Olympic Team Event In?

Discussion in 'Great Skate Debate' started by AragornElessar, Apr 6, 2011.

  1. GarrAarghHrumph

    GarrAarghHrumph I can kill you with my brain

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2001
    Messages:
    16,228
    I think the idea of being able to bring in different skaters for different components of the event is extremely intriguing. You could have one man skate the short program, and a different skate the long, and they're all contributing to the success of the team by adding their own strength to that team. Very cool.
     
  2. GarrAarghHrumph

    GarrAarghHrumph I can kill you with my brain

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2001
    Messages:
    16,228
    There are, but as I said before, the Olys is 1) looking for ways to shrink the number of athletes, 2) looking for ways to shrink costs, not add them by having to have at least two additional ice surfaces, plus all that housing, and 3) trying to maintain some sort of gender equity; and since synchro is almost 100% women, that is not in its favor.
     
  3. danceronice

    danceronice Corgi Wrangler

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    6,474
    Yeah, in dance, if one partner falls, you don't win. In equestrian if you fall off the horse, you don't win. (Even in the team events having a horse or rider go down will usually be enough to take the entire team out as it's considered a HUGE fault and either destroys your score or gets you DQ'd. In the eventing cross-country phase it is or soon will be a mandataory elimination if you fall--meaning you come off, you're disqualified from the entire event. Sucks for the reduced team who have to try to make the points up and usually can't, but that's how it goes when you've got a team.)

    I am torn. I don't hate the idea of a team competition. I don't especially want to have to see the same programs I just saw AGAIN. (No, I don't find watching someone do the same floor routine or beam routine or vault they just did in the all-round particularly exciting, either.) If they were going to have different (maybe shorter/fewer requirements) programs, or different skaters....

    I'm also divided on the tired-out thing. On the one hand I can see where that would make a tiring event even worse (competition is a lot more exhausting and stressful than just practicing at home, even when you enjoy it.) OTOH, it hasn't killed the gymnasts or equestrians (however in equestrian you do not always have the same rider/horse combos) or the track and field athletes.

    It could work. It could be awful. I tend more towards awful, but not because the general idea is bad but because of all the people to make a difficult idea work, $peedy is not one who inspires deep confidence in me.
     
  4. wonderlen

    wonderlen New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2007
    Messages:
    600
    It's not practically a bad idea because some country like CND, US. Russia and Japan have multiple skaters. And they said, they can substitue different skaters between SP and LP, so country like Japan and US can definietly let someone do a SP and another one do LP. SO itn't not really that much different, unless u only have one entry each for events.
     
  5. wonderlen

    wonderlen New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2007
    Messages:
    600
    And I'm sure Uncle Sam wouldn't mind adding more medal to the tally. A medal is a medal.
     
  6. smartblade

    smartblade New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2010
    Messages:
    52
     
  7. minignome

    minignome New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2011
    Messages:
    88
    Yes. For those lamenting the state of US pairs, if there is another shot at a gold and adding to the medal count, this may provide the incentive to the USOC to kick up some funding.
     
  8. Frau Muller

    Frau Muller President of Dick Button Appreciation Club

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2005
    Messages:
    7,955
    Synchro is a totally-unisex sport, like equestrian. No separate men's and women's categories or sets of medals. There's nothing keeping men from doing synchro.
     
  9. a56

    a56 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2010
    Messages:
    232
    I wonder what the statistics are regarding how many male skaters are in synchro. I remember reading that Robin Szolkowy skated in a synchro team when he couldn't find a pairs partner. Maybe synchro is perceived as very, very feminine. I did notice that there are quite a few male synchro officials though (example: three out of the six members of the ISU synchro technical committee are male, including the chairman; and the referee of this year's synchro worlds is male).
     
  10. minignome

    minignome New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2011
    Messages:
    88

    If you look at the sports added in Sochi, it's all about return on investment for the host country. All the new sports use existing venues and only a small increase in the number of athletes participating. Assuming there are prelims and finals in each event you can sell 12 more sets of tickets (and figure skating at least is a big $$ ticket) for the cost of adding 100 or so athletes.
     
  11. Frau Muller

    Frau Muller President of Dick Button Appreciation Club

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2005
    Messages:
    7,955
    Wasn't ice hockey perceived of as very, very masculine? (It still is by many people. But 'girls hockey' seems to have become quite mainstream in some places.)

