Judge throws out 3 of 51 counts against Sandusky

Discussion in 'Off The Beaten Track' started by Fan123, Jun 21, 2012.

  1. taf2002

    taf2002 Texas slumlord

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    Messages:
    14,187
    My BIL played football in college only because that was the only way he could get a college education. He had no interest in going pro - he did have offers. In this situation he would not have transferred. Football is not life-and-death to every player. Neither are bowl games - after all, it's an extra game they have to play & they don't even get paid for it.
     
  2. MacMadame

    MacMadame Internet Beyotch

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    16,516
    We'll have to disagree then.

    For someone who loves to beat an argument to death, you seem rather bent out of shape because I'm trying to both defend and clarify my POV.

    And speaking of straw man arguments, I don't think your example of the doorman is remotely applicable to this situation.

    SHOCKING, eh! :lol: Talk about blowing things out of proportion.
     
  3. julieann

    julieann Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,596
    I didn't say it was life or death for every player for but it's an important stepping stone for many.

    Here's an article about the pros and cons about leaving verses staying.
     
  4. heckles

    heckles Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2005
    Messages:
    3,114
    The doorman analogy was spot-on. These Penn State employees were planning the camps, creating the brochures, promoting the camps to local schools and coaches, enrolling the kids, checking them in--all while aware that a predator awaited them. Sandusky could not have done this without assistance from an army of enablers.
     
  5. agalisgv

    agalisgv Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2005
    Messages:
    23,979
    I'm sympathetic to sustained argumentation ;), but it doesn't make sense to critique an argument by a poster they never made. That was really my point. If you look at taf's first post to which you responded, there was no mention of internet fans. The bone of contention was whether the people at Penn State and Mrs. Sandusky were as bad as Sandusky because they covered-up and enabled him to offend over decades.

    Your initial reaction to that was incredulousness. Then you called it bizarre. When I pointed out that follows legal reasoning, you responded you don't agree with the law.

    So to better focus the discussion, do you think the officials at Penn State who knew Sandusky was molesting/raping children on their campus but did nothing to stop it (thereby allowing it to continue unabated for years) are equally guilty of child sexual abuse?

    I say they are.

    Oh, and btw, the recent case where the Catholic Monsignor who oversaw pedophile priests and didn't intervene to keep them out of parishes was just sentenced yesterday. He was given longer jail-time than the pedophile priest.

    Food for thought.
    Yeah, I was going to say that analogy was taken from the Freeh report. It was the conclusion of Freeh that the admins at Penn State were the effective gatekeepers, and had they at any time shut their doors to Sandusky, his method for luring in victims would have effectively ended, and many innocent lives could have been spared. But never once did those admins close the door on Sandusky's access, and this is what allowed the abuse to continue for so long.

    So yeah, I think it's a pretty apt parallel.
     
  6. MacMadame

    MacMadame Internet Beyotch

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    16,516
    Well, yes, as I said, just because that's how the law works, doesn't make it right. The law has many irregularities and when you compare sentences, you can find a lot of inconsistencies and things that most wouldn't agree is fair. Like women getting harder sentences for killing their spouses than guys who kill theirs.

    And, as a victim of sexual abuse myself, I am still incredulous at the idea that anyone is more guilty than Sandusky. He is the one who did it. No one made him do anything; it was all on HIM. I don't understand how Paterno has become this lightening rod for scorn and derision when Sandusky actually raped young adults in his care. No punishment is good enough for Sandusky IMO.

    I already said they weren't. (I don't think the discussion actually needs "focusing" either. :p)

    You already said that. ;)

    My thought is that our criminal justice system is a mess.

    No wonder people have been criticizing it then...

    This is what I think:

    The guilt of the officials at Penn State is variable. Some of them are like the bar owner who let's the mob run something illegal in his back room because they pay him to turn a blind eye. Some are like a landlord who suspects he's rented to the mob but doesn't investigate so he can claim he didn't know anything; but he kind of does know. And some are like an absentee landlord whose really does have absolutely no idea something hinky is happening on his property. These people are not all equally guilty as each other let alone equally guilty with the ones committing crimes.

    The bouncer in the above example is actually a member of the gang. He's like the driver of a getaway car in a bank robbery. Maybe he didn't come in to the bank and say "give me all your money" but he committed the same crime because the job wouldn't have been successfully pulled off without his contribution. I don't see any of the officials in that role unless there was one who actively funneled boys to Sandusky to keep him happy.

    Maybe Mrs. Sandusky is playing that role, but I don't know enough details as to what she did and didn't know to say that for sure. I also suspect that Sandusky abused her emotionally because pedophiles often do that their spouses. Which makes her a victim too.

    As for the penalties, I think the fine should have been twice what it was at a *minimum*. But I think the stripping of the titles was petty and dumb. I also think most of the sanctions hurt the people least involved including some who are completely innocent.

    If they want to punish wrong-doers, they should take away everyone's coaching credentials (well the NCAA equivalent of that) and bar them from coaching anywhere for at least 5 years but preferably more. THAT would punish people who actually did something wrong instead of players some of whom are not only victims of Sandusky but now are victims of the NCAA.
     
