UPDATED Connecticut elementary school shooting - 20+ dead (incl gunman)

Discussion in 'Off The Beaten Track' started by Vash01, Dec 14, 2012.

  1. cruisin

    cruisin Banned Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2005
    Messages:
    17,561
    Is it me, or is this one of the most ill-reported, by the media, tragedies, ever? The media needs to be more responsible.
     
  2. Vash01

    Vash01 Fan of Julia, Elena, Anna, Liza, and Sasha

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2001
    Messages:
    25,890
    You can't be serious. ALL of us should have mandatory psych evaluation? What kind of society would that be? You can't punish/legislate people based on tendencies, in a free society. Each person has some emotions that are negative. It's about controling our emotions but it is also important that no one other than the necessary people in the society (law enforcement, soldiers, etc.) has an easy access to guns. If people did not have guns, they won't start shooting others; instead they will find other ways to deal with their emotions. They may even throw punches, but those aren't as deadly as guns.
     
  3. Vash01

    Vash01 Fan of Julia, Elena, Anna, Liza, and Sasha

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2001
    Messages:
    25,890
    Isn't it too early to make those judgments? The media can only report what they have found out. In a complex case like this, it is going to take some time for everyone to figure out what really happened, then the whys, hows, and what can we do to prevent this in the future.
     
  4. Jenny

    Jenny From the Bloc

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2001
    Messages:
    17,504
    At this point, I don't think anything is confirmed until it comes directly from the police investigators, and they are not naming the shooter yet.

    But what we have seen this afternoon is that the media has reported many "facts" that have turned out to be incorrect. As Habs noted earlier, in the rush to be the first, media is reporting information that has not been officially verified. In the old days you could do that to some extent, and post a correction later. But now, any "fact" is repeated hundredfold by other media outlets and numerous other online sources, so I think they should be a lot more careful about what they report as "fact."
     
  5. rfisher

    rfisher Satisfied skating fan

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2005
    Messages:
    40,855
    Actually, that is the exact issue being discussed on several other forums. No doubt a forensic examination of this young man's past will identify flash points that were ignored by his family, friends, teachers, etc., Over and over and over the perpetrators of violence are found to have mental dz. Yet, we don't address that. It's easy to get on the gun control soapbox and try to convince yourself that will stop the violence, but it won't. It won't stop people from beating their child or spouse to death. Lawsuits were filed against Virginia Tech for not identifying mental health issues in the shooter or for providing him with mental health care. Just wait until all the data is out about this guy. I was being facetious about requiring a psych eval, but that's the only way to identify potential sociopaths and prevent them from acting. And, then it wouldn't work, because a true sociopath is able to totally fake a psych eval.
     
  6. cruisin

    cruisin Banned Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2005
    Messages:
    17,561
    Yes, but it seems that this has been extraordinarily mixed up. I realize that they need to sort through things. But, maybe they should hold back "facts" until they are sure about them. I had the TV on this morning and first it was unconfirmed gun shots at a Connecticut school, then Confirmed gun shots, no one injured, then gunman dead one teacher shot in foot and taken to hospital, then gunman dead 3 hospitalized, then gunman and 1 child dead 3 hospitalized, then.... It seems like they should have waited to get more information, rather than changing it continuously. Even getting the right brother. Is the information about the girlfriend right? If the girlfriend is missing - her family must be frantic. But, what if she's fine and uninvolved, just not where the media expects her to be. Maybe I'm just frustrated with all of the changes and the fact that every 5 minutes this horror gets even worse. Maybe I'm transferring my frustration to media adding to the pain of the victim's families.
     
  7. Prancer

    Prancer The "specialness" that is Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2001
    Messages:
    38,613
    While I am absolutely in favor of gun control, I think that mental health care in this country is at least as big a problem. But I don't know that behavior is predictable enough to make mandatory evals any kind of viable solution. Yes, the perpetrators of violence are found to have mental illnesses. But the perpetrators of violence have also, more of than not, been seen by mental health professionals as well--and some were under treatment at the time of their attacks. I don't think most people ignore the signs; it's that there isn't a whole lot people can do about them. You can't lock people up against their will. You can't force an adult into treatment. You can't make people take anti-psychotic medication. And so on.
     
  8. skateboy

    skateboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2006
    Messages:
    4,288
    Horrifying. I can't imagine how terrified those children must have been.
     
  9. Jenny

    Jenny From the Bloc

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2001
    Messages:
    17,504
    I fear a world where we are all to be tested and labeled as to our mental health and likelihood to commit crimes.

