Boogying Butryskaya (94 Euros SP)

Discussion in 'The Trash Can' started by Aussie Willy, Jan 7, 2011.

  1. Aussie Willy

    Aussie Willy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    Messages:
    18,089
    I found this clip of her SP from 94 Euros and just had to post because I am sure others will like it as well. Loved the energy and attack. Plus the voidy version of Phantom with the bird calls.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmjp4czOEp4&NR=1

    The Finnish judge gave her first place above Baiul.

    Here is Baiul's SP.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRoVqkISQEQ

    I think even with a mistake on the combo Baiul was probably the better performance. Artistically it had so much detail and worked with the music.

    Still really enjoyed both of these.
     
    gkelly and (deleted member) like this.
  2. poths

    poths Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2003
    Messages:
    18,047
    Loved this....Markova actually finished 3rd in this competition with Butyrskaya 4th....but, NO RUSSIAN WOMEN could go to the Olympics a month later!! :fragile: Pathetic qualifying rules from the ISU
     
    Last edited: Jan 7, 2011
  3. poths

    poths Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2003
    Messages:
    18,047
    I know sometimes I make outrageous statements, but seriously:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POcVjSr9W9U&feature=related
    ^^^That's her LP at these championships. She finished 4th....She should have WON.
    It was her best ever skate IMHO
    All of the triples are cleaner than Baiul's, I prefer the pace of the program, better spins, MITF and more mature. JMHO
    With these performances she could have medalled at Lillehamer. I think it's clear the Russian fed sold her out for Markova and IIRC it took a few years for them to give her back their support (having favoured Slutskaya post 1995).

    People always said Butyrskaya was :fragile: but honestly, she had a disaster worlds debut in 1993 and a horrific LP at 1995 Euros (who didn't) but aside from that, she always got it together at the majors.
     
  4. floskate

    floskate Vacant

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2003
    Messages:
    8,800
    I remember this competition so well. :) Markova and Bute were the clear standouts for me. Surya landed everything but was, well, Surya and Oksana wasn't in great jumping form here at all. I have to say I probably agree with Poths on this one. It would be very interesting to see this comp judged under CoP. I'm sure the result would be very different. It's just a tragedy they couldn't go to Lillehammer. :(
     
    poths and (deleted member) like this.
  5. Kwantumleap

    Kwantumleap Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2004
    Messages:
    3,942
    I don't remember seeing Butyrskaya skate with such abandon. It's really impressive and unfortunate that she wasn't able to sustain that intensity and freedom throughout, but at least she won Worlds in 99. From that performance, she looked headed for a world title sooner.
     
  6. Seerek

    Seerek Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2002
    Messages:
    3,479
    I know I must have asked this before, but I'm assuming there was no last chance qualifying competition for the 1994 Olympics?
     
  7. julieann

    julieann Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,580
    LOVE Markova, can't put my finger on it, I just do...
     
  8. gkelly

    gkelly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    Messages:
    10,643
    I don't think there was.
     
  9. poths

    poths Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2003
    Messages:
    18,047
    I'm pretty sure the russian ladies situation at the 1994 Olympics was indeed the impetus to hold such winter qualification events
     
  10. robinhood

    robinhood Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2005
    Messages:
    710
    Maria was my first ever favorite lady skater, much more than Kwan or Slutskaya. with the pass of time, i developed a soft spot for Irina even though she wasn't a very musical skater but Maria remains my favorite Russian lady of all time.
    She was really voidy here, but I actually love her exquisite choreographies she had later. She wasn't that much appreciated by the american media, I feel...but in europe she was beloved
     
  11. casken

    casken Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2004
    Messages:
    6,382
    Maria's skating was so much smoother pre 1997. She really got down into her knees better. I wonder what happened after 96 becuase her skating stiffened up so much. The difference between her Malaguena program from 96 to 97 is obvious.
     
  12. Aussie Willy

    Aussie Willy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    Messages:
    18,089
    Here is Baiul's FS

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJmcMo5uImA

    And here is Markova

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mT57QERvqa0

    And for good measure I have thrown in Bonaly

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jnw1RsxVxeQ

    Interesting to rewatch all of these. Maria should have at least been on the podium with that performance, but it might have come down to the stronger technical mark. I still don't get why Bonaly was always placed as high as she was because even the spins were not that great - they travelled and didn't really flow. And her skating skills, apart from the speed, was really poor.

    Actually the strongest in terms of skating stills was Markova. Really beautiful edges and transitions galore. Although technically in terms of jumps she was the weakest of the bunch.

    Maria's skating skills were okay, but on her forward crossovers she was ploddy - no lightness. But she did have good control.

    Baiul, whilst she probably used the music most effectively, actually did a lot of it standing in the one spot. It was a very clever program in that they used the changes in the music to enhance that.

    Just highlights how different things were under 6.0 compared to IJS. Because if that was judged using IJS I am sure it would have been a different result.
     
  13. bardtoob

    bardtoob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2005
    Messages:
    8,026
    It irritates me that Oksana was botching the combo in the SP during the whole 93-94 season, yet the judges kept on saving room for her and giving her inflated scores.
     
  14. poths

    poths Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2003
    Messages:
    18,047
    Just seen how fecked up the ordinals were :eek:

    Markova was last to skate ..

    her ordinals were:

    6 3 4 2 5 3 4 4 3

    In essence, more had her off the podium than on. One had her 6th, one had her 2nd!! :lol:
     
  15. museksk8r

    museksk8r Holding an edge and looking dangerously sexy

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2008
    Messages:
    3,290
    Yes, sucky reputation judging at its 6.0 worst. This would be the story of Masha's career though. She is perhaps arguably the most wuzrobbed ladies singles skater in history. :EVILLE: judges!
     