  7. heckles

    heckles Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2005
    Messages:
    3,114
    The buck has to stop somewhere. Joe was in charge, Joe knew about it, Joe didn't fire Sandusky, Joe didn't contact authorities. Heck, Joe could have at least cancelled the camps, citing liability or streamlining the program or similar. Sandusky is in jail as he should be; Joe had the lucky break of dying at a convenient time.
     
  8. CDANN1013

    CDANN1013 Active Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2002
    Messages:
    406
    One problem with that, Heckles, Sanducksy WAS NOT an employee of Penn StTe football in 2002 when the shower scene happened. Sanducksy was granted access BY the Athelic director and the President of the university NOT by Joe Paterno. When the shower scene happened it was reported to Paterno by McCleary, if Joe Paterno or anyone else reported it to the authorities, the cops would have asked if they witnessed the crime, otherwise it might be considered hearsay evidence.

    Carol
     
  9. judiz

    judiz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2006
    Messages:
    3,286
    Joe Paterno had major influence on the Penn State campus and the surrounding town. A co-worker's daughter was at Penn State a few years ago and this co-worker said you could not go one block without seeing the Paterno name or image on a store or building. She said when people spoke of Joe, it was like they were talking about a holy man. Maybe, if Paterno had gone to the police, his reputation alone would had given the police cause to formally investigate. AND, if Paterno couldn't go to the police, what about a call to child protective services? Those calls can be made anonymously.
     
    Last edited: Jul 26, 2012
  10. BelleBway

    BelleBway a monkey stole my title

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2002
    Messages:
    8,980
    I think in some cases it may also have been like a landlord who rented an apt to his friend and didn't want to think the friend could be up to no good.

    Sandusky fooled a hell of a lot of people- it's easy for us now to see him for what he is when we are distanced from the situation and when a ton of kids have come forward. But at the time? To someone closer to the situation? Not to excuse them or say that they behaved appropriately- just saying that I think they are imperfect human beings who made some huge mistakes (which deserve to be punished) and not the root of all evil.
     
  11. michiruwater

    michiruwater Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2006
    Messages:
    9,210
    Oh come on. So Paterno was just supposed to stay mum and hope that McCleary reported the CHILD MOLESTOR to the police, and when he didn't, it was okay that Paterno didn't do ANYTHING? How much CSI do you watch? Do you seriously think that it's okay for an authority figure, who did have power over McCleary, to not immediately take what McCleary told him to the police? 'Hearsay evidence'? Are you kidding me? Do you really think that you cannot report something to the police unless you have witnessed it yourself or have solid, incontrovertible evidence? That's what a courtroom is for.

    Anyone with a brain knows that because these things were happening on Penn State grounds, Penn State was liable. It was Paterno's duty, if not in writing as part of his job than as a human being, to report such things and stop them from happening - because, don't you know, child molestation is llegal.
     
  12. taf2002

    taf2002 Texas slumlord

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    Messages:
    14,187
    I dont think anyone said that the people who covered up are more guilty than Sandusky. Of course not. But I think McQuery for one should go to jail & he probably would have if he had not made a deal for his testimony. I can't even imagine in my wildest not stopping whatever was going on in the shower. Why didn't he run in there & break it up? Why didn't he go to the police instead of to Paterno? It looks like he won't get any punishment at all for his involvement. He should be blackballed from any sports-related jobs. I for one would not want a child of mine in his care. He had very poor judgement to say the least.

    I agree with most of this but once they knew about the abuse & said nothing when they saw Sandusky having access to other young boys, then I see them as the bouncer or the getaway driver....an active participant in the crime.

    I agree with the 2nd paragraph but I also agreed with the stripping of titles. That hurt the school, not the players. Any individual stats or titles were not affected. The atmosphere at the school was that football was king & everything else could go to hell. The coaching staff did not create this atmosphere in a vacuum. Football was big money & the college administrators went along with whatever promoted football.
     
    Last edited: Jul 26, 2012
  13. Vagabond

    Vagabond Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2011
    Messages:
    3,706
  14. gkelly

    gkelly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    Messages:
    10,669
    That article is too short and vague. I can't tell whether "made sure it stopped" means going in to break it up right then and there, since all the details are about what he did elsewhere and afterward.

    Apparently he is in the process of doing so: http://news.yahoo.com/jerry-sandusk...-says-sue-164900942--abc-news-topstories.html
     
  15. Vagabond

    Vagabond Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2011
    Messages:
    3,706
    What else could it mean?

    By the way, McQueary has claimed that he did go to the police.

    http://articles.mcall.com/2011-11-1...quick-decisions-grand-jury-report-joe-paterno

    I don't know whether Louis Freeh's investigation (or anything else) corroborated this, but I'm inclined to believe McQueary about this too.
     
