Royalty Thread #5 - Kate Now Officially A MILF

Discussion in 'Off The Beaten Track' started by floskate, Jul 23, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. kwanfan1818

    kwanfan1818 I

    Joined:
    May 24, 2003
    Messages:
    19,416
    Yeah, England will curl up and die if there's another Princess Anne, just like they did the first time. Oh, wait...

    Queen Elizabeth was a beautiful young woman.
  2. heckles

    heckles Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2005
    Messages:
    3,106
    Elizabeth could handle one Anne, but the old broad doesn't want to double her displeasure. Liz looks good for a vintage blue blood, but her sis Large Marge wasn't so fortunate, which had to make it that much tougher for the latter when Liz decided to c-block her.
  3. falling_dance

    falling_dance The Scarlet Unlettered

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2007
    Messages:
    23,197
    I wouldn't mind looking like the young Princess Margaret.
  4. kwanfan1818

    kwanfan1818 I

    Joined:
    May 24, 2003
    Messages:
    19,416
    I'm with you, falling_dance.
  5. DarrellH

    DarrellH New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2007
    Messages:
    4,763
    :rofl:
  6. escaflowne9282

    escaflowne9282 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2002
    Messages:
    2,917
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJg1zqWKFZU
    IMHO Margaret was easily the better looking of the two :confused:. Not to say the Queen is unattractive, but her appearance and demeanor always came across as so severe, even as a child.
  7. paskatefan

    paskatefan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2006
    Messages:
    3,768

    :respec:
  8. mag

    mag Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    6,995
    Lovely photo of Kate, George, and William on the front of this week's People magazine.
  9. kwanfan1818

    kwanfan1818 I

    Joined:
    May 24, 2003
    Messages:
    19,416
  10. smileyskate

    smileyskate New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2007
    Messages:
    667
    Wasn't George the name of the King during the American Revolutionary War?
    I wonder why they'd go with that as a first name, unless of course they are honoring a completely different monarch? Although, I did read that in the colonies, the Loyalists at the time loved that King and the Patriots hated him. Also, that the people in Great Britain (at the time) felt he did nothing wrong.
  11. PDilemma

    PDilemma Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Messages:
    4,762
    Two of the most recent kings of England, Elizabeth's father and grandfather, were George V and George VI. I highly doubt that the couple were thinking all the way back to George III who died in 1820, but rather that they sought to honor William's own great grandfather and great great grandfather.
  12. heckles

    heckles Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2005
    Messages:
    3,106
    Sure, but as mentioned, she didn't age well, unlike her sister. It's probably just as well Liz put her foot down, since in Maggie's youth she was nailing some pretty low-grade characters, from a mob boss to Warren Beatty.
    Last edited: Jul 29, 2013
  13. danceronice

    danceronice Corgi Wrangler

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    6,461
    Yes. My money was on George to honor HMQ's father. True, that wasn't his first name, but "Albert" wouldn't really be a popular choice....Yes, "George" was King George III's name but it goes back to the first Hanoverian king of England, George I. (The current line of succession descends from Sophia of Hannover, who was the granddaughter of James VI/I, which does, btw, mean the current house is very tangentaly related to the Tudors via Henry VIII's sister Margaret, which was how James VI had the best claim on the English throne when Elizabeth I failed to produce an heir.)
  14. Skittl1321

    Skittl1321 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2007
    Messages:
    11,083
    Maybe they are secretly supporting the Scottish separatist movement and named the baby after George Washington who led a similar movement...
  15. Celine82

    Celine82 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2003
    Messages:
    1,434
  16. dardar1126

    dardar1126 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    3,247
    Last edited: Jul 29, 2013
  17. skatesindreams

    skatesindreams Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2002
    Messages:
    13,732
    I hope the nickname won't last beyond childhood.
  18. Jenny

    Jenny From the Bloc

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2001
    Messages:
    17,469
  19. PDilemma

    PDilemma Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Messages:
    4,762
    I doubt it will. Many men in particular have nicknames like that that do not last beyond childhood except perhaps in their immediate families. My extended family had Davey, Mikey, Stevie, Timmy, and Scotty. They are now David, Mike, Steve, Tim and Scott. Although, those of us who are roughly the same age as Mike often still call him Mikey. The world outside of us does not and his parents always called him Michael.
  20. snoopy

    snoopy Team St. Petersburg

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2002
    Messages:
    5,764
    LOL. Poor Jenny. Maybe you can adopt fandom for some of the other country’s royals whilst Georgie is growing up. Or maybe he’ll soon have a sister to steal some of the spot light.

    The hottest guy in my high school was a George, so the name generally doesn’t bother me. But “Georgie” is kind of obnoxious.
  21. liv

    liv Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2001
    Messages:
    1,656
    I'm the opposite. I like Georgie, but dislike George. ...although I have a cat named George...
  22. paskatefan

    paskatefan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2006
    Messages:
    3,768
    My dad's name was George, but when he was a kid, the other kids would call him "Georgie" based on the rhyme 'Georgie Porgie, pudding & pie." I sense that it didn't bother him. As an adult people called him George.

