Plushenko will skate in ISU competition on October 2nd, 2010

Discussion in 'Great Skate Debate' started by let`s talk, Sep 3, 2010.

  1. Nomad

    Nomad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009
    Messages:
    7,733
    I'm not saying it has to be the exact same cut. Just a short cut. I think mullets look ugly on anyone.
     
  2. falling_dance

    falling_dance Bravo, Patrick.

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2007
    Messages:
    23,373
    You really must make an exception for :shizuka1:.
     
  3. Nomad

    Nomad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009
    Messages:
    7,733
    Divakawa had a mullet?
     
  4. falling_dance

    falling_dance Bravo, Patrick.

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2007
    Messages:
    23,373
  5. Spartacus

    Spartacus Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2010
    Messages:
    206
    Me too! I've seen many guys with this euro mullet, including my Johnny. But you must have wavy or curly-ish hair for it to work, ala the sexy Cristiano Ronaldo.

    As far as my feelings on this competition, I'll quote, Celestia (aka Anne Heche): "Aha wawa ahhhHa!"
     
  6. Jayar

    Jayar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2001
    Messages:
    8,614
    It's not limited to competitions. There are others events that must be sanctioned, and I believe that is where Plushy went wrong.
     
  7. ciocio

    ciocio Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    578
    Can you tell us more things about this? JO is a sanctioned event and it´s a competition for eligible ans ineligible skaters (that´s why Plushenko can compete). He should send a letter to ISU asking¨" do you allow me to skate in JO", or what should he do, because everybody is speculating that ISU might not like his participation to this event but nobody explains why.
     
  8. senorita

    senorita New Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2008
    Messages:
    1,945
    i thought Jo invited him, since it is ISU event, wouldnt it be a strange point to invite him and then tell him, no we didnt like you participated..BAN.
     
  9. Marco

    Marco Missing Ziggy

    Joined:
    May 9, 2002
    Messages:
    11,323
    He really just skated the same program over and over since 2004 :puppet:
     
  10. ciocio

    ciocio Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    578
    I thought is was since 2001, now it´s 2004? I´m really confused!:(:plush:
     
    immoimeme and (deleted member) like this.
  11. allezfred

    allezfred Hideous Admin Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2003
    Messages:
    43,081
  12. Polymer Bob

    Polymer Bob New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2007
    Messages:
    2,667
    Evgeni no longer needs permission from the ISU to do anything. They have taken his eligibility. If they feel his participation in future ISU competitions is to their advantage, and Evgeni feels it is to his advantage, they can negotiate that later.
     
  13. let`s talk

    let`s talk Banned Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2009
    Messages:
    943
    Don't worry. Under the new judging system they all skate the same program over and over hunting for points. They just change costumes, music and get busy on the ice. Plush at least sent kisses while dancing tango, a sort of character.
     
  14. ciocio

    ciocio Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    578
    Precisely! Wasn´t 2004 the first year when they used the new scoring system? Plush skates the same program until 2004 because he is older than other skaters but the youngsters still have plenty of time to use their programs over and over again.
    Sorry guys, but Plush did it first!:plush:. They should add this to his Wikipedia page!
     
  15. Ozzisk8tr

    Ozzisk8tr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    Messages:
    3,930
    Are you still here?
     
  16. let`s talk

    let`s talk Banned Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2009
    Messages:
    943
    Who? Plush?
     
  17. ciocio

    ciocio Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    578
    Who, me?:huh:
     
  18. LadyNit

    LadyNit moving right along Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2002
    Messages:
    7,038
    :lol: :lol: :lol: This is the first: a Plush thread that I'm totally enjoying. :cheer2:
     
  19. Jayar

    Jayar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2001
    Messages:
    8,614
    He lost his eligibility. He is permitted to skate in the Japan Open as a non-eligible, but he can't reinstate. There was a window of opportunity for him to appeal, and he did not. In June, Plushy skated in non-sanctioned shows which led to his loss of eligibility. He had 21 days to appeal, and he did not, so he is now ineligible. Allowing him to reinstate opens a (possibly good) can of worms in that they would have to afford others the same opportunity. This does NOT affect his ability to skate in the Japan Open.
     