  16. julieann

    julieann Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,596
    I can't open the article but are you sure he didn't mean campus police? I have never heard he called 911. I'm sure after he walked in on the abuse he ended it even if it wasn't physical. I can understand being stunned by what he just saw. He called his father than night :rolleyes: saw Paterno the next day. :eek: and continued to work with Sandusky for years after and never said a word. :mad:
     
  17. skatingfan5

    skatingfan5 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2002
    Messages:
    10,790
    :confused: In what way did McQueary continue to work with Sandusky? I haven't read any of the testimony (or the report), but I thought that they had very little to do with one another after Sandusky "retired" several years before that shower incident. I guess I am wrong in thinking that.
     
  18. milanessa

    milanessa engaged to dupa

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2002
    Messages:
    18,917
    The second linked article quotes him as saying he slammed his locker door (apparently to let Sandusky know someone else was in the locker room.) Enough? Not in my opinion but more than others did. Nothing less than him going into the shower and escorting the boy out was enough for the immediate situation, IMO.
     
  19. Vagabond

    Vagabond Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2011
    Messages:
    3,706
    Excuse me, julieann, but I have to ask. Do you have some sort of reading comprehension problem or learning disability?

    I never said that he called 911. The fact that you somehow gleaned that from my post is ... umm, worrisome, to say the least. :eek:

    And yes, it was the campus police.

    But of course, you are right. He should have taken that boy home or to the police. I wonder what did happen to that boy immediately after the incident. I guess we may now find out soon enough.
     
  20. julieann

    julieann Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,596
    Worked with him was the wrong word but McQueary certainly knew Sandusky wasn't arrested for what happened and didn't inquire about it either or he would have been questioned. I'm sure the incident in 2002 wasn't the last time either one saw each other.
     
  21. berthesghost

    berthesghost Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2005
    Messages:
    4,891
    He said he slammed his locker door hard, letting them know they weren't alone.
    He saw it at 9:00pm. I have no friggin clue what's so :rolleyes: about a 20something intern calling his dad for advice about what to do when you find an uber popular and very powerful higher up in your company doing something illegal after hours. He reported it to his boss during the next possible business hours. After that it was up to his employers on how to handle illegal activity on their premises. I'm sure that he too wishes he had handled it differently or done more, but I don't really find his actions that outragous. Paterno had a dictatorship going there and it's his and the university's actions to the event that I find :eek::eek: not really the actions of the smallest cog in the wheel, who blew the whistle but just didn't blow it loud enough for some. And of course, as MacMadam keeps reminding us, it's the serial rapist who'd been abusing this kid for years that most to blame, even if they're all going to various rings in Dante's inferno.
     
  22. julieann

    julieann Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,596
    There is a HUGE difference between 'police' and 'campus police'; anyone whose been to university knows that. If you mean to say campus police, that is the word you should use.
     
  23. Vagabond

    Vagabond Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2011
    Messages:
    3,706
    This from the woman who thinks that the term to "go to the police" means to call 911. :rolleyes:
     
  24. julieann

    julieann Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,596
    You can call 911 at any time, they are always open. Especially if you feel other children may be at risk at a rapist who's name you know. Especially if you are still seeing him walking around and feel your 'boss' may not have handled the situation. McQueary wasn't a teenager he was pushing 30.
     
  25. my little pony

    my little pony snarking for AZE

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    30,897
    so what? they get to keep their penn state scholarships if no one else wants them
     
  26. heckles

    heckles Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2005
    Messages:
    3,114
    On every college campus I've been on, calls to 911 from campus phones automatically got forwarded to the campus security office. Even if you dialed 9 for an outside line, then 911, it still went to campus police. Campus police are notoriously gutless, and just want to cover up anything that will make the college look bad. If you tried to bypass that by calling the police non-emergency number, they'd just tell you that because the issue was on campus, you had to call campus police. Fraternity and sorority houses were in some lawless Wild West: campus police wouldn't get involved there because the Greek houses weren't "on campus", yet the municipal police said it was "University property".

    Maybe the situation varies from college to college--perhaps a haughty academic type will contrarily chime in--but the above could have been a factor at Penn State.
     
  27. Vagabond

    Vagabond Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2011
    Messages:
    3,706
    :wall:

    What is it with you people? Can't you read and understand basic English?

    When a university official says he witnessed another university employee having anal sex on university grounds, then "immediately" thereafter spoke by telephone about the incident with his father, and, after that "had discussions" with the police about what he had witnessed, it implies that he did something other than call 911.

    Indeed, why would he call 911 at that point? 911 is for emergencies, and, at that point, there was no emergency.

    Most likely, he went into the campus police station to report what he saw.
     
  28. heckles

    heckles Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2005
    Messages:
    3,114
    The point is the same. Municipal police have a tendency to not want to address campus crime, and campus police ironically have the same reluctance. All you have to do is Google the words "under-reported campus crime" to see how crime is handled--or more accurately, not handled--at Universities.
     
  29. moojja

    moojja Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2007
    Messages:
    273
    So who are you suppose to call?
     
  30. heckles

    heckles Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2005
    Messages:
    3,114
    Good question! Too often, these crimes just go unaddressed. In the Penn State case, it would appear that what really got things moving was the local newspaper, which was initially maligned for its reporting.