    Re: royal baby George, I'm willing to bet that the chosen name is in remembrance of Queen Elizabeth's father.
  23. Reuven

    Reuven Official FSU Alte Kacher

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2005
    Messages:
    12,137
    kwanfan1818 and (deleted member) like this.
  24. aftershocks

    aftershocks Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2009
    Messages:
    4,507
    ITA re Camilla is completely accepted as a member of The Royal Family. As far as Diana “knowing what she was getting,” IMO that’s debatable. Diana and Charles got married at a very different time and what subsequently happened to both Charles and Diana during their relationship ultimately changed the monarchy, seemingly for the better in some ways, although a huge price was paid. Diana rebelled against protocol, and stuffy royal attitudes and she desired love above all. She had an indication prior to the wedding but after the engagement re Charles’ extreme closeness with Camilla. IMO, Diana was still a immature and school-girlish in the ways of love. She was a romantic who apparently was in love with being in love with Prince Charles. It was perhaps a bit like one of her stepmother’s romance fantasies come true, which recalls the fairy tale nature of Diana’s wedding right down to her fantastical dress. Neither Charles nor Diana actually got to know each other very well prior to their engagement. Charles also was immature in some ways and emotionally needy. Moreover, Charles was definitely still in love with Camilla but likely he felt (again having grown up during a different time with more traditional expectations) that he was bound to do his duty and marry a young virgin who would ultimately be acquiescent and accepting of his love for Camilla.

    Diana was expected to produce an heir and a spare and to accept her position and to be okay with Charles’ philandering and to not make a fuss as someone in line to be Queen to his King. From what I’ve read and recall, Camilla played a role in approving Charles’ ultimate decision to pick Diana for his bride. Everyone thought Diana was shy and malleable. NOT! She was young, romantic, needy, with a strong rebellious spirit. She was also still growing as a person and still struggling with the psychological effects of her own parents’ scandalous 1960s divorce, not to mention her bulimia. Diana was also unused to the inner workings of royal life (despite her own grandmother’s close relationship with the Queen Mother). There has been acknowledgement in royal circles that Diana as a very young bride new to the ins and outs of royal protocol should have been better prepared by The Royal Family for the role she was taking on. Kate has absolutely been prepared (and of course Kate’s a different person altogether, grew up in a different time, comes from a happy family, and got to intimately know Prince William mostly out of the public eye in the early years of their relationship). As a result of what happened to Charles and Diana (and no less to the marriages of other members of the Royal Family), the Queen in recent years advised the younger generation of royals to take the time to get to know the person they were in love with and to be absolutely certain they were suited for each other before getting married in order to guard against any more royal divorce scandals.

    William in a sense benefited from experiencing what happened to the marriage of his parents, despite it having been obviously a traumatic experience for him, as his mother leaned upon him very heavily (from what I’ve read) in an emotional sense. Queen Elizabeth began to devote more time to William during his adolescence when his parents were going through their difficulties. I think William and Harry seem to have got for the most part the best from both their parents in an emotional sense. They both seem very well-adjusted, and eager for their father’s happiness and in equal measure loving and respectful regarding their mother’s life and memory. They seem to maintain a deep sense of positive perspective as well as privacy regarding their mother, and they both seem to be able (especially William) to balance being real people in today’s world with being heirs to the British throne.
    nubka and (deleted member) like this.
  25. heckles

    heckles Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2005
    Messages:
    3,106
    Eh, I can't feel much sympathy for Charles or Camilla in the situation. He had the opportunity to marry her in his early 20s, but he expected her to wait around for eight years, and she refused. For her part, she got married to Andrew Parker Bowles and had two kids, but continued to sneak around with Charles. They were a couple of self-absorbed flakes, and it's weird to see their relationship portrayed as an awesome love story.
  26. aftershocks

    aftershocks Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2009
    Messages:
    4,507
    ^^ :lol: Well together, albeit flakey, they seem to share something quite awesome (maybe something to do with fate and fulfilling each other's basic emotional/ physical needs perhaps)? Who knows? That old tacky private telephone conversation meant only for each other's ears was quite :scream:

    Nothing like living life in a fishbowl apparently. All one's faults, missteps and character flaws exposed. Charles and Camilla both seem to have weathered the storm, although it remains to be seen when they will attain the throne together. :p Going by Queen Elizabeth's mother's longevity, it may be quite some time. Will Charles be older than King Edward VII when his Mom, Queen Victoria finally relinquished the throne to rejoin her true love?

    Actually young Prince Charles did not really "have the opportunity to marry" the young Camilla, as she apparently was known to have had a "past" before she met Charles. Uncle Louie (Mountbatten) had a very strong influence upon Charles. Both Uncle Louie and The Royal Family were against Charles actually marrying Camilla. Charles was never known for bucking tradition (and very old-fashioned notions still held sway back then). Neither did Charles seem to possess a rebellious spirit or strong backbone in his youth.

