Judge throws out 3 of 51 counts against Sandusky

Discussion in 'Off The Beaten Track' started by Fan123, Jun 21, 2012.

  1. Cyn

    Cyn Well-Known Member

    21,222
    5,556
    113
    Bail automatically revoked....sentencing to be in ~90 days according to CBS news.
     
    Last edited: Jun 23, 2012
  2. Lacey

    Lacey Well-Known Member

    8,999
    869
    113
    I heard sentencing within 90 days. Has to be evaluated by sexual pervert team, or something like that.

    I hope they go after the officers and executives of the university also. It would seem to me that they lied and covered up.
     
  3. CDANN1013

    CDANN1013 Active Member

    406
    32
    28
    According to WJAC-TV (Johnstown, PA), he was found not guilty of the counts that happened in the Penn State shower.
     
  4. Lacey

    Lacey Well-Known Member

    8,999
    869
    113
    They couldn't prove what type of sex that was...what the red headed coach saw was not definitive, just sounds, gross.
     
  5. BigB08822

    BigB08822 Well-Known Member

    20,818
    2,371
    113
    Isn't it ironic that the assault that seemingly started all of this, or at least what we heard about first, is the one to not get a conviction?

    I have a feeling his true punishment will occur in prison, this was just the beginning.
     
  6. barbk

    barbk Well-Known Member

    6,023
    555
    113
    Only one of those counts -- he was convicted of the other counts related to that.

    What tough testimony for a jury to have to consider.
     
  7. Twizzler

    Twizzler Well-Known Member

    1,231
    87
    48
    Which were the 3 counts where he was found not guilty?
     
  8. Alex Forrest

    Alex Forrest Banned Member

    916
    114
    0
    Thank goodness. It's not a time to celebrate but just to breathe a sigh of relief that justice was served. I hope his victims can get some peace out of this and it will help them move on. The monster has been caged for life. Time for healing to begin.
     
  9. Twizzler

    Twizzler Well-Known Member

    1,231
    87
    48
    Not yet- time to go after the countless number of others who knew and did NOTHING to bring him to justice more than a decade ago.
     
  10. WindSpirit

    WindSpirit OmnipresentAdmeanistrator

    7,938
    2,302
    0
    Guilty. Guilty. Guilty.

    Probably not going to happen, but part of me wishes they went after Sandusky's wife, too. There's very little chance if any that she didn't know. She might have ignored it, repressed it, lied to herself about it, etc., but I don't believe she wasn't aware of it or at least suspicious of his behavior. He was raping those kids at home when she was there, too. One of the men testified he was calling her name from the basement, if I recall correctly. She might have not heard the kid, but when your husband locks himself with a minor in the basement and then the minor acts weird (which I'm sure they did at some point) or doesn't want to go to the basement in the first place, get fcuking curious, OK? And even if everything seems hanky dory, go and check on them from time to time. If the door is closed, that's your fcuking clue that's something shady is going on.

    Many predators like him are able to do what he did for a looong time because no one says anything, even if they are suspicious or even saw anything. That's why it's important to go after those who knew, too.

    :fragile:

    It could have ended 13 years ago? The mind boggles.

     
  11. milanessa

    milanessa engaged to dupa

    18,917
    2,870
    0
    I wonder why he stopped. Don't most pedophiles offend throughout their lives? If he didn't stop then there are younger victims out there.
     
  12. heckles

    heckles Well-Known Member

    3,121
    634
    113
    I suspect there were, but they're too scared to come forward just yet. Some victims don't realize just how impacted they were until well into adulthood, sometimes their 30s or 40s. That's why it's surprising that in a lot of states, the victim has only until two years after hitting the age of majority--age 20-- to take legal action. In 2007, Pennsylvania raised their statute of limitations to the victim's 50th birthday. Hopefully, more states will do this.
     
