"Sultry Blonde" Anne of Green Gables Book Cover Causes Controversy

Discussion in 'Off The Beaten Track' started by overedge, Feb 7, 2013.

  1. overedge

    overedge Well-Known Member

    18,194
    2,770
    113
  2. my little pony

    my little pony snarking for AZE

    31,365
    8,605
    113
    i dont remember her owning a plaid work shirt

    that looks like a still from season 1 of dawson's creek
     
    flutzilla1 and (deleted member) like this.
  3. cygnus

    cygnus Liberal Furry

    2,375
    870
    113
    It would appear that nobody involved in this decision had actually read the books!
     
  4. Alixana

    Alixana Definitely NOT a sonogram

    1,273
    176
    63
    It's just wrong. :yikes:
     
    skateboy and (deleted member) like this.
  5. iggie

    iggie Well-Known Member

    1,452
    91
    48
    "it's blonde, ain't it?"

    the girl let the braid drop back with a sigh that seemed to come from her very toes and to exhale forth all the sorrows of the ages.

    "yes, it's blonde," she said resignedly. "now you see why i can't be perfectly happy. nobody could who had blonde, hair."
     
    Last edited: Feb 8, 2013
  6. Habs

    Habs Well-Known Member

    3,883
    1,100
    113
    This is so wrong.
     
  7. Prancer

    Prancer Jawwalking Staff Member

    39,074
    6,868
    113
    Well, she should have red hair, but I must say that when I read that she was "sultry," I was expecting something more along the lines of a plunging neckline, visible cleavage and a through-the-eyelashes come hither look. It sure wasn't something that would have looked right at home on a book in the 50s.
     
  8. Kruss

    Kruss Not Auto-Tuned

    2,189
    388
    83
    As I saw on Twitter, Gilbert called her 'carrots', not 'turnips'.
     
    Alixana and (deleted member) like this.
  9. Spareoom

    Spareoom Well-Known Member

    1,839
    199
    63
    lol, that is hilarious. Whoever put that cover on there obviously knows NOTHING about the books, otherwise they would have known that they could have put ANYONE on the cover and it would have been fine AS LONG as she had red hair. I mean, "Anne of Green Gables" is practically synonymous with red hair, haha!
     
  10. Nomad

    Nomad Well-Known Member

    7,908
    1,412
    113
    Pulp novels excepted. I love the lurid covers of the 40s and 50s drugstore novels.
     
  11. Wyliefan

    Wyliefan Well-Known Member

    18,029
    2,370
    113
    Saw that the other day -- isn't it awful? Of course, the irony is that now this little self-published version is getting all kinds of attention that it wouldn't have gotten otherwise. I doubt it'll translate into sales, though, so their marketing strategy may have backfired on them.
     
  12. skatingfan5

    skatingfan5 Well-Known Member

    10,836
    2,051
    113
  13. Artemis@BC

    Artemis@BC Well-Known Member

    5,221
    1,062
    113
    A friend posted this on her Facebook page last week. My immediate response was "oh, it's Anne of Heartland." :lol:

    Honestly, as wrong as this picture is (wrong era, demeanour, and obviously wrong haircolour) ... what disturbs me more is the fact that anyone can use "CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform" to just take Montgomery's text, slap a Photostock image on it, and sell it as theirs. I know that's how it works when a publishing copyright expires ... but it's still wrong in my book.
     
  14. DarrellH

    DarrellH New Member

    4,763
    375
    0
    Sultry?
     
  15. backspin

    backspin Active Member

    996
    124
    43
    I'm a little surprised her estate didn't get the copyright extended, sometimes I believe they can do that.
     
  16. danceronice

    danceronice Corgi Wrangler

    6,486
    524
    113
    I would actually be very surprised if Sullivan Productions can't go after them.

    And can someone who can rep please rep Kruss for the 'turnips' comment? :lol:
     
  17. Artemis@BC

    Artemis@BC Well-Known Member

    5,221
    1,062
    113
    Sullivan owns the rights to their own televised productions, not to the original text. There was a publisher on CBC radio the other day who said that the novels are public domain, although the copyright for some of Montgomery's short stories is still in effect.

    Found the interview online: interview (probably geoblocked)
     
  18. Artemis@BC

    Artemis@BC Well-Known Member

    5,221
    1,062
    113
    :respec:

    :rofl:
     
  19. Finnice

    Finnice Well-Known Member

    5,122
    1,378
    113
    This cover has nothing, nothing to do with Anne of the Green Gables. It is one of the worst examples of misleading book covers ever. :angryfire:yikes::angryfire

    (Yes, I am a huge L.M. Montgomery fan who has even travelled to Prince Edward Island because of her books.)
     
  20. overedge

    overedge Well-Known Member

    18,194
    2,770
    113
    Even though the book is in the public domain, I wouldn't be surprised if the Anne of Green Gables Licensing Authority (yes, it really exists) goes after them too.
    http://www.gov.pe.ca/anne/license.php3
     
  21. Alixana

    Alixana Definitely NOT a sonogram

    1,273
    176
    63
    Done!
     
  22. Kruss

    Kruss Not Auto-Tuned

    2,189
    388
    83
    Thanks, all! I wish I could take credit for that, but I saw it on Twitter. The funny thing is, I had no idea what they were talking about at the time, but of course saw it later in this thread.
     
  23. overedge

    overedge Well-Known Member

    18,194
    2,770
    113
  24. skateboy

    skateboy Well-Known Member

    4,373
    918
    113
  25. March_Hare

    March_Hare Member

    182
    11
    18
    :yikes: Unbelieveable. Did anyone else have to double-check the calendar to make sure it was not April 1st?