Minimum Total Technical Scores for 2012-13 ISU Championships (including Jr Worlds)

Discussion in 'Great Skate Debate' started by Sylvia, Jun 27, 2012.

  1. Andrey aka Pushkin

    Andrey aka Pushkin Brezina's Nemesis

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2001
    Messages:
    15,815
    I guess he'd have to miss the competition, unless, of course, he's a superstah from a strong federation :rolleyes:
  2. Skittl1321

    Skittl1321 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2007
    Messages:
    11,072
    Since there is no qualifying round, isn't everything a direct entry now?
  3. kwanfan1818

    kwanfan1818 I

    Joined:
    May 24, 2003
    Messages:
    19,354
    Javier Fernandez would have qualified for Euros. Euros/4C's scores are lower, and he would have gotten international championship experience that way.

    The base for Ladies doing the minimum possible (rotated) required SP technical content (3T/2T, 3S, 2A, B-level CH sequence, layback, sit/camel, combo [one foot change, no change of position] with base quality is:

    18.4
    18.9-19.0 if a flying entrance is required.

    Add another 1.1 to 1.3 for Level 1's instead of Level B's.

    The old TES minimum (17) for Ladies at championships was less than the minimum required technical content done competently.

    For Euro/4C's Ladies, the Ladies' minimum TES for the SP is 20, barely over being able to fulfill the minimum requirements, without a single feature or +GOE involved. I think that is reasonable at the senior championship level.

    The issue is different on the Men's side, where apart from the layback spin, they ask for competitiveness, rather than being able to meet the minimum.

    For Worlds, they're asking for 40% more technical content/GOE, a requirement for competitiveness on the Ladies side, as well as the Men's. I pointed out that Lafuente's technical base for one competition was 27 points: that included a 3F, 3Lo/2T, and three L3 and one L4 elements and was still under the minimum.

    Levels are going to be even more crucial this year, placing more power in the hands of the technical panels. I suspect that Ladies on the cusp will go for a more conservative jump content and attempt to trade GOE points for difficulty, until they earn the minimum.

    Without prelims, there are no direct vs. indirect entries.

    Yes. That's been true since the ISU added minimum championship scores, although the minimums were a lot lower.

    The TES minimums can be earned the previous or current season.
  4. gkelly

    gkelly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    Messages:
    10,492
    But they also need to concentrate on skating as clean as possible, with sufficient difficulty, even if that's at the expense of presenting the program. Some might intentionally choose to sacrifice PCS and actually end up with lower placements at the fall competitions as a result. But a senior B or even a GP medal won on the strength of the PCS won't get you into Worlds if the TES wasn't high enough.
  5. peibeck

    peibeck Left in the Kiss-n-Cry

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2004
    Messages:
    16,098
    Thanks, kwanfan1818! Sorry if those seemed like dumb questions. :shuffle:
  6. hanca

    hanca Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    2,739
    So you if once earn the TES minimum, it is valid for two seasons? (I wonder why two seasons, why not one or three seasons, or why not to be valid forever?)
  7. kwanfan1818

    kwanfan1818 I

    Joined:
    May 24, 2003
    Messages:
    19,354
    This stuff is impossible to keep up with. We all keep each other up-to-date. The prelim thing took a while to dawn on me.

    It's possible they aren't valid forever because they've been reducing the required elements and changing some to single-level "choreographic" elements over the years. The biggest impact in the positive direction is on 3A's and 4's, which affect mostly the Men and a few Pairs. In general, the farther back you go, the more the skater had the opportunity to earn more points not available to current skaters, although not with 3A's and 4's.

    I suspect it's to give the skaters a little leeway in terms of injury and rewarding good performances in the prior year, but not so much leeway that they can skip seasons without being bothered to go through some qualification process.

    The only thing that appears to be valid forever is being able to be a comeback skater: it doesn't matter when the skater was seeded.
  8. barbk

    barbk Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Messages:
    5,953
    Thanks for all the explanations, kwanfan.

    When is the deadline for providing the qualifying procedure to the IOC? I think it comes up very, very soon.
  9. YukiNieve

    YukiNieve Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2003
    Messages:
    632
    Can minimum TES be earned in any ISU-sanctioned competitions?

