View Full Version : Amber Corwin on My Fair Wedding?!

Pages : [1] 2

03-12-2012, 01:43 PM
Last night there was a new episode of My Fair Wedding with David Tutera, and Amber was on the episode as one of the bridesmaids of Taylor Strook. The theme was a Mad Men wedding so all of the wedding party got to do a photo shoot in the 60s style. It took place in California.

The show is on the WE channel if anyone wants to check it out. Amber appears later in the episode. She didn't say anything other than "I feel like a princess" when she got to wear her cool bridesmaid dress. But they showed her a lot.

03-12-2012, 01:45 PM
Did she get to wear a tiara? :)

03-12-2012, 01:53 PM
No :lol:

03-12-2012, 02:25 PM
She looked lovely in the dress, though!

03-12-2012, 05:28 PM
Oh Amber! Your tiara and once of the worst jumping techniques ever seen. How I miss thee! :drama:

03-12-2012, 08:52 PM
She wasn't that bad. I give her a lot of credit for being late 20s, showing up to nationals every year for a decade, and doing a 3t-3t.

03-13-2012, 02:33 AM
I think you mean her 2t-2t:lol:

03-13-2012, 06:10 AM
Amber was known for mastering a 3/3 -- don't take that lofty accomplishment away from her. :) The jumps were rated as triple/ triples even if they were underrotated. All before CoP, therefore if Sarah Hughes could win gold with underrotated triples at '02 Olympics, Amber can be credited for landing 3/3s.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAA0TJuISNU 2006 sp at age 27
lands 3/3 tho' she falls on 2 other jumps

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=the5aSRKW30 2001 lp -- 3/3 landed

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCsed1iD1ag 2002 sp -- 3/3 landed

Amber landed 3/3s quite often during her career (despite wonky technique/ underrotations). Overall she did not have unmatchable strengths in every aspect of her skating, but she worked hard and kept trying.

03-13-2012, 04:10 PM
Those "3/3s" were usually both pre- and under-rotated. :P

03-13-2012, 05:19 PM
Those "3/3s" were usually both pre- and under-rotated. :P

That they were, but in Amber's defense that wasn't a very big concern back in those days. She got good height on the jumps, so I always wondered if she could have fixed her toeloops if she had to, i.e. under IJS.

03-13-2012, 06:06 PM
Corwin did skate under IJS. She didn't retire until 2006.

03-13-2012, 06:21 PM
Corwin did skate under IJS. She didn't retire until 2006.

Forgot about 2006! I think she was already in swan song mode by that point and didn't care too much about downgrades. What I was thinking was having her compete under IJS for several years when she would have gotten dinged for underrotating on a regular basis. I just checked Nationals protocols and she actually got no < or << for her 3t-3t in 2006. Caller must have liked her tiaras in the past :P.

03-13-2012, 06:32 PM
Her 3-3 in 2006 was one of the best I remember her doing and I would've given it a + GOE. Both jumps were definitely 3 full rotations from the point of picking in to the landing edge and I don't find the prerotation on the toe to be more than would usually be required and expected just by the mechanics of the jump (in real time the takeoff looks fine to me, and that is what the tech panel uses to look at takeoffs). See here for an example of a severe pre-rotation on a 3T that should be obvious even in real time, and the jump was << (and also a lip on the flip :shuffle: so it got mostly -3 GOEs, which I agree with): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVozXWoY2lk&feature=player_detailpage#t=70s

03-13-2012, 08:02 PM
Her 3-3 in 2006 was one of the best I remember her doing and I would've given it a + GOE.

You're right. The combination in the SP looks clean and she got positive GOE's in both the short and the long. Watching this again, it looks like her feet don't really pre-rotate that much, but she does this odd thing leading with her head and shoulders and that makes her look like she's pre-rotating a lot -when she really isn't.


03-14-2012, 04:30 PM
Amber Corwin discussion aside, the mechanics of the toe jump do not really involve any pre-rotation.

Pre-rotation is only a natural occurrence that you can't get around on the edge jumps.

To the largest degree on the loop to a lesser degree on the salchow and axel.