Pairs/Dance splits & partner search 2013 thread (all countries)

Discussion in 'Great Skate Debate' started by Sylvia, Feb 1, 2013.

  1. 2sk8

    2sk8 Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    Messages:
    761
    Well, she often looks grouchy, but that's beside the point. I do wonder why Lyndon was so grouchy on this board about carriemarie "spilling the beans" a few days early. Mind you, carriemarie has offended people I care about on this board, but that's the nature of the board. Maybe he was just disappointed in himself for not controlling the spin this time??

    Regardless, I hope the two of them both find whatever they are looking for in the upcoming season. Seems they are tossing out a good option with a year to go - and while D might be short, she is certainly a much different build than Rockne's prior partners. Lots of work there too, if they go that route, and not a lot of time to get it together. Here's to US Pairs!
  2. Stephanie

    Stephanie Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,740
    Caelen Dalmer and Shane Firus are both on IPS so I guess that split is confirmed now (Tantallongirl mentioned the rumored/likely split in a Trash Can thread a couple of weeks ago).
  3. aemeraldrainc

    aemeraldrainc Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    305
    Who's Lyndon?
  4. madm

    madm Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2006
    Messages:
    541
    Lyndon Johnson is her coach in Florida.
  5. minx

    minx New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2006
    Messages:
    569
    Both Shalena Rau and Phelan Simpson are listed on IPS. Unknown why they split but possibly he wants someone who can jump triples based on his profile of 2A and 3S ability.
  6. johndockley92

    johndockley92 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2011
    Messages:
    474
    Rau completes the axel and sal with greater consistency than Simpson in practice
  7. Ziggy

    Ziggy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2002
    Messages:
    20,569
    The competition is what really counts though. Isn't he more consistent then?
  8. Sylvia

    Sylvia Whee, summer club comps!

    Joined:
    May 27, 2002
    Messages:
    30,136
    You mean Lyndon Johnston and not the 36th President of the United States. :p

    Phelan Simpson lists himself as 5'6"/167 cm. in his IPS bio.
  9. Ziggy

    Ziggy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2002
    Messages:
    20,569
    Good luck finding suitably sized partners then. :shuffle:
  10. kwanfan1818

    kwanfan1818 I

    Joined:
    May 24, 2003
    Messages:
    19,392
    They were too close in height, a real shame.
  11. Erin

    Erin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2001
    Messages:
    4,920
    Not from what I saw at Canadians and Challenge, where he was the one with jump difficulties. I remember also thinking while watching them that the throw errors they made were because of poor technique on his part.
    Last edited: Feb 12, 2013
  12. fan

    fan Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2003
    Messages:
    973
    this thread makes me nervous everytime someone posts.
  13. SamuraiK

    SamuraiK Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2008
    Messages:
    1,541
    LOL I know, everytime I see it updated Im afraid another team has split. and probably im provoking the same for another poster right now :D
  14. Tantallongirl

    Tantallongirl New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2012
    Messages:
    26
    After all the partner splits does anyone know about new partnerships? I am sure coaches are working on developing new partnerships for the new skating season.
  15. arakwafan2006

    arakwafan2006 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2009
    Messages:
    693
    :scream:
  16. Sylvia

    Sylvia Whee, summer club comps!

    Joined:
    May 27, 2002
    Messages:
    30,136
    Caitlin Fields, age 17 (7th in Junior Pairs at 2013 U.S. Nationals and 2012 U.S. Novice Pairs silver medalist with Jason Pacini) is now listed on IPS. She lists herself as 4'11".
  17. figuresk8302

    figuresk8302 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2013
    Messages:
    12
    I wonder how good a Middleton/Johnson pairing would be. Both medaled the same year in intermediate and both had potential for JGP's with their old partners.
  18. Rochelle

    Rochelle Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2009
    Messages:
    348
    Is relocation listed as an option for either? (Of course, relocation sometimes becomes a option unexpectedly for the right partner at the right time).