    For example, Misha Ge got 36.37 for TES for his SP at Asian Trophy in 2011.
    Does this count?
  10. Hanna

    Hanna Wheeeeeeeeeee

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2004
    Messages:
    16,054
    The minimum scores for Worlds are really scary. :yikes: It's not only the developing federations whose skaters will probably be unable to meet the scores but also a lot of mid-level skaters (e.g. Lafuente, like kwanfan mentioned).

    Selfishly, the good thing to come out of this is probably more and better skaters at Senior B's. The ladies' competition at last year's Finlandia Trophy was completely horrid level-wise and I'd be glad to see more interesting skaters there this year. But it will definitely be an unfair advantage to non-Europeans as most senior B's and junior competitions are held in Europe.
  11. antmanb

    antmanb Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2006
    Messages:
    3,245
    It seesm ridiculous that Kevin VDP at worlds in teh SP landed 3T/3T, 3Lz and 2A and level 3s and 4s on all his elements yet failed to make the relevant TES score.

    Obviously Kevin was hoper for bigger elements but there are plenty of skaters who are either from either weak skating countries, or may just be up from junior where those elements are what they plan in their SP and they won't get a chance to comepte? Seems fecking stupid.
  12. kirkbiggestfan

    kirkbiggestfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2003
    Messages:
    2,211
    The ISU wants to reduce the number of competitors at Worlds. We all get it. Are those minimum TES the best way to get it done? They should just say that they want x number of skaters at worlds because they dont want an event to last more than y number of hours. Maybe they can find a compromise and let everyone skate at Euros and 4CC and only the top 20 TES at Worlds. Stop beating around the bushes and tell us how many skaters you want.
  13. Eislauffan

    Eislauffan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2002
    Messages:
    3,968
    The ISU is not looking for a certain number of skaters at Worlds, I think, but wants to raise the level of the competition and at the same time keeping the costs down.

    The preliminaries were a compromise - everyone gets to go to Worlds, participate in some way and has a chance to make it to the "main" competition. The federations of the skaters who participated in the preliminaries had to pay for their accommodation and meals.

    Many of you probably don't know that in many other sports all participants (or their federations) pay for their own expenses. Or, in some sports, only the top athletes from the world standings are invited and everybody else pays. Anyway, the "smaller" federations, naturally more concerned by the preliminaries (although CAN, RUS, FRA etc also had skaters in the preliminaries at Euros and Worlds or Junior Worlds, even Plushenko skated in the preliminaries) apparently didn't like the idea of paying something themselves, no matter how good or weak their skater is. So what they get now is just the logical reaction of the ISU. The ISU understandably didn't want to get back to the nine-hours Ladies Short Programs at Worlds.

    The minimum scores for Worlds are certainly tough. However, as the ISU communication states, it can be adjusted if too many (or too few) skaters achieve it. They have raised the bar. Again, in other sports the criteria are also tough sometimes to get to Worlds or the Olympic Games (athletics for example).

    Finally, many feel that going to Worlds is very important for skaters from "developing" countries. I think these skaters can learn as much from participating in the Junior Grand Prix, Junior Worlds and International B events (where there are usually some top skaters). Worlds is a prestigious event and should feature the best. Yuna Kim came from a developing country and went through the Junior circuit. When she debuted at Worlds in 2007, she took the bronze right away. She didn't need to go to Worlds to learn. Maybe she is not a good example as she is an extraordinary talented skater, but it shows that if there is a real talent, it will come through.

    The only problem I have with not everyone being able to go to Worlds is that in many countries federations might loose funding if they are not attending ISU Championships.
  14. elfenblüte

    elfenblüte New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2008
    Messages:
    420
    Would it be possible for the ISU or a federation to arrange something like an "After-Congress" or a poll that could be sent to all ISU members that they have the chance to vote for reintroducing the preliminaries?

    I think many federations that voted against the preliminary rounds would vote FOR them again, since they are aware of the radical solution the ISU made.

