Joubert: “The skaters have to improve, but the judging system has to improve, too”

Discussion in 'Great Skate Debate' started by Ninchen, Jul 27, 2010.

  1. Ninchen

    Ninchen Active Member

    706
    49
    28
  2. Tony Wheeler

    Tony Wheeler Well-Known Member

    2,488
    185
    63
    What is most interesting to me is how the interviewer brings up the comments that Joe Inman made before the Olympic Games. Last time I checked, the original source of the drama came from the same website AND interviewer (from Absolute Skating) when Plushenko himself said the following:

    It just doesn't make much sense to me that the same interviewer this time would ask

    I dunno, maybe I lack comprehension, but I still think it was Plushenko basically telling the world that he didn't have any transitions and dragged Joubert into that mess himself. If there was a translation error or mis-wording on the part of the interviewer originally, it still wouldn't necessarily be Inman's fault for copying and pasting the comment, right? The interviewer seems to have told or suggested to Joubert that Inman basically came out of nowhere talking trash about Plushenko and Joubert, when in reality Inman was using her own article as an example! She should have really clarified that it was a copied comment made by Evgeny.


    I also don't know how Joubert can go on to say

    Sorry, but if he's admitting right before this that he hasn't even seen the programs, then his opinion becomes silly. I know he's all about the quad, but there's so much more to a program even if someone does land the quad. Brian knows that.

    Anyways, I still always find myself rooting for Joubert even if I know he lacks some of the strengths in components that some of the others have.
     
    Last edited: Jul 28, 2010
    alilou and (deleted member) like this.
  3. Ziggy

    Ziggy Well-Known Member

    20,569
    1,599
    113
    It still makes me :wall: that judges need Joe Inman or Plushenko or anybody else to tell them something that is very clearly visible to everyone. :rolleyes:
     
    alilou and (deleted member) like this.
  4. kwanfan1818

    kwanfan1818 I <3 Kozuka

    20,860
    3,748
    113
    ^This.
     
  5. MR-FAN

    MR-FAN Kostner Softie

    5,586
    491
    83
    Good interview, I love how you can sense that all these disappointments make him more mature. And I completely agree with him that a 4-2 in the sp needs to have a much higher value than a 3-3. As he said having a quad in the SP changes EVERYTHING, including your approach, your pacing, your train of thought, and your nerves.

    And I also think transitions and choreography need to be more representative of what the skaters actually do on the ice :p
     
  6. caseyedwards

    caseyedwards Well-Known Member

    6,567
    276
    83
    The critera for what a transition is totally open for interpretation. You can read the criteria and it doesn't seem to require anything at all be done with skates. Everyone thinks only spread eagles and ina bauers and knee bends are transitions-well the criteria doesn't say those are the only transitions.

    For a skater like Joubert who has worked so hard to do a quad because he felt it was necessary to win events to know of a skater not land a quad in their Olympic program and win in 2010 I am sure it is totally baffling and dispiriting. From 1997 to 2007 all world champs had a quad and the Olympic champions of 1998, 2002, and 2006 had one. It was seen as necessary to TRY IT! If you failed you lost-If you did a quad and did everything else you won. To do everything else but not a quad meant you lost!
     
  7. overedge

    overedge Well-Known Member

    18,175
    2,743
    113
    Who is this "everyone"? You would have to be an very uninformed observer of skating to think that "only spread eagles and Ina Bauers and knee bends are transitions".

    And most people would probably agree that at the senior elite international level, straight stroking, crossovers, and maybe the occasional 3-turn or mohawk is not enough transitions, or not difficult enough transitions, to gain legitimate high marks. Which is the issue with your boy Plushenko, who (as stated above) says he doesn't do transitions.
     
  8. miki88

    miki88 New Member

    806
    46
    0
    The article is interesting. He did mention that he tried doing his SP with a 3-3 and it was much easier for him to do. I tend to agree with him on this point because if it weren't so, more skaters would be attempting 4-3 combo. They should find a better method of rewarding the different combinations.
     
  9. michiruwater

    michiruwater Well-Known Member

    9,255
    1,944
    113
    Both men who won World Championships and the man who won the Olympics did, in fact, try it. One of them landed it a couple times.

    You left out a variable - what if you have a quad, but not much else?

    You beat on this dead horse so much, and yet you haven't made anyone agree with you buy those few who already did. Do you think you're going to change anyone's opinion? Or do you just enjoy hitting that horse so much?
     