    Who decides what the criteria are? Who ensures that the evaluators are qualified and unbiassed? Who ensures consistency in how evaluations are conducted? Who keeps these very personal and potentially damaging records? Who has access to them - police, governments, social services, schools, employers? Can a person or their family contest their evaluation or ask to be reevaluated after treatment or when circumstances may have changed? Will evaluations be ongoing? How often? Will this affect a person's ability to get health insurance, social assistance, a job, credit, into schools, to vote? How is the system kept free of corruption? What happens when the government changes and the system is changed or dissolved or reassigned - what happens to all those records? What safeguards will there be in place to keep this information safe from those who would misuse it? Can parents/caregivers/lawyers/doctors have access to this info? Are the records sealed or destroyed when someone dies, or can they be requested by heirs and researchers? For that matter, would the data be available to researchers who develop new therapies or drugs, or to those who fund social programming and law enforcement?
     
  10. Vash01

    Vash01 Fan of Julia, Elena, Anna, Liza, and Sasha

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2001
    Messages:
    25,890
    Below is a quote from your post:
    "So, perhaps we should all have mandatory psych evals and those who exhibit sociopathic tendencies should be legislated since this seems to be the bigger issue."

    You make it sound so easy; ALL of us should go through mandatory psy eval and we will find the potential culprits. You can't legislate tendencies. You are essentially ignoring what guns can do (KILL) and instead you believe that psychologists are going to be able to catch all the people with mental illness. Many people who are not clinically mentally ill can go over the cliff, and those are the most dangerous ones. It will be very easy to label someone whose behavior you don't like as 'mentally ill' and ruin his/her life, using your suggestions. I for one, will not subject myself to this mandatory psych eval, and how often are you going to conduct this? Every year/month/day?
     
  11. Angelskates

    Angelskates Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2004
    Messages:
    12,791
    The same thing happened after the Port Arthur massacre in Australia. One was enough.

    ITA. Martin Bryant, the one who caused the Port Athur massacre, had mental health problems and at one stage was on medication. Then he went off them. There were warning signs, but police can't act on the, when a crime hasn't been committed, and doctors can't institionalise just because someone goes off their meds.
     
  12. Anita18

    Anita18 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2001
    Messages:
    11,167
    I don't think they should be sold automatic weapons, though. Fine, in this country it's a right to own a firearm. Then get a hunting rifle that can only fire one round at a time. (Or whatever the equivalent is - I know next to nothing about guns.) Just because it's your right to own a gun doesn't mean you should be able to legally buy one whose sole purpose is to kill as many people as possible in the shortest amount of time.
     
  13. Vash01

    Vash01 Fan of Julia, Elena, Anna, Liza, and Sasha

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2001
    Messages:
    25,890
    The media did not say these were 'facts'; they were reporting what they had found up to that point, and I didn't see them saying this is the final story. What I saw/heard on the videos at different times was : "xxx, what have you found so far? or have they found ......" and so on. They did go on correcting themselves as more info came in. What did you expect them to do? Talk about something else while this was going on? We all have enough sense to know that it takes time to get the full story.

    Crusin, in her characteristic way, called this 'the worst ever reporting'.
     
  14. BlueRidge

    BlueRidge AYS's snark-sponge

    Joined:
    May 24, 2002
    Messages:
    42,412
    The vast majority of people with severe mental illness will not be violent. That is what makes it so difficult to deal pre-emptively with mental illness as a factor in mass shootings. I don't have any expert knowledge but it doesn't seem that mental health providers have any concrete way of predicting who will be violent.

    We've seen this with other recent shootings. I believe it was mentioned that it is usually in the early stages of severe mental illness before the full situation is known to mental health providers that this kind of violence manifests.

    I think anything that can be done that helps to identify and get help for individuals who may become violent should be, but it isn't likely to prevent shootings from taking place.
     
  15. rfisher

    rfisher Satisfied skating fan

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2005
    Messages:
    40,855
    I didn't say it was easy at all. I guess you missed the I was being facetious statement. See Prancer's post with which ITA. I most certainly am not ignoring the facts about guns. I suspect I know way more than you do on the subject and I'll just leave it at that.
     
  16. AYS

    AYS Cruder than you thought

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2002
    Messages:
    19,721
    I just turned it on a bit ago, but CNN has prefaced at least some of their reports with cautions that it is difficult to confirm events at this point, and this is what they've heard from wherever, etc.

    This is an extraordinary event, in scope more complex and emotionally wrenching than even similar recent shootings. Both the numbers involved and the fact that so many children were killed have us all freaking out, and trying to understand what the hell happened, and why.
     
  17. Vash01

    Vash01 Fan of Julia, Elena, Anna, Liza, and Sasha

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2001
    Messages:
    25,890
    I know what you are saying. Personally, I would like to see a constitutional amendment to take away the right for every citizen to carry guns. I know it's not going to happen, so the next step is to ban assault rifles. Sadly, even after so many innocent lives lost, this country still does not want to ban those weapons. Why does anyone in a civilized society need to carry a gun? There are law enforcement people for that. I don't approve of hunting, but there is no way hunting rifles will be banned, so I have to live with it. Not everyone that owns a gun or an assault rifle is mentally ill, or seeing a psychiatrist, or on mental medicine. Normal people can lose their temper and shoot someone. I know I am in the minority when it comes to gun control, but I believe that at least assault rifles should not be sold anyone that is not going to war.
     