    Participate in the preliminary round and show your free program at the World Championships is better than nothing!
  15. seabm7

    seabm7 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2009
    Messages:
    461
    If you are from "developing" countries, it is not even easy to go to Senior B's.

    The entire North/South America will have only one senior B this year on September. The Asia/Pacific area will have one, too, on August. Both of them are at the beginning of the season, when TES scores will be lower compared to the rest of the season.
  16. Frau Muller

    Frau Muller President of Dick Button Appreciation Club

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2005
    Messages:
    7,858
    I disagree. It's better to have Quality than Quantity. This should drastically cut-down on the number of suburban-Americans with dual citizenships and wealthy parents showing up at Worlds, Euros and Four Cs as if on vacation. [Legitimate talents representing Philippines, Pto Rico and a few other places not included in this group!]
    barbk and (deleted member) like this.
  17. peibeck

    peibeck Left in the Kiss-n-Cry

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2004
    Messages:
    16,098
    There is some sense to this reasoning, BUT to see the example above where a skater like Kevin VanDer Perren's Worlds SP score with 3 triples, a 2A and his spin and footwork sequences all level 3 or 4 would not have met the minimum quality? Sorry, but that is ridiculous!

    Let us hope the ISU, as Eislauffen reminded us, revisits the minimum score later this season.
  18. elfenblüte

    elfenblüte New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2008
    Messages:
    420
    I dont get the "increase the standard" discussion. Do the best skaters become worse, because some lower ranked skaters participate at the same event?

    All of these lower ranked skaters train hard, they all have high costs, they need coaches, skates, costumes and training time, its not like they are sitting on the couch the whole year and then go to Worlds only because they are the only skater from that country, they all train hard! And the ISU could simply honor that all with a fix entry into the world championships, at least for the best skater from every ISU member!
    Lanna and (deleted member) like this.
  19. michiruwater

    michiruwater Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2006
    Messages:
    9,138
    See, if you were arguing that from the POV of a ladies' skater I would agree with you, but I think 3 triples (with a 3T-3T being a triple-triple ladies were landing in the 80s if I remember correctly) with a 2A... I mean, that's the content of a decent ladies' program. I definite prefer quality over quantity, but that jump content for a man who has placed in the top ten for world's does not impress me an iota.
  20. kwanfan1818

    kwanfan1818 I

    Joined:
    May 24, 2003
    Messages:
    19,354
    While those on the cusp might go for conservative content -- ie, not adding a 3Lz or 3F to a SP -- until after they've earned their minimum -- for; example, Lafuente could have made 28 in one competition by landing a clean 3S or 3T instead of an almost -3 3F -- the ISU has created a minimum that makes the jumps much more important. L3-4 elements have to be a given when even with them, one mistake on a jump is the difference between making a qualifying score or not.
  21. Skittl1321

    Skittl1321 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2007
    Messages:
    11,072
    The more I think about it, the more I think it is almost offensive that there is no requirement for PCS at all. I know there is a lot more "swing" in that mark, but that is like the ISU is saying that components are a completely unimportant part of skating.
  22. gkelly

    gkelly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    Messages:
    10,492
    What will happen sometimes is that skater A will be qualified to enter Worlds and skater B will not even if skater B had defeated skater A in competition every time they competed against each other in the past year, on the strength of PCS.

    This will be especially embarrassing if a federation has to tell their national champion the ISU won't let them go to Worlds but will allow the 2nd or 3rd place finisher.
  23. barbk

    barbk Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Messages:
    5,953
    Didn't Sweden set different Olympic qualifying standards for younger athletes than for older athletes, and that kept Schultheiss home and Berntsson the olympic entrant even though Berntsson only came in second at nationals?

    There are plenty of sports that require qualification standards, and as long as there is a standard, somebody, somewhere, is going to fall afoul of it. Is this the right number? I don't know -- it seems a bit high. A point or two lower might be better.

    How would Lepisto have fared? That might indicate something about what the ISU's thoughts are on technical content. ( I think we can put paid to the old slogan that a well-done double is better than a poorly done triple.)
  24. gkelly

    gkelly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    Messages:
    10,492
    Not sure. That may be true.