    This is almost reverse sexism. In the 80s and 90s, the craze was to de-feminize women and bring them into 'butch team sports.' So why should there be a problem with the reverse action? Just sayin'.
     
  12. Beefcake

    Beefcake Guest

    I'm not yet sure how I feel about this, overall, but Snarky Me is calling this Russia's first strike :bribe: toward assuring more medals at its home Olympics.

    Olympic Gold Medals Tally Board (April 1, 2014): ;)
    Michelle Kwan: 0
    Brandon Mroz: 1
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 7, 2011
  13. patinage

    patinage Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2002
    Messages:
    84
    This proposed calendar shows three segments for the dance event, which no longer holds true.

    Here are two ways of squeezing in a team event while still giving Short Track the five days they need to run their events:

    Scenario One: Team event at the end:

    Day 2 - Pairs' Short
    Day 3 - Short Track
    Day 4 - Pairs' Free
    Day 5 - Men's Short
    Day 6 - Short Track
    Day 7 - Men's Free
    Day 8 - Short Dance
    Day 9 - Short Track
    Day 10 - Free Dance
    Day 11 - Ladies' Short
    Day 12 - Short Track
    Day 13 - Ladies' Free
    Day 14 - Team Short
    Day 15 - Short Track
    Day 16 - Team Free
    Day 17 - Exhibition

    This would be hardest on any ladies who competed in both individual and team events. Also, it would favour any country (e.g. JPN, USA, RUS) with sufficiently deep fields that they could enter a lady in the team event who didn't qualify for the ladies' individual event. (Yukari Nakano in 2010, for example.)

    Scenario Two: Team event at the beginning:

    Day 2 - Team Short
    Day 3 - Short Track
    Day 4 - Team Free
    Day 5 - Pairs' Short
    Day 6 - Short Track
    Day 7 - Pairs' Free
    Day 8 - Men's Short
    Day 9 - Short Track
    Day 10 - Men's Free
    Day 11 - Short Dance
    Day 12 - Short Track
    Day 13 - Free Dance
    Day 14 - Ladies' Short
    Day 15 - Short Track
    Day 16 - Ladies' Free
    Day 17 - Exhibition

    This would be hardest on any pairs who competed in both individual and team events. It would favour any country (e.g. RUS, CAN, maybe USA and CHN) with sufficiently deep fields that they could enter a pair in the team event who didn't qualify for the pairs' individual event. (Duhamel/Buntin in 2010, for example).

    Of course, scenario 2 is going to be hard on any skater who has to compete both individual and team events, so I really, really hope the IOC goes with something like scenario 1.

    Think of how many skaters came this close to qualifying for the Olympics in 2010: Nakano, D/B, Inoue/Baldwin, Weaver/Poje, Kevin Reynolds, etc. The team event might be a nice consolation prize for them. Not that that's an argument for the team event, but I don't think any of them would have turned down the opportunity!

    Also, skaters like Joubert or Verner might have been happy to have an opportunity for an Olympic redemption skate in the team event (one more argument for having the team event at the end).
     
  14. patinage

    patinage Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2002
    Messages:
    84
    Hey, if Canada can do it, why not the Russians . . . ;)

    The Queen must return! This is her perfect opportunity!
     
  15. minignome

    minignome New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2011
    Messages:
    88
    I don't think it's so much gender equality as return on investment that is keeping synchro out. If you allow 20 teams that is around 400 additional athletes/coaches/judges to house for close to 3 weeks for an opportunity to sell the arena 2 more times. I don't know how it is in other countries, but I've never seen synchro on tv here in the US. So even though it's figure skating, I would not think they would be able to charge the high dollar amounts that they charge for other figure skating comps.
     
  16. leafygreens

    leafygreens Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2009
    Messages:
    1,664
    Exactly - I smell a rat. It's so obvious that this whole thing is about money, by not allowing extra athletes to stay in the village, and forcing countries to build teams in less than 3 years (hey federations, surprise!), just so they can sell more tickets. We can't put an event in like synchro that's already popular and that people actually want to see, or jump/spin events that take a lot less time.