  10. caseyedwards

    caseyedwards Well-Known Member

    6,567
    276
    83
    My comment came from reading stuff like you wrote about how stroking crossovers and 3 turns should not be enough to get a 7 or an 8 in transitions marks. It doesn't say anywhere in the rules that doing crossovers and stroking and 3 turns would not be deserving of a 7 or 8. So what would be worth a 7 or 8? Stuff like spread eagles and ina bauers or waltz jumps or whatever. Maybe the rules for transitions should be more clear because nowhere does it say that the blade moves are transition moves. It is very clear that arms and the head are included in transitions.
     
  11. Tony Wheeler

    Tony Wheeler Well-Known Member

    2,488
    185
    63
    From the ISU Components Criteria:

    Variety, difficulty, and intricacy wouldn't exactly include stroking and three-turns. It even says in the rules, minimum use of cross-cuts, which I suppose you missed. Also, three-turns were something everyone can do in the first few months of skating. I'd hardly consider them to be difficult or intricate or showing variety when the Sal, toe loop, and flip already have three-turns into their entrances. I also don't think a bunch of arm flailing while skating around on two feet and doing crossovers into everything is showing variety, difficulty, or intricacy; then again, maybe some find it difficult to have arm and head movements while doing crossovers in the same way that some people can't rub their stomachs and tap their heads at the same time.
     
    LynnW and (deleted member) like this.
  12. Ziggy

    Ziggy Well-Known Member

    20,569
    1,599
    113
    They are.

    That's why skaters who:

    a) control the position of their arms and head all the time (so they are nicely aligned and not just dangling)
    b) are able to move them to the music whilst skating

    Should be getting higher PCS (this will reflect both under Transitions and Interpretation - provided it's performed to the music - there is a lot of crossover like that with PCS where certain things come under criteria of two or more components).

    And Joubert really lacks this kind of detail.

    So what is your point again?
     
    Last edited: Jul 28, 2010
  13. barbk

    barbk Well-Known Member

    6,024
    557
    113
    Sure -- and in the 90's the triple axel was a must have jump, and male skaters were expected to deliver ALL the triples. Now we have had years with men on the podium at Worlds who don't have all the triples. I'm not sure that having a quad while not having a triple axel is much, if any of an improvement.
     
  14. Ziggy

    Ziggy Well-Known Member

    20,569
    1,599
    113
    Also, I personally disagree that 4/2 should be worth much more than 3/3.

    Getting a 3 jump off another jump is very hard because you don't have the preparation time and speed you would normally get.
     
  15. Sparks

    Sparks Well-Known Member

    7,243
    2,006
    113
    What if a certain skater has a quad, but has an injury (Evan)?
    It is wise to leave it out rather than risk a fall, or further injury.
    That said, I still have a little soft spot for Joubert - Plushenko? Not so much.
    ((Baboo))
     
  16. bek

    bek Guest

    I don't think it was just the injury that had Evan leave out the quad, he did at nationals. I think it was the fact that Evan was inconsistent with the quad and to be frank Joubert has a point at least in Evan's direction. Whenver Evan tried the quad even it was clean, he normally messed up somewhere else probably due to energy given towards the quad.
     
  17. MR-FAN

    MR-FAN Kostner Softie

    5,586
    491
    83
    Landing a quad much, much harder.

    Is there any male skater capable of qualifying to the LP at a major competition who can't do a 3-3? Now how many of them can do a quad, let alone a 4-2?

    yes a 3-3 is hard, but a 4-2 is much, muuuuuch harder.
     
  18. MR-FAN

    MR-FAN Kostner Softie

    5,586
    491
    83
    Which reminds me, Evan has spent a couple of seasons attempting a quad in the SP, was he ever able to deliver a clean SP with the quad? (I don't think so, but I could be wrong)
     
  19. Sparks

    Sparks Well-Known Member

    7,243
    2,006
    113
    Okay. I still maintain that Evan was the rightful champion that night. He DID have a foot injury at Worlds 2009. It was still (Frankly ;) ) wise to leave it out in order to skate cleanly, and have a well balanced program.
    Plushenko apparently knows the COP rules, as evidenced by his remark about transitions. He didn't maximize the 2nd half of his program. He seemed to ignore the rules...:rolleyes:

    If the quad was EVERYTHING, then Kevin Van der Pants and Timothy The Tree Goebel would be World Champs. :encore:

    Should they be equal? I struggle with this question.
     
  20. caseyedwards

    caseyedwards Well-Known Member

    6,567
    276
    83
  21. caseyedwards

    caseyedwards Well-Known Member

    6,567
    276
    83
    I think the best are the ones with a triple axel and a quad. Lambiel was the only top level skater I can think of as someone who stopped doing triple axels. I think doing a quad should be the new triple axel but the point system needs to concrete the quad by making it worth more.