    Yes, wherever you draw the cutoff, there are going to be people who just fail to make the cut.

    My point is that the cutoff is based on only half the score. So you may have someone who makes the cutoff but consistently loses to someone who does not make the cutoff because that other skater is better at the other half of the scoring.

    Of course, you can also have skater C make the minimum score at an event with a generous tech panel, or a judging panel who are especially generous on GOEs, whereas skater D never got to compete at an event with such generous panels and never quite made the minimum, although D always beat C at the events where they went head to head.


    Lepisto's TES at 2010 Worlds where she medaled (her last competition) were 34.98 for the SP and 54.24 for the FS, so well above the new cutoffs of 28.00 and 48.00.

    Remember, though, that there were still leveled spiral sequences that year. Delete the 5.20 she got for the spiral sequence in her Worlds SP, and she'd have 29.78 for the SP. Assume the same GOE in the FS and change the base mark from level 4 to Choreo and she'd lose 1.40, ending up with 52.84.

    So she'd still easily make the cutoff, but with less of a margin, especially in the short.

    The current rules aren't dictating technical content. It doesn't matter what elements the skater used to meet the minimum as long as it was met. +GOE on every element can earn more points than lower average execution of greater content.
  25. allezfred

    allezfred Prick Admin Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2003
    Messages:
    42,656
    Not all of the "smaller" federations voted to remove the preliminaries. Ireland for one certainly did not. It's a shame the majority of federations did not think ahead the consequences of their votes though.

    I absolutely agree that I don't see any reason why skaters should have their accommodation paid for by the organisers. Most sports that I'm familiar with skating is the exception rather than the rule. And the way the accommodation for the preliminaries was organised whereby you had to pay for your stay in advance in cash and then if you qualified you received your cash back was truly ridiculous.

    I heard the vast majority of the skaters in the preliminaries didn't even end up paying. I would have barred them from getting on the ice in the first place. That would have cut down on numbers. :p

    But (and since you used athletics as an example ;)), there is an A standard in athletics where you can send three athletes and if no-one from your country has an A standard then you can send one B standard athlete. If you have no B standard athlete, you are then allowed one entry across all disciplines.

    Figure skating limits the amount of athletes who can compete in an Olympics to 30 in singles, 24 in dance and 20 in pairs. I would argue that it is much more difficult to have a figure skater in the Olympics than in athletics certainly.

    No, Yuna Kim is not a good example. Besides the fact that she didn't appear in isolation. She would have grown up seeing Korean skaters older than her getting the opportunity to go off to Worlds and knew that if she practised hard enough she would have the chance to be the best in her country and do the same. If there had been restrictions like the one being imposed now 20 or 30 years ago, the chances of seeing a Yuna Kim or Shen/Zhao even would have been so much less in my opinion.

    In terms of promoting a sport and appealing to the domestic public, media, sponsors and government funding departments, you can go to all the B competitions, Junior Grand Prixs and Junior Worlds, but what really gets the attention are Europeans, Worlds and Olympics. There is no comparison.

    As for the skaters going to Worlds, it is most definitely an important learning experience. Perhaps a certain skater won't do terribly went at their first Worlds or even their entire career. But if they become a coach and a skater they teach gets to compete at Worlds they can impart the knowledge they picked up from their experience.

    Not every country has a long tradition and breadth expertise in figure skating like countries such as Russia, the US or Canada which makes it even more important that skaters from countries where figure skating human resources are scarce get to go to Worlds.

    Some smaller federations are working really hard to develop figure skating in their countries (and not go the Azerbaijan/Israel route) but with the balance of power so heavily skewed to the established nations it really is an uphill struggle. I don't think it should be underestimated how demotivating effectively barring a whole raft of countries from Worlds will be for them as organisations.

    Some federations get no public funding at all so that's the least of their problems. :lol:
  26. kwanfan1818

    kwanfan1818 I

    Joined:
    May 24, 2003
    Messages:
    19,354
    While I agree about PCS, your scenario would have applied to Canadian Ladies this year based on TES: neither Lacoste nor silver medalist Phaneuf met the TES minimum by Worlds. Kaetlyn Osmond did, but only at Junior Worlds, which this year is back-to-back with Worlds. Skate Canada might have sent Lacoste and Pfaneuf to one of the many post-Nationals Senior B's to try to earn it.