    About the comments on how the athletes aren't glass dolls - actually, some of them are. Oly competition is not the same as practice. It's a completely different mentally draining experience. Many athletes conserve their energy and body and hide injuries just to compete in singles. These athletes are accustomed to a certain schedule at a competition - SP, rest day, LP. Now we are throwing in potential SP, LP, days of waiting, SP, rest, LP again. And think of how hard this is going to be for the athletes in countries who don't have a reserve team and only have one skater available. Or how hard this is going to be for the reserve athlete who is commuting because they don't have a slot in the athlete's village. Why does this athlete get forced to miss out on the Oly experience if they are an alternate? Does this mean if they win a team medal, that it isn't "real" either? Performing at that level is exhausting and no matter how many medals are available, the individual event will always be the most prestigious. Look at how many skaters skip worlds once they win OGM.

    They just don't want to put the team events at the end because it would conflict with the money-making cow (ladies singles) and otherwise no one would watch all of the Olympics. :blah: Silly, do away with it. They could have gone about adding a new event in a much better way rather than springing something on people that hasn't even been thought out.
     
  17. julieann

    julieann Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,578
    Countries have had decades to build programs in all four disciplines, they just choose not to and now some will not be able to reap the rewards. Such is life.

    :rofl: They are Olympic athletes, it doesn't get much more in shape than that. Don't patronize them. We have all seen them skate back to back week to week from one end of the world to the next, broken foot, dislocated shoulders with mono and flu. Give them the credit they are due, they can all handle a programs that is a few minutes long.

    If there are more than one alternate for a country, the first alternate travels with he team and the second alternate stays home and leaves only if called up after the first alternate is used, that is not new and won't change anytime soon. So some alternates can't stay in the OV, boo hoo, at least they are there.

    Only if the "fans" look at it that way.

    Many "skip" for various reasons some for injury and some just don't want to be embarrassed because they know they can't replicate the Olympic win so they just retire.

    The only way around it (not using ice and skaters) is to invent a new sport with a new venue (can use ice or snow) and hope it catches on.
     
  18. minignome

    minignome New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2011
    Messages:
    88
    Hosting the Olympics is not exactly a money making venture. If they can minimize their losses by adding cost-effective events at under utilized venues, why not? It would be nice if it the Olympics was all about the purity of sport and not economics, but there is that pesky thing called reality.
     
  19. Visaliakid

    Visaliakid Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2003
    Messages:
    3,313

    My take on the above replies to 'leafygreens' comments in post # 166...

    This post #167 by Julieann is the most honest and non-politically correct set of replies to (what imho are) silly statements bashing the announced olympic team event, even before the event's structure has been decided upon.

    You gotta love it... Uber Fans want more skating... they get more skating, and yet we get... "oh, but more skating in this form won't do! :blah:

    Well those who don't want it... then DON'T WATCH! It's that simple! :rofl:
     
    alilou and (deleted member) like this.
  20. overedge

    overedge Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2005
    Messages:
    17,824
    Because it isn't "more skating" if it's the same skaters doing the same programs.

    Admittedly it's not clear whether the participants in the team event will be the same participant in the other events, but if they are, I don't buy that the team event is going to result in more TV viewing, more attention, etc. I would guess that if a casual TV viewer turned on the team event, and then turned on the other events a few days later and saw the same programs again, s/he would find something else to watch.

    I also can't help but notice that when pro skaters do the same routines in show after show, people b*tch about that here and say "why don't they do something else". But skaters doing the same routine in two different events seems to be just fine if they're doing it at the Olympics.
     
  21. julieann

    julieann Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,578
    True, honestly haven't we have been watching the same programs all year...and for skaters some two years? :)

    I watch the same gymnast do the same floor exercise 3 times in one Olympics, it never occurred to me to say "Gee, maybe she should have changed it up a bit"

    What occurres to me is she has been working on it for a year and she probably would like to show it off for a while before moving on to a new program.

    Come to think about...I have seen that same serve in tennis for years now, can't they find another way to get that ball over the net?!?
     
  22. cygnus

    cygnus Liberal Furry

    Joined:
    May 4, 2002
    Messages:
    2,342
    While most the teams at the 2 synchro WCs I have attended have been mainly women- quite a few of the teams had at least one guy. The Swedish team at the Ottawa WC had 2 guys IIRC- the South African team in Colorado Springs had 3 or 4. The second Russian team in Ottawa was 50/50 girls and guys- it looked really cool on the ice and allowed for some interesting moves.

    I did notice that the US and Canadian teams were all girls though- the guys were on the Euro and South African teams.
     
