Royalty Thread #4 Nappies and Nuptials

Discussion in 'Off The Beaten Track' started by taf2002, Dec 3, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. AxelAnnie

    AxelAnnie Well-Known Member

    6,131
    1,048
    113
    Although that is lovely....and about time.........but they already know the gender........or could know if they wanted. So, it was either a safe bet (cause it is a boy) or a big deal (knowing it is a girl) :)
     
  2. liv

    liv Well-Known Member

    1,703
    134
    63
    I am saying now it will be a girl. Just a feeling I've had since the beginning...we'll see if I"m right!!
     
  3. avivadawn

    avivadawn Well-Known Member

    1,028
    100
    63
    I'm also thinking that she's carrying a girl.
     
  4. *Jen*

    *Jen* Well-Known Member

    11,614
    1,371
    113
    I think it's time for a girl too - but that has nothing to do with this legislation, which had actually been proposed well before the pregnancy was announced :) They pushed through similar reforms in Denmark and then Prince Christian turned out to be a boy!

    But...there are odd coincidences and patterns in my family regarding gender, so I'm using the pattern for the royals. The Queen had a sister - two girls. She had 3 boys and a girl. Charles had 2 boys. It's time for some girls!
     
  5. PDilemma

    PDilemma Well-Known Member

    4,878
    828
    113
    William and Kate may know, but that doesn't mean the Queen or anyone else has been told. Just saying.
     
  6. *Jen*

    *Jen* Well-Known Member

    11,614
    1,371
    113
    I doubt they already know the gender. She was well under 12 weeks when the pregnancy was announced and the baby is rumoured to be due June/July, putting her at 12 weeks now. I don't think you can know so early?

    And anyway, like I said, this change was proposed long before the pregnancy was announced.
     
  7. Jenny

    Jenny From the Bloc

    17,560
    2,132
    113
  8. my little pony

    my little pony snarking for AZE

    31,363
    8,600
    113
    i dont like it at all. it looks like someone did an age progression to show what she will look like in 30 years after an all night bender.
     
    IceAlisa and (deleted member) like this.
  9. Jenny

    Jenny From the Bloc

    17,560
    2,132
    113
    That's what a lot of comments are saying on Facebook - perhaps in an effort to make it timeless, they made her look older, and slightly plumper. Maybe it's better in person, but her most important attribute - her natural radiance - is sadly missing.
     
  10. skatesindreams

    skatesindreams Well-Known Member

    14,606
    2,489
    113
    That portrait doesn't capture "her" in any way.
    How in the world could the artist make her look "matronly" - at 30!
    She is a beautiful, charming young woman.

    Better to have enlarged and displayed one of the very fine photographs which have been made instead.

    The worse thing is that "smirk".
    Who thought that was a good idea?
     
  11. Jenny

    Jenny From the Bloc

    17,560
    2,132
    113
    Some have compared it to Mona Lisa's smile, but I think it does look like a smirk, which is uncharacteristic for her. She usually smiles with her mouth open, much more engaging.
     
  12. skatingfan5

    skatingfan5 Well-Known Member

    10,836
    2,051
    113
    I'm afraid the portrait doesn't seem to capture any of Kate's vibrant personality and does make her look older than her 31 years -- although I certainly wouldn't mind looking like that at age 60! :p The "Mona Lisa smile" is indeed much more like a smirk. When I saw a brief glimpse of it on TV, I thought why is Kate doing the "McKayla is not amused" face?!? Oh well, this is only the first official portrait -- one can hope that future ones are more flattering.
     
    Last edited: Jan 11, 2013
  13. professordeb

    professordeb Well-Known Member

    3,818
    414
    83
    I absolutely HATE the portrait. It just isn't the Kate we have come to know/admire/love. It's just one big whopping UGH!
     
  14. danceronice

    danceronice Corgi Wrangler

    6,485
    524
    113
    Question: If the Commonwealth has agreed to the change in succession rules, have they also agreed to Cameron's proposal to rescind the Settlement Act provision that bars the heir from marrying a Catholic? Considering the heir is free to marry anyone else of any other religion or lack thereof, that one is as outdated as the male primogeniture laws.

    And of the subject of multiple titles and ranks, besides William using a lesser title, there's always that third rail of titles--Camilla is really entitled to be known as Princess of Wales and the only reason they don't use that one is the Diana-fanatics flip out over it.
     