  20. caseyedwards

    caseyedwards Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2009
    Messages:
    6,450
    I believe it has been posted that the rule that Plushenko lost his eligibilty over allows for a request for reinstatement. Appealing to the CAS the original ISU decision was not considered the best course of action. If you lost the CAS appeal and made the ISU spend the money made it less likely that you could get eligibility back if you would go back and request it.
     
  21. Susan M

    Susan M Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2004
    Messages:
    1,500
    I think you are confusing two different things. He basically waived his right to appeal to the CAS the ISU's decision to make him ineligible. He still has a right to request reinstatement, just like any other ineligible person who hasn't violated the nonsanctioned competition rule.

    I would think the ISU would be thrilled at Plushenko's participation in the Japan Open, as he helps sell tickets and make money for the sponsoring federation. The whole reason the ISU made these rules was to keep star skaters working for them even after their eligible careers.
     
  22. senorita

    senorita New Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2008
    Messages:
    1,945

    :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: it is not that I read such misinformatrion here, it is that I read the same exact in the examiner blog, the guy there had not made any research, he took something like the above from a forum probably and made it an article.
     
  23. ciocio

    ciocio Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    578
    Senorita, you should put the eligibility rule as signature!!!!!:(
     
  24. Dragonlady

    Dragonlady Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2001
    Messages:
    9,910
    An "open" competition means that both eligible and ineligible skaters may compete. This has nothing to do with Plushenko's ineligibility for the GP events and other ISU events. He's still out.

    And for the record, Jeff Buttle is still eligible to compete in ISU events. He has done nothing that would cause him to lose eligibility, even though he has retired from competition. Unlike Plushenko, he could, if he so desired, return to ISU competition. Not that I think he's going to do so, but someone further up the thread said he's ineligble.
     
  25. Jayar

    Jayar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2001
    Messages:
    8,614
    I'm trying to figure out who is on glue here... Plushenko has been deemed ineligible by the ISU. He waived his right to appeal. So, he is ineligible. He can ask for reinstatement all day long, but it's not just going to happen because he is Plushenko. If the ISU agrees to that, then they have to let all ineligibles have the opportunity to do the same. Why is that so difficult to understand?
     
  26. Jayar

    Jayar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2001
    Messages:
    8,614
    Have you heard of google? Go out there and type in 'Plushenko ineligible', and you will find plenty of articles explaining the same thing. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: Back at you.
     
  27. senorita

    senorita New Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2008
    Messages:
    1,945
    Yes I know google, have you heard of being polite ?

    You irony fails me, sorry, I said that articles including examiner say that he is forever banned and bash him for not making appeal in CaS, clearly they have not read the rules.


    oh and I see you are one of them.
     
    Nan and (deleted member) like this.
  28. Jayar

    Jayar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2001
    Messages:
    8,614
    If you want polite, go to www.ilovepuppies.com. This is FSU, and I'm as rude as they come.

    But if you insist that Plushy still has an opportunity to be eligible, then please explain the rules for all of us... because I have seen nothing that would support what you keep insisting is true.
     
  29. senorita

    senorita New Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2008
    Messages:
    1,945
    the rest here we have posted it and analysed it some months ago. Since you have still questions, ISU rule 103 paragraph 2, I guess you know google.
     
  30. Jayar

    Jayar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2001
    Messages:
    8,614
    You mean this:

    2. A person who is or has been ineligible may apply for reinstatement as a Skater only if such person had not violated Rule 102, paragraph 2 (ii) and (iii).


    2. Definition of an ineligible person
    A person becomes ineligible to participate in ISU activities and competitions by:
    i) skating or officiating without the prior express authorization of the respective Member, in any capacity in a Skating competition, exhibition or tour in any of the sport disciplines of the ISU;
    ii) skating or officiating in a competition conducted by Officials (Referees, Technical Controllers, Technical Specialists, Judges, Starters, Competitors Stewards, etc.) not on the approved list of the respective Member or on the ISU approved list;
    iii) skating or officiating in an event not sanctioned by a Member and/or the ISU; or
    iv) otherwise violating this Rule 102.



    ***He skated in a non-approved event, as per iii. Reinstatement is not a possibility.