Bizarrely titled Reuters article on Davis & White

Discussion in 'Great Skate Debate' started by Sylvia, Mar 9, 2013.

  1. Sylvia

    Sylvia On to Nationals!

    32,494
    4,867
    113
  2. Holley Calmes

    Holley Calmes Well-Known Member

    3,867
    824
    113
    The article itself is strange - why drag up the Plushenko stuff which has absolutely no relevance here? Sometimes the people who write the story don't write the headline, and that dreadful headline could've been penned by someone who just breezed over the story and thought shock value would attracted readers. Probably did in this case. But a lot of folks don't even read an entire story anyway, and to get to the nice parts about D/W, you have to scroll on down. Weird. All media have an agenda. What's theirs I wonder?
     
  3. Iceman

    Iceman Well-Known Member

    2,587
    227
    63
    Yes that is a bizarre title: To me it makes it sound like they might have a tantrum in the future if history repeats itself, but the whole article was devoted to explaining that that was not their nature.


    DEF. to postpone acting on someone or something. I know he keeps pestering you for an answer, but we'll just have to put him on ice until we have more facts to go on. Let's put this project on ice till we find out how well it's financed.
     
  4. professordeb

    professordeb Well-Known Member

    3,818
    414
    83
    Stupid article. Even though I understand the reference to Plushenko about how taking a tantrum and having your fans on board to cry "he's the real winner". I see the writer drawing up a bit of a parallel with D/W whose fans felt they were robbed of gold at last year's worlds, using the fact that people came up to them after the comp and said that they should have won. Then goes on to say that judging by the standing ovation, W/D should have won and that the judges were blind and deaf. Man, way to try and stir the pot. Kudos to Charlie for not really taking the bait. I like that he commented about them "not being able to pull off a Plushenko attitude" and then laughing after giving his answer.

    Unlike the dumb writer, these two seem to have their heads on straight and their focus on the right thing -- doing what they do on the ice.
     
  5. AYS

    AYS Cruder than you thought

    20,343
    5,442
    113
    What an asinine slant for an article.
     
  6. Sylvia

    Sylvia On to Nationals!

    32,494
    4,867
    113
    That was Meryl. :)

    I don't think this journalist covers figure skating much (and it shows). Here's her article on the Worlds free dance in Nice last year: http://in.reuters.com/article/2012/03/29/figure-skating-world-idINDEE82S0K220120329
     
  7. l'etoile

    l'etoile New Member

    4,891
    843
    0
    Bizarre indeed. These top two teams must be really tired of these kinds of noise around them:( Why can't rivalries be great just as they are without any ridiculous press?
     
  8. Zemgirl

    Zemgirl Well-Known Member

    5,575
    1,831
    113
    I thought it was one of the worst parts - essentially like they're backing up her criticism of Plushenko, which was rather nastily phrased (I'm also not sure how exactly his behavior worked out for him, I don't recall a second gold being awarded). I don't recall any of the men's skaters, even the ones who had a real stake in that event, making these sort of comments.

    I posted in the D/W thread after reading the article, because I think it does them an enormous disservice. For one thing, she makes them sound smugly superior - oh no, we're not like those other whiny skaters - which is unappealing. Also, the angle she chose to play up makes the judging seem arbitrary, unprofessional or corrupt (take your pick), which cheapens whatever they do accomplish. I also found it interesting that she went on about the supposed wuzrobbing that so perplexed the audience at Worlds, considering we saw how people in attendance at Nice reacted when a result really offended them, and it didn't happen in the dance event. Even as a non-fan, I think there are enough positives to bring up re D/W and the challenges they have faced in the past year, rather than framing it like this.

    I hadn't realized this was the same journalist who wrote the Chan article about China that got him in trouble last season, but I'm not surprised. At least D/W were able to avoid something truly damaging.
     
    Cherub721 and (deleted member) like this.
  9. reese

    reese Well-Known Member

    3,407
    390
    83
    I think press is a big part of sports rivalries, even though this article is pretty silly.

    I'm at least glad both teams have dialed back the "we're best friends" stuff.
     
