George Zimmerman back in police custody after domestic altercation involving gun

Discussion in 'Off The Beaten Track' started by Whitneyskates, Sep 9, 2013.

  1. Whitneyskates

    Whitneyskates Well-Known Member

    1,009
    97
    48
  2. Buzz

    Buzz Well-Known Member

    17,289
    1,695
    113
  3. Tinami Amori

    Tinami Amori Well-Known Member

    9,666
    840
    113
    He hates white blue-eyed women..... :rofl:
     
  4. Buzz

    Buzz Well-Known Member

    17,289
    1,695
    113
    Oh just his soon to be ex-wife.
     
  5. Lacey

    Lacey Well-Known Member

    9,001
    873
    113
    Is it legitimate that I want him to be denied bail.
     
  6. Anita18

    Anita18 Well-Known Member

    11,214
    1,039
    113
    His soon-to-be ex-wife may not press charges, but it looks like the police are holding him for the time being anyway.

    I remember an op-ed after the trial ended, that mentioned Zimmerman has now inherited the pains of a black man when he killed one. Looks like it's coming to fruition.
     
  7. oleada

    oleada Well-Known Member

    29,056
    3,910
    113
    Shocking. Was she wearing a hoodie and armed with skittles and iced tea by any chance? :rolleyes:

    He's scum.
     
  8. Vash01

    Vash01 Fan of Julia, Elena, Anna, Liza, and Vera

    26,863
    4,052
    113
    This from the CNN article:

    "The incident comes two months after Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer, was found not guilty of murder in the shooting death of Trayvon Martin in Sanford, Florida.

    Hudson said earlier that police are following procedure by placing Zimmerman in investigative detention.

    "Anytime we have anybody suspected of doing anything, we place them in investigative detention until a complete investigation has been done," Hudson said. "

    Had they followed that last paragraph, may be Trayvon's family would have had a stronger case.
     
  9. genevieve

    genevieve drinky typo pbp, closet hugger Staff Member

    30,856
    6,471
    113
    I read elsewhere that Shellie Zimmerman (and her dad, I guess?) declined to press charges, so GZ has been released.
     
  10. Vash01

    Vash01 Fan of Julia, Elena, Anna, Liza, and Vera

    26,863
    4,052
    113
    I guess they did not want to deal with Mark O'Mara who would have won the case for Zimmerman.
     
  11. once_upon

    once_upon Yes, I will have some cheese with that wine

    896
    859
    93
    Domestic violence allegations are often denied after the police intervention has occurred. That might have been part of it, it might have been any other number of things. Do I think Zimmerman is a loose cannon, yeah. But we don't know why she declined to press charges
     
  12. Lacey

    Lacey Well-Known Member

    9,001
    873
    113
    I am not official, just speculating here. I think I read that it was her lawyer who called her off of the chase. Am I nasty in assuming it was something like well, if he's in jail your spousal support in a separation and divorce is in jeopardy. So she forgot whether or not the gun was in his hand. Seriously. BLAH.
     
  13. Karina1974

    Karina1974 Well-Known Member

    2,665
    238
    63
    Well, his wife is a piece of work herself. :rolleyes:

    http://m.nydailynews.com/news/natio...rmanent-life-insurance-dogs-article-1.1448699

    Seriously??!! What part of "once it's over, it's over" doesn't she understand? You want to divorce your husband, that means he owes you NOTHING once it becomes final. You're on your own.
     
    Last edited: Sep 10, 2013
  14. MacMadame

    MacMadame Cat Lady-in-Training

    17,071
    3,561
    113
    That is a very typical divorce settlement. I don't understand your response.
     
  15. Sasha'sSpins

    Sasha'sSpins Well-Known Member

    3,762
    328
    83
    The guy had a history of run-ins with the law long before he killed an unarmed Trayvon Martin. Arrest for assault against a police officer, domestic disturbance (doesn't surprise me), he was also fired from a security job for being 'too aggressive'. I knew he'd run afoul of the law again I just didn't think it would be this soon. And he's going to end up in trouble again. And again. He's just that kind of a swell guy.
     
  16. Karina1974

    Karina1974 Well-Known Member

    2,665
    238
    63
    Splitting up accumulated-during-marriage $$/property is one thing, but that life insurance policy to benefit HER as paid for by HIM, considering she now wants a divorce, is a bit out of bounds, don't you think? And if he does win that defamation suit against NBC, and it happens after their divorce becomes final, why should she get any of it?
     
  17. Skittl1321

    Skittl1321 Well-Known Member

    12,050
    1,393
    113
    Because she got dragged through the mud with him?

    Though I don't understand the life insurance policy at all.
     
  18. agalisgv

    agalisgv Well-Known Member

    24,050
    4,428
    113
    I've never met anyone with that as part of their settlement. Maybe if there were children involved, I could see it as insurance for child support. But what would be the reasoning for it otherwise? Most courts don't award much alimony anymore, and certainly not for very long.
     