  16. C_T_T_

    C_T_T_ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2006
    Messages:
    4,415
    This was all before my time...what where the olympic qualification rules back then and when did they change?

    Completely off topic but I've also always wondered why there where only 2 men at 1998 Olympic for russia when Yagudin and Kulik finished 3rd and 5th at worlds the year before.
     
  17. Sedge

    Sedge Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2002
    Messages:
    844
    Butyrskaya and Russia 1994 spot was lost at 1993 Worlds where Maria finished 34th ..I don't believe she even skated the FP.
    Olympic spots were drawn solely from 1993 Worlds top placements..no secondary Q

    At 1997 Worlds Urmanov started the competition ( I believe he was 1st in the SP) and withdrew with a groin injury during the FP warmup, IIRC. That was the intro year for qualifying next year's team based on a formula for placements that is still in existence today. Trouble was they charged you points for the 3rd skater, once the competition had started and Urmanov's points must have taken them too low to Q 3 people.
    Later..they dropped the points charged for the 3rd entry so you could send a developmental skater and not have it hurt you.
    I believe that Dan Hollander's placement at 1997 Worlds also cost USA a 3rd spot in 1998
     
    bardtoob and (deleted member) like this.
  18. C_T_T_

    C_T_T_ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2006
    Messages:
    4,415
    Ah I see, thank you!
     
  19. Rock2

    Rock2 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Messages:
    1,863
    This was almost the exact music that Czako used in her LP in 94 I believe it was. THAT program, while it had good jumps, was an artistic disaster. Nice to see what real choreo looked like to that music.

    I liked the layback in this program. Better attempt at what was usually a bad element for her.

    I found that yes there was a little more speed and attack in the program, helped by the demands on the music. But, in her upper body and face you can see the tension, so I wouldn't say there was much abandon here. My interpretation is that she tried to improve her skating maturity to get her second mark up as the years went on. This made her look stiffer as she tried to be more controlled and mature vs. what judges might have seen as a bit hokey in this program. So I'm not completely convinced that her skating went to much further south as the years went on. The hints of her discomfort were always there in my mind.
     
  20. Rock2

    Rock2 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Messages:
    1,863
    When it comes to Baiul I have to say her 94 programs in general left me furious. First, her short was an absolute classic and one of the best SPs I can remember from women (spins not super great and f/w could have used a little more variety but I'm overlooking for now). I'd have that program artistically at least 0.3 above any other program coming out of the gate. What irritates me was that she won the gold in Lillehammer so we never got to see more of this. Further, this ultra-sophisticated short made her LP look dated and immature. I consequently would have marked this one way down.

    And, yes, the USFSA used her LP in judging seminars after 1994 to explain why you should mark programs down. There was a calculation of about 90 seconds of the program (I forget exactly how much) where she stood or danced in place. On a related note they used Petrenko's 92 LP similarly to show why a record number of crosscuts does not a great program make.

    Now for Markova and Butyrskaya. I think judges favored much more classical styles and music back then and particularly techno for women wasn't as readily embraced. I don't think it helped that in my mind Maria and Olga were virtually clones of each other based on how they skated, the music they chose, even how they did their hair. Maria's costume looked way out of place in relation to the music. Olga lined up her look, music and choreo much better....so she was the better clone. I think their styles put them in the second tier right out of the gate and no doubt their marks were also affected by a downgrading in the overall Brand of Russian women who were not worthy (based on the rules) of competing at the Olympics.

    I think Maria moved up over the years because of her consistently decent skates, addition of a full complement of triples and programs/packaging that were a little less left-of-center
     
    poths and (deleted member) like this.
  21. taf2002

    taf2002 Texas slumlord

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    Messages:
    14,144
    I agree that Maria was voidy here but her spiral sequence...:scream: And her layback travelled quite a bit. I also feel that the performance level went down as the program progressed. But her jumps were very nice.
     
  22. gkelly

    gkelly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    Messages:
    10,643
    So, anyone want to do an FSU judging game with these freeskates? Add in the German ladies too?
     
  23. Aussie Willy

    Aussie Willy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    Messages:
    18,089
    I think it would make a great judging game. I could put the results into the system. Just got to get the ISUCalc program working on my laptop.

    If someone wanted to post the link to the clips then that would be appreciated.
     
  24. alchemy void

    alchemy void Running away from POTO

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Messages:
    3,807
  25. all_empty

    all_empty Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2002
    Messages:
    1,221
    Oksana wasn't without mistakes either.

    I'm not positive what the spin requirements were back then, but her layback looked short and there was no sit position in her combination spin.

    Still the program is one of the finest works of choreography ever.
     
  26. Squibble

    Squibble New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,520
  27. Seerek

    Seerek Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2002
    Messages:
    3,479
    Ludmilla ivanova was 2nd in the qualifying? Wow... what happened to her?
     
  28. seaner00

    seaner00 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2010
    Messages:
    114
    I've always wanted to do a judging game based on 3axel1996's vast amount of videos. I wish someone would get 8 other people so we could do our own competitions.

    I've already judged some Olympics myself from youtube videos so I already have a head start!

    Anyone interested??
     
    Last edited: Jan 9, 2011
  29. Squibble

    Squibble New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,520
    http://web.archive.org/web/20071216070943/http://ostrov.zp.ua/nomer79-lichnost-skolzkaya-zhizn.html

    As of three years ago, she was married and living in a one-room unit in Zaporozhye, where she was coaching young skaters and trying to build up skating from scratch.

    ETA: According to the article, she had twice been confined to a wheelchair but was fine at the time of the interview. It isn't clear from the article if her mobility problem was skating-related.
     
    Last edited: Jan 9, 2011
  30. poths

    poths Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2003
    Messages:
    18,047
    Wow! :eek:

    That's pretty interesting.