  15. milanessa

    milanessa engaged to dupa

    18,917
    2,870
    0
  16. PDilemma

    PDilemma Well-Known Member

    4,878
    828
    113
    Why does she have bags/dark circles under her eyes???? Did the artist hate her????
     
  17. Garden Kitty

    Garden Kitty Tranquillo

    25,271
    5,593
    113
    That's what struck me too. I'd say the artist was trying to be "realistic" except I've never seen pics of her that look that bad.
     
  18. Jenny

    Jenny From the Bloc

    17,560
    2,132
    113
    Exactly. I've never seen her look anything but flawless, in a nice, natural and approachable way. If the artist wanted her to look "real" he should have worked harder on her smile, because that's what does it. In one squib I read that he changed the colour of her eyes to match her blouse, which is all fine and dandy if you are doing an interpretive image, but not if it's supposed to be a realistic portrait. The very idea that he thought he might improve her look! Centuries from now scholars will argue that this portrait was done when she was much older - although my bet is that she ages a lot more gracefully than this.

    Every time I look at that portrait, I hate it even more. :(
     
  19. Skittl1321

    Skittl1321 Well-Known Member

    12,070
    1,424
    113
    I don't like the portrait. She looks like she is smirking, not smiling, and her eyes look like she is glaring- as if she is plotting something, or mad. It just doesn't fit her personality at all.
     
  20. skatesindreams

    skatesindreams Well-Known Member

    14,606
    2,489
    113
    This "official" portrait painter hardly seems an "artist" to me.
    He certainly didn't "serve" his subject.

    Is this person the best the UK has to offer?
     
  21. skatingfan5

    skatingfan5 Well-Known Member

    10,836
    2,051
    113
    Agreed. Here's what the artist had to say about it:
    I think the portrait is an epic fail at portraying an "enormously open, generous, and very warm person." And also an epic fail at representing her smile.
     
  22. Skittl1321

    Skittl1321 Well-Known Member

    12,070
    1,424
    113
    According to the article I read, they did a search and Kate was part of the committee that selected him. (It also said she "loved" the painting, but I can't imagine her saying anything else unless she was going to force them to destroy and redo it.)
     
  23. skatesindreams

    skatesindreams Well-Known Member

    14,606
    2,489
    113
    Of course, she would say that, publicly.
    She's too tactful and well-bred to say anything else.

    I don't know if I could have "held my tongue"!
     
  24. Fergus

    Fergus Well-Known Member

    7,586
    791
    113
    I once did a Google search for "Queen Elizabeth II paintings" and may I say there are some FUGLY paintings out there of the Royal Family made by artists from across the globe. :yikes:

    Ah, for the days of royal portraits by Philip de Lazslo!

    The one successful aspect of Catherine's painting is the hair. :)

    Maybe this is gonna sit in an attic and turn decrepit whilst HRH stays young and fresh forever. ;)
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2013
  25. skatesindreams

    skatesindreams Well-Known Member

    14,606
    2,489
    113
    Perhaps, it can be hidden behind a door in some Royal gallery, if it must be displayed.
     
  26. Alixana

    Alixana Definitely NOT a sonogram

    1,273
    176
    63
    Hair looks great; skin looks good. But if that was my portrait, I'd make him re-do the baggy eyes and pursed lips. And I wouldn't pay for it!! :mad:
     
  27. Jenny

    Jenny From the Bloc

    17,560
    2,132
    113
    And I'd want my own eye colour. If he wanted it to match the blouse, why not change the blouse, instead of the woman?
     
  28. skatingfan5

    skatingfan5 Well-Known Member

    10,836
    2,051
    113
    I guess it's a good thing she wasn't wearing green or grey .... or red. :eek:
     
  29. centerstage01

    centerstage01 Well-Known Member

    2,063
    492
    83
    In exchange, the first child will be named Dorian. :p.

    I know the guy was trying for "natural" but what woman wants bags under her eyes even if she might have had them the day she sat for the picture? And why would he change her eye color to match her blouse?? I'm not impressed.
     
  30. nubka

    nubka Well-Known Member

    7,909
    1,370
    113
    I don't think the portrait is so awful. It does look like her. My only complaint is that it's just so drab and faded looking...
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.