  19. MacMadame

    MacMadame Cat Lady-in-Training

    17,071
    3,561
    113
    I've seen the life insurance thing in a lot of divorce settlements. Another typical provision is to ask for half of the 401k.

    Life insurance is pretty cheap. Some of you are acting like she's asking for all the marital assets not half of them plus the dogs and a little life insurance. (I'm assuming the dogs are basically hers and that's why she's asking for custody.)
     
  20. agalisgv

    agalisgv Well-Known Member

    24,050
    4,428
    113
    I'm just wondering why would someone even think to ask to be a beneficiary on an ex's plan if there are no children involved? I don't understand the reasoning there. People move on with other relationships, so if George married someone else, of course the new wife would be the beneficiary--not the ex. I'm just trying to understand the reasoning here.

    Now, it could be different if children were involved, but I thought Zimmerman had no children. Is that incorrect?
     
  21. Prancer

    Prancer Jawwalking Staff Member

    39,065
    6,850
    113
    Sometimes people will ask for this kind of thing in lieu of or to bolster retirement benefits. For example, some friends of mine got divorced. She was entitled to a big chunk of his retirement benefits down the line, but she and the husband agreed to the life insurance policy instead; he figured it would be cheaper for him in the long run (he was probably right) and she figured it would be more secure (she was probably right). He has another life insurance policy that names his second wife beneficiary.
     
  22. agalisgv

    agalisgv Well-Known Member

    24,050
    4,428
    113
    I also don't understand why someone should be entitled to someone else's retirement benefits :shuffle:....
     
  23. OliviaPug

    OliviaPug Well-Known Member

    2,285
    447
    83
    Right. Also, in those long-term marriage cases where the former spouse could be entitled to spousal support for the rest of his/her life or very long-term depending on the circumstances (although there are formulas for calculating support, ultimately each case is viewed on a case-by-case basis), the former spouse often requests and gets named as a beneficiary to a life insurance policy. The reason is simple: What if the earning spouse passes away shortly after the divorce? It does make some sense, though I personally believe support should be strictly rehabilitative.

    As far as the domestic alternation, I don't believe either Zimmerman or his soon-to-be ex or her father.

    O-
     
  24. OliviaPug

    OliviaPug Well-Known Member

    2,285
    447
    83
    Because, often times, those or a portion of those retirement benefits were earned during the marriage.

    O-
     
  25. MacMadame

    MacMadame Cat Lady-in-Training

    17,071
    3,561
    113
    Because you supported them during the time they were earning them.

    Also, in every negotiation like this, you ask for a little more than you expect to get. I have a life insurance policy that cost me less than $400 a year. It's an easy thing to ask for and then if George starts balking at "but I love those dogs (that I never even take for a walk or to the groomers) too" then Shellie can say "fine, only 2 years of life insurance then".

    It's not like she's asking for the house outright and 10 years of alimony.
     
  26. kwanatic

    kwanatic Well-Known Member

    2,041
    476
    83
    I pray that crazy son of b*tch doesn't reproduce...the world doesn't need any more gun-toting trigger-happy psychos than it already has.
     
  27. mag

    mag Well-Known Member

    7,661
    2,857
    113
    Because couples make all kinds of decisions when they get married and or have kids. Those decisions can enhance or limit the earning power of each person. For example, one partner may give up a successful career to move across the country so the other partner take a promotion. One partner may give up a successful career in order to stay home and raise the children. In this case, it can be a huge benefit to the other partner as they are not restricted in their work hours or ability to travel for work. They are not having to leave work early to get to daycare pick up or to pick up sick children. Those examples may not apply to the Zimmerman case, but they are very legitimate reasons for spousal support and or sharing of pension benefits.
     
  28. my little pony

    my little pony snarking for AZE

    31,361
    8,588
    113
    it could be for a variety of reasons, joint debts, to get back part of the $ she may have put into a house or a spouse's tuition, payback for the time a spouse may not have worked full time or contributed to her own 401k, or just because her lawyer thinks she can get it. it's quite common. we dont keep stats on it so i cant tell you how common it is.
     
  29. Latte

    Latte Well-Known Member

    1,191
    125
    63
    It's just a matter of time before that nut kills someone else. I don't blame his wife for being scared, it could easily be her or her family. He's crazy. And now that he has gotten away with murder once, he probably thinks he can get away with it again.
     
  30. genevieve

    genevieve drinky typo pbp, closet hugger Staff Member

    30,856
    6,471
    113
    did Shellie Zimmerman's testimony help his case? I assumed that the life insurance thing was a business agreement related to 1) her help in his getting away with murder 2) the detrimental effect her association with him in part due to #1 will have on the rest of her life and 3) the increased odds that he may not make it to a ripe old age.

    But I'm cynical.
     
    mag and (deleted member) like this.