 years later that Peggy Fleming won her first medal at Worlds when people thought it might take a decade to get back on top. US women were known for being strong competitors as well as graceful artistic etc etc and could land the jumps. But we've had girls who either couldn't jump or skate as if they are scared to death at times. Sooner or later someone will come along that has the jumps and the toughness to become a champion. There is to much talent out there for this to continue.
     
  26. jlai

    jlai Title-less

    9,101
    636
    113
    I totally agree. I think everything that helped Lipinski/Hughes be successful is no longer there (recent dings on URs, flutzes, minimum age rules, etc)
     
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2012
  27. Jammers

    Jammers Well-Known Member

    4,082
    421
    83
    I also think that American coaches were slow to pick up on the Code of Points scoring system for many years and are only now coming to grips with it. It seems like they were training there skaters like the 6.0 were still in use.
     
  28. RD

    RD Well-Known Member

    3,966
    155
    63
    Good point, didn't really think about this one. US Nationals continued to use 6.0 until 2006 when they finally switched. However, you had skaters like Cohen doing quite well internationally under the new system. But I think the bigger issue is the cracking down on jump landings. Plus, other countries (Japan in particular) have really caught up to us in depth and talent of ladies skaters.

    It will be interesting indeed to see the long-term effects of this drought on interest should it continue, particularly at the Winter Olympics. I think for the first time in quite awhile, ladies' figure skating flew under the radar here at the last Olympics. The attention was more on Skiing (Vonn), speed skating (Ohno) and snowboarding. Those sports seem to be picking up fans and are perfectly capable of generating Olympic buzz in the US without skating's help. And on the night of the women's free skate, NBC elected to show other sports (I think even an obscure one) where Americans did well/won medals, joining the skating only during the last group (where both Americans were skating).

    How long before women's skating is no longer THE sport at the Olympics to watch?
     
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2012
  29. Jammers

    Jammers Well-Known Member

    4,082
    421
    83
    If an american is in the hunt for a gold medal or medal of any kind i guarantee they won't show other sports as much as they did in Vancouver. Plus women's skating is better when the US is competitive and when they are it will be THE sport yet again to watch at the Olympics.
     
  30. zippy

    zippy Active Member

    575
    99
    28
    I don't really see how that's a problem with the theory, if anything it shows that the US produced skaters who were able to rise up and beat Kwan at Worlds and Olympics throughout her reign. The US was able to put 2 US women on the podium at Worlds or the Olympics at many points during the Kwan years, and it's only been since the exit of both Michelle and Sasha that the US has not been able to medal at Worlds or keep 3 spots. I think the phenomenon of competitiveness creating better athletes can be seen with the Japanese women today, or just in individual rinks on a smaller scale. Sometimes kids succeed faster at a known training center than at the local mall rink not only because of good coaching, but also because of the environment - they see their friends working hard, landing new triples, etc., and it pushes them to achieve the same thing or do one better.

    I definitely don't think this is the only thing at play, though. The US benefited in the 90s from lots of interest in the sport and a good economy, so more potentially talented kids were out there trying skating. I'd say the 90s were also kind of a golden period for the elite training centers like Lake Arrowhead, where so many of the top coaches and skaters were all clustered in one spot - it seems a little more decentralized now. So lots of factors from the ground up, the aftermath of the whack, plus COP and UR/flutz dings, like others have said.