  18. Jenny

    Jenny From the Bloc

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2001
    Messages:
    17,504
    The problem is that when media says something, people assume it's fact, and that's why it gets repeated. What they need to do is hang onto information until they can confirm it from a credible source - otherwise to name names especially is irresponsible. There is plenty to report in the mean time, and that media has been reporting - background on the school/community, context such as other similar events, background on local gun laws, and for news, numerous eyewitness accounts. The police have now given several briefings, as has the President and the Governor, and there have been additional statements from others to report as well. And, amid all this chaos of information and developments, I think the media could spend a bit more effort doing regular recaps of the FACTS that have been confirmed and by who, and what information is still to come.

    And no, we don't all have enough sense to know that it takes time to get the full story. Those "facts" that were later corrected have been spread everywhere, including in this thread. It's impossible to go back and correct it all, and as a result, misinformation continues to fly around the world.
     
  19. rfisher

    rfisher Satisfied skating fan

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2005
    Messages:
    40,855
    I don't think normal people can understand. He had his reasons which were valid to him, but only to him. Same as every murderer regardless of the situation.

    And how would banning assault rifles have prevented this? He didn't use one. He used hand guns.
     
  20. Angelskates

    Angelskates Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2004
    Messages:
    12,791
    In addition, it's hard for anyone, including me, to believe that someone who does this doesn't have a mental illness. Mentally stable people don't commit mass murder. Whether it was an ongoing mental illness, or a temporary psychotic break, I believe anyone capable of this has a mental illness. There's no other way in my mind to explain it, plenty of people have domestic disputes and don't shoot up a kindergarten class. But plenty of mentally ill people have disputes and don't commit mass murder either, so trying to predict who is going to do what, is impossible, even if we do know someone's mental state.
     
  21. Anita18

    Anita18 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2001
    Messages:
    11,167
    To be fair, my greatest fear is that someone will attack me, or my family, in our homes and given that none of us are in any fighting shape (nearly any fit man would be able to throw us over their shoulders), I wouldn't blame my parents if they wanted a gun in the house for protection. A regular burglar would get the hell out of dodge if he got shot at. If the intruder had more nefarious purposes, we would be pretty screwed, gun or no gun.

    But you do not need a fecking ASSAULT RIFLE for protection. That much should be clear to anyone with a brain.
     
  22. cruisin

    cruisin Banned Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2005
    Messages:
    17,561
    Really? You want to use this thread to go off on me. And this is what I actually said: Is it me, or is this one of the most ill-reported, by the media, tragedies, ever? The media needs to be more responsible.
     
  23. Habs

    Habs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2003
    Messages:
    3,844
    Absolutely. There is no good reason to name names so early - especially since the media was WRONG. It's the rush to be first, and accuracy goes out the window. I was a journalist, I understand the intensity. But there is something to be said for responsibility and integrity as well.

    ETA: I am horrified by the number of kids being interviewed and photographed. If my editor had asked me to do that in my reporter days, I would have quit on the spot.
     
    Last edited: Dec 14, 2012
  24. Angelskates

    Angelskates Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2004
    Messages:
    12,791
    I think the photos of the kids were terrible. And not necessary, the text is devastating enough.
     
  25. skipaway

    skipaway Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2002
    Messages:
    7,563
    Probably should be posted in PI...but I knew someone would make an insane statement like this. :mad:
    Why doesn't God send a Lightening Bolt Down on this Idiot?





     
  26. PDilemma

    PDilemma Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Messages:
    4,827
    You can pray in a public school. Anyone who wants to can. At any time. Quietly and by yourself. Which is more or less how we should pray anyway. Jesus had something to say about people who pray out loud in public to be seen and it wasn't positive.
     
  27. Angelskates

    Angelskates Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2004
    Messages:
    12,791
    Disgusting. This guy obviously doesn't read the same Bible as I do if he thinks God doesn't go where He's not wanted. God is everywhere, idiot. He doesn't come and go.
     
  28. Whitneyskates

    Whitneyskates Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2012
    Messages:
    1,009
    Wow that guy. Prayer isn't going to stop a shooting. Does he not remember Paducah KY. 1997? Michael Carneal opened fire on a group of students who were participating in a prayer group.
     
  29. Susan1

    Susan1 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2005
    Messages:
    783
    Moving away from the political arguments for a moment - the grandmother of one of the little girls lost today goes to my church in West Carrollton, Ohio.
     
  30. Vash01

    Vash01 Fan of Julia, Elena, Anna, Liza, and Sasha

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2001
    Messages:
    25,890
    The Wisconsin shooting took place in a Sikh temple- a holy place.