Gifts to Chan keep American men out of GPF

Discussion in 'Great Skate Debate' started by skatemuse, Dec 5, 2010.

  1. skatemuse

    skatemuse New Member

    21
    7
    0
  2. Jenna

    Jenna Well-Known Member

    7,139
    313
    83
    Do we really need another thread hashing out this topic? :wall:
     
  3. ltnskater

    ltnskater Active Member

    603
    40
    28
    LMAO absolutely not....I read up to the third paragraph, and realized how the author couldn't even keep her facts straight just to try and accentuate their bias...

    "In the short program at Skate Canada, Chan fell three times — twice on his jumps and once on his footwork. A similar disaster landed Nobunari Oda in 28th place at Worlds last year."

    As we all know...Oda popped all 3 jumps in the short last year, and you get virtually ZERO points for that, Although Chan fell three times, he got the deductions he was supposed to get but he still got points for rotating jumps. In absolutely NO WAY was that similar...

    Let us not forget one last thing....the author is comparing WORLDS to Skate Canada? LMAO the fact that she used that comparison between Oda & Chan, between worlds and skate canada to provide support for her point shows that there is nothing but bogus in her argument LOLLLL...

    What it does make her sound like is a 10 year old whining why didn't her favorite American skater make the GPF. Ok...another pet peeve of mine is how this point is used again and again...

    "Worst of all, the complexity of the scoring makes it virtually incomprehensible to the audience, which in turn makes cheating by the judges easier than ever before."

    Complexity of the scoring is MUCH SIMPLER than it was before, in fact.. it is the 6.0 system that was really "incomprehensible" to the audience if you think about it. You do stuff, you get points, you do harder stuff, you get more points...you make mistakes... you get less points for the stuff you did..that is that, use a calculator to add that all up, you have your grand total. There may have been a learning curve for everyone involved in the sport when it first came out, but it has been a good 7 seasons and I think the audience is not quite as dumb as these bloggers make them sound, they are not quite as clueless as they seem, they know that when a skater does well, they will get more points... if there seems to be a discrepancy..now you can go look at the protocols to see the exact breakdown of what the skaters did to get the points!

    Back in 6.0... you see skaters performing very well and getting 5.1s and 4.8s...huh? why? doesn't make sense... o well..not to mention, the marks didn't count as it was only the rankings that did.
     
  4. dundas

    dundas Banned Member

    57
    19
    0
    It's been 7 years and we're still 'learning'. Yeah, audience is still quite 'dumb' NOT to appreciate that Chan's scores are well deserved with 4 falls per competition under CoP.

    People are dying but Chan apologists keep on spinning...:lol:
     
    flutzilla1 and (deleted member) like this.
  5. Indra486

    Indra486 Well-Known Member

    1,650
    113
    63
    Who is dying? :confused:
     
  6. Really

    Really No longer just a "well-known member" Yay!

    29,902
    6,477
    113
    dundas
     
  7. centerpt1

    centerpt1 Well-Known Member

    936
    319
    63
    American men kept themselves out of the final. No other way to look at it.
     
  8. Nomad

    Nomad Well-Known Member

    8,063
    1,707
    113
    This. The main reason why I hated 6.0 and see no reason to reinstate it.
     
  9. LilJen

    LilJen Well-Known Member

    10,289
    2,034
    113
    Who's Brian Mroz?? :lol:
     
  10. Carolla5501

    Carolla5501 Well-Known Member

    3,552
    567
    113
    I think it's "punishment" American TV is broadcasting "Skating with the Stars" Penance must be paid for anything that bad.

    (Hey it makes as much sense as some of the other whining :) )
     
  11. kwanfan1818

    kwanfan1818 I <3 Kozuka

    21,995
    5,035
    113
    It's all Michelle Kwan's fault :drama:
     
  12. Indra486

    Indra486 Well-Known Member

    1,650
    113
    63
    I sure didn't know what any of those numbers mean.

    Protocols are there for a reason. At it's simplest and most idealistic, everything is outlined. We may not be able to read the judges' minds but we know what the numbers mean in reference to the element that is done. There's a rubric that most of us can follow along to understand. It's not perfect but there is meaning to an 81.30.

    This blogger conveniently didn't bring up anything about the American men and their scores but brought up the Japanese men. It's a tad scary that her whole blog reads like a PSA about the evils of the CoP. :slinkaway
     
    Last edited: Dec 5, 2010
  13. Copper

    Copper New Member

    31
    1
    0
  14. bbkenn

    bbkenn Well-Known Member

    1,285
    131
    63
    Aren't we having too many Chan bashing threads on FSU now? I'm sooo tired of this.
     
  15. museksk8r

    museksk8r Holding an edge and looking dangerously sexy

    3,311
    519
    113
    FREE ABBOTT! :mitchell:
     
  16. pinky166

    pinky166 Well-Known Member

    11,941
    894
    113
    Yup Adam didn't skate well at SA, Jeremy didn't skate well at COR, and Brandon earned his low PCS which kept him out of the GPF with his zzz skating. The only ones who even competed against Chan in a GP event were Rippon, who I do think deserved to beat Chan there but I don't think deserved to beat Oda (I would have had the results 1.) Oda 2.) Rippon 3.) Chan) which would have meant he would have come in 2nd place and 4th place at his 2 GPs and still would not have qualified for the final; and then Jeremy at COR, and Jeremy made so many mistakes there that I thought his scores were deserved and he should have been behind Chan, therefore making Chan not responsible for Jeremy's not qualifying for the GPF. So really, Chan doesn't play a factor in any of it.
     