    There's no exemption from minimum scores for the host nation. I hope Canada has a contingency travel budget for Senior B's: they might need it for Ladies to qualify for a spot in London. Osmond hasn't skated seniors internationally, and it isn't clear that Orser can get Phaneuf over the hump, although both Lacoste and Phaneuf were within two points at least for the SP. I haven't even checked the FS.

    Short answer: yes, as long as it meets the ISU minimum requirements re: number and distribution of participants and judges, etc.

    Detail:
    Communication 1742 says,
    Article 38, paragraph 7 of the ISU Constitution:
    Rule 107, paragraphs 1-9 of the ISU General Regulations:
    1-List of ISU Championships for Figure and Speed Skating
    2-Olympic Winter Games
    3-Winter Youth Olympic Games

    5-ISU World Cups (speed skating)
    6-ISU Grand Prix/Grand Prix Final (figure skating)
    7-World Team Trophy


    Yes, under Rule 107.8.b, because it fell during the 2011-12 season, and it met the minimum standards. (Lakernik wouldn't have shown up if it didn't ;)). Unlike for World Standings/World Ranking points, where the competitions must be open, restricted competitions count for earning minimum scores.
  27. Ankka

    Ankka New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    50
    Wasn't there an increase on the value of the second part of combinations? If so, it would make sense that the ISU think the skaters would end up with higher points. Of course, the requirements seem pretty high anyway.
  28. ioana

    ioana Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2002
    Messages:
    5,031
    I understand the need to set some standards in place, but some of those requirements are prohibitive. Not sure that should be the point of Worlds. We already have the GPF in place for a 'best of the best'-type of event.
  29. kwanfan1818

    kwanfan1818 I

    Joined:
    May 24, 2003
    Messages:
    19,354
    Usually the NOC's that require more than the normal ISU qualifying procedure require an international standard, not a nationals placement.

    This sounds familiar, but I thought it was the opposite. In 2006, the only year between 2003-2011 that Berntsson didn't win the National title, both he and Schultheiss went to 2006 Euros, where Berntsson came in 14th and Schultheiss 20th, and Berntsson went to Turin. At 2010 Euros, Shultheiss came in 12th and Berntsson 15th, and Schultheiss went to Vancouver. In both cases, the National champion didn't go.

    I looked at it to see if had these rules been in place last year for her last competitive season, whether she'd have qualified for Worlds (assuming same judging and quality.) This is dropping high/low, without random selection.

    In her last Skate Canada FS, she earned 48.62, but that needs to be adjusted by changes in base value, the GOE scale for jumps, and that change from leveled to CH spiral:
    • -.94 on the spiral sequence. Her leveled base was 3.1+.4 for mostly 1's in GOE. Under last year's rules, it would have received 2.0+.56 for mostly 1's in GOE as a CH spiral sequence.
    • +.21 in base for the two 3Lo's, one with 10% bonus: base was raised by .1, .11 for bonus
    • .3 for reduction in -GOE for 3Lo (-.7 vs. -1.0). No change for 3Lo/2T, all 0 GOE.
    • +.2 for reduction in -GOE for 3Lz (-.2 vs -.4)
    • +.3 for reduction in -GOE for 2A (-.5 vs. 0-.8)
    • -.31 for reduction in +GOE for 2nd 2A (.29 vs. .6)

    The net reduction to her TES would have been -.13, so she would have made the minimum for Worlds.

    For her SP at Euros 2010, she earned 34.60 and dropping the spiral sequence (2.80), she would have started with 31.80 before the adjustments to base and GOE. She still would have been at or close enough to 30 after that.

    That's not even counting the Olympics, where she likely would have made it for the SP, but blew away the 48 in the FS with TES of over 63, the fourth-highest in the competition, after Kim, Nagasu, and Asada, and, even with adjustments, it would have been close or at 60.

