The Hunger Games

Discussion in 'Off The Beaten Track' started by Icetalavista, Feb 12, 2012.

  1. susan6

    susan6 Well-Known Member

    3,706
    709
    113
    The most awesome thing about the Alien "chest-burster" scene? The actors (aside from the "victim") had NO CLUE what was about to occur. The director wanted authentic reaction shots. The lady with the short blonde hair actually had hysterics, and one of the big guys had to spend the rest of the day calming down in his room because his heart was going crazy.
     
  2. Anita18

    Anita18 Well-Known Member

    11,214
    1,039
    113
    I am often a bit :eek: at by what is allowed to be shown on CSI nowadays. :shuffle:

    And ratings were weird back then! The Temple of Doom IIRC was PG so I was like, ":yikes: JEEZUS CHRIST!" when they showed Alfred Molina impaled in the face multiple times. Was NOT prepared for that! :lol:

    From what I understand, Alien is more scary/tense than it is gory. I have come across it on TV but couldn't bear even the long tracking shots inside the ship and had to change the channel. :lol:

    How can you not? It's RIDLEY SCOTT coming back to sci-fi after DECADES! :cheer:

    From Wikipedia, the actors knew that an alien would be coming out of the victim (practical effects, so they had to have a puppeteer under the table maneuvering the thing), but they didn't know there would be that much blood flying out. :rofl:
     
  3. MacMadame

    MacMadame Cat Lady-in-Training

    17,071
    3,560
    113
    When I was pregnant with my first child, I had nightmares about it bursting through my chest like that. :shuffle:
     
  4. PRlady

    PRlady Smoking

    21,936
    5,646
    113
    I've never seen Alien. :shuffle: Or that Pandora whatever movie from a few years back. Everyone who knows me warns me off these things and I listen.

    As for Hunger Games, I'm almost at the end of the last book and didn't think it so bad. The first book is the best, of course, but that's typical. I still think the author has dreamed up 101 ways of killing people and I'm not so curious to see it on the screen. Although Jennifer Lawrence is getting really good reviews.
     
  5. michiruwater

    michiruwater Well-Known Member

    9,258
    1,946
    113
    The movie's gotten very good reviews, though Jennifer Lawrence is (unsurprisingly) the focus of many of them. I just bought my ticket. I'm going to regret this when I'm dead tired tomorrow and trying to teach, but oh well ;)
     
  6. Mozart

    Mozart Well-Known Member

    2,946
    575
    113
    I now have tickets for the 12:01 showing which is now sold out and they added a 12:15 showing. I am going to be dead tired tomorrow too michiru but at least I have an all day elementary music inservice. I have done the party till 3:30 and teach all the next day thing and it didn't work very successfully
     
  7. Mozart

    Mozart Well-Known Member

    2,946
    575
    113
    it's 14a in Canada
     
  8. michiruwater

    michiruwater Well-Known Member

    9,258
    1,946
    113
    I have to actually teach all day tomorrow :shuffle: Oh well though. Half my Concert Winds are going tonight anyway so we'll all be stupid in 4th hour.
     
  9. Mozart

    Mozart Well-Known Member

    2,946
    575
    113
    woohoo! Loud band instruments when exhausted!
     
  10. Mozart

    Mozart Well-Known Member

    2,946
    575
    113
    I'm from District 4
     
  11. oleada

    oleada Well-Known Member

    29,023
    3,888
    113
    I am soooo pumped! I have tomorrow off so I can really enjoy it.
     
  12. Spareoom

    Spareoom Well-Known Member

    1,838
    199
    63
    I'm here at the theater...we weren't going to show up till now but there were already people in line by six so we showed up at 7. Luckily our theater lets us exit and reenter as needed so we're taking turns getting dinner. Apparently there will be another showing at 3am after this one gets out...that just boggles the mind. If you can't make the first showing, you might as well wait till the next day, lol.

    Apparently a friend of a friend has been in line since 8am today. 8-0.
     
  13. Marge_Simpson

    Marge_Simpson Well-Known Member

    5,406
    1,994
    113
    At work tonight I mentioned that I'm seeing the film on Friday. My coworkers already think I'm nuts; this was just more proof as far as they are concerned. They are convinced I will be the only person in the theatre over the age of 16.
    But I don't care; I'm totally psyched to see it.
    Please post reviews!
     
  14. Mozart

    Mozart Well-Known Member

    2,946
    575
    113
    OMG I just got out of the 12:01 Atlantic time showing and I loved it! So great! I felt a little queazy at times because of the camera work but it was an awesome movie. I have an inservice in the morning so I must go to bed but I will write review tomorrow! I saw so mnay of my students (I teach elementary) there though. Was shocked their parents would let them stay up this late on a school night
     
  15. oleada

    oleada Well-Known Member

    29,023
    3,888
    113
    I thought it was very good. I normally hate adaptations of books I love, but I think they did an excellent job. Jennifer Lawrence was great. I wanna see it again already :p

    I don't think Josh Hutcherson is charming enough, though.
     