  17. Jenna

    Jenna Well-Known Member

    7,139
    313
    83
    Yuka Sato is doing well with him. Why does he need to be freed?
     
  18. victoriaheidi

    victoriaheidi New Member

    1,784
    79
    0
    I mean, I feel badly about the fact that so few Americans are going to the final, but at the same time, I'm sure that Jeremy needs to stay home (wasn't he having boot trouble or something like that?) and I'm not sure that Mroz going would be the best idea (I think that he needs to keep training if he hopes to do well should he make worlds) and...well, I can't come up with a good reason to leave Adam behind, other than his SA performance.

    All in all, it's one GPF. This isn't the Olympic season, this is just a season in between, and they have three years to rebound.

    Additionally, Chan does not deserve the blame for any of this. Sure, I was really pissed after SC (although I did pick him for my A pool, so go figure), but I think we spend wayyyyy too much time talking about Chanflation.
     
  19. dundas

    dundas Banned Member

    57
    19
    0
    Well, nobody is forcing you to join a so-called 'Chan-basing' thread. :rolleyes:
     
  20. igniculus

    igniculus Well-Known Member

    8,292
    967
    113
    Seriously? :blah:
     
  21. luCN

    luCN New Member

    471
    48
    0
    Totally agree.

    They just aren't good enough to make the GPF.If Weir and Lysacek competed they will easily attend the GPF.

    Jeremy and Rippon bombed in their second GP,and their programs weren't good enough.and Brandon is tooooooo boring.If they can go to the GPF,that will be so strange indeed.
     
  22. amy8

    amy8 Member

    96
    18
    8
    Can we discuss why Czisny is in before Phaneuf? skating skills? experience? no big shoulders? or maybe just she(Alyssa) just skated better that day? BTW I love both these ladies very much. Chan is becoming more interesting for the controversy he creates than his skating
     
  23. museksk8r

    museksk8r Holding an edge and looking dangerously sexy

    3,311
    519
    113
    :rolleyes: Riiiiiiiiiight, Abbott only won the GPF the first time he ever qualified for it. He certainly is good enough to make the GPF as he has done so the past 2 seasons. His COR LP skate just wasn't up to snuff; learn from it and live to skate another day.

    :rofl: And you can prove this with 100% certainty how? :blah:
     
    flutzilla1 and (deleted member) like this.
  24. Indra486

    Indra486 Well-Known Member

    1,650
    113
    63
    I've been slacking on the GP series but does it have to do with Alissa winning one of her GP events?
     
  25. professordeb

    professordeb Well-Known Member

    3,820
    423
    83
    Maybe the author of this piece should watch some Canadian skating on TV and be informed as to how COP works instead of whining about the American boys getting left out of the GP final.

    And the Chan bashing continues. He must be a really great skater if there are this many topics devoted to the hatred of him by a few.
     
    Rock2 and (deleted member) like this.
  26. purple skates

    purple skates Shadow dancing

    17,179
    5,426
    113
    :confused: :confused:

    Because Czisny won two medals, one of which was gold, and Phaneuf had two fourth place finishes? Plus, Czisny beat Phaneuf head to head in both competitions.

    http://www.isuresults.com/events/gp2010/gpsladies.htm
     
  27. jlai

    jlai Title-less

    9,348
    769
    113
    Aren't you two talking about the same thing really? Lucn said he wasn't good enough to make the gpf (meaning this season); you said his skates weren't good enough.

    In general I find FSUers are already nicer to him than just about any other skater competing. That comment is extremely mild compared to what's been said about others.

    On another note, as a two-time national champ it won;t kill Abbott to take some criticism like other national champs do.Just saying as an Abbott fan.
     
    centerpt1 and (deleted member) like this.
  28. museksk8r

    museksk8r Holding an edge and looking dangerously sexy

    3,311
    519
    113
    I don't know what skating boards you go to, but Abbott certainly does get criticized for his lack of international resume. He certainly has been bashed often over his Worlds and Olympics performances. I'm not sure how you get the impression that his competitive shortcomings have gone unscathed. :confused: If he doesn't get as badly criticized as others, it's because he's generally a nice, humble guy who is respectful towards his competitors. I think he, Tomas Verner, and Michal Brezina all attended the same school to be gentlemen on (and off) ice.
     
  29. l'etoile

    l'etoile New Member

    4,891
    858
    0
    duh!
     
  30. jlai

    jlai Title-less

    9,348
    769
    113
    To be honest I find all posts re Abbott to be mild, considered what's been said about Weir, Lysacek, or Chan/Joubert. Every time there's a hint of Jeremy criticisms there're ubers to the rescue, :) :) to the point that sometimes I think constructive criticisms also get unsaid. :( In fact, many criticisms on Abbott would never raise so much of an eyebrow had it been say, Caroline Zhang.

    While I don't particularly think fans should harshly criticise skaters, I personally do not find it problematic that what's been said about other skaters should apply to my own favorite too. Fair is fair. You may think so-and-so is nice and doesn't deserve harsh words, but who's to say Lysacek isn't nice in his own tough-guy sort of way?