  23. kwanfan1818

    kwanfan1818 I

    Joined:
    May 24, 2003
    Messages:
    19,999
    Shani Davis got hell for declining to accept a last-minute place on a speed-skating relay team. If it interferes with the athlete's main event(s), the athlete might well pass.

    Gymnasts, swimmers, and athletes in other sports train that way. So far, skaters do not. That doesn't mean they aren't physically capable of doing additional programs, but they might not want to risk injury or adjust to a schedule if their main event is more important to them.

    To allow skaters who have not qualified for individual competition is a major revision of the qualifying rules. I think it's a ridiculous idea to use the current qualifiers to the team event. I know they want to not increase the numbers, but if they said that any team that had three qualifiers could send one non-qualifying team/skater to the team event, they'd have a maximum of ten additional athletes.

    They could do a best-of-three score format, with some formula or revised weighting system to balance all four disciplines, and if a team had three of four entries, they could use all three.

    Or they might be more willing to send a skater/team who qualified by ISU standards, but not by their current NOC standards, if by having a team at all the team has a chance to medal or close.

    There were men on at least one of the two teams from Germany in Colorado Springs, and I think a man on the French team. The guy on the Australian team was beautiful to watch.
     
  24. Made4Dancin

    Made4Dancin New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    89
    I'm surprised so many people dislike the idea. I don't really see how someone winning a team medal would cheapen the other medals. I think a lot of the skaters would like more than one chance to win a gold medal.

    The example that pops up in my mind is Roger Federer. He's an Olympic Gold Medalist. But he didn't win on his own. He won the Men's Doubles for Switzerland. And he seemed pretty happy to do so. I'm sure he probably would have liked to have won the Singles Medal too but I doubt if he now uses his OGM as a doorstop. He hardly ever plays Doubles usually but he took the opportunity to compete in both events giving himself another chance. I'd be happy for any figure skater who got two opportunities to be as happy as he was that day.
     
  25. smartblade

    smartblade New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2010
    Messages:
    52
    Imagine having a ticket to a team event...watching all disciplines, you now have ticket to watch pairs, men, dance, and ladies. After each round of pairs short, mens short, short dance, and ladies short, the countries keep on swapping placements. Who cares if you've seen the same program, maybe this time around they skated it differently, maybe change an element place it safe or add something more risky. if they can skate a different program (Bechalat/bourzat, and kerr/kerr skated different programs at worlds than the olympics) These skaters are not skating for themselves but for each other as a team.

    Remember they made this event possible because of the elimination of compulsory dances... no compulsory -10000 fans being able to watch,
    new Team event + 20000 more fans being able to watch

    The venues in Sochi have a smaller capacity than that of vancouver...so additional events give those olympic fans who want to live that olympic experiece have that more opportunity and greater chance to watch.
     
  26. Visaliakid

    Visaliakid Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2003
    Messages:
    3,313
    I am so glad that the naysayers opinions here are only that.... with no ability to affect the decision to have the team event. I will enjoy watching ALL of the skating while they stew in their 2014 Wnter of Discontent! roflmao!
     
  27. julieann

    julieann Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,578
    Last minute being the operative word...

    Not exactly the same thing hopefully with the figure skaters it can be avoided. (Story below for those who are curious) If they wanted Davis to skate (in a team event he has never skated in before in his life) they should have named him to the team on December 31, 2005, not 5 other guys, then hashed it out long before they all left for the Olympics. Not wait until right before then change who will be on the team behind his back

    Hopefully with the skating teams, they will know who is competition long before they leave to avoid this trouble, unless you are an alternate then you are always on deck unfortunately. I equate it to forcing a Kim Yu-Na to ice dance before her short program without telling her she was an alternate and then getting mad when she says no...a stretch I know, but I can see Davis' point. I hope the ISU and federations avoids such trouble.

     
  28. leafygreens

    leafygreens Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2009
    Messages:
    1,664
    Except a gymnast doesn't perform the same floor routine 3 times - they perform a watered down one for the team event and the most difficult one for event finals. How many skaters are going to want to come up with, and then skate an easier version of their LP right before the big event? It takes skaters almost a year to perfect just their regular programs. You don't want to tinker with taking elements in and out and doing jumps any differently. It's not the same thing as gymnastics in this aspect. Tennis is irrelevant because they actually work as a team while playing, skaters are just going to be doing their individual routines. The only way the team event could be considered the equivalent to tennis is if all 6 skaters did a routine on the ice together, which would be synchro, not the current team Ice Wars.