  16. skipaway

    skipaway Well-Known Member

    7,615
    1,622
    113
    The local radio station was talking about it this morning. The opinion was that they would easily be able to take their 10 yr old to the movie. Seeing as the book was incredibly violent, I was surprised by that. I won't be seeing the movie until next week.
     
  17. Mozart

    Mozart Well-Known Member

    2,946
    575
    113
    Yup it wasn't nearly as violent as I expected it to be
     
  18. Rogue

    Rogue Sexy Superhero

    954
    45
    28
    I haven't let my 10-year-old read the book yet, and she sure isn't going to the movie. Perhaps in a couple of years, but not yet.
     
  19. PRlady

    PRlady Smoking

    21,936
    5,646
    113
    The reviews are calling it "sanitized." While in some ways that's a shame, because the violence is integral to the plot, if it's too visceral for young audiences it would miss its marketing target.

    Certain scenes from the first book stick with me as really awful -- Glimmer's and Cato's deaths, for example. Someone who has seen the movie please tell me how they were handled.
     
  20. Stormy

    Stormy Well-Known Member

    3,752
    844
    113
    I went to a midnight showing as well....and am quite tired as a result! And it was 98% teenagers there, and some young teenagers. Maybe I'm showing my age, but if I was a parent, I wouldn't let my 12 year old go to a midnight movie on a school night.

    The deaths were very sanitized. Had they been done as they were described in the books, the movie would have gotten an R. It wasn't gory at all, even Glimmer's death. How Glimmer is described in the book after being attacked by the tracker jackers was really gross, but in the movie it wasn't.

    This is of course dependent on the child, but the book is too graphic for a 10 year old, but the movie should be fine.

    I wasn't a real fan of the camera work, especially in the first half. I didn't like the jerky editing of it but it got better as the movie went on. I won't say any more now because I don't want to spoil things for those who haven't seen it. :)
     
  21. kwanatic

    kwanatic Well-Known Member

    2,040
    476
    83
    ^^Spoil away, please! :)

    I've read the books and the reviews are saying that it's sticking pretty close to it so I doubt if there will be any surprises.

    My biggest concern is the guy they have playing Peeta. I like the casting for everyone else (I don't know about Sutherland for President Snow but whatever...he's not a main character) but the guy playing Peeta reminds me of Daniel Radcliff for some reason. I think it's b/c he looks really short, especially compared to the girl playing Katniss and the guy playing Gale (similarly, Radcliff was dwarfed by his costars too). Seeing as how Peeta's selling point is supposed to be his strength, I'd have thought the producers would have found someone a bit more in line with that. In my mind, Peeta was bigger; not super-buff like the Rock or something but bigger...big enough to be allied with the rest of the Career Tributes and taken seriously.

    Hopefully he'll portray the character well and have some kind of chemistry with Katniss...
     
  22. Rob

    Rob Beach Bum

    13,419
    1,883
    113
  23. PrincessLeppard

    PrincessLeppard Pink Bitch

    22,460
    5,112
    113
    But Peeta and Katniss had no chemistry in the books, so why should they have it in the movie?

    :p
     
  24. michiruwater

    michiruwater Well-Known Member

    9,258
    1,946
    113
    I thought Hutcherson did a good job looking at Katniss adoringly, especially in the second half when he believed she was reciprocating. There wasn't chemistry per se, but to me that fits, because the entire lack of chemistry was coming from Katniss, as it should. She's playing a part.

    Lawrence was beyond spectacular. Oscar-quality, if the Academy ever really nominated people for these sorts of performances.

    I loved it. They adapted it very faithfully. Yes, it was sanitized. Both Glimmer and Cato's deaths were not at all as gruesome as in the books, though they were still a little cringe-worthy. Rue's death had me sobbing, as it should - both actresses nailed it there.

    I'm going to see it several more times I'm sure :lol: Although I do think an R version would have been better and nailed it home completely, I can understand why they did it PG-13.

    I had so few people in Concert Winds today it was ridiculous. Most of my seniors skipped after going to the movie. Oh well though. I got through all the classes just fine (slept before and after the film), though I'm crashing a little now :)
     
  25. kwanatic

    kwanatic Well-Known Member

    2,040
    476
    83
    :p

    Shame on you PrincessLeppard! There was chemistry later on in the books...at least for me there was.