  10. Zemgirl

    Zemgirl Well-Known Member

    5,575
    1,831
    113
    Wouldn't it be vastly more entertaining if they did something like that old Yags & Plush rivalry fluff, with them staring pensively at the snow from the windows of abandoned buildings, while proclaiming that they kind of hate each other :watch:
     
  11. overedge

    overedge Well-Known Member

    18,177
    2,745
    113
    This article is just terrible. "Every man, woman and squealing child sitting inside Nice's Acropolis Arena last March had thought the Americans eclipsed [Virtue and Moir]". Really? REALLY? Everyone? It sounds like the writer is the one who wishes they had won, and is projecting that onto her interpretation of the event.

    And the headline is completely misleading. It sounds like D&W wanted to have a tantrum over the results, and decided instead to go out and skate like hell to prove that they should have won. Which is not at all what the actual D&W quotes say.

    Might be time to find the emails of the writer and the person named as the editor, and let them know what crappy work this is.

    ETA: the writer: pritha.sarkar@thomsonreuters.com
    the editor: frank.pingue@thomsonreuters.com
    Editor is also on Twitter as @frankpingue
     
    Last edited: Mar 9, 2013
  12. caseyedwards

    caseyedwards Well-Known Member

    6,567
    276
    83
    Bringing up plushenko is dumb because that was 2010 olympics and the crowd was not involved like in nice 2012 with Davis and white. Better wobbly than worthless. Plushenko did better in Vancouver then Torino because there he doubled a jump. Imagine if plushenko had doubled a jump In Vancouver! So by doing what you set Out to do and what you did all season plushenko was better in vancover than Torino. No doubled jump. No jump errors like that. Davis and white and virtue and moir are so even but plushenko was so superior to everyone else in the top 10 in Vancouver with 2 quad triples. So even are d/w and v/m and totally superior to everyone else was plushenko.
     
  13. overedge

    overedge Well-Known Member

    18,177
    2,745
    113
    In fact, he was so superior that he placed second :p
     
    alilou and (deleted member) like this.
  14. MacMadame

    MacMadame Cat Lady-in-Training

    17,024
    3,522
    113
    I just want to say that while the Reuter's article was bizarrely titled, that THIS THREAD TITLE is awesome! :lol:
     
  15. Holley Calmes

    Holley Calmes Well-Known Member

    3,867
    824
    113
    Ah yes....it begins. I was waiting to see how long it would be until a Plushenko uber turned the discussion from David and White to Plushenko and how he should have won in Vancouver. Only 11 responses after the first posting! Wish I had placed a bet with someone. Let's don't start that PLEASE!!!
     
  16. professordeb

    professordeb Well-Known Member

    3,818
    414
    83
  17. Mayra

    Mayra Well-Known Member

    7,680
    1,455
    113
    Vancouver is irrelevant because the real match up was in SLC and King Yagudin came out on top!

    Wheeee! SLC rehash coupled with Plushenko vs Yagudin :argue: Much more interesting than zzzzz Vancouver. ;)

    :rofl: at the article! I wish the writer had bothered to get some :watch: quotes from Scott. It would have taken everything to the next level. "We train with each other but...we kind of hate each other." :lol: Oh well, maybe next time.
     
  18. IceAlisa

    IceAlisa Épaulement!!!

    31,157
    4,384
    113
    Can I get a non-partisan opinion on the 2012 Worlds results? Did V/M deserve to win? I don't follow dance much but like both teams generally.
     
  19. Cloudy_Gumdrops

    Cloudy_Gumdrops New Member

    11,834
    676
    0
    I don't like either team. That said, I felt V&M were the clear winners. They're just in a different class when it comes to things like polish, lines, posture, etc. People can spout off about them being equals all they want, but I refuse to drink that kool-aid.
     
    cris, alilou, aka_gerbil and 4 others like this.
  20. IceAlisa

    IceAlisa Épaulement!!!

    31,157
    4,384
    113
    Thanks! :)
     
  21. Cherub721

    Cherub721 YEAH!

    14,516
    1,865
    113
    For those with access to the archives, here is the Worlds 2012 aftermath thread. People seem rather underwhelmed by both FDs. :lol:
     
    IceAlisa and (deleted member) like this.
  22. allezfred

    allezfred Old and Immature Admin Staff Member

    44,044
    10,558
    113
    Davis/White had the more crowd-pleasing routine, Virtue/Moir were the better skaters (even if their dance was a bit twee).
     
