Skaters/Couples who were PCS gifted or ungifted

Discussion in 'The Trash Can' started by icellist, Jul 12, 2011.

  1. icellist

    icellist Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2010
    Messages:
    421
    Another one of those threads XD

    Just wondering about some of your thoughts about specific skaters and couples who were continuously given unjust/bad or ridiculously/unreasonably good PCS marks. I'd rather the thread not talk about specific skates in a competition but rather a certain skater, couple, or one of their programs that were not recognized by the judging panel. Also please include which part of PCS was unjust: Skating Skills, Transitions, Performance, Choreography, or Interpretation.

    and Please, again, not specific skates. Just skaters or couples or their programs (if you want to talk about transitions and choreography)

    Also, can someone differentiate performance and interpretation for me?
     
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2011
  2. TheIronLady

    TheIronLady New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,520
    The judges never gave the PCS they should have to Mao's Bells of Moscow.
     
  3. icellist

    icellist Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2010
    Messages:
    421
    how so? was it the program's transitions or choreography or mao's interpretation/performance?

    be specific please :D
     
  4. Moka-Ananas

    Moka-Ananas Man's Ruin

    Joined:
    May 1, 2010
    Messages:
    4,480
    Carolina Kostner and Patrick Chan come to mind who often managed to get high PCS although they bombed their programs.
     
    flutzilla1 and (deleted member) like this.
  5. Jenna

    Jenna Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2009
    Messages:
    7,139
    "Bombing" a program, though, doesn't always mean low PCS should be given. One can have 2-3 falls, pops, etc. and still deserve good marks for skating skills, choreography, interpretation.

    People that come to mind that are undermarked in PCS: Akiko Suzuki, Yukari Nakano, Alissa Czisny (before the 10-11 season), Cynthia Phaneuf at times, Denis Ten

    Gifted: Gachinski (only at Worlds, really), Bradley (at US Nats), Samuel Contesti, Miki Ando at times
     
  6. Vagabond

    Vagabond Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2011
    Messages:
    3,757
    Matthew Savoie had some of the most intricate and difficult Transitions in the sport and should have been given about the same marks as Jeffrey Buttle and Stephane Lambiel. His other PCS marks were low too, but the undermarking for Transitions was particularly egregious.

    A couple of years ago, Takahiko Kozuka was given "corridor marks" that resulted in Transitions marks that were lower than they should have been. The same thing happened to Jorik Hendrickx this season.

    Evgeni Plushenko was given absurdly high marks for Transitions at the 2006 Winter Olympic Games. At the 2010 Olympics, his Transitions marks were: 8.75 6.00 8.00 8.75 6.00 6.50 7.25 7.25 8.50, which means that some of the judges ranked him higher on that Component than they did Lambiel, Takahashi, and/or Chan. :shuffle:
     
    flutzilla1 and (deleted member) like this.
  7. bardtoob

    bardtoob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2005
    Messages:
    8,147
    Except for maybe execution, which is held up because the judges don't want to be out of the window, Chan deserves high PCS all the time.

    Kostner always receives "Political" Component Scores in every category. She has not been as good as her scores for at least 5 years.
     
  8. manleywoman

    manleywoman podcast mistress

    Joined:
    May 8, 2003
    Messages:
    7,833
    Yup. To me, Matt Savoie is the biggest wuzrobbed in the history of PCS.

    And Plushy is the most gifted.
     
    kwanette and (deleted member) like this.
  9. Marco

    Marco Missing Ziggy

    Joined:
    May 9, 2002
    Messages:
    11,480
    IMO the international judges have been quite generous with Ando and Plushenko and have not been quite appreciative of Abbott, Nagasu, Czisny and Wagner IMO.
     
  10. gkelly

    gkelly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    Messages:
    10,747
    See detailed program component explanations here.

    I usually think of everything to do with how the skater relates to the music during the performance as constituting the the Interpretation.

    Performance/Execution and Choreography have a lot of different criteria that don't necessarily relate directly to each other.

    The overall structure of the choreography in relation to the musical phrasing or music-related theme on a macro scale would come under the Choreography component, and a couple of the Performance/Execution criteria also mention music, so I wouldn't say that every single thing related to music comes under Interpretation.

    But I think that everything scored under Interpretation relates to the music.

    P/E seems like kind of a catch-all category for everything about the performance that isn't covered under any of the other components.
     
  11. RumbleFish

    RumbleFish New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2010
    Messages:
    1,004
    My problem with current PCS marking is that some skaters' marks never go down even when they screw up badly.

    PCS marks should tumble when skaters make multiple errors, but for likes of Chan, Kostner, and Takahashi, their PCS never drops. We saw this at 2010 SC for Chan, 2008 Worlds for Kostner, and 2009 GPF for Takahashi. I think highly of these skaters' skills and think they should get high PCS if they perform well, but I cannot stand them getting held up even when they mess up.

    For Ando, it is a different story. She always gets absurdly high PCS despite doing nothing that deserves such marks.
     
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2011
  12. Amy03

    Amy03 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2010
    Messages:
    252
    i agree mao never get the pcs score that she deserved for her bells it really was a masterpiece and i really think that she interpreted the music well, I remember seeing it on the Olympics and i instantly fell in love with the program it diffidently deserved more... I know that mao isn't the best actress on the ice but her using her whole body and the transitions were enough to make this program something special well actually just skating to such dark and different kind of music was amazing in itself..
     
  13. julieann

    julieann Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,633
    In regard to PCS (and thanks gkelly for posting that) I think some people assume judge's scores should plummet from what would have been maybe an 8 or 9 to a 5 or 6 just because of a fall or stumble and that's not realistic either.

    Out of a 4 1/2 minute program hitting a skater that hard for a one-two second mistake is just as harsh. If you had good Choreography and good interpretation but bad execution that particular day the PCS numbers should reflect that accordingly based on that days competiton.
     
  14. julieann

    julieann Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,633
    Do you mean 2010 SC for Chan? My biggest question about Chan in 2010 SC is do judges mark off for fall on jumps in PCS or only in GOE and if so where? Falls on jumps are not clearly defined except for the manditory deduction.
     
  15. RumbleFish

    RumbleFish New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2010
    Messages:
    1,004
    Thanks for the heads up. I meant 2010 SC for Chan and 2009 GPF for Takahashi.

    IMO, errors like falls, step-outs, two-footing, and cheated jumps should have negative impact on PCS marks. Afterall, how can skaters peform choreography or display skating skills when they are cleaning off the ice with their butts? Likewise, noticeable mistakes takes the air out of programs and enthusiasm among the crowd.
     
  16. gkelly

    gkelly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    Messages:
    10,747
    Falls on elements absolutely get reflected in the GOEs. The required reduction is -3, so that will almost always be the final GOE except in rare cases if there was enough of the element before the fall that would have had the element on the plus side (e.g., fall on last jump of a combination, end of otherwise good spin or step sequence).

    There's no requirement for falls to be reflected in the PCS. My impression is that many judges will not penalize one fall that doesn't disrupt the program for more than two or three seconds, but if there are multiple errors resulting in the overall impression of a sloppy performance, that will be reflected under Performance/Execution. After all, visible errors such as falls and stumbles are not compatible with the "Clarity of movement" criterion for that component.

    Still, a skater who is generally very refined but spends 10 seconds out of 4+ minutes making or recovering from errors might deserve higher marks for that criterion vs. another skater who makes no visible mistakes but is generally lax on posture, body line, blade placement, etc., for the whole 4+ minutes.
     
  17. julieann

    julieann Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,633
    Thanks, that make sense. I have seen some skaters take a few moments after a fall to compose themselves and some never get back into the program and others (like Chan) who act like nothing happened and if you missed the fall wouldn't have known anything happened. I can see how some judges wouldn't deduct as sever as others.
     
  18. briancoogaert

    briancoogaert Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2003
    Messages:
    12,509
    Well, Patrick Chan and Carolina Kostner have amazing skating skills, so, even if they don't land every jump, it's beautiful to watch them. IMO.
     
  19. Erin

    Erin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2001
    Messages:
    5,131
    I would definitely agree that Savoie's Transition marks were too low, but I never thought he was that undermarked in all of the other components. I thought Matt had interesting programs and wonderful detail to them, but found the use of his arms and lack of line somewhat detracted from the program. His rather introspective performance also hurt a bit. Given that, at a bare minimum I can understand why he didn't get really high marks in Performance/Execution (due to carriage, clarity of movement, precision in delivery and projection) and Skating Skills (some of the areas around sureness of edges, balance, rhythmic knee action). I could agree with his Choreography and Interpretation marks being higher, though.


    I believe there was guidance in the initial draft of COP that judges should deduct 0.5 for each fall from the PE mark. In actual experience, judges either didn't do so or may have done so, but it was difficult to see. As a result, the mandatory -1 per fall rule came into effect. I tend to think of that deduction as at least partially reflecting that a fall impacts a program's flow more than some other errors and should have an additional penalty over and above the lost GOE. I would almost think of the -1 deduction as the cost of a "regular" fall on the program. At the same time, sometimes skaters have falls that are significantly more disruptive than the average, multiple falls in the program (which tend to exponentially impact the program's performance), messy mistakes that do not qualify as falls, or simply lose the performance value after making a mistake. In these cases, the impact on the program was more than the required deduction and it makes sense for the PCS to reflect that additional impact. Now as to whether a judge sees it that way or whether that is the way the ISU even wants them to see it, that's a different story.
     
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2011
    gkelly and (deleted member) like this.
  20. nikjil

    nikjil Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2004
    Messages:
    355
    It always seemed to me that there are differences between falls that should be relfected in the PC marks. There's what I tended to think of the Kwan fall, a bounce on the butt them up that was never particularly disruptive as opposed to the Butryskaya/Kostner sprawl or face plants that really disrupts the flow of the program. The problem for me with Kostner's marks is that generally her multi-fall programs tend to be accompanied with a complete "deer in headlights" performance quality that never seems to be reflected in her PC marks.
     
  21. npavel

    npavel Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2007
    Messages:
    1,463
    Plushenko's transitions marks are always to high as he had often said you don't need them, just jump.
    Kostner's skating skills are about the best in women's field, so she should always get these marks quite high. This year she has grown in presentation really much.
    PCS are not jumps and it's why they get are to mark independently. I always think skaters who are god jumpers get high PCS, but it shouldn't be so. Jumps get a lot of credit in the technical marks; the skating skills, presentation, execution, transitions, choreography, the artistry ... should reflected much more independently in PCS.
     
  22. sk9tingfan

    sk9tingfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    Messages:
    1,955
    PC:2010 SC
     
  23. museksk8r

    museksk8r Holding an edge and looking dangerously sexy

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2008
    Messages:
    3,297
    Carolina Kostner's amazing footwork usually deserves high scores. Girl has MAD speed and skating skills! Her choreography and musical interpretation usually merit her high scores as well I think.
     
  24. Fozzie Bear

    Fozzie Bear Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2004
    Messages:
    1,265
    I felt DelSchoes often deserved higher PCS than they were given.
     
  25. Proustable

    Proustable New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2011
    Messages:
    1,592
    I've heard that stated several times, but what about someone like Denis Ten? He got higher PCS for an LP with five falls than he did for an LP with three falls (Skate America 2010 vs NHK 2010). I think if you examine the scores, you'll see that mistakes on elements tend not to be reflected in the actual PCS (S/S at Euros 2011 is another example)
     
  26. julieann

    julieann Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,633
    I agree, Chan fell on a quad and got the deduction, he got right back up. Fell on a triple and got the deduction, got right back up. Neither one I would consider egregious. The fall on the footwork was at the last 10 seconds of the program, it was weird but he did again get the deduction. The rest was good and hardly a bomb. He got the deductions where he should have got them. But he didn't he didn't get deducted where he clearly earned the score.

    This is a bomb yet their PCS scores were on par with the second place team even though they were in 4th and much higher than the third place team.
     
  27. misskarne

    misskarne #408

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2011
    Messages:
    6,244
    Not really. One fall you can maybe get away with it - by two or three falls or pops you've really taken away from the feel of the program.

    I honestly don't understand the Gachinsky Worlds 2011 hate. He actually skated really well and I like the style he's developing. It's kind of a YagudinPlushenkoKulikWeir mishmash. It's fun.

    THIS this this.

    This is pretty much my thoughts exactly.

    IMO I don't think falls are penalised harshly enough. I've heard enough people criticise and say "it's figure SKATING, not figure JUMPING" well let me reply with, "it's figure SKATING, not figure FALLING!"

    If you fall, it should be a whopping deduction, not the little ones it is now. (I don't think -3 GOE and a -1 deduction is enough, really.) You should not be able to win with a fall. You shouldn't be able to top five with two, and you should be lucky to top 10 with three or more. (For the record, this isn't a Chan hate issue - I also think Plushenko was extremely lucky to be 4th after the SLC SP.)

    Or, to put it another way - in motor racing, you could have smooth cornering, excellent braking skills, great acceleration technique. But if you crash, you're penalised - either by the stewards for being a moron, or by the simple fact that you can't continue. Either way it's virtually impossible to win the race - as it should be.
     
  28. julieann

    julieann Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,633
    Saying a skater can't win with a fall is not taking into consideration everything else they are being judged on.

    If a skater has a base value of 80 and improves that by 10 but has one fall and another skater has a base value of of 60 and improves that by 5 with no falls, with both PCS' being equal the skater with no falls wins even though that skate wasn't as good points wise? Why don't we just turn the music off when a skater falls and ask them to leave the ice?

    Does a team who throws and interception never come back to win the Superbowl? Does a batter who strikesout never comes back to win a World Series? The list goes on and on.....
     
    Ozzisk8tr and (deleted member) like this.
  29. walei

    walei Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2004
    Messages:
    1,330
    I do not agree with this analogy. In a racing sport all competitors are basically doing the same thing, complete the same course.

    In figure skating is different. Unless all skaters do the exact same steps and exact same elements, those who fall should not win. However that's not the case as we all know.
     
    bardtoob and (deleted member) like this.
  30. moebius

    moebius Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,511
    Never thought Alissa Czsiny was gifted with PCS. She skates slow and tentatively. People think she should get higher PCS because of her artistry.

    Evan Lysacek was always gifted with PCS. Those frenetic moves look very awkard on ice.