    I was pointing out that virtually anyting a skater does inbetween elements can be counted as a transition.

    I saw the cross cut thing but there are lots of elements and judges can decide to judge based on some or all or whatever they want. You have Inman going around saying what he thinks should get high marks but his opinions are not the rules and no judge has to pay attention to anything he says and just based their opinions on their readings of the rules and criteria.
     
  22. michiruwater

    michiruwater Well-Known Member

    9,255
    1,944
    113
    Yes, and most judges are wise enough to recognize that what Joubert and Plushenko do are not, in any way, the sorts of transitions that skaters of their caliber should be doing. And they mark them accordingly. Joe Inman not needed.
     
    Sparks and (deleted member) like this.
  23. mia joy

    mia joy New Member

    1,124
    102
    0
    Why do you hate Joubert and the quad so much? just curious.

    And please, look how many girls can perform a 3/3 - even if it's just 3toe-3toe, it's still that 3 jump off another jump that is so very hard to do in your opinion. And now show me a girl who can perform a solid quad and then yet another jump after that.
    Seriously, I think this kind of attitude is exactly was has brought us to a situation that we now have Olympic champion without a quad, without artistry, without anything worthy. Sorry, Evan fans.

    Didn't even read the interview yet, but as I can see, the quad bashing is back and strong :rolleyes:
     
  24. caseyedwards

    caseyedwards Well-Known Member

    6,567
    276
    83
    Well I think Plushenko maximized the first half by doing a quad triple! LOL
     
  25. Ozzisk8tr

    Ozzisk8tr Well-Known Member

    3,930
    1,494
    113
    Okay, in your way of thinking, show me a guy who can do a Biellman? :rolleyes: And what would you say if Pat Chan comes out this year with a quad and his exquisite skating skills. :rolleyes: See, I can roll my eyes too :rolleyes: I'm not even an Evan fan yet he deserved the gold over Plush's abortion of a program and Baboo's meltdown. :rolleyes: I love a good quad, but not at the expense of everything else.
     
  26. Tony Wheeler

    Tony Wheeler Well-Known Member

    2,488
    185
    63
    Look, Inman didn't say ANYTHING about his own opinion. He quoted what Plushenko himself said. Would he have said anything had A) Plushenko not said anything? and B) the interviewer not published that comment? Probably not. Plushenko is to blame in this situation no matter who you are or are not a fan of, and he dragged Joubert down with him in the process.

    Then again Ziggy has it right that the judges should be able to realize whether skaters have transitions without anyone (including a skater HIMSELF) saying they don't.

    And another thought. Seems that most everyone that had an issue with Inman's quoting Plushenko never once tried to argue that Plushenko had transitions, at least not from what I've seen. They've all just went on about how there was a North American bloc going on, etc, or how everyone just must hate Evgeny.

    Exactly, so what is the point of singling out Inman by anyone?
     
    Last edited: Jul 28, 2010
  27. flyingsit

    flyingsit Well-Known Member

    7,644
    1,467
    113
    To be honest, what's the obsession with the 4-3 combo? If you can do a quad, but not a reliable 4-3, do your quad as the solo jump in the SP, add the 3A and a 3-3, and max out the points that way. Yes, technically the solo jump needs to be "out of steps" but we know that criteria is ignored by the judges anyway.
     
    manhn and (deleted member) like this.
  28. angietang

    angietang Member

    195
    15
    18
    Your conclusion is really brilliant. Who once said " the quad was EVERYTHING", Brian or Plushenko? Technically speaking, can the quad be measured in the same way as the transitions, the step sequences, or whatever?
     
  29. michiruwater

    michiruwater Well-Known Member

    9,255
    1,944
    113
    No one is bashing the quad. No one. I have not once seen anyone bash the quad.

    What people are 'bashing' is the mentality that the quad is the end-all-be-all of men's figure skating and trumps absolutely everything else by its mere presence - that it eradicates everything else a skater can and cannot do. I don't think anyone on this site would argue that it's an easy element - though, personally, I think the actual hardest men's singles element is level 4 footwork, which has been accomplished by significantly fewer men than the quad (Lysacek being one of those very few men). And even then the quad is certainly the second hardest. I simply don't think that Evgeni or Brian's ability to land a quad means they should automatically win anything when the rest of their skating doesn't measure up.
     
  30. flyingsit

    flyingsit Well-Known Member

    7,644
    1,467
    113
    Agreed with ^ that level 4 footwork in singles is the most difficult thing of all; I believe only three women (Kostner, Asada, and Suzuki IIRC) have achieved it, and among the men only Buttle, Chan, Takahashi, Lysacek and a few others I can't remember right now.