    I just couldn't help but ship Katniss and Peeta simply b/c Gale wasn't around enough. You see him at the beginning of the book but then Katniss leaves and that's it. Same thing in the 2nd book; around for a minute but then stuff happens (don't want to spoil too much) and then he's absent again. By the 3rd book Katniss is such an emotional mess there's just no point...

    The whole triangle thing takes a backseat to what's going on in the books and I'm grateful for that. I love romance novels but I'm not that big a fan of love triangles at all b/c (typically) it's obvious who the person is going to be with...and that was the case with this book as well. There was never a doubt in my mind who Katniss would end up with...
     
  26. michiruwater

    michiruwater Well-Known Member

    9,258
    1,946
    113
    Oh, me either. Gale was such a non-character. I still don't think he had any purpose in the novels at all.

    Unfortunately, Lawrence has a lot more chemistry with Hemsworth than Hutcherson...
     
  27. kwanatic

    kwanatic Well-Known Member

    2,040
    476
    83
    Who wouldn't?! Lol! He's OMG HAWT! :p

    I watched an interview with Lawrence the other day and I have to say, I totally dig her personality. She's pretty up-front and kinda blunt, but it's in an honest way and I admire that...plus it makes her funny by accident. :) I saw her in X-Men: First Class and though she was pretty cool but I didn't see her in her other role, "Lovely Bones" or "Winter's Bone"...something Bone...I don't remember.

    I'll probably catch the movie next week or the week after that. I am excited to see it but not to the point where I'll go crazy if I don't see it right now. I'm glad to hear it's going to be good though...


    ETA: ITA about the Gale being a non-character thing. He just wasn't around enough. The same thing goes for Prim as well. In terms of characters who you need to form some kind of emotional attachment to, I didn't with either of them. They were a bit underdeveloped for obvious reasons. I mean Katniss spends the majority of the series away or busy doing other things, so there isn't a lot of bonding/really-learn-who-this-character-is time with her and either of the characters, especially Prim IMO.

    Peeta OTOH, you get his full story and reason upon reason to root for him...at least I did, though it's obvious others didn't feel that way...
     
    Last edited: Mar 23, 2012
  28. brina

    brina Well-Known Member

    3,228
    336
    83
    I got to see the movie last night. I was surprised to see that it got a fairly high rating on rottentomatoes.com, so my expectations were kind of high going into it.

    Overall I liked it, but there were certainly some aspects of the film that I think could have been improved, although perhaps it would not have been rated PG-13. I thought not only were the deaths sanitized, but they were also slightly unrealistic. While I understand the need to keep the film PG-13, it made you have to suspend your disbelief a little to enjoy it. Also, I felt like the characters didn't get dirty enough in the arena... and there was not enough emphasis on the difficulty to obtain living necessities.

    I felt like Jennifer Lawrence did a GREAT job acting. If anything, her performance made the movie. However, as the movie progressed I think there were moments where she was too stoic. Sure, in moments of distress she perfectly convinced you that she was sad/upset/scared, but it's like in the process of portraying her strength she became too little of a real person.. no matter how strong/determined you are, you still have moments of vulnerability. I think this was the fault of the writer, perhaps.

    That's another thing... they claim that the author co-scripted the movie, and it is very obvious. It was very sequential. It kind of reminded me of the first Harry Potter movie. Finally, I felt like the Capitol's world was a little too obviously computer-generated. I thought there could have been just a little more work done on the effects to make it seem less fake. That was another situation where you had to suspend your disbelief just a little.

    Overall it was a good film. I was concerned that it would be a big disappointment after the hype it received. While I think there are some things that could be improved, it was worth seeing for sure.
     
    Last edited: Mar 23, 2012
  29. vesperholly

    vesperholly Well-Known Member

    7,665
    1,257
    113
    Never heard of that film, but it has no official connection that I know of.

    That was one of the things I thought might happen with JL after I saw her in X-Men: First Class. Sometimes I felt like she was too much of a cypher, not showing any emotion at all on her face. Katniss is not very outwardly expressive in the book, but that doesn't matter in prose since we're in her head.

    But I'm still VERY EXCITE to see it tonight!! :cheer2:
     
  30. michiruwater

    michiruwater Well-Known Member

    9,258
    1,946
    113
    Lawrence is so non-Hollywood. I love her for it. In every interview I've ever seen she's completely honest and funny. She doesn't sound like her team prepped her at all, which is refreshing. She just says whatever she feels is true. The Letterman interview was absolutely hilarious, and Letterman's reaction was priceless. You could tell how much he enjoyed having a celebrity he could just chat with and how effortlessly charming and blunt she was about everything.

    Winter's Bone is the film she was Oscar-nominated for. It's gut-wrenching and hard to watch, but her performance is absolutely riveting. It's also available to watch instantly on Netflix :)