    Except the whole purpose, according to IOC Inc., was that this event is supposed to make things more equitable for all. So for all the athletes not born in USA, Russia or China, I guess it's too bad for them, and that's life.

    See Shani Davis example. I'm not saying they CAN'T do it, I'm saying that they shouldn't be forced to. Some athletes do not want to stress their bodies - skaters are already concerned about retooling their practices for the rescheduled World's so they "peak" at the right time. And that's just for one SP/LP, not a slew of programs. And if the alternate is going to be used, then they should be allowed to officially be on the team, stay in the village, etc., right from the beginning. Essentially they should not be called an alternate but an official team member.

    Maybe some skaters don't want to be forced to compete in Ice Wars because of injuries? Or maybe they are exhausted. Sasha couldn't even sleep the week of her competition, just because of the stress of one SP/LP. If they want to do the extra event, great, but no way should they have to do it.

    A team event is NOT the "only way around" adding new events. Synchro, jump/spin. There's at least two other options, one a really popular event with a lot of extra athletes and ice time, or a never-heard-of event that would push the limits of the sport with less ice time. Both IMO even with the drawbacks have more promise than Ice Wars.

    How was Julie's answer non-politically correct, insinuating that mine was, and what does that even mean? That statement makes no sense whatsoever. What does political correctness have to do with anything?

    You must be lumping me in with a bunch of other people, but I never said I wanted more skating if the skating is going to be a last-minute thrown together cheesefest. They took the worst out of all the ideas for extra events and chose the team event based on money, not what fans or athletes want. The USFSA doesn't even know what to do with this. "U.S. Figure Skating awaits further clarification on the technical details of the event." Shouldn't the technical details been worked out with everyone ahead of time? Maybe warn all the federations? Nope, we have to hurry up and ad an event to sell tickets. Yippie.
     
  29. julieann

    julieann Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,578
    You don't even know how the competition is going to work so to assume they need two different programs at this point is irrelevant. The tennis analogy was a joke, sorry I forgot the smilie face :shuffle:

    Who said it was to make things more equitable for all? I never read that. As I have said ad nauseum at various places, All countries have had ample opportunity and time to nurture all four disciplines, but some choose to focus of singles or whatever and let others slide. So the ones who paid attention to all four will do the best. This will make those countries step it up, that is a good thing...:)

    See my Davis answer.

    This years worlds is different, the skaters were in limbo for weeks if a competition was even going to happen at all. Skaters now have a three year heads up about the team competition so they can train appropriately. As I said before, don't sell the skaters short, next thing you know we will be asking them not to do triples anymore. :rofl: They are some of the highest trained athletes in the world, they can handle it.

    So skaters will do jumps, spins, throws, whatever in a separate completion but they will be too tired to do the rest of the program? :shuffle:

    Maybe if they are SO tired we should just take away the short program if they are that fragile. :rolleyes:

    The reason synchro isn't included yet has been covered to death.
     
  30. victoriaheidi

    victoriaheidi New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2010
    Messages:
    1,784
    I've been out since this particular conversation started, but here are my reasons for being against a team event (I'm sure they've all been mentioned, but still):
    1. How is it fair that, for so many years, some of the best names in the sport had to compete for the ONE gold (and by ONE, I mean the assigned to the top competitor in that discipline, be it a pairs/dance team or an individual) and did not make it for whatever reason and now, we're awarding Olympic medals to people who probably would not have gotten them in the first place?
    Looking back at Vancouver, can you imagine the outrage on here if, say, Rachael Flatt or Alena Leonova came back with a gold medal for her role in the team event? What if Mao left with a bronze in addition to her silver? I'm not in agreement with these specific sentiments, but the team event basically says that, with one or two people/teams holding up the score, an athlete who wasn't in medal contention could leave with a medal for someone else's work.
    2. How many times would the average, once-per-cycle fan want to see the same programs? It's not the same as gymnastics because gymnastics programs are so much shorter.
    OT: does NBC plan on playing more skating in 2014? That's actually purely rhetorical, unless someone knows.
    3. What happens if a champion in one discipline chooses not to participate? Doesn't that "mess with the curve"?