    Considering how few of the smaller Federations host championships, what did they think they were getting out of it by voting for it? (Or what was the underlying fear/threat if they didn't?) If they really didn't want to pay to send someone to the prelims, couldn't they just have imposed a minimum standard of their own, like the NOCs?

    I think you answered why here:

    Or, even when the SP was the qualifier, stayed after elimination and tried not to pay for the difference.

    Exactly.

    Is the difference that if you have a B standard athlete, you have to send that athlete, otherwise you can choose who you want?

    It's more difficult to have a figure skater in the Olympics than in many sports, because there are so few figure skaters, so few training facilities, and so few competitions, relatively speaking. The barrier to entry is high. Other sports, like ski jumping, might have limited training facilities, but they have a robust competition circuit, and there are generally more lakes to row on than skating rinks.


    Most of the top skaters say they saw skating on TV, usually during the Olympics, and wanted to be like Baiul, Kwan, Browning, Plushenko, Lambiel, etc.
    I'm not so sure Kim's career trajectory would have been so much different. Certainly her mother knew what it would mean for her to be the first, and step one seems to be "Train elsewhere," whether that be North America, Russia, or Obertsdorf.

    A small group of Chinese coaches seemed set on creating a program. I'm not sure Shen/Zhao would never have shown up.

    I don't underestimate what participating means to a nation developing a program. Just the experience of knowing what it's like to travel, to check in, to practice around world-class athletes, to negotiate the practice ice, etc. and to be coached by someone who was the first and knows what the experience is like is invaluable. I don't think that experience has to happen at Worlds first, especially now that there's 4C's: Yao Bin and Luan Bo were ridiculed in Dortmund in 1980. There's no reason for this, especially in Europe, to not compete up through the circuit, whether it be the GP or Senior/Junior B competitions, to Euros/4C's and then Worlds. Sending someone outclassed repeatedly to big international events can't do wonders for a developing skater's confidence unless their skin is as thick as a cow's.

    The bar for Europeans is still quite low, especially for the Ladies. For the SP, it's barely more than performing the new base level of the minimum required elements at base competency, which I don't see as overly strict for a major championship.

    It will be interesting to see what the Olympic minimum scores will be after the ISU does a review after this year. The NOC's are the ones who create their own, stricter criteria and make it a nail-biter about whether ISU-qualified skaters will be allowed in the Olympics, which, TV- and audience-wise, is the big prize.


    Some smaller federations won't/can't pay for a skater and coach to go to Worlds, even when they're held on the same continent with surface rail to get there.

    The Australian skaters are screwed: their Federation is weak and has no money, and there's nothing close by.

    There are a ton of small sports in North America for which it's worse for the athletes: they're federation officials couldn't even be bothered to be tempted by trips to major championships.
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2012
  30. RUKen

    RUKen Guest

    The skaters who are competitive for medals at the World Championships pace themselves throughout the skating season so that they peak at Worlds. The Grand Prix Final is three months before Worlds when the skaters are still building up their programs, so it is hardly a "best of the best" event.
  31. Oz_sk8ting_mum

    Oz_sk8ting_mum New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2005
    Messages:
    219
    :(
  32. allezfred

    allezfred Prick Admin Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2003
    Messages:
    42,656
    It wasn't a matter of not wanting to send someone. It was a matter of voting for what was in the best interests of getting our skaters to the championships and not financially burdening the hosting federation at the same time. Preliminary rounds have worked very well for Ireland's skater and I certainly didn't want them gone.

    The idea of going back to 50+ ladies SPs was also not appealing. :scream:


    You don't have to send anyone (not even if they have an A standard). A B standard only give you the right to enter that athlete into that specific event.


    But it's having skaters from your own country competing at the big events that gives you the belief that it is something that you can attain.

    But Yuna wasn't the first Korean skater to compete at Worlds or even the Olympics. Yuna has been in the making ever since the first Korean skater competed at Worlds. The experience and expertise gained through that by the Korean federation undoubtedly benefited Yuna

    I'm here at Year Zero for figure skating in Ireland. Even if we had someone as phenomenally talented as Yuna (and we may have), you can't make a world champion/medallist on talent alone. You need to have the right guidance and good advice. And you don't get that until you have a core group of people in your country who are able to provide that.