  13. PDilemma

    PDilemma Well-Known Member

    4,873
    822
    113
    Good opinion piece about how we look at sports:

    http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/23/opinion/jones-sandusky/index.html?hpt=hp_t1

    I agree with this so much. My father, the former super star high school athlete (he could have played professional baseball, but things didn't work out), constantly explains to us that this or that is different if it is in the context of sports. Hence his opinion that children in the shower with grown men is okay if it was a locker room. At the school I last taught at, the principal was the head football coach. Parents complained to the school board more than once that he called players "retard" and "dumb ass" and otherwise verbally berated them. It was deemed okay by the entire board because of "context"--in other words, as long as it happened on a football field or sideline it was okay. The male teacher who taught in the classroom next door to me constantly yelled at his students during class. A student was complaining in front of me one day that a female teacher "yelled" at them all the time and was just "harsh". I answered that Mr. Next Door yells constantly and this same student admired him. Response: "That's totally different than a woman doing it. He's a coach and he just goes into coach mode and you have to expect that. It doesn't make him a bad teacher."

    There is a double standard in our society for sports. We have to let go of that or all kinds of abuses will continue to be overlooked on fields and courts and in locker rooms.
     
    Gazpacho and (deleted member) like this.
  14. tarotx

    tarotx Well-Known Member

    1,570
    141
    63
    I'll never understand why Penn State hid this and did nothing.So many people reported Sandusky over a long period of time and nothing was done. It makes no sense. Sandusky was an institution at the school but he wasn't a school symbol. Them making sure kids were safe would have given much more a positive then whatever the Sandusky name was adding to the schools appeal.

    Sandusky's wife should at least be prosecuted in the case of her own adopted son so I hope that goes forward. Children need to be safe from coaches but even more definitely from forester and adopted parents.It was the wife's responsibility to make sure the children under her care were protected. But also because she and he created a "safe" haven for children and then hurt and/or allowed children to be hurt, this is even more heartbreaking and ****ed up so they both need the book thrown at them!!!!
     
  15. Sparks

    Sparks Well-Known Member

    7,243
    2,005
    113
    The Sandusky case has brought up many things for me.
    In the '90's I worked along side an ex-priest who was a child molester.
    Right after I met him, I attended his wedding where he became the father of 3 boys. He cried as the 3 boys walked down the aisle ahead of their mother. I was so creeped out - it was like he was marrying those children. After that, he started telling us "funny" stories of wrestling and showering with the boys. I got together with 2 other co-workers and made a call to CYFD. Nothing came of it.
    He was working as a mental health professional and it was obvious he took a special interest in his vunerable, young male clients. Many of us complained to management. A client even filed a compliant, but everything was swept under the rug. He kept moving up the ranks, received awards, and had his photo taken with Senators, the Governor, etc. When we had to be fingerprinted by the FBI, *something* came up and he was put on suspension, BUT returned to work in no time.
    His wife was a clueless, drunk woman who was, imo, happy that she had a husband to take care of her after her bitter divorce.
    I, among others, continuously complained about him, and contacted the media numerous times.
    Finally, the law caught up with him and he was charged with dozens of child molestations in Arizona and California when he was a priest. He was among several perpetrators who were shielded by the Church in Arizona.
    He is currently in jail.
    I'm still so disgusted at how everything was handled. As most pedophiles do, he hid in plain sight for over 12 years. He presented as such a helpful, Christian man. TPTB refused to see what he really was.
    I hope that high profile cases can at least serve to wake people up as to the real nature of pedophiles. Yes, they work and live among us every day and everywhere. :mad:
     
    Last edited: Jun 24, 2012
  16. Lacey

    Lacey Well-Known Member

    8,999
    869
    113
    I am not mad at Joe Paterno, may he rest in peace, I actually think he thought he had told the authorities.

    I am not mad at the coach with the red hair, who thought he had reported it to school officials. He should get back his job or a lifetime retirement fund. Strange that one of the charges was what he thought he witnessed in the shower, guess the jury decided they couldn't be sure what crime it really was.

    I am furious at each and every officer of the university, up to and including the former president, because they all knew and closed their eyes. And they should all be placed on leave immediately, if they are still there, charged and prosecuted, and fired if they are not gone already with no retirement if found guilty.

    And yes, you all are correct here, Snaduskey's wife should bear some responsibility. Bad enough that he did things to all of those children. Think about it, he also did them to their own adopted kids. And she knew about everything, must have.

    And I hope they can close his "charity" and get some of the donated money back to distribute to his victims. And sell his house and get his retirement account for them too.

    I hope this is a lesson for pedophiles everywhere.
     
    Last edited: Jun 23, 2012
  17. Polymer Bob

    Polymer Bob New Member

    2,667
    159
    0
    Well, if that filth likes sex in the shower, he should enjoy where he's going.
     