    They're on completely different coasts and Elise Middleton is still a bit young to relocate w/o a parent - by some standards. Her sister has a partner in Intermediate Dance (7th at Nationals with an All Year FSC partner)... so relocating outside of the SoCal area may realistically not be an option for the family until she's older.
  19. Sylvia

    Sylvia Whee, summer club comps!

    Joined:
    May 27, 2002
    Messages:
    30,136
    Another thing to consider is that the new ISU Junior maximum age rule for male pair/dance partners of 19 will come into effect for the 2014-15 season. For example, Johnson will be 19 and ISU Junior age-eligible for 2013-14 but then will age out before the 2014-15 season.

    ETA list of 2013 U.S. Nationals skaters currently listed on IPS:

    Caitlin Fields (7th in Junior Pairs with Jason Pacini)
    Caitlin Belt & Michael Johnson (9th in Junior Pairs)
    Brenna Doherty (12th in Junior Pairs with Craig Norris)
    Elise Middleton (3rd in Novice Pairs with Robert Hennings)
    Lianna Thomas & David Botero (10th in Novice Pairs)
    Juliette Erickson (11th in Novice Pairs with Connor Fleming)

    Yura Min & Igor Ogay (11th in Junior Dance) - he has RUS citizenship & she lists herself as USA
    Alexander Martin (7th in Novice Dance with Sierra Chadwick)
    Cassidy Klopstock & Logan Leonesio (6th in Intermediate Dance)
    Last edited: Feb 15, 2013
  20. NarumiAyane

    NarumiAyane New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2009
    Messages:
    65
    I remember seeing that Michael Johnson posted a status about needed a backpack big enough for his tryouts-means that he may relocate for a potential partnership
  21. La La Candy

    La La Candy New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2013
    Messages:
    71
    Interesting. When was this announced? It puts a new spin on things...are the ISU rules followed domestically or does this only apply to international competitors?
  22. Sylvia

    Sylvia Whee, summer club comps!

    Joined:
    May 27, 2002
    Messages:
    30,136
    See ISU Rule 108 (Age limits effective July 1st, 2014) that was passed at the ISU Congress in June 2012 - pages 103 ff.: http://www.isu.org/vsite/vfile/page/fileurl/0,11040,4844-206227-223450-177140-0-file,00.pdf

    USFS has no minimum or maximum age limits for their Novice, Junior, and Senior levels domestically. Does this apply to Skate Canada as well?
  23. Ziggy

    Ziggy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2002
    Messages:
    20,569
    I believe so.

    Because it makes so much sense to take spots away from teams, which are actually age-eligible... :shuffle:
  24. Sylvia

    Sylvia Whee, summer club comps!

    Joined:
    May 27, 2002
    Messages:
    30,136
    IMO, it's more about a flawed or outdated Nationals qualification system in the U.S. than a pairs age-eligibility issue.
  25. nikjil

    nikjil Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2004
    Messages:
    332
    The Nationals qualifications system really needs to change. It makes me nuts when I see 21-year-olds competing against the kids in novice.
    flutzilla1 and (deleted member) like this.
  26. Skittl1321

    Skittl1321 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2007
    Messages:
    11,079
    If it wasn't for the 21 year olds, many of the girls would never get to skate pairs at all. That experience helps develop them for later in their careers.
  27. gkelly

    gkelly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    Messages:
    10,506
    So what do you envision as a better system?

    Is the goal to allow only teams who have the potential for senior success with their current partners to compete at all, and anyone else who might be interested in learning pair skating is out of luck?

    Should teams with mismatched ages or skill levels, or teams who are currently too young or too old to compete at their current skill level, allowed to compete in some other events along the way, but not allowed to qualify for nationals?

    I don't understand this thinking. There are few enough pairs in the world, and even within the US. It helps the field as a whole if there are more teams competing. If only ideal teams are allowed to compete, they will often have no one to compete against. Does it really help their development if the size of the field and the size of the country can sustain only one or two pairs competitions a year?

