Will Perez Hilton finally receive a little karmic justice?

[uyeahu]

Apparently Perez forgot Miley Cyrus is still a minor and thought it would be appropriate to post an up-skirt photo of her getting out of a car on his blog. He's since taken it down and posted a poorly conceived and flippant faux-pology in which he both denies having done it but contradictorily asking if we really think he's that stupid (well, yeah, I do). You can read more about it and see his apology without going to his site here (http://www.popeater.com/2010/06/15/perez-hilton-miley-cyrus-upskirt-photo/).

I hope he's prosecuted and at the very least has to issue a sincere apology and pay a fine. Jail time would work for me too though. He's a nasty little vulture.

[UGG]

he is seriously dumb for doing that. he had to have known she was a minor. But why the hell is Miley trying to be Britney 2.0? zzzzzzzzzzz. I hope she goes away soon-she has nothing good to offer as an artist. The Lolita sex thing is played out and old.

[Ziggy]

He's a nasty little vulture, yes.

But the whole idea of that photo possibly being child pornography is beyond ridiculous IMO.

[skatemommy]

That would be some just desserts for Perez...he is a nasty little queen.

[BigB08822]

Perez is very aware of Mileys age, he posts her age all the time when he blogs about her. Whether you think of it as child porn or not she is underage and he knew better. I hope he is prosecuted but I don't know who would be the one to press charges. I don't see Miley or her camp doing it.

[uyeahu]

Regardless of whether she was wearing panties or not is kinda beside the point. It's COMPLETELY inappropriate to post an upskirt photo of a minor, even if that minor is Miley Cyrus.

[Angelskates]

Regardless of whether she was wearing panties or not is kinda beside the point. It's COMPLETELY inappropriate to post an upskirt photo of a minor, even if that minor is Miley Cyrus.

It's completely inappropriate to take an post upskirt photos of ANYONE, regardless of their age, especially without their permission. It's disgusting.

Ziggy, why do you not think of this as child porn? For all you know, he could be getting his jollies out of staring at the photo he took.

[orbitz]

Anything that will bring on the demise of Perez Hilton should be celebrated. Oh please charge him with something.

[FiveRinger]

What a douche. Now, I'm not a fan a Miley's by any stretch, she gets on my feckin' nerves. But this is really atrocious. Somebody tell this idiot she'll be 18 and fair game in a few months. So impatient....

And you might not even have to sneak the damn picture. She might give it to you!

[Ziggy]

But this is really atrocious. Somebody tell this idiot she'll be 18 and fair game in a few months. So impatient....

And that's exactly what is making me :rolleyes:. How totally arbitrary a distinction is that.

It's completely inappropriate to take an post upskirt photos of ANYONE, regardless of their age, especially without their permission. It's disgusting.

Celebrities thrive on that, it just gives them more exposure.

[FiveRinger]

And that's exactly what is making me :rolleyes:. How totally arbitrary a distinction is that.

From a legal standpoint, it's everything.

I don't want to see anybody taking pictures of anybody's panty-free crotch. I don't condone it. Unfortunately, skummy paparazzi are going to snap whatever they want, even when you're in an uncompromising position.

And let's face it, when Miley does turn 18, what little protection she had because of her age will be gone. She's going to be fodder for a lot of folks. Sad, but true.

[Anita18]

Anything that will bring on the demise of Perez Hilton should be celebrated. Oh please charge him with something.
Joe Francis finally got his comeuppance via tax evasion. I'm not picky, I'll take what I can get!

[Prancer]

Perez is now claiming that it's a fake:

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE65E6DO20100615

And apparently it is, because you can see her panties through her dress in other photos taken at the time.

http://dk3rv6hblwrlz.cloudfront.net/miley_cyrus_upskirt4.jpg

Of course, some people are insisting she must have put them on after the first pic was taken, but :rolleyes: since from what I read in Reuters, her crotch was pixilated in Perez's photo and no one could see anything anyway, so it's hardly pornographic, child or otherwise.

:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: at Perez Hilton, but much ado about nothing much here, I think.

[silverstars]

I don't like Miley Cyrus, but I despise Perez Hilton. Regardless of whether or not it's something that most would consider child pornography or the fact that she'll be an adult in a few short months, the law is black and white--there's no such thing as "almost," and I think that she would have a viable case against him. I hope that she sues the pants off of him.

[my little pony]

noting Prancer's post, what would she sue him for?