  18. barbk

    barbk Well-Known Member

    6,023
    555
    113
    He was only found not guilty on the charge related to sexual assault in the shower, because the jury couldn't conclude that McQuery had actually seen penetration. He was convicted of all the other charges associated with that incident.

    And I don't ever think jail rape is appropriate punishment no matter what the crime.
     
  19. agalisgv

    agalisgv Well-Known Member

    24,038
    4,397
    113
    Penn State trying to get out front of anticipated civil suits:
    http://www.philly.com/philly/sports...il_actions.html?cmpid=137039853#ixzz1yfrco6G5
     
  20. Polymer Bob

    Polymer Bob New Member

    2,667
    159
    0
    I never really believed in witch hunts. They should try to resolve the issue quickly and fairly.
     
  21. heckles

    heckles Well-Known Member

    3,121
    634
    113
    Does that mean that he was found guilty of fondling that specific boy, but not raping him? Did the boy allege he'd been raped?
     
  22. agalisgv

    agalisgv Well-Known Member

    24,038
    4,397
    113
    The boy above has never been located. That was the problem--there was no direct testimony in that case.



    ETA: Apparently Sandusky is under suicide watch.
     
    Last edited: Jun 24, 2012
  23. Lacey

    Lacey Well-Known Member

    8,999
    869
    113
    The suicide watch is more to give him protection from other inmates than to address his emotional state. But apparently it puts him in solitude, which is not always a great thing.

    With regard to the university's very quick thinking about offers to those who were harmed by Sanduskey, I am naiive not to have thought that they have been waiting these six months with a we're so sorry after all the denials over the years. I mean, talk about a wham bang move.

    I obviously hope that those who were able to testify will get huge quick settlements.

    But I am on the fence about those who have yet to come out of the woodwork, would they take a small offer when they could get a much larger amount from a jury.

    And isn't the bottom line for Penn State that they want to keep their executives (former) out of trouble?

    Also I read something about their insurance company isn't quite so wild about the university offering what the company will have to pay off, they have to agree and might (probably wrongly) think that they could get off with less.
     
  24. barbk

    barbk Well-Known Member

    6,023
    555
    113
    He was found guilty of several counts related to that boy (I forget the exact name of the charges) but not the specific deviant sexual assault charge. So, it seems that the jury felt that there was clearly very, very inappropriate, sexual behavior demonstrated, but not enough evidence to convict on the rape charge itself.
     
  25. purple skates

    purple skates Shadow dancing

    16,843
    4,699
    113
    I'm no expert on insurance, but I would think that the willful misconduct by Penn State officials in not investigating/stopping the abuses could negate the insurance policy in this instance.
     
  26. barbk

    barbk Well-Known Member

    6,023
    555
    113
    Sandusky's attorney seems to be doing everything possible to create grounds for an appeal. Given the many inappropriate things he's said outside of court during the trial and the deliberations, the poor job he did on the defense, whatever Second Mile and Sandusky paid him was way too much. (I'm not defending Sandusky in the least, but nobody deserves a lawyer like that.)
     
  27. agalisgv

    agalisgv Well-Known Member

    24,038
    4,397
    113
    Unfortunately attorney misconduct is rarely if ever a sufficient reason for an appeal.
     
  28. milanessa

    milanessa engaged to dupa

    18,917
    2,870
    0
    Did anyone see the Anderson Cooper interview with Joe Amendola (Sandusky's lawyer) the night of the verdict? More specifically his comments while he was being miked and readying himself to be on air. Completely inappropriate, IMO. When Jason Carroll, the CNN reporter on the scene, told him they were going to hook him up (fit his microphone) he responded "With who? Is she cute?" (that may not be a direct quote but it's close.) He sounded punch drunk.

    I found it on YT:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfrY1JUwwv8
     
  29. Polymer Bob

    Polymer Bob New Member

    2,667
    159
    0
    I don't have all the details in front of me, but I seem to recall that they DID investigate. :confused:
     
  30. purple skates

    purple skates Shadow dancing

    16,843
    4,699
    113
    There's no way there wasn't a huge cover-up going on.

    http://www.cbssports.com/collegefoo...als-suspected-coverup-by-penn-state-officials