    Plus there could be a number teams that are not ideal now but who will become better matched as they both mature. Or who will each find more appropriate partners after they've had an opportunity to get experience skating pairs. Or only one of whom will go on to success with a more appropriate partner after having learned the basics with a less-ideal partner.

    Without those opportunities, how many of those would-be pair skaters would just give up on the dream of skating pairs and stick to singles, or quit skating entirely and find some other activity that actually lets them participate?

    Exactly.
    reese and (deleted member) like this.
  28. Sylvia

    Sylvia Whee, summer club comps!

    Joined:
    May 27, 2002
    Messages:
    30,136
    I agree with gkelly and Skittl1321's points. It's NOT about age.

    Re-posting my reply in the U.S. Nationals Novice Pairs thread in Kiss and Cry to clarify what I meant re. the (IMO) "flawed or outdated Nationals qualification system":
    So, it's logical to say that Egbers/Simon (and possibly other pairs) should have "section-hopped" from the deeper, more competitive Midwestern section, but why should ANY teams (pair or dance) be forced to section-hop, probably at greater expense, in order to have a better shot at qualifying for Nationals? That's the inevitable result of the current qualification system and, IMO, needs to be changed.

    P.S. I apologize to those of you who are opening this thread with bated breath to see which team(s) are the latest to have split.

    ETA: Stacey Siddon, 18, and Jared Weiss, 20 (12th in Junior Dance at 2013 U.S. Nationals) are both listed on IPS as of today. Weiss lists himself as 6'6" / 198 cm tall!
    Last edited: Feb 16, 2013
  29. Dance truth

    Dance truth New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2012
    Messages:
    28
    Good point
    PeterG and (deleted member) like this.
  30. Debbie S

    Debbie S Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2004
    Messages:
    6,097
    I've seen him in person and yes, he is very tall. :) But I imagine there are plenty of girls out there who would like to compete in dance but have been told they are too tall for a partner, so he shouldn't have a problem finding prospective partners.

    I noticed Allison Timlen, who competed at Nationals in Novice (2010) and Junior (2011 and 2012) is now seeking a pairs partner. Hopefully she can find a partner for the coming season.

    I agree that unbalanced sections is a big problem and there are so many instances where choosing the top 12 skaters across sections would be more fair. But I could see the potential for problems, like score inflation (i.e. let's fill Nats with skaters from our section) and qualifying comps could get even more political. And what if something happens to the judging system due to extenuating circumstances? I'm thinking about Easterns 2 seasons ago in Aston, PA, where there was a fire in one of the locker rooms overnight, forcing the next day's events to be relocated to another rink in the facility, and paper-and-pencil judging was used (IJS system was set up in the other rink and it would have been too time-consuming to move it for the day), with no replays. UR's were sight-only and comparing the protocols for the groups that had the SP and LP on different rinks/different judging systems, I remember thinking some of the skaters may have benefited from the lack of replay.
    Last edited: Feb 16, 2013
  31. Sylvia

    Sylvia Whee, summer club comps!

    Joined:
    May 27, 2002
    Messages:
    30,136
    I saw her new IPS profile, too, and think she may have good pairs potential (IIRC, others here have mentioned her name as a possibility before) - I hope she can find a suitable partner in the U.S.!

    Right, so are these good enough reasons for USFS to consider reducing the current 3 Sectional qualifying competitions to 2 or maybe even 1, like Skate Canada's Challenge?

    ETA:
    Steven Pottenger has a new IPS profile up today but he's NOT looking for a partner with whom to compete. Instead, he's advertising his services as a pairs coach for Juvenile on up: "My goal is to train good freestyle girls who want to learn how to skate pairs. With a little experience it will be easier to get a partner." Here's his Coach page on the new website for the Canton, Michigan training rink: http://internationalskatingacademy.com/coach/steven-pottenger/
    Last edited: Feb 16, 2013
  32. kwanfan1818

    kwanfan1818 I

    Joined:
    May 24, 2003
    Messages:
    19,392
    I love Pottenger's idea

    . In Dance, don't coaches pair with their students for tests?
  33. Jayar

    Jayar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2001
    Messages:
    8,603
    Finally, Alison! This is GREAT news!!!
  34. Debbie S