  23. Holley Calmes

    Holley Calmes Well-Known Member

    3,867
    824
    113
    I'll drink the Kool Aid. I like D/W best although I admire both. V/M kind of bore me most of the time, and I really don't like their Carmen program. I think I've seen the ballet too often which has a lot more depth and REAL passion and depth of artistry for me to think much of V/M's effort. I keep hearing they're so fabulous with this skate, but there are many other of their skates I like better. To me, Tessa is just not Carmen in any way. She's beautiful, wonderful.....but so entirely different from a Carmen persona to me. But that's just me. I love D/W's joie de vivre and Charlie precious face and energy and zest. Scott is just as handsome, but in a different way. In fact, he's gorgeous. Tessa is a delicate beauty and very, very lovely but in no way can she scare up a Latina character. But anyway - how lucky are we to have 2 such lovely teams to watch? I confess to not knowing a lot of skating technique and that might obliterate my opinion in many minds here on FSU. Like I care. However, I do represent a very large viewership who don't know technique but who love skating. Both teams are wonderful. I prefer D/W but they're both worthy of anyone's admiration.
     
  24. The Accordion

    The Accordion Well-Known Member

    3,457
    899
    113
    I loathe it any time someone thinks they can speak on behalf of every person in an audience.
     
  25. TheIronLady

    TheIronLady New Member

    1,520
    212
    0
    I thought it was a good article. Davis and White are very sportsmanlike, and I think this article tells an important story about the "was robbed" politics and rhetoric that some skaters have played to have extraordinary influence. Skate Canada and the North American media played the "was robbed" song so loudly in 2002 that it generated twenty four hour new coverage even before the unstable French judge was interrogated and had a nervous breakdown. I think Davis and White have a uniquely zen attitude about final results, and this has helped them.
     
  26. overedge

    overedge Well-Known Member

    18,177
    2,745
    113
    But as you say, Davis & White generally don't get involved in the wuzrobbed stuff. So why does of any of that belong in a story about them? Especially with an example that has nothing to do with them, unless I missed when they competed in the 2010 Olympic men's event.

    Wow, first we have the "Plushy was robbed" argument, and now we have the "2002 pairs results were OK until Skate Canada and the NA media started bitching about them" argument. What next? "Madge Syers could have kicked every man's competitive ass in 1903 and that was why the ISU politicked women competitors out of worlds"? :rolleyes:
     
  27. TheIronLady

    TheIronLady New Member

    1,520
    212
    0
    It's not that big of a leap of imagination or outrageous to compare two recent contested losses, especially when you are doing it to highlight attributes of the subject of the article.
     
  28. overedge

    overedge Well-Known Member

    18,177
    2,745
    113
    D&W's loss at worlds has very little similarity to Plushenko's loss at the Olys, so there is no reason to choose that particular example for contrast.

    And speaking of Plushenko - caseyedwards, is this you?
    http://www.reuters.com/article/comments/idUSBRE92801N20130309
     
  29. TheIronLady

    TheIronLady New Member

    1,520
    212
    0
    What would be an example of a memorable contested loss that would meet your criteria as similar enough?

    The point of the article is still valid. One misses the forest for the trees by complaining about Plushenko's loss not being the perfect comparison. It's rhetorical/literary not historical analysis. You are entitled based on your in depth knowledge of skating to think it's not relevant, but the article isn't about 2012 worlds or what happened. It's about Davis and White's perseverance after a skating loss that some observers thought was wrong. Sometimes to communicate this to the public you use symbols and stories they are familiar with; to make the point that David and White have remained friendly and respectful of their rivals the Plushenko contrast is interesting.
     
  30. overedge

    overedge Well-Known Member

    18,177
    2,745
    113
    D&W's loss wasn't a controversially contested loss, except maybe in the writer's mind, so there isn't any need to make the comparison in the first place.
    And since the article is about D&W's appearance at Fake London Worlds and their reputation/performance leading up to it, actually, yes, it is a historical analysis.