    Everybody has different expectations going into Worlds. Most skaters are there, as cliched as it sounds, to represent their country and do their best. Most skaters are realistic and know they aren't going to be medallists or even in the top ten. It isn't about what other skaters do or how much better they are. If that were the case 99% of skaters would look at Yuna Kim and not bother even showing up.

    As for going to the GP, that's not going to work if you can't skate at Worlds now is it. :p

    Skating up through competitions is pretty much the natural progression of the season so I'm not sure what your point is. And if a skaters wants to go to Worlds or Euros/4CC they have to do Senior Bs in any case.

    Many small federations have very little money. Federation officials and skaters all pay their own way to championships. Would it be nice if they didn't have to? Yes, of course. But I don't see anything wrong with having to pay your own way to a championships. Even more because as much as some people may pretend otherwise skating is a sport for people who are already well off in comparison to most people in this world.
  33. kwanfan1818

    kwanfan1818 I

    Joined:
    May 24, 2003
    Messages:
    19,354
    Sorry, meant to type "JGP".

    The point is that you stay at the international competition level until you're strong qualify for Euros/4C's, and then when you're strong enough, you qualify for Worlds. (I'm talking about smaller federations where there aren't many strong skaters, and it was an instant entry to the qualis at championships. The Olympics are a different story.) That wasn't the case until there were minimum scores a couple of years ago, and barely so with the original minimums, where for Ladies, you didn't even need to have minimum content to reach them.
  34. YukiNieve

    YukiNieve Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2003
    Messages:
    632
    Thank you, kwanfan1818!!
  35. Ziggy

    Ziggy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2002
    Messages:
    20,569
    This is true but it is the direct result of the total disaster that was the federations voting to scrap the Preliminary Rounds. They have only themselves to blame. :duh:

    This will harm the development of skating massively. :(
  36. kwanfan1818

    kwanfan1818 I

    Joined:
    May 24, 2003
    Messages:
    19,354
    You never know with the ISU: the Council put through IJS without a vote of the ISU Congress. While they justified the action because of the vote in Congress, they had the authority to up the minimum scores without the vote, making the prelims unnecessary, since it's all in the Special Regs.
  37. Ziggy

    Ziggy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2002
    Messages:
    20,569
    Damnit, this is the biggest disaster to happen to skating since I started to follow it...
  38. DaveRocks

    DaveRocks Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2002
    Messages:
    5,310
    :( and :eek: and :yikes:

    And another :(
  39. kwanfan1818

    kwanfan1818 I

    Joined:
    May 24, 2003
    Messages:
    19,354
    The change to give a 10% factor to the base value of jumps after the 1 min 25 sec mark should help some of the skaters who were close to the World TES SP minimum (28). Lafuente might reconsider doing all of her jumps in a row at the beginning of her program, since she was .57 from making the minimum at TEB.

    Among the Canadian Ladies, Osmond scored 49.06 with one fewer element (no CH Spiral) in her Junior Worlds FS, and she was the only one to meet next year's minimums for next season. Lacoste came closest at Rostelecom for her FS (46.98). Lacoste will have a chance at Skate Canada. If Skate Canada does not give Phaneuf the TBA at Skate Canada, then she will have no chance at a GP, since, not counting Czisny, she's 10th on the alternates list, and she won't be bumped into the Top 5 with no guarantee to be picked until the sixth spot opens up. (Lacoste is three ahead of her on the list.)
  40. Ziggy

    Ziggy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2002
    Messages:
    20,569
    I understand all that.

    But couldn't ISU force through making the federations pay their own expenses instead of barring the entry to Worlds to the vast majority of skaters? :(

    Well, I guess there would be no need for that if the federations themselves didn't vote to scrap the preliminaries...

    I guess at the next congress, we might get the federations voting to pay their own expenses in exchange for scrapping the huge minimum scores.

    It has to be said though, some federations have budgets so small that they can hardly cover the air fares if an ISU Championship is at the other side of the world. When you add all other costs on top, sending skaters to the major events might become really difficult for them. :(