    Debbie S Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2004
    Messages:
    6,097
    Hmmm, well, one one hand, it could decrease the politiks and would also decrease the amount of clubs needed to host Sectionals. But it would also increase the expenses of the clubs hosting Sectionals (and probably require more ice time/surfaces). And the expenses of the skaters, who would probably have to travel further. Maybe the solution to politiks is to have equal judging representation from all 3 sections at each Sectionals, if they do go the top-12 route. But that would probably also increase expenses for the host club. Sigh...I guess I have no solution....
  35. stjeaskategym

    stjeaskategym Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2002
    Messages:
    1,277
    Yes. It's silly that geographic location can play such a huge part in qualifying for Nationals. Lopsided sections are inevitable, and "desperate" skaters sometimes play the game of switching clubs and sections when in need of an easier road to Nationals. Some pair teams will find a section that doesn't even have 4 pairs in it so that they can automatically qualify to Nationals without even showing up, which just seems lame.

    Reducing the number of qualifying competitions would help ensure that all the nation's best skaters are getting to Nationals, not just because of geography, but also because it may be easier psychologically on a kid going into a qualifier knowing they have to be, say, top 10 or 15 to qualify for Nationals instead of medal worthy. You can bet plenty of Nationals-worthy skaters having melted down at Sectionals over the years under the pressure of having to finish all the way up in the top 4.
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2013
  36. gkelly

    gkelly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    Messages:
    10,506
    For pairs and dance, they could just have one qualifier held at one of the sections. E.g., one year all the pairs could go to Midwesterns and all the dance teams to Easterns, and the next year the pairs event could be at Pacific Coasts and dance at Mids, etc.

    For singles, especially the girls, there would still need to be earlier rounds of cuts before sectionals. It's usually at the regional level that inequitable numbers of competitors are an issue -- at sectionals the numbers are the same, although there may be variance in where the very best skaters happen to be located that year at that level. So I'm not sure how combining sectionals would solve the problem of uneven size/strength of various regions.

    I can see how it would, as stjeaskategym suggests, take the pressure off some of the better skaters who suffer from nerves when qualification for the big event is on the line.
  37. Ziggy

    Ziggy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2002
    Messages:
    20,569
    Yes, what Sylvia said. The system does need a complete overhaul.
  38. Sylvia

    Sylvia Whee, summer club comps!

    Joined:
    May 27, 2002
    Messages:
    30,136
    Okay! :D

    Well, since this is a pairs/dance thread, let's shelve the U.S. singles qualifying dilemma for the time being. :p
  39. kwanfan1818

    kwanfan1818 I

    Joined:
    May 24, 2003
    Messages:
    19,392
    When I went to the regional Metropolitan Opera Council Auditions a few years ago at Meany Hall on the University of Washington campus in Seattle, one of the contestants was in the Ladies room while I was standing on line. She was listed as from Houston in the program, and one of the audience members on the line told her how much she liked her performance of "Einsam in trueben Tagen" from Lohengrin, and she asked what her connection to the Northwest, thinking maybe she had been a member of the Seattle Opera Young Artists Program or was studying Wagner with Jane Eaglen, who taught at UW. The singer replied that she picked Northwest because she thought she had a better chance than whatever region Houston is in. (She was a member of the Houston Grand Opera Studio at the time.) She was completely open about it, no hesitation whatsoever; she was from Richland, Washington, and she could have just said she grew up in the region.
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2013
  40. johndockley92

    johndockley92 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2011
    Messages:
    474
    Couple things: I don't think there should be an age limit for novice & junior domestically. If a 22 year old man switches from singles to pairs, why should he have to compete senior his first year? It'd make it much harder for him to find a partner, it'd make for more duds at nationals, and frankly it'd be dangerous for him to try such hard elements in his first season (on most occasions anyways).

    Second: Maybe Allison will tryout with Rockne? She is the right size. Interesting!
    gkelly and (deleted member) like this.