    Re the discussion about Princess Margaret, she was definitely considered to be very attractive and charming in her youth. Sadness, cigarettes, alcohol and excess led to poor health in Margaret's later years. In their youth, both Margaret and Elizabeth were known for their English rose complexions. Also, Margaret was quite the irrepressible mimic and I've read that some people feel she could have had a great career as an actress had she not been born a Royal. In addition, Margaret was the apple of her father's eye and completely spoiled by him. George VI's death had a devastating personal effect in different ways upon each of the three women he left behind.

    It also goes without saying that Princess Margaret's traumatic loss of true love early in her life in some part likely led to her wild ways. The decision against Margaret's desire to marry her father's former equerry was so unnecessary in retrospect-- but her true love (despite being a war hero) was also a divorced older man and the memory of her Uncle David's abdication to marry a divorced woman was still a royal sore point. I think Queen Elizabeth wanted her sister to be happy but Churchill and others advised the young QE against granting Margaret's wish to marry Group Captain Peter Townsend. Since the thwarted lovers are both dead for awhile now, where's the miniseries? Maybe it might have to wait for some time out of respect for Her Majesty, QE. Just as the movie about King George VI's struggle with stuttering had to wait until QE the Queen Mother's passing.
    Last edited: Aug 2, 2013
  27. heckles

    heckles Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2005
    Messages:
    3,106
    Then it was that much suckier that Charles thought that he could never marry her, and instead tried to convince her to wait for eight years. When that failed, they continued shagging each other despite being married to other people and having kids involved.

    I suspect that a large amount of the perceived appeal of the Charles and Camila story is that Americans are confusing it with the stories about former high school sweethearts who didn't see each other for decades, then suddenly meet up again when both are widowed, and pick up where they left off. The latter type type of story is awww-worthy. Charles and Camila, not so much.
  28. OliviaPug

    OliviaPug Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2002
    Messages:
    2,249
    Thank you.

    O-
  29. Jenny

    Jenny From the Bloc

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2001
    Messages:
    17,469
    This is fun - the British Monarchy FB page has posted Prince George's birth certificate.

    Interesting to see the official names/titles, as well as the "occupations" of the parents :)
  30. Wyliefan

    Wyliefan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    17,647
    I was half expecting it to be done in Ye Fancy Olde-Fashioned Calligraphy. :D
  31. screech

    screech Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2004
    Messages:
    3,866
    I thought it was interesting to see Kate's occupation listed as Princess of the United Kingdom.
  32. Lorac

    Lorac Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,541
    From the blurb attached it sounds as if Willaim avoided having to make an appointment at the local registry office like the rest of us plebs - they came to him :) And love the occupations - especially as William could conceivably have put his RAF job! I wonder if by law those occupations had to be placed on the birth certificate of an HRH who is in line for the throne ;)
    Last edited: Aug 2, 2013
  33. Jenny

    Jenny From the Bloc

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2001
    Messages:
    17,469
    The RAF is a temporary job for William - once does like to go with one's most impressive credentials on important documents like this :)
  34. Skittl1321

    Skittl1321 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2007
    Messages:
    11,083
    Not sure if this is your point, but I've seen a lot of people argue she isn't a Princess. If they hadn't been granted the Duke/Duchess titles, wouldn't she be called Princess William? (Well, except the fact that the media is never going to get off the "Kate Middleton" thing.)
  35. mkats

    mkats New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    Messages:
    2,804
    Is there a reason William has HRH listed first before his name, and Kate is listed as "Catherine Elizabeth, HRH"? Or maybe the person was just writing in a rush and forgot the order? :lol:

    Thanks Jenny for posting, that was cool to see :)
  36. mkats

    mkats New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    Messages:
    2,804
    Is there a reason William has HRH listed first before his name, and Kate is listed as "Catherine Elizabeth, HRH"? Or maybe the person was just writing in a rush and forgot the order? :lol:

    Thanks Jenny for posting, that was cool to see :)
  37. Jenny

    Jenny From the Bloc

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2001
    Messages:
    17,469
    Others might have further insights, but I think it's because she wasn't born to the title, and William was.
  38. screech

    screech Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2004
    Messages:
    3,866
    IIRC, Kate won't be styled Princess until William becomes the heir apparent. Once Charles is King, I think William and Kate will then be referred to as Prince and Princess instead of Duke and Duchess.

    But yeah, that's what I thought was odd - she was listed as Princess for her occupation, when she hasn't yet been officially styled as princess.
  39. mag

    mag Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    6,995
    Kate is a princess. She is Princess William of Wales just like Princess Michael of Kent. Kate is also the Duchess of Cambridge and a couple of other titles I can't remember. They choose to be known as the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge. When / if William is made the Prince of Wales, Kate will be become the Princess of Wales.
  40. Zemgirl

    Zemgirl Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    4,876
    Yes, she would, like Prince and Princess Michael of Kent. As with other royal wives, she is not a princess in her own right, and takes her husband's style. Technically Diana was HRH the Princess of Wales, not Princess Diana (after the divorce it was "Diana, Princess of Wales"). When William becomes the Prince of Wales, Kate will be HRH the Princess of Wales, and I imagine George will be Prince George of Wales.

    I am not sure if Kate is styled Princess William even technically at the moment, there's no mention of it on her